AFFF Lawsuit Update: AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

Key takeaways:

  • Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), which is used by the military, airports, and other industries, has been linked to numerous types of cancer and health effects.
  • The chemicals in AFFF firefighting foam, known as PFAS chemicals or forever chemicals, do not break down.
  • Scientific research has found that PFAS can remain in the environment and in the human body for an indefinite period of time.

Intro to the AFFF Lawsuit

On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF Lawsuit, updates surrounding the AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit, AFFF side effects, who can file an AFFF foam lawsuit, and much more.

AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), which is used by the military, airports, and other industries, has been linked to numerous types of cancer and health effects.

The chemicals in AFFF firefighting foam, known as PFAS chemicals or forever chemicals, do not break down.

Scientific research has found that PFAS can remain in the environment and in the human body for an indefinite period of time.

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit
Play Video

AFFF Lawsuits are being filed on behalf of those who were exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently diagnosed with cancer or other health problems.

To instantly see if you qualify for filing an AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit, contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page if you or a loved one have suffered from health problems related to AFFF exposure.

Table of Contents
AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit

Lawsuit Updates

  • April 2024 Updates:

    The Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) litigation landscape is evolving rapidly.

    The latest filings from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) indicating a total of 7,738 lawsuits pending consolidation as of April 1st.

    This marks a notable increase from the 7,170 cases reported just a month earlier, on March 1st.

    The surge in litigation activity is attributed primarily to increased awareness among affected individuals about their legal options for seeking compensation due to exposure to firefighting foam.

    AFFF has been widely utilized across various military branches and by firefighting units for its effectiveness in extinguishing fuel-based fires.

    Despite its utility, the foam’s chemical components, particularly Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), have come under scrutiny for potential adverse health effects.

    The core of the ongoing lawsuits revolves around allegations that exposure to AFFF, and consequently PFAS, is associated with several serious health conditions.

    Individuals with prolonged exposure to AFFF, notably firefighters and military personnel, are reportedly at higher risk and have been instrumental in bringing these issues to light.

    For individuals who believe they have suffered health problems as a result of AFFF exposure, legal counsel is advised to explore possible compensation avenues.

    Our law firm offers free consultations to evaluate potential cases related to AFFF exposure. 

    Interested parties are encouraged to reach out through our website’s chatbot for immediate assistance or to arrange a consultation with our specialized AFFF attorneys.

  • March 2024 Updates:

    The AFFF Lawsuit continues to progress, and our AFFF Lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states. 

    The focus of the AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) legal battle is currently on setting up a procedural structure to examine the scientific claims that the foam’s chemicals are linked to liver and thyroid cancer.

    A pivotal event in this phase is the “Science Day,” scheduled to brief the MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) judge on pertinent scientific and medical evidence pivotal to these claims.

    The lawsuit’s current stage involves choosing specific cases of liver and thyroid cancer to undergo the bellwether process.

    This process mimics trial scenarios to gauge how a jury might react to the presented evidence and testimonials.

    A critical part of this stage is the deadline set for both parties to share scientific studies that either support or dispute the claims of cancer linked to AFFF exposure.

    These exchanges will culminate in the Science Day presentations.

    After the Science Day, a 60-day period is allocated to outline a comprehensive plan for moving forward with the bellwether trials.

    This follows a significant settlement where the 3M Company agreed to pay over $10.3 billion to resolve water contamination claims from local water suppliers.

    However, the cancer claims related to AFFF exposure are still unresolved.

    Individuals who have been exposed to AFFF and have since developed cancer or other health issues might be eligible to participate in the AFFF Lawsuit.

    TruLaw offers free consultations to those affected. 

    Alternatively, our ChatBot is available to immediately assist in determining your eligibility for the AFFF lawsuit. 

  • March 2024 Updates:

    The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

    As of the latest filings by the JPML, there are currently 7,170 lawsuits regarding Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) waiting to be combined.

    In the United States, Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) serve as a mechanism to efficiently manage multiple civil lawsuits that share common issues, facts, or defendants.

    These litigations often involve a large number of plaintiffs who have filed lawsuits under similar circumstances, such as cases of product liability, pharmaceuticals, or mass torts, and allow for the consolidation of these cases in a single federal district court for the purpose of pretrial proceedings.

    The goal of the AFFF MDLs is to make the litigation process more efficient by centralizing the discovery phase, minimizing repetitive efforts, and ensuring uniform decisions on crucial legal matters.

    The recent addition of 176 cases over the past month highlights the ongoing growth of the AFFF MDL initiative.

    While a settlement has previously been reached concerning water contamination issues, legal actions regarding individual exposure to AFFF continue.

    If you or someone close to you has experienced harm due to AFFF, understanding your legal rights is crucial. 

    You can use the chatbot on this page to instantly check if you qualify for the AFFF lawsuit.

  • February 2024 Updates:

    February 1st, 2024:

    Connecticut’s Attorney General has initiated two legal actions targeting 28 chemical manufacturers, accusing them of deliberate contamination of the state’s water and natural resources through the use of PFAS chemicals.

    These lawsuits are designed to establish the companies’ responsibility for PFAS pollution stemming from two primary sources: the use of Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting and the incorporation of PFAS in the production of consumer goods such as food packaging, cookware, carpeting, upholstery, clothing, and cosmetics.

    PFAS chemicals are notorious for their long-lasting presence in the environment and their association with severe health issues, including various forms of cancer, liver damage, birth defects, elevated cholesterol levels, infertility, and diabetes.

    The primary objectives of these legal actions are to secure both injunctive and monetary relief.

    This would entail compelling the companies to dispose of their hazardous chemical inventories, mitigate pollution within Connecticut, disclose their research findings, and reimburse the state for expenses related to remediation and testing.

    Additionally, the complaints seek penalties for breaches of state laws extending back several decades.

    These companies are alleged to have possessed knowledge about the toxicity and enduring nature of PFAS since the 1950s, yet they allegedly failed to safeguard the public interest, resulting in widespread contamination.

    Although Connecticut has already taken measures to ban PFAS use in firefighting foam and food packaging, the state is still grappling with the consequences of PFAS pollution.

    The lawsuits underscore contamination across various water systems and demand accountability from the chemical manufacturers held responsible for the environmental harm.

    In essence, these legal actions symbolize Connecticut’s commitment to addressing the grave health and environmental repercussions associated with PFAS contamination while holding the responsible parties answerable for their actions.

  • January 2024 Updates:

    January 1st, 2024:

    The MDL judge recently granted a joint motion, allowing an extension for the parties to conduct discussions on an ongoing discovery dispute and a motion to compel.

    The extended deadline for these discussions is now January 31st.

  • December 2023 Updates:

    December 28th, 2023:

    Hawaii’s Attorney General, Anne E. Lopez, has initiated legal proceedings against 25 manufacturers of firefighting foam products containing harmful per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

    In this lawsuit, it is alleged that these companies breached state consumer protection and tort laws by concealing the environmental and human health risks associated with PFAS products, all while profiting from their sale.

    The lawsuit aims to hold these defendants accountable for all expenses related to PFAS, encompassing testing, treatment, and monitoring of the state’s natural resources.

    It seeks compensation for residents who have suffered losses due to natural resource damage, disposal costs, civil penalties, restitution, disgorgement, punitive damages, and other remedies.

    This legal action by Hawaii’s AG is the latest in a series of actions taken against AFFF manufacturers, joining the numerous claims filed by individuals who have been exposed to PFAS.

    December 1st, 2023:

    The AFFF class action MDL is centered on the Telomer water provider cases, a subgroup of water contamination issues.

    Recent orders and rulings specifically pertain to this subgroup, not covered by the August water contamination settlement. Regrettably, this focus suggests a potential delay for the remaining individual cancer cases.

  • November 2023 Updates:

    November 28th, 2023:

    Water contamination lawsuits have dominated the AFFF class action docket, leading to some frustration. The delay’s severe consequences are underscored by the submission of three “Suggestion of Death” notices in the MDL, signifying the passing of three plaintiffs awaiting justice. These notices formally inform the court and involved parties about a party’s demise in the lawsuit, initiating the process of substituting the deceased with a representative from their estate, typically the executor or administrator.

    November 3rd, 2023:

    Kathy Jennings, the Attorney General of Delaware, has taken legal action against 14 companies, including 3M, for their production of firefighting foam containing “forever chemicals,” allegedly resulting in soil and aquifer contamination within the state.

    The lawsuit claims that these companies, involved in manufacturing aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), introduced PFAS into the environment, leading to harm and health hazards for residents.

    Before filing the lawsuit, the state conducted a comprehensive two-year investigation involving environmental sampling and scrutiny of corporate records.

    Building on Delaware’s prior success in securing a $50 million settlement related to PFAS products from companies associated with DuPont, which led to over $1.1 billion in commitments nationwide to settle PFAS-related claims, the current lawsuit aims for monetary damages, compensation for natural resources, and funding for testing and addressing contamination arising from the defendants’ PFAS-containing firefighting products.

    The lawsuit specifically outlines alleged efforts by the companies, especially 3M, to hide the dangers of PFAS and their products.

    It asserts that 3M was aware of PFAS risks dating back to the 1950s and intentionally misled the public.

    3M has stated its intent to defend itself in court and is taking steps to address PFAS concerns by remediation, investment in water treatment, and working in collaboration with affected communities.

    Additionally, the case targets the remaining 12 companies, indicating that they likely knew about PFAS risks through industry groups and should have been aware of potential dangers associated with their products.

    The lawsuit underscores the responsibility of these companies for the environmental and health impacts caused by their PFAS-containing firefighting foams.

    November 1st, 2023: 

    In the coming weeks, parties involved in Aqueous Film-Forming Foam personal injury cases will choose which cases will be part of the bellwether discovery pool.

    They have until November 14, 2023, to share their lists of potential plaintiffs for the bellwether trials. The selected plaintiffs will undergo case-specific fact discovery, leading to the final selection of individuals for the personal injury bellwether trials.

  • October 2023 Updates:

    October 27th, 2023:

    A recent study conducted a nested case-control investigation, examining patients with thyroid cancer by analyzing plasma samples taken before or at the time of their cancer diagnosis.

    This study comprised 88 thyroid cancer patients, each carefully matched with 88 healthy controls based on various factors.

    The study’s results indicated a 56% higher likelihood of thyroid cancer diagnosis linked to elevated levels of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (n-PFOS).

    This positive association remained statistically significant when focusing on a subgroup of thyroid cancer cases diagnosed one year or more after plasma sample collection.

    These findings imply a potential link between PFAS exposure and an increased risk of (papillary) thyroid cancer, a matter of global concern given the widespread prevalence of PFAS exposure.

    October 1st, 2023:

    A recent study led by Mark Purdue, Ph.D., at the Uniformed Services University explored the link between blood levels of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), a type of PFAS chemical, and testicular cancer among active-duty Air Force servicemen. The study found that elevated PFOS blood levels were associated with a higher risk of testicular cancer.

    This research, published in July 2023, is the first to investigate this relationship using blood measurements within a military population. Further research is needed to explore PFOS exposure and testicular cancer risk in highly exposed populations.

  • September 2023 Updates:

    September 19th, 2023

    There are now a total of 6,000 separate AFFF Lawsuits consolidated within the multidistrict litigation (MDL).

    Municipalities are on the verge of reaching a global settlement valued at more than $10.3 billion for AFFF Lawsuits related to water contamination. This settlement would cover the expenses associated with cleaning up and addressing contamination caused by AFFF products in local water supplies throughout the country.

    Municipalities are pleased with this settlement agreement, as it means that the responsibility for cleanup costs falls on the companies responsible for the pollution rather than on the residents affected by it.

    Now, the spotlight remains on individuals who have initiated AFFF Lawsuits against the same group of manufacturers, asserting that their health issues are a result of exposure to AFFF fire fighting foam.

  • August 2023 Updates:

    August 20th, 2023: 

    A recent study published in URO Today investigated the link between serum concentrations of PFAS and testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) in U.S. Air Force servicemen. They found that elevated concentrations of certain PFAS were associated with military employment in firefighting and service at bases with high PFAS concentrations in drinking water. Specifically, elevated perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) concentrations in the second sample were positively linked to TGCT.

    August 18th, 2023:

    Jones v. 3M, et al., has been recently filed directly within the AFFF  MDL in South Carolina.

    The plaintiff, a 73-year-old former Air Force firefighter from Texas, alleges exposure to fluorochemical products during his service, leading to a diagnosis of prostate cancer and subsequent prostatectomy.

    August 1st, 2023:

    Judge Gergel approved an unopposed motion to replace a plaintiff in a lawsuit after the original Alabama plaintiff passed away. The deceased plaintiff’s daughter has now taken over as the new plaintiff and filed a wrongful death lawsuit.

  • July 2023 Updates:

    July 17th, 2023

    In the past month, 493 new cases were consolidated into the AFFF class action MDL, representing the highest monthly volume since the litigation’s inception.

    This increase follows the recent global settlement announcement for water contamination cases.

    However, the breakdown between water contamination and cancer cases remains unclear.

    The MDL now encompasses over 5,000 pending cases.

  • June 2023 Updates:

    June 1st 2023

    The initial bellwether test trial in the AFFF class action MDL, City of Stuart v. 3M Co. et al. case, was originally set to begin on June 5, 2023.

    The lawsuit pertains to allegations that AFFF contaminated the municipal water system in Stuart, Florida.

    However, the trial was postponed due to the PFAS manufacturers reaching a settlement in the case.

    The class action MDL received an additional 300 AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits last month, resulting in a total of 4,793 claims now pending in the multidistrict litigation.

  • May 2023 Updates:

    May 1st, 2023

    The judge sets a deadline for the parties involved in the litigation to submit chosen parts of depositions and a list of evidence they plan to use in the upcoming trial.

    May 2nd, 2023

    The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) releases research on the presence of PFAS in firefighting equipment textiles, revealing the existence of PFAS in various gear materials.

    The findings prompt discussions on the potential transfer of PFAS from equipment to firefighters and their increased cancer risk.

    May 7th, 2023

    Objections regarding trial exhibits arise, leading to a hearing scheduled to address these evidence-related disputes.

    The judge requires lead counsel to personally argue each objection, aiming to narrow down baseless objections.

    May 9th, 2023

    As the bellwether trial approaches, the defense submits its final List of Trial Exhibits, trial brief, and deposition designations.

    The MDL Judge denies the defense motion for summary judgment, ensuring that the jury will decide the bulk of the plaintiffs’ claims in the upcoming trial.

    May 12th, 2023

    The first test trial in the firefighting foam class action MDL begins with the case of City of Stuart v. 3M Co., et al.

    The trial centers around allegations that PFAS from firefighting foam products contaminated Stuart’s water supply.

    The defendants argue that there is no evidence linking their products to the contamination.

    The trial outcome holds significance for the litigation, potentially resulting in a multi-billion dollar global settlement if the defendants face a substantial loss.

  • April 2023 Updates:

    There are still new cases being filed while AFFF lawsuits filed against PFAS-containing firefighting foam increase in number.

    While plaintiffs await their trial, it’s important to remember that there have been several PFAS settlements in the past already, which range from a $17.5 million class action settlement to a $4 billion settlement.

  • March 2023 Updates:

    March 2nd, 2023

    A new lawsuit was filed in South Carolina by a 62-year-old Deer Park, Texas man named Kent, who was exposed to fluorochemical products during his service as a firefighter in the United States Marine Corps.

    Kent was diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent prostatectomy, and he claims that the exposure to the fluorochemical products caused him personal injuries, pain, suffering, and emotional distress.

    The plaintiff’s lawyers filed the complaint in accordance with Case Management Order No. 3, which designates the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas as the “home venue” for the case.

    March 7th, 2023

    A firefighting foam lawsuit was filed by Kent against 3M, and Judge Richard M. Gergel, the AFFF class action lawsuit judge in South Carolina, issued the order.

    The plaintiff’s lawsuit asks that the case be transferred to the Southern District of Texas because the events or omissions leading to the claim occurred in Texas.

    March 16th, 2023

    It was reported that 354 new cases were added to the firefighting foam class action MDL in the last month, bringing the total number of pending cases to 4,058.

    This marks the second month in a row with higher than average volume of new filings, suggesting that lawyers may be anticipating a settlement and trying to get cases filed before it happens.

  • February 2023 Updates:

    February 3rd, 2023

    Many victims do not contact us because they believe the statute of limitation deadline to file a lawsuit bars their claim.

    They correctly assume that the statute of limitations for filing an AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) lawsuit is typically 2-3 years from the date of injury in most states.

    But most states have a discovery rule that is critical to extending the deadline to file an AFFF lawsuit.

    In other words, the time limit for filing a personal injury lawsuit does not start until the plaintiff becomes aware of the injury and its connection to the defendant’s negligence.

    The statute of limitations and discovery rule are complicated, with scores of exceptions.

    But many victims looking to file an AFFF lawsuit call us believing they likely do not have a claim in 2023 when they absolutely do.

    February 13th, 2022

    The AFFF MDL Judge is set to make critical rulings on Daubert motions challenging the admissibility of scientific evidence in City of Stuart v. 3M Co., et al. (the first bellwether trial set for June).

    The City of Stuart is a water supply contamination case, not a personal injury case involving claims that exposure to AFFF caused cancer.

    However, the Daubert rulings on causation evidence in the City of Stuart will still have some applicability to what scientific evidence will be allowed in AFFF cancer cases.

    The personal injury cases will participate in a separate bellwether trial program after the water supply trials.

    February 16th, 2023

    Rulings with respect to the admissibility of scientific evidence in initial drinking water utility lawsuits involving damages caused by firefighting foam containing PFAS will be forthcoming soon.

    The first bellwether trial, City of Stuart v. 3M Co., has been scheduled for June 5, and the parties are currently in the final stages of presenting arguments regarding the Daubert standard, which is the criteria that the US District Court for the District of South Carolina should use to evaluate scientific testimony and evidence.

    These rulings could impact the admissibility of certain scientific evidence in the cancer lawsuits.

    February 17th, 2023

    Since January 15th, 317 new firefighting foam AFFF lawsuits were added to the MDL, bringing the total number of pending cases up to 3,704.

    The monthly average of new cases for this MDL in 2022 was 175, so this month was almost double that.

    We don’t know how many of these new cases are municipal water contamination cases versus personal injury claims.

    February 23rd, 2023

    A recent article authored by eight leading scientist was published in Science Direct in December 2022 and cited over seventy other studies in support of their position.

    Due to the persistence of PFASs in the human body and their ability to bioaccumulate, firefighters experience cumulative effects of PFAS-containing AFFF exposure throughout their careers, increasing their risk of developing thyroid, kidney, bladder, testicular, prostate and colon cancers.

    The study suggests that PFASs may contribute to firefighter cancers, and further research is needed to evaluate the role of occupational PFAS exposure in causing an elevated cancer risk for firefighters.

  • January 2023 Updates:

    The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing and law firms are accepting clients daily.

    Similar to previous lawsuits filed for PFAS contamination, the City of Mansfield, Ohio is filing suit against 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products and Chemguard for AFFF contamination of local drinking water.

    The contamination stems from use by the Ohio Air National Guard at the local airport.

    If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file suit.

    Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for the Firefighting Foam Lawsuit instantly.

What is the AFFF Lawsuit?

Toxic chemicals known as PFAS or forever chemicals are in firefighting foam used by firefighters, military firefighters, airports, industrial workers, and others.

These chemicals have been linked to various types of cancer and other health problems.

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit

The Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Lawsuit seeks to compensate those suffering from exposure to AFFF firefighting foam, holding AFFF manufacturers liable for injuries and health problems associated with exposure.

There is a multidistrict litigation (MDL) filed on behalf of victims exposed to firefighting foam on the job or through consuming contaminated water.

AFFF MDL 2873 is a consolidated lawsuit in the US District Court: District of South Carolina.

What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)?

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) is a type of firefighting foam that is used to extinguish liquid fires, such as those started by oil, jet fuel, and industrial chemicals.

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit; firefighting foam on airplane; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)

The firefighting foam works by combining with water to form a film layer that suppresses a fire’s oxygen source and prevents it from re-igniting.

AFFF firefighting foam has been used since the 1970s, originally produced by a collaboration between 3M and the US Navy.

It has been banned in some areas, and currently is widely reserved for use in extreme situations.

Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks

AFFF firefighting foam contains Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit; firefighting foam on airplane; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)

PFAS chemicals are known as “forever chemicals” due to their ability to remain in the environment and human bodies for an indefinite period of time.

Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to numerous types of cancer and other health effects:

  • Bladder cancer
  • Breast cancer
  • Colon cancer
  • Kidney cancer
  • Liver cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Changes in liver enzymes
  • Small decreases in infant birth weights
  • Decreased vaccine response in children
  • Increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women

People are exposed to firefighting foam and PFAS chemicals from firefighting foam in many ways.

Firefighting foam lawsuits have been filed on behalf of individuals suffering from occupational exposure and also from individuals suffering from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water near an area where AFFF firefighting foam was used regularly.

Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination LawsuitsA number of lawsuits have been filed and settled for AFFF exposure and exposure to PFAS.

PFAS exposure lawsuits have garnered significant settlements, and lawsuits for exposure to PFAS through certain avenues, like AFFF firefighting foam, are gathering steam.

The AFFF MDL has yet to reach any settlements, with bellwether trials scheduled for December 2022.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Well over 2,500 firefighting foam lawsuits have been consolidated in the MDL, but other AFFF lawsuits have been filed or settled outside of the MDL:

  • An Ohio jury trial resulted in DuPont being ordered to pay a $50 million verdict for a testicular cancer victim and his wife.
  • An AFFF class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the National Rural Water Association (NRWA) against AFFF manufacturers and producers.
  • A class action lawsuit was recently filed in New York on behalf of military service members who were exposed to AFFF during their time in service. The class action names a number of companies as defendants, including 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products, and more. These companies are accused of knowing about the risks associated with AFFF but failing to warn service members or take steps to protect them.

PFAS Exposure Lawsuits

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits

Many of the PFAS exposure lawsuits have been class action lawsuits.

Below are a few settlements reached with companies accused of contaminating the environment with PFAS:

AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit; firefighting foam on airplane; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)

As no AFFF lawsuits in the AFFF MDL have been settled, it’s a bit too early to determine average settlement amounts.

According to the legal community, AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts could range from $10,000 to well over $300,000 depending on the strength of the claim, level of exposure, and the medical problems suffered.

These figures are not a guarantee of financial compensation for AFFF exposure.

Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have been exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently received a cancer diagnosis, you may qualify for an AFFF lawsuit.

AFFF foam lawsuits aim to hold AFFF manufacturers and producers liable for injuries and damages suffered as a result of exposure.

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit

In order to have a sufficient claim, firefighting foam lawyers will direct you in gathering evidence for your AFFF lawsuit, assessing damages incurred as a result of exposure, and determining liable parties.

Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

In AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits, evidence is extremely important.

You should do everything in your power to gather and preserve relevant evidence for your AFFF foam lawsuit.

Make copies of medical bills and records, document your cancer diagnosis or other health problems, and keep any other evidence safe for your law firm to handle.

Evidence in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits may include:

  • Medical expenses and records
  • Cancer diagnosis information
  • Documentation of other health problems
  • Employment records
  • History of AFFF exposure
  • Personal and witness testimony
  • Any other information relating exposure to firefighting foam with health condition(s)

An experienced team of personal injury lawyers will be able to guide you on evidence specific to your AFFF lawsuit.

Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit

Damages are the total amount of economic and non-economic losses incurred as a result of exposure to PFAS in AFFF firefighting foam.

AFFF Lawsuit Update AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview; What is the AFFF Lawsuit; What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF); Firefighting Foam and PFAS Chemicals Health Risks; Previous AFFF Lawsuits and PFAS Contamination Lawsuits; Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; PFAS Exposure Lawsuits; AFFF Lawsuit Settlement Amounts; Can I File an AFFF Lawsuit; Gathering Evidence for Firefighting Foam Lawsuits; Assessing Damages in an AFFF Lawsuit

Your firefighting foam lawyers will be able to help determine your damages and demand adequate financial compensation from the defendants.

Damages in an AFFF foam lawsuit may include:

  • Current or past medical expenses
  • Future medical bills
  • Pain and suffering and other emotional damages
  • Permanent disability
  • Lost wages or lost earning ability
  • Loss of consortium
  • Punitive and compensatory damages

Damages depend on the strength of one’s case and the ability to gather crucial evidence.

Personal injury lawyers will help their clients to determine their damages and gather evidence that supports the demand for financial compensation.

TruLaw: Accepting Clients for AFFF Lawsuits

TruLaw’s network of AFFF lawyers is accepting clients in all 50 states and filing AFFF lawsuits on behalf of those exposed to toxic chemicals in firefighting foam.

If you or a loved one have been exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently suffered health problems or a cancer diagnosis, you may qualify for an AFFF lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is AFFF and how is it dangerous?

    Aqueous Film Forming Foam, commonly known as AFFF, is a type of firefighting foam that was widely used to suppress flammable liquid fires.

    The danger associated with AFFF lies in its composition.

    It contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and potential adverse effects on human health.

    Prolonged exposure to these chemicals has been linked to an increased risk of developing cancer.

  • Who is at risk for exposure to firefighting foam?

    Individuals who are most at risk for exposure to firefighting foam include:

    • Firefighters
    • Military personnel
    • Workers in industries dealing with flammable liquids
    • Employees at airports, military bases, factories, and plants

    These individuals may have handled AFFF routinely, putting them at a higher risk of exposure to the harmful chemicals contained in the foam.

  • What are AFFF's effects on the human body?

    Exposure to AFFF can lead to several adverse health effects.

    The most significant concern is the increased risk of developing various types of cancer, including kidney, testicular, liver, colorectal, and prostate cancer.

    Other potential health risks associated with AFFF exposure include ulcerative colitis, asthma, fertility issues, liver disease, thyroid disease, and immune system problems.

  • Is there an AFFF class action lawsuit?

    Yes, there are ongoing class action lawsuits against the manufacturers of AFFF.

    These lawsuits allege that the manufacturers were aware of the health risks associated with the chemicals in the foam but failed to warn the public or take necessary precautions.

  • How much does it cost to hire a firefighting foam attorney?

    The cost of hiring a firefighting foam attorney can vary based on several factors, including the complexity of the case and the attorney’s experience.

    However, many attorneys operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only charge a fee if they successfully recover compensation on your behalf.

  • What toxic chemicals are present in Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)?

    AFFF contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are characterized by their persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and potential adverse effects on human health and the environment.

  • What types of cancer are caused by AFFF?

    Exposure to the chemicals in AFFF has been linked to several types of cancer, including:

    • Kidney cancer
    • Testicular cancer
    • Liver cancer
    • Colorectal cancer
    • Prostate cancer

  • What to do if you’ve developed cancer from AFFF firefighting foam exposure?

    If you’ve developed cancer after being exposed to AFFF, it’s crucial to seek medical care immediately.

    Once your health is being managed, consider contacting a lawyer experienced in AFFF lawsuits.

  • What are the potential firefighting foam lawsuit settlement amounts?

    While no settlements have been reached in the AFFF litigation as of yet, lawyers estimate that AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts may fall between $40,000 to $300,000 or more depending on the strength of the case and other individual factors.

    However, these figures are merely projections based on knowledge of prior mass tort cases and settlements for cancer diagnosis.

    It’s important to note that these amounts can vary greatly and it’s best to consult an experienced lawyer to discuss the specific details of your case.

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources