Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we will discuss an overview of how transvaginal mesh problems or complications are diagnosed, surgical procedures causing transvaginal mesh problems, tips to manage transvaginal mesh complications, and much more.
Here’s an introduction to the key aspects of transvaginal mesh problems:
Our skilled product liability lawyers at TruLaw project that compensation for transvaginal mesh complications could range from $150,000 to $400,000, based on the extent of the injuries sustained.
Contact TruLaw through the chat feature on this page to determine your eligibility for pursuing damages in the transvaginal mesh litigation today.
Transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedures are intended to provide support for weakened pelvic structures.
Unfortunately, patients may experience a range of complications that can significantly impact quality of life.
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs when pelvic organs drop due to a weakened vaginal wall.
Transvaginal mesh is often used to support these organs, but complications can arise:
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the involuntary leakage of urine during activities that increase abdominal pressure.
Transvaginal mesh aimed to treat SUI can be problematic:
Pelvic floor dysfunction involves the inability to relax and coordinate the pelvic floor muscles correctly.
Complications from TVM related to pelvic floor disorders can include:
Transvaginal mesh surgery, while a common treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, comes with its own set of potential complications that need to be carefully considered.
The use of transvaginal mesh can lead to various complications that affect a patient’s quality of life.
Some of the common complications associated with mesh surgery include:
In certain scenarios, these complications might necessitate additional surgeries to address.
Symptoms can often be a direct result of mesh-related complications.
Complications can manifest in specific ways, such as:
Recognizing these symptoms early on is critical for managing and potentially mitigating further complications.
The chance of developing complications from transvaginal mesh surgeries can be influenced by several risk factors.
The risk factors and prevalence of complications include:
Understanding these risk factors can help in preoperative counseling and the decision-making process regarding transvaginal mesh surgery.
Transvaginal mesh problems often arise from surgical procedures intended to address pelvic organ prolapse.
These complications can be directly linked to the type of procedure and the surgical technique used.
Pelvic reconstructive surgery is an elaborate procedure aimed at restoring the pelvic anatomy.
This surgery is critical when dealing with conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse.
However, the use of synthetic mesh can lead to complications including:
Transvaginal prolapse repair involves correcting the prolapsed organs to their original position.
Points to consider regarding these procedures include:
In cases where mesh removal surgery or avoidance of mesh is desirable, native tissue repair is an alternative approach.
Benefits of this technique involve:
When deciding on a procedure for repairing pelvic organ prolapse, it’s crucial to weigh the risks and benefits of mesh vs. native tissue approaches.
The efficacy of transvaginal mesh surgery rests heavily on the postoperative process and the adeptness of handling any subsequent complications.
Ensuring the patient’s comfort and swift recovery through systematic management strategies is paramount.
After patients have undergone surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence using transvaginal mesh, they embark on a post-surgery recovery process.
This phase is crucial in monitoring for early signs of complications and facilitating a smooth healing journey.
Here’s what patients can expect during the post-surgery recovery process:
When complications from transvaginal mesh arise, surgical management may be necessary.
The objective is to alleviate pain and restore quality of life with the utmost care and precision.
Here are key strategies for managing transvaginal mesh problems:
In managing transvaginal mesh complications, patient-specific factors are closely considered to determine the most appropriate and effective treatment pathways.
The long-term management of transvaginal mesh complications requires a detailed consideration of patient quality of life and the applications of this surgical method.
Pain and discomfort can persist, affecting daily activities and overall well-being.
The aftermath of transvaginal mesh surgery can significantly impact a woman’s life, often necessitating additional interventions for complications that arise.
Important factors affecting quality of life include:
Transvaginal mesh is primarily used in female pelvic reconstructive surgery to address pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.
Its applications must be carefully weighed against potential long-term risks:
Complications from transvaginal mesh implants can be multi-faceted, affecting various aspects of a patient’s health.
They may include chronic pain, infections, bleeding, and mesh erosion, which can significantly impact the quality of life.
Furthermore, sexual dysfunction and problems with urination can also be indicative of issues with the mesh.
When mesh erosion occurs, treatment typically involves a surgical intervention to remove the eroded mesh.
In some cases, non-surgical approaches such as estrogen cream might be prescribed if the erosion is minimal.
It’s important for patients to receive a thorough evaluation to tailor the treatment to their specific situation, which may include pain management strategies and infection control.
For a vaginal mesh lawsuit to be considered viable, it must generally involve proof of injury caused by the mesh and the negligence on the part of the manufacturer in providing adequate warnings or instructions.
Additionally, the failure of the product to perform as intended and the manufacturer’s lack of response to known complications may bolster the case.
Symptoms that may signal complications from surgical mesh devices include persistent vaginal bleeding or discharge, pelvic or groin pain, and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence.
Patients might also experience painful intercourse or notice that the mesh is protruding through the vaginal tissue.
Differentiating between bladder and pelvic mesh complications can be challenging, but generally, bladder mesh issues often manifest as recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary incontinence, or pain during urination.
In contrast, pelvic mesh complications might present as lower abdominal pain, pain during intercourse, or a sensation of pelvic fullness.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?