Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit

April 14,th 2025: Zuckerberg’s Antitrust Testimony: Broader Implications for Social Media and Mental Health Lawsuits

On April 14, 2025, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent over ten hours testifying in a major antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The case challenges Meta’s previous acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, arguing that the company sought to suppress competition and solidify its dominance in the social networking sphere.

The FTC contends that internal company documents reveal Meta considered divesting Instagram in 2018, allegedly to sidestep regulatory concerns.

This, the agency suggests, signals Meta’s awareness of its potentially monopolistic behavior.

In contrast, Meta defends its acquisition strategy as lawful and aimed at enhancing the user experience by fostering innovation and creating a more integrated platform ecosystem.

Though the central focus of the case is antitrust law, its ramifications could influence other legal arenas, particularly lawsuits accusing social media firms of harming youth mental health.

Meta, alongside other tech giants, is currently facing legal challenges that claim their platforms are intentionally engineered to encourage excessive use among young users, potentially exacerbating mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders.

These mental health lawsuits and the antitrust case remain legally distinct.

However, they converge around a shared narrative: that Meta may have prioritized growth and engagement metrics over consumer well-being.

Evidence presented in the antitrust trial regarding Meta’s strategic planning and internal communications could potentially bolster arguments in the mental health suits by revealing similar patterns of decision-making.

A verdict against Meta in the antitrust case wouldn’t directly determine the outcomes of the mental health lawsuits.

Still, it could influence how courts, regulators, and the public assess corporate responsibility within the tech sector.

Increased scrutiny might follow regarding how digital platforms are structured and promoted, especially to minors.

As litigation progresses, the outcomes are poised to shape the regulatory landscape and define the extent to which social media companies are held accountable for the societal impacts of their business practices.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

April 9, 2025: Washington State Considers New Tax on Social Media to Fund Youth Mental Health

Washington state is taking bold steps to address the growing youth mental health crisis by proposing a new tax on major social media companies.

House Bill 2038, scheduled to take effect in early 2026, would apply a 0.4% tax on the Washington-based income of large, for-profit companies operating social media platforms.

The revenue—estimated at $45 million over six years—would go into the newly established Youth Behavioral Health Account to support services for individuals from birth through age 25.

Funds would be used to expand school-based therapy, telehealth access, and resources for youth with complex mental health needs, while also implementing the state’s forthcoming youth mental health plan.

The bill also creates a leadership role, the Chief Officer of Youth Behavioral Health, to coordinate care efforts across education, health, and child welfare systems.

Small businesses and nonprofits earning under $125,000 annually would be exempt from the tax.

Supporters say the law responds to the mental health harms linked to social media use.

However, tech industry groups have pushed back, arguing that the bill may conflict with the Internet Tax Freedom Act and raises concerns over how “social media platform” is defined.

Despite the opposition, HB 2038 is seen as a long-term commitment to improve mental health outcomes in a state with some of the lowest access to youth care nationwide.

April 4th, 2025: Social Media Addiction Lawsuits Advance Amid Alarming New Study on Youth Mental Health

A recent study in the Journal of Affective Disorders has found that 40% of children and teens being treated for depression or suicidal ideation report problematic social media use.

Led by Dr. Madhukar Trevadi at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, the study surveyed 489 young patients and linked heavy social media use to worsening symptoms of anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts.

These findings add critical support to the more than 1,500 lawsuits filed against social media companies like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat.

Plaintiffs allege that these platforms were designed to encourage addictive behavior through algorithmic manipulation, especially among vulnerable users.

In October 2022, all federal social media mental health lawsuits were consolidated under Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Northern District of California.

Judge Rogers recently allowed negligence and wrongful death claims to proceed, advancing the litigation toward trial.

This new research underscores key arguments that social media companies prioritized engagement metrics over user safety, contributing to serious youth mental health outcomes.

April 2nd, 2025:  Florida Social Media Law Challenge Dismissed, Groups to Refile Lawsuit

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Florida’s 2024 social media law, stating the tech industry groups behind the case failed to prove legal standing.

The ruling leaves the law temporarily in place, though plaintiffs have until March 31 to revise and refile.

The lawsuit was brought by NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which represent companies like Meta and Google.

They argue the law violates the First Amendment by limiting minors’ access to online platforms.

However, the court did not rule on the constitutional issues, instead focusing on whether the plaintiffs showed a direct impact to their members.

The law bans children under 14 from having social media accounts and requires parental consent for ages 14 and 15.

It targets platforms based on features like algorithmic feeds and addictive design.

Although enforcement was paused pending litigation, the legal battle is far from over as plaintiffs plan to amend their case and continue challenging the law’s restrictions.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

April 1st, 2025: April 2025 JPML Update

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit continues to gain momentum, with a significant rise in filings between March and April 2025.

As of March, 1,464 lawsuits had been filed. By April 1st, that number had increased to 1,745—an addition of 281 new cases.

This sharp growth underscores escalating public concern over how social media platforms impact users’ mental health.

The litigation claims that companies behind platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat knowingly used addictive algorithms, exposed users to harmful content, and failed to implement safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals—especially teens and young adults.

As more families come forward, this case is shaping into one of the most impactful technology lawsuits of the decade.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that challenged Arkansas Act 689, a 2023 law intended to limit minors’ access to social media.

The law requires platforms to verify users’ ages and block those under 18 without parental consent.

The tech industry group NetChoice, which represents companies like Meta and TikTok, filed the suit claiming the law violated First Amendment rights and was overly broad.

A temporary block was granted in August 2023 due to constitutional concerns.

However, U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks has now dismissed the case, ruling that NetChoice lacked standing because the law never went into effect and caused no current harm.

While this decision halts the immediate legal challenge, it does not prevent future lawsuits if the law is enforced or revised.

As states continue to explore restrictions on youth access to social media, this case may shape future legal battles over digital rights and safety.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

March 18th, 2025: New Studies Link Social Media Use to Teen Mental Health Risks as Lawsuits Grow

New research is reinforcing concerns over the mental health impact of social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat.

A recent study published in BMC Psychiatry links heavy social media use to narcissism, body dysmorphia, and even delusional thinking, raising alarms about how these platforms affect users’ perception of themselves and reality.

Meanwhile, the Journal of Adolescent Health found that teens who spend more than seven hours per day on screens face higher risks of anxiety, depression, and low overall well-being.

In contrast, real-life friendships were associated with better mental health outcomes.

These findings are fueling ongoing litigation, where over 1,500 lawsuits allege that social media companies intentionally designed addictive algorithms that harm young users.

School districts have also joined the fight, seeking compensation for the rising costs of student mental health services.

The first bellwether trials in this multidistrict litigation are set to begin in 2026, and the results could shape future settlements and accountability for tech companies.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

March 12, 2025: New Study Links Social Media to Delusional Disorder

New research from Simon Fraser University suggests a strong link between heavy social media use and psychiatric disorders involving delusions, such as narcissism, body dysmorphic disorder, and anorexia.

The study, published in BMC Psychiatry, analyzed over 2,500 academic papers and found that social media platforms may allow users to maintain distorted self-perceptions without real-world checks, potentially worsening these conditions.

Researchers say that social media isn’t the root cause, but it creates an environment where delusions can thrive.

Popular platforms’ features encourage self-promotion and unrealistic self-presentation, making it easier for users to sustain exaggerated or inaccurate self-images.

The study highlights how social media’s immersive nature, especially when paired with real-world isolation, can amplify mental health struggles.

One of the study’s authors, Professor Bernard Crespi, explains that in-person interactions help prevent delusions.

Still, social media removes that reality check, allowing users to reinforce unhealthy self-perceptions.

The study also suggests that new technologies, like eye-contact interfaces and 3D interactions, could help make online interactions feel more grounded in reality.

As concerns over social media’s mental health effects grow, this research adds to the ongoing discussion about how digital environments shape self-identity.

Experts call for further studies on the specific platform features contributing to these issues and how they can be modified to support healthier online interactions.

With legal cases already emerging against major social media companies over their impact on youth mental health, this new research may provide additional support for claims that platforms contribute to psychiatric harm.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

February 21st, 2025: Utah Judge Allows Lawsuit Against TikTok

A Utah judge has ruled that the state’s lawsuit against TikTok will proceed, rejecting the company’s motion to dismiss the case.

The lawsuit, filed by the Utah Department of Commerce’s Division of Consumer Protection in June 2024, accuses TikTok of promoting the sexual exploitation of minors.

The complaint claims TikTok functions “like a virtual strip club,” allowing young users to be exploited sexually in exchange for virtual gifts.

TikTok attempted to have the case dismissed, citing jurisdictional concerns and federal protections that shield it as a platform for third-party content.

However, Utah District Judge Coral Sanchez dismissed these arguments, stating that TikTok’s deliberate commercial activity and financial gain from Utah users placed it under the state’s jurisdiction.

Utah Attorney General Derek Brown expressed appreciation for the ruling, highlighting the state’s dedication to protecting minors from harm.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

February 14, 2025: Study Strengthens Legal Claims Against Social Media Giants

New research from the University of Amsterdam underscores the urgent need to address the potential mental harm social media may be causing among young people, a pressing issue in ongoing litigations against major social media platforms.

The study’s findings underscore the potential harm of social media use on the mental health of adolescents and young adults.

The study reveals that young adults are particularly susceptible to social validation and rejection, with their engagement on social media platforms directly impacting their mood, self-esteem, and brain activity.

Published in Science Advances, the study examined over 1.6 million Instagram posts, conducted experimental mood assessments, and utilized neuroimaging to explore how likes and social feedback affect users.

The results emphasize the heightened emotional impact on adolescents from social media interactions, with the absence of likes potentially leading to lower self-esteem and depressive symptoms.

Researchers suggest that compulsive engagement with platforms may amplify anxiety and reinforce addictive behaviors.

These findings align with growing legal arguments that social media companies design platforms to exploit psychological vulnerabilities, particularly among young users.

Litigation efforts claim that features like engagement-driven algorithms and validation metrics encourage compulsive use, raising questions about corporate responsibility and potential harm.

Experts argue that addressing these issues is not only possible but necessary, and may require industry reforms and improved digital literacy education for young users, offering a hopeful path forward.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media

January 28, 2025: California Court Rules Social Media Platforms Can Be Sued Over Design Choices

A California state court has ruled that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not protect social media companies from lawsuits challenging the design of their platforms.

This decision could have major implications for ongoing legal battles related to mental health harms allegedly linked to these platforms.

Judge Carolyn Kuhl rejected a motion to dismiss a consolidated multi-district litigation (MDL) that involves personal injury claims, allowing the case to move forward.

The bellwether trial is currently set for late 2025.

Originally enacted in 1996, Section 230 was designed to shield online platforms from liability for content posted by third-party users.

While it contains certain exceptions—such as for illegal content—it has long served as a core defense for social media companies. However, in this case and similar lawsuits, plaintiffs argue that the issue goes beyond user-generated content.

Instead, they claim that social media algorithms actively promote harmful material, contribute to mental health struggles, and foster addictive behaviors.

According to the lawsuits, these alleged harms stem from the companies’ own design decisions, which plaintiffs contend fall outside of Section 230 protections.

This ruling follows a series of 2024 decisions in other state and municipal courts where judges similarly rejected social media companies’ reliance on Section 230.

In those cases, courts determined that the law does not provide blanket immunity, particularly when lawsuits target business practices—such as how platforms’ algorithms curate and distribute content—rather than individual user posts.

Judge Kuhl’s decision reflects this broader legal trend, reinforcing the idea that Section 230 does not offer absolute protection when it comes to platform design.

For plaintiffs seeking accountability in mental health-related claims against social media companies, this ruling marks an important step forward.

It signals a growing judicial willingness to scrutinize how algorithmic features and platform structures contribute to potential harm, increasing the likelihood that such lawsuits will progress.

The decision also underscores a shifting legal landscape in which courts are making distinctions between liability for content and responsibility for platform design.

As the MDL proceeds through discovery and pre-trial phases, its outcomes could set influential legal precedents.

While the bellwether trial is expected to clarify key issues, delays are likely as social media companies continue to challenge these claims.

This ruling has the potential to significantly impact the accountability of social media platforms, especially in cases related to mental health effects.

For affected individuals and families, it represents an opportunity to hold these companies responsible for how their design and algorithmic choices influence users.

The case’s developments could ultimately shape future regulations and policies regarding online platform safety.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media

January 16th, 2025: FTC Refers Snapchat AI Case to DOJ Over Alleged Harm to Young Users

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced Thursday that it has referred a complaint about Snap Inc.’s AI feature to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The complaint alleges that Snapchat’s young users have been harmed by the company’s AI-powered chatbot, “My AI. “

This unusual public disclosure highlights the FTC’s concern that Snapchat may be violating or on the verge of violating federal law and the terms of a 2014 settlement with the agency.

While the FTC didn’t specify how the “My AI” chatbot may have harmed young users, it said that making the referral public was in the public interest.

According to the FTC, its investigation uncovered “reason to believe” that Snap is breaking the law.

Snapchat resisted the allegations.

A Snapchat spokesperson said My AI was built with “rigorous safety and privacy processes” and criticized the FTC’s complaint for “lacking concrete evidence.”

The company also expressed concern that the agency’s actions misrepresented its efforts to create a safe and transparent product, warning that such regulatory moves could stifle innovation.

The decision to refer the case was approved by the FTC’s three Democratic commissioners in a closed-door meeting.

The case, filed as United States of America v. Snap Inc., brings fresh attention to regulators’ challenges in overseeing AI tools on social media.

As the DOJ considers the FTC’s allegations, the case could have significant implications for how companies balance innovation, user safety, and free speech, providing crucial insights into the future of AI regulation.

The case underscores regulatory concerns about AI tools and their potential psychological risks, which plaintiffs may cite to argue that companies failed to anticipate or mitigate these harms.

A government finding against Snap Inc. could also set a precedent for liability and influence future legal standards for AI and social media safety.

If your child has suffered from social media addiction, mental health disorders, an eating disorder, or other health issues related to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit.

Parents of teenage users who have tragically taken their own life as a result of mental health problems linked to social media usage may be eligible to file a wrongful death claim.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

January 14th, 2025

The fate of TikTok in the United States remains in flux as the Supreme Court deliberates the constitutionality of a recently passed law requiring ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, to divest its U.S. operations.

If upheld, this legislation could significantly restrict access to the platform as early as January 19.

Passed with bipartisan support as a national security measure, the law targets companies like Apple and Google and cloud providers like Oracle.

It mandates that they cease hosting, distributing, or updating TikTok. While users who already have the app installed will not lose immediate access, the app’s performance is likely to deteriorate over time without updates or bug fixes.

TikTok would also be removed from app stores, preventing new downloads and security enhancements.

The legislation does not criminalize individual use of TikTok, but technical barriers—such as the need to rely on VPNs or alternative download sources—are expected to discourage most users.

President Biden retains the authority to extend the divestiture deadline by 90 days if ByteDance demonstrates significant progress toward compliance.

However, the company is unlikely to meet the high bar set by the legislation.

At the same time, President-elect Trump has requested a delay in enforcement, seeking additional time to negotiate a political resolution after assuming office on January 20.

This situation carries substantial implications for current and future social media-related mental health lawsuits.

While the potential ban would not retroactively impact existing cases, the inability to access TikTok in the U.S. could diminish future claims tied to the platform as its influence and user base diminish.

As this scenario continues to evolve, it will undoubtedly shape the legal landscape for individuals seeking compensation for alleged mental health harms caused by TikTok.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

January 7th, 2025

A recently unsealed version of the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit filed by the state of Utah against TikTok highlights serious concerns about the company’s awareness of potential child sexual exploitation and money laundering activities linked to its live-streaming feature, TikTok LIVE.

The unredacted lawsuit was released on January 3rd by Utah’s Attorney General’s office.

Utah accuses TikTok of disregarding expert warnings about the platform’s misuse and choosing to prioritize revenue over the safety of users, particularly minors.

The lawsuit, filed in June 2024, claims TikTok profited from troubling activities enabled by its virtual currency system.

These activities include children bypassing age restrictions to host live sessions and engaging in sexualized content in exchange for virtual gifts, which could be redeemed for money.

Through an internal investigation, TikTok also discovered that its virtual gifting system facilitated criminal activity, such as money laundering and drug sales, for organized crime groups, the lawsuit alleges.

Additionally, TikTok also reportedly discovered that minors were receiving concerning messages from adults during these sessions.

Utah claims that TikTok ignored red flags raised by interactions between minors and adult users who encouraged them to engage in provocative acts for money.

TikTok rejects the allegations in its defense, stating that the lawsuit misrepresents the company’s efforts to protect its users.

TikTok points to its community guidelines, safety features for parents, and consistent enforcement of its policies as evidence of its commitment to maintaining a safe platform.

Bipartisan attorneys general from more than a dozen states sued TikTok last fall, accusing the app of exploiting minors.

Utah also filed another lawsuit against TikTok in October, accusing the platform’s algorithms of being addictive and harmful to youth.

This lawsuit is part of a growing legal movement across the U.S. that aims to hold social media platforms accountable for the safety and mental health of minors, with the outcome potentially influencing future regulations in the tech industry.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

January 2nd, 2025

The number of lawsuits related to social media mental addiction in the MDL increased from 815 in December 2024 to 974 in January 2025, reflecting a rise of 159 new cases.

This growth in filings indicates increasing public awareness of the lawsuit and a growing trend toward holding social media companies accountable for the alleged harm caused by their platforms.

Social Media Mental Health Lawsuits address the responsibility of social media companies in designing addictive features that may contribute to mental health challenges, particularly among vulnerable groups like teenagers and young adults.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

December 31st, 2024

California Attorney General Rob Bonta achieved a preliminary victory in defending Senate Bill (SB) 976, known as the Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act.

A federal court upheld most provisions of the law, set to take effect on January 1, 2025, which seeks to address social media addiction in children and teens by limiting addictive algorithms, notifications, and design features designed to increase screen time.

SB 976 aims to disrupt social media companies’ engagement-maximizing tactics, which critics link to negative mental health effects in young users.

“This addiction is no accident; it’s driven by algorithms deployed by Big Tech,” said Attorney General Bonta.

The law is designed to empower families to manage children’s social media use and foster healthier technology habits.

Although most provisions were upheld, the court temporarily blocked two sections on free speech grounds.

Attorney General Bonta disagreed with this aspect of the ruling, asserting that SB 976 does not regulate speech.

The California Department of Justice plans to appeal the decision and remains committed to defending the bipartisan law, which has garnered support from educators, public health advocates, and parents.

This legal milestone highlights the growing scrutiny of Big Tech as lawsuits targeting social media’s impact on youth mental health advance, emphasizing the need for greater accountability in protecting vulnerable users.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

December 17th, 2024

A recent study conducted in England found that teenagers with public social media profiles are 39% more likely to experience anxiety and depression than their peers with private accounts or no social media presence.

The research, which included over 16,000 adolescents, also highlighted the positive impact of active parental involvement in mitigating these mental health risks.

Teens with supportive and engaged parents reported fewer challenges, while those with stricter or less present parental guidance were less protected.

The findings underscore the critical need to understand the influence of social media and online behavior on adolescent mental health.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

December 6th, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The increasing impact of social media on youth mental health has prompted growing legal and regulatory actions against major platforms.

These efforts address concerns over data privacy, psychological harm, and corporate accountability.

Court Ruling on TikTok

A U.S. appeals court recently upheld a law requiring TikTok’s parent company to sell its U.S. operations, citing national security and user data privacy risks.

The ruling specifically addresses the need to protect sensitive data, particularly from minors, and may pave the way for stricter regulations on social media companies.

Class-Action Lawsuit Against TikTok

TikTok faces a class-action lawsuit alleging it bypassed age verification systems to collect and monetize children’s data.

Plaintiffs claim the platform exploited young users while disregarding child privacy protections.

Experts believe this case could lead to tighter enforcement of child privacy laws and greater accountability for social media platforms.

Florida Legislation Targets Social Media Practices

Florida lawmakers are moving forward with Senate Bill 3, which aims to regulate how platforms like TikTok and Instagram promote content.

The bill would increase transparency around algorithms and hold companies accountable for their contributions to youth mental health challenges.

Social Media and Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD)

Studies show social media amplifies unrealistic beauty standards, contributing to body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in teenagers.

Platforms like Instagram and TikTok are often linked to obsessive behaviors and negative self-image, prompting calls for public education and stricter regulations.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

December 2, 2024

In November, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) recorded 620 case filings for the Social Media Mental Health lawsuit.

This number grew to 815 in December, showing an increase of 195 cases.

The lawsuit involves allegations that social media platforms have exacerbated mental health problems, especially among adolescents and young adults.

Claims suggest that addictive algorithms, harmful content, and lack of proper safety measures are contributing factors.

The sharp increase in case filings may be due to rising public awareness, active advocacy, and emerging research on the impact of social media on mental health.

As the Social Media Mental Health multidistrict litigation continues to unfold, it draws increasing national attention as more individuals and families seek justice for the harm caused by these platforms.

If your child has suffered from social media addiction, mental health disorders, eating disorders, or other health issues due to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for legal action instantly.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled on October 25, 2024, that lawsuits filed by school districts against leading social media companies may proceed, based on claims that these platforms encouraged addictive behaviors in students.

Defendants Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snap face accusations that their design choices and content algorithms foster compulsive use patterns, which school districts allege have harmed educational settings and students’ well-being.

The lawsuits claim these companies used manipulative tactics to retain young users’ attention, which school districts argue contributes to a growing mental health crisis.

Judge Rogers allowed these claims to advance, stating that the alleged actions have strained educational systems.

However, some claims were dismissed under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects internet platforms from responsibility for user-generated content.

While Rogers’ ruling supports the school districts’ claims, it contrasts with a decision earlier this year by Los Angeles Superior Court, which rejected similar claims from Los Angeles districts.

This ruling permits more than 150 lawsuits to proceed while excluding claims from Los Angeles-based entities, thus narrowing the litigation.

In the Social Media MDL, 26 additional cases were filed in the last month, bringing the total to 620 cases by November.

If your child has suffered from social media addiction, mental health disorders, eating disorders, or other health issues due to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for legal action instantly.

October 21st, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing. 

On October 17, 2024, a Massachusetts judge rejected Meta’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell.

The lawsuit, initiated in October 2023, claims that Meta’s design of Instagram fosters harmful social media addiction among children and teens.

The court ruled that the case focuses on Meta’s platform design and practices rather than user content, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.

This case is part of a broader wave of legal actions against social media giants, with over 600 similar claims filed across the U.S. against companies like Meta, Google, YouTube, Snap, and TikTok.

These lawsuits argue that these platforms are intentionally designed to maximize engagement and addiction, leading to severe mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and more, especially among teens.

Meta had attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing it was not responsible for third-party content.

However, Suffolk County Superior Court Justice Peter B. Krupp ruled that the lawsuit is based on Meta’s own design choices and internal knowledge of the harm caused by its platform.

The suit alleges Meta knew about the negative impact on young users but failed to take meaningful action to reduce risks.

Similar individual personal injury claims are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in California, overseen by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, with bellwether trials expected in 2026.

If your child has suffered from social media addiction, mental health disorders, eating disorders, or other health issues due to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for legal action instantly.

October 15th, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The expanding litigation against social media giants for their impact on youth mental health now includes new cases filed by Indigenous tribes and state officials nationwide.

A coalition of Native American tribes, including the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, has filed lawsuits targeting major platforms like TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat.

The tribes argue that these companies violate state laws and exploit vulnerable youth through manipulative and addictive practices.

The lawsuits claim that social media algorithms are engineered to keep young users engaged, exposing them to harmful content and negatively impacting their mental health.

In North Dakota, the Spirit Lake, Turtle Mountain, Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate, and Standing Rock tribes have also joined the consolidated litigation.

Separate investigations by state attorneys general have uncovered internal documents from TikTok revealing that the company was aware of the negative effects its platform could have on youth.

Research by TikTok confirmed its app’s addictive nature and its role in causing anxiety, sleep disturbances, and other harmful outcomes among teens.

However, instead of implementing meaningful changes, TikTok has focused on superficial time-management tools and public relations efforts.

If your child has experienced social media addiction, mental health issues, eating disorders, or other conditions related to excessive social media use, you may qualify to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit. 

Parents of teens who tragically lost their lives due to social media-related mental health problems may also be eligible to pursue wrongful death claims.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant evaluation of your case.

October 8th, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Social media giants like TikTok and YouTube are increasingly under legal scrutiny for their impact on children’s privacy and mental health.

Multiple states have filed lawsuits, raising serious concerns about how these platforms affect youth.

In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued TikTok, alleging violations of children’s privacy laws by sharing personal information without parental consent.

The lawsuit seeks civil penalties under the Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment (SCOPE) Act, with fines of up to $10,000 per violation.

Similarly, Arkansas has filed a lawsuit against YouTube and its parent company, Alphabet, accusing them of contributing to a youth mental health crisis.

The state claims the platform’s addictive nature and harmful content have forced Arkansas to spend millions on mental health services for young users.

Additionally, a coalition of states, led by California and New York, has taken legal action against TikTok, arguing that the platform is designed to be addictive and has harmed children’s mental health.

The lawsuits highlight TikTok’s promotion of dangerous challenges and unrealistic beauty filters, which negatively impact young girls’ body image, leading to eating disorders and body dysmorphia.

If your child has suffered from social media addiction, mental health disorders, eating disorders, or other health issues due to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit. 

Parents of teens who have tragically lost their lives due to social media-related mental health issues may also be eligible to file a wrongful death claim.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

October 1st, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health lawsuit focuses on claims that major social media platforms are contributing to worsening mental health, especially among teenagers and young adults.

Plaintiffs argue that companies like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok have intentionally designed their platforms to be addictive and have failed to warn users about the potential psychological harm, including depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues.

In September, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 584 active Social Media Mental Health lawsuits.

By October, that number had risen to 594, reflecting a modest increase of 10 cases. Key dates have been established for the first trial, expected in 2026.

According to Case Management Order (CMO) 19, important deadlines include:

• May 16, 2025: Plaintiffs’ expert report is due.
• May 23, 2025: Identification of the bellwether trial pool.
• July 9, 2025: Defendants’ expert report is due.
• September 4, 2025: Daubert Motions.

Within the next year, the litigation’s progress will become clearer, with the first trial anticipated as early as the second quarter of 2026.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action.

These lawsuits aim to hold social media companies like Facebook (Meta), Instagram, and TikTok (ByteDance) accountable for their role in putting teen mental health at risk, seeking compensation for victims.

The belief that future improvements can mitigate these issues suggests a growing demand for more responsible and user-friendly social media environments.

If you or a loved one has been affected by the negative impacts of social media on mental health, contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

September 28th, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health MDL combines governmental entities and individual plaintiffs, presenting unique challenges.

Governments pursue claims related to widespread mental health issues and increased healthcare costs, while individuals allege direct harm such as depression, anxiety, or suicide.

This structure raises concerns about resource allocation and settlement negotiations. Governmental cases may overshadow personal injury claims, potentially delaying justice for individuals.

The divergent goals of these plaintiff groups could complicate settlements, as government entities seek broader policy changes while individuals focus on compensation for specific mental health injuries.

September 23rd, 2024

A tentative trial date for social media mental health lawsuits emerges for January 2026.

The schedule outlines critical milestones, including document production completion by November 2024 and expert report deadlines throughout 2025.

Bellwether trial pools will be identified by May 2025.

This timeline creates pressure for potential settlements, addressing the mental health impacts of social media use.

The path to trial signals progress toward resolving claims of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues allegedly caused by social media platforms.

September 16th, 2024

The state of New Mexico has initiated a lawsuit against Snap, Inc., the company behind Snapchat, accusing it of facilitating child exploitation, sexual abuse, and trafficking on its platform.

Filed earlier this month in the First Judicial District Court of Santa Fe, the lawsuit claims that Snapchat’s design and algorithms enable predators to target children for extortion and abuse, while misleading users about the platform’s safety.

The lawsuit argues that Snapchat is the most widely used platform for child exploitation, with features that allow predators to connect with minors, extort explicit content, and distribute it through criminal networks, including the Dark Web.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez highlighted the platform’s dangerous design, stating it makes it easy for predators to target and manipulate minors.

The lawsuit follows an undercover investigation by the New Mexico Department of Justice, revealing Snapchat’s frequent use in various extortion schemes.

The state accuses Snap, Inc. of prioritizing profits over child safety by deploying features that encourage exploitation and failing to implement proper protections or age verification.

This lawsuit comes after similar legal actions, such as a social media addiction lawsuit against Meta last year, where several states accused the company of designing features to addict teens and expose them to harmful content.

The claims against Snapchat reflect wider concerns about the negative mental health effects of social media on young users, including anxiety, depression, and self-destructive behaviors.

The belief that future improvements can mitigate these issues suggests a growing demand for more responsible and user-friendly social media environments.

If you or a loved one has been affected by the negative impacts of social media on mental health, contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

September 1st, 2024

In a significant ruling, a U.S. appeals court has revived a lawsuit against TikTok, filed by the mother of a 10-year-old girl who died after participating in a viral “blackout challenge” on the platform.

The case, involving the tragic death of Nylah Anderson in 2021, challenges the typical legal protections granted to social media companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Tawainna Anderson, Nylah’s mother, claims that TikTok’s algorithm recommended the dangerous challenge to her daughter, contributing to her death.

Although Section 230 usually shields internet companies from liability for user-generated content, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled that this protection does not extend to TikTok’s algorithmic recommendations.

In a decision written by U.S. Circuit Judge Patty Shwartz, the court found that TikTok’s algorithm represents “first-party speech,” meaning the company’s promotion of specific content is not protected by Section 230, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.

Meanwhile, the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit, which focuses on claims that excessive social media use has contributed to mental health issues such as depression and anxiety, has seen an increase in filings.

There were 557 active cases in August 2024, which rose to 584 by September.

This rise suggests growing awareness of the negative impact of social media on mental health, especially among younger users.

The increase in filings highlights the importance of seeking legal counsel if social media use has caused significant mental health challenges for you or a loved one.

The belief that future improvements can mitigate these issues suggests a growing demand for more responsible and user-friendly social media environments.

If you or a loved one has been affected by the negative impacts of social media on mental health, contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

August 16th, 2024:

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A survey of 2,000 Gen Z Americans by Talker Research, commissioned by LG Electronics, provides valuable insights into the relationship between social media use and mental health.

Key Findings from the Research include:

• Mental Health Concerns: 75% of Gen Z users believe that social media negatively affects their mental health.
• Negative Emotions: Nearly half (49%) experience stress and anxiety from social media use.
• Impactful Platforms: Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook are identified as the platforms with the most negative impact.
• Time Spent: Gen Z spends an average of 5.5 hours per day on social media.
• Content Issues: 62% wish they could reset their social media feeds, and 54% feel they lack control over what appears.
• Positive Aspects: Despite the negatives, 80% find positive emotions from content like comedy and animal videos.
• Future Optimism: 38% believe that social media platforms could improve their impact on mental health in the next five years.

Despite the negative impact, many users continue to engage with social media for entertainment and connection, even as they feel a loss of control over the content they see.

This ongoing struggle mirrors broader concerns in the current Social Media lawsuit, where the impact of platform algorithms on user well-being is increasingly under public scrutiny.

The belief that future improvements can mitigate these issues suggests a growing demand for more responsible and user-friendly social media environments.

If you or a loved one has been affected by the negative impacts of social media on mental health, contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.

August 5th, 2024:

The Social Media Mental Health lawsuit is ongoing, with numerous groups suing social media giants. 

The Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa has joined the growing legal battle against major social media companies, alleging their platforms contribute to a mental health crisis among Indigenous youth.

This lawsuit targets Meta, Snapchat, TikTok, Google, and YouTube, asserting that these companies knowingly designed their platforms to be addictive and harmful to young users.

The Senate recently passed two landmark bills, the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0), aimed at enhancing online privacy and safety for children.

These bills require digital platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to children, including bullying and sexual exploitation, and expand privacy protections to include teenagers up to 16 years old.

The lawsuit filed by the tribe highlights the disproportionate mental health issues faced by Indigenous youth, exacerbated by social media usage.

Suicide rates among Native American youth have surged by 70% in the past decade, making suicide the second-leading cause of death for this group.

The lawsuit claims that social media platforms amplify these issues by promoting negative appearance comparisons and unrealistic beauty standards, particularly affecting female tribal teens.

Lawyers representing the Fond du Lac Band argue that social media companies failed to disclose the harmful nature of their platforms and used psychologically manipulative features to keep young users engaged.

The lawsuit seeks financial damages to fund mental health resources and programming tailored to Indigenous communities.

A recent lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California by a minor from New York seeks class-action status against Meta.

This lawsuit alleges that Instagram’s features were intentionally designed to be addictive, causing mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and lower academic performance.

The plaintiff is seeking $5 billion in damages and calls for Meta to implement stricter protections for minors.

Meta and Google have responded to the allegations by emphasizing their efforts to create safer online environments for young users, including implementing age verification technologies and parental control features.

However, critics argue that these measures are insufficient to mitigate the profound negative impacts on youth mental health.

If you or a loved one has been affected by mental health issues related to social media use, contact TruLaw for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a lawsuit instantly.

August 1st, 2024:

The lawsuit for teens and young adults who have suffered mentally from social media use and addiction is ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting new clients.

The Social Media Harm Lawsuit involves claims against major social media companies for contributing to mental health issues among users.

Plaintiffs argue that the platforms’ algorithms and features worsen conditions such as anxiety, depression, and other mental health disorders.

In July, there were 499 filings in the Social Media Mental Health lawsuit, which increased to 557 by August.

This rise in filings reflects growing awareness of the potential mental health impacts linked to social media use and more individuals seeking legal action.

Social media platforms are designed to maximize user engagement, often resulting in excessive use.

This overuse can contribute to mental health issues like anxiety, depression, and other psychological disorders.

The addictive nature of social media and exposure to negative content have led many affected individuals to file lawsuits against social media companies, underscoring the mental health risks involved.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

Social media companies like Facebook (Meta), Instagram, TikTok (ByteDance), and others have evaded responsibility for putting teen mental health at risk, and lawsuits are being filed to compensate victims for their injuries and damages.

July 29, 2024

The lawsuit for teens and young adults who have suffered mentally from social media use and addiction is ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting new clients.

The Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa has filed a significant lawsuit against the parent companies of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube, accusing them of contributing to the rise in mental health issues and suicide rates among Indigenous youth.

The lawsuit, which was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, is part of a broader trend, following similar actions by 33 states.

The complaint presents scientific evidence and warnings from experts linking social media use to mental health problems in young people.

Attorneys for the tribe argue that these social media platforms were designed to be addictive, despite the known risks.

Indigenous youth, who already face significant mental health challenges and have access to fewer resources, experience suicide rates five times higher than those of white youth.

The lawsuit seeks financial support to improve mental health services and education within tribal communities.

Google and Meta have denied the allegations, emphasizing their initiatives to enhance online safety for teens.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

Social media companies like Facebook (Meta), Instagram, TikTok (ByteDance), and others have evaded responsibility for putting teen mental health at risk, and lawsuits are being filed to compensate victims for their injuries and damages.

July 24, 2024

The lawsuit for teens and young adults who have suffered mentally from social media use and addiction is ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting new clients.

A federal judge has dismissed a claim from a tech industry group’s lawsuit challenging Utah’s social media regulations.

The group, NetChoice, argued that Utah’s prohibitions on certain features for minors’ social media accounts were preempted by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

• Judge’s Ruling: U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby ruled that Section 230 does not preempt Utah’s law since it regulates the design features of social media platforms, not the content.
• Features Targeted: The law prohibits autoplay videos, infinite scrolling, and push notifications on minors’ accounts, aiming to mitigate the mental health impact on youth.
• Regulation Validity: The judge emphasized that Utah’s law targets the conduct of social media platforms, not the dissemination of third-party content.

Utah State lawmakers, including Rep. Jordan Teuscher, praised the decision as a significant victory in protecting minors from social media harms.

Additionally, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office has published three proposed rules detailing how a new law aimed at keeping children off social media platforms will be implemented.

This law, which takes effect on January 1, 2024, also aims to block minors from accessing online pornography.

The law seeks to prevent children under 16 from opening social media accounts.

Platforms must verify parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds to use social media.

Reasonable verification methods include requesting parental contact details and confirming their identity through commercially reasonable means.

The proposed rules could lead to hearings before finalization.

Similar laws in other states have faced legal challenges.

Florida’s approach may set a precedent for how states regulate minors’ use of social media and access to online content.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly. 

Social media companies like Facebook (Meta), Instagram, TikTok (ByteDance), and others have evaded responsibility for putting teen mental health at risk, and lawsuits are being filed to compensate victims for their injuries and damages.

July 9, 2024

Several Long Island school districts are suing TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat, alleging these platforms are “addictive and dangerous,” contributing to mental health issues among young students.

This legal action aligns with U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s call for warning labels on social media due to their association with significant mental health harms for adolescents.

Eleven school districts claim social media platforms have caused financial and resource disruptions, necessitating the hiring of on-site mental health professionals.

Nicholas Ciappetta, President of the South Huntington Board of Education, noted that disruptive social media posts have significantly impacted the school environment.

William Shinoff, a California lawyer representing about 1,000 school districts nationwide, mentioned that over two dozen other districts in the Long Island area plan to file similar lawsuits.

In response, a Google spokesperson stated that the allegations against YouTube are “simply not true” and highlighted their efforts to provide safer, healthier experiences for young people.

A Snapchat representative acknowledged ongoing efforts to improve safety and support for adolescents on their platform.

If you or someone you care for has been prescribed Ozempic and/or Wegovy, or any compounded versions of these medications, and have since developed gastroparesis (a condition leading to stomach paralysis) or other related health issues, you may be eligible to submit a claim in the Ozempic Lawsuit.

Contact Keith Law Group for a free consultation and more information on Ozempic Lawsuit claims.

Use the chatbot for a free and confidential case evaluation.

July 1, 2024

The Social Media Mental Health lawsuit is ongoing.

The Social Media Mental Health lawsuit involves claims that excessive social media use has led to significant mental health issues, especially among teens and young adults.

In June, there were 475 Social Media Mental Health lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 499, reflecting growing concerns about social media’s impact on mental health.

Excessive social media use can lead to depression, anxiety, and other mental health disorders by fostering unrealistic comparisons, cyberbullying, and addictive behaviors.

A recent federal lawsuit against TikTok also highlights concerns about children’s privacy and psychological impact, contributing to the rise in filings.

The Social Media Mental Health lawsuit seeks to hold social media companies accountable.

If you or someone you care for has been prescribed Ozempic and/or Wegovy, or any compounded versions of these medications, and have since developed gastroparesis (a condition leading to stomach paralysis) or other related health issues, you may be eligible to submit a claim in the Ozempic Lawsuit.

Contact Keith Law Group for a free consultation and more information on Ozempic Lawsuit claims.

Use the chatbot for a free and confidential case evaluation.

June 27, 2024

New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella announced a lawsuit against TikTok Inc., alleging violations of the state’s consumer protection act.

The lawsuit, filed in Merrimack Superior Court, claims that TikTok engages in unfair and deceptive practices by designing an addictive product and misleading consumers about its safety.

The lawsuit highlights that TikTok’s platform uses features that exploit young users’ ongoing brain development, resulting in excessive use and potential harm, such as depression and anxiety.

TikTok is also accused of violating children’s privacy by collecting and using their personal data without proper consent.

In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission settled a similar complaint against TikTok’s predecessor, Musical.ly, for nearly $6 million.

Additionally, the European Commission is investigating TikTok for potential breaches of the Digital Services Act, which addresses risks to minors’ mental and physical health.

The New Hampshire lawsuit follows a similar complaint filed by AG Formella against Meta Platforms in October 2023, alleging manipulative design features and deceptive practices on Facebook and Instagram.

The lawsuit ties TikTok’s popularity to increasing mental health issues among New Hampshire teens, citing a significant rise in depression and suicide rates among high school students since TikTok’s launch in 2017.

The complaint claims TikTok’s addictive design alters the brain chemistry of young users and that the company has downplayed the risks while touting ineffective safety measures.

If you or someone you care for has been prescribed Ozempic and/or Wegovy, or any compounded versions of these medications, and have since developed gastroparesis (a condition leading to stomach paralysis) or other related health issues, you may be eligible to submit a claim in the Ozempic Lawsuit.

Contact Keith Law Group for a free consultation and more information on Ozempic Lawsuit claims.

Use the chatbot for a free and confidential case evaluation.

June 21, 2024

The Social Media lawsuit is ongoing. 

Almost 500 lawsuits have been initiated against prominent social media corporations, including Meta, Alphabet Inc., Google LLC, YouTube LLC, Snap Inc., TikTok Inc., and ByteDance Inc.

These legal actions assert that the design of social media platforms is deliberately optimized to increase user engagement, which leads to addiction and significant mental health problems among adolescents.

The plaintiffs, comprising parents, school districts, and state attorneys general, claim that these companies have neglected the detrimental impacts on young users.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has been assigned to oversee these cases, which have been consolidated in the Northern District of California.

The first bellwether trial in the Social Media Addiction MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) is set to commence on October 25, 2025

The selection of bellwether cases anticipated by February 6, 2025. 

Bellwether trials are pivotal as they offer an early indication of how juries might react to the presented evidence and testimonies, and they play a significant role in shaping the outcomes of subsequent cases in the litigation.

Thirty-five states have joined the litigation, demanding accountability for the mental health expenses attributed to social media addiction.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact Us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

June 17, 2024

The Social Media lawsuit is ongoing. 

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy is calling on Congress to require health warning labels on social media platforms to tackle the mental health issues prevalent among young people.

Murthy highlights the grave risks like increased anxiety and depression linked to prolonged use of social media, advocating for measures to raise user awareness and safety.

His proposed bill would oblige platforms such as Meta, X/Twitter, TikTok, and Snap to display digital warning labels that outline the possible adverse effects on mental health, especially for adolescents who are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts.

Furthermore, Murthy is pushing for legislation that would mandate social media companies to publicly share all data on health impacts and permit independent scientists to conduct unbiased studies on this data.

He draws an analogy to the health warnings seen on tobacco products, suggesting that similar warnings on social media could lead to more informed decisions by users.

Murthy envisions these warnings could be implemented as pop-up messages on sites, similar to cookie notifications, or included in app descriptions in digital stores.

Details regarding how these regulations would be enforced and complied with are still being debated.

Additionally, it has not yet been determined which platforms would be officially categorized as ‘social media’ under the new regulations.

This initiative is part of a wider examination of social media platforms, which includes regulatory hearings and ongoing discussions about a possible TikTok ban.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact Us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

June 10, 2024

The Social Media lawsuit is ongoing. 

On June 9, 2024, the New York State Legislature passed two significant bills aimed at regulating social media usage by minors.

The first, known as the SAFE (Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation) for Kids Act, requires minors under 18 to have parental consent to access “addictive” social media feeds.

This legislation targets platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and YouTube, which are known for algorithms that encourage prolonged engagement at the cost of user well-being.

Supporters of the legislation cite a Harvard University study showing that the six largest social media platforms generated $11 billion from targeting ads at minors. T

They also point to research linking social media addiction to increased depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem among youths.

The second bill, the New York Child Data Protection Act, bans websites from collecting, selling, or sharing minors’ personal data without informed consent.

For children under 13, this consent must come directly from a parent, with civil penalties up to $5,000 per violation for non-compliance.

In related developments, Mississippi will enact a law on July 1 requiring age verification on digital platforms.

Despite unanimous state legislative approval and its intention to shield children from inappropriate content, this law faces opposition and legal challenges from technology companies concerned about its broad impact on content moderation and privacy.

Similar regulatory measures have been introduced in states like Utah, Arkansas, and Texas.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

June 4, 2024

The Social Media lawsuit is ongoing. 

On June 3, 2024, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes filed a lawsuit against TikTok, alleging the platform facilitates the sexual exploitation of children through its live streaming features.

The lawsuit claims TikTok Live allows children to perform illicit acts on camera in exchange for payments, with insufficient age verification measures.

Despite TikTok’s rule that users must be at least 18 to host live streams, the complaint states the platform has been aware of these issues since December 2023.

TikTok spokesperson Michael Hughes defended the platform, asserting it has strong policies to protect teens and revokes access to features for accounts that do not meet age requirements.

This is the second lawsuit filed by Utah’s attorney general against TikTok for allegedly endangering children, with a previous lawsuit accusing the app of harming young users’ mental health.

The new lawsuit claims TikTok failed to address the misuse of its live feature despite being aware of the issue.

Utah’s attorney general is seeking a jury trial.

This lawsuit adds to the growing legal pressure on TikTok, which is also facing a potential ban in the U.S. following a law signed by President Joe Biden.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

June 3, 2024

This month, 20 additional cases were included in the Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 3047), raising the total to 475 cases pending, as reported by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

These cases allege that TikTok and other social media platforms have crafted algorithms that intensify the susceptibility of young users to harmful content, contributing to mental health issues and fostering addictive behaviors, while failing to shield users from such content.

If you or someone close to you has experienced mental health issues due to social media use, you might be eligible to file a claim.

Additionally, various states, school districts, and local municipalities are pursuing legal actions against major social media platforms:

• The Mayor of New York City has initiated a lawsuit against Meta, accusing it of contributing to the youth mental health crisis.
• The Muscogee County School District has entered the multidistrict litigation, claiming that social media content has negatively affected students’ learning capabilities in the classroom.
• The state of Utah has sued TikTok, alleging the platform sexually exploits young people.
• Nebraska has launched a lawsuit against TikTok, asserting that the platform’s design deliberately targets minors with addictive features.

If you or a loved one has suffered from mental health disorders, suicidal thoughts or behaviors, or other health issues linked to excessive social media use, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a lawsuit.

You can also instantly determine if you qualify for the Social Media Lawsuit by using the chatbot on this page.

May 22, 2024:

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing.

Nebraska has initiated legal action against TikTok and its parent company ByteDance, alleging that the platform’s design specifically targets minors with addictive features that exacerbate the youth mental health crisis.

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers accuses TikTok’s algorithms of promoting content harmful to children, including messages that encourage eating disorders, substance abuse, and inappropriate sexual behavior.

The state contends that despite TikTok’s claims of being “family-friendly,” it exposes young users to dangerous content.

The lawsuit, filed in state court, reveals that fictitious profiles set up by investigators for users aged 13, 15, and 17 quickly encountered content that violates TikTok’s Community Guidelines, which forbid material threatening the safety of young users.

Nebraska’s investigation demonstrates a significant gap between TikTok’s advertised safety measures and the reality of the content minors encounter on their ‘For You’ feeds.

This feature automatically populates users’ feeds with potentially harmful videos without any active searching required by the user.

This case is among multiple lawsuits TikTok faces, including a federal lawsuit stemming from U.S. legislation requiring TikTok to sever ties with ByteDance, its Chinese parent company, within one year.

Over 30 states and the federal government have also banned TikTok on state- or government-owned devices due to similar concerns.

TikTok refutes Nebraska’s allegations, stating it has set industry-leading safeguards for teens, including age-appropriate features, parental controls, and a default 60-minute daily time limit for users under 18.

The company pledges ongoing enhancements to these protections to mitigate industry-wide concerns over youth safety and data privacy.

If you or a loved one have experienced mental health issues after developing a social media addiction, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.

Contact TruLaw for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for potential legal action instantly.

There is no shame in admitting that you need help and support to deal with the negative effects of social media.

May 17, 2024:

In a pivotal phase of the Social Media Addiction Lawsuit, federal and California state courts are advancing the proceedings.

A Case Management Conference (CMC) has been scheduled to outline the process for selecting plaintiff representatives.

By June 24th, 24 plaintiffs will be chosen, with the individual fact discovery phase concluding by December 6th.

Following this, the plaintiff group will be narrowed down to 10-12 individuals for the expert discovery phase, with expert conclusions expected by the end of 2025.

Simultaneously, a related case in the California Superior Court under Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl is examining the effects of social media on student behavior.

This litigation involves school districts alleging that major platforms like Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc., TikTok Inc., and Google LLC have disrupted educational environments, necessitating increased disciplinary actions and enhanced communication strategies.

The districts claim that these platforms, designed to be addictive, are contributing to behavioral issues such as depression and anxiety among students.

Further complicating matters, some social media-driven trends have resulted in considerable property damage within schools.

The oral arguments have emphasized distinguishing between direct content-related harm and the broader, algorithm-driven behavioral impacts.

The schools are challenging the application of federal liability protections under Section 230, arguing against the exemption of external factors like social media from school-related claims.

The broader legal discussion centers on whether the intentional design of these platforms fosters addiction among youth, thereby necessitating a responsibility on the part of social media companies to counteract the negative impacts on young users’ mental health and education.

Our law firm offers confidential consultations for those affected or considering legal action related to social media addiction and its educational impact.

Contact us today, or use the chatbot on our page to determine if you qualify for the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit.

May 1, 2024:

The Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation continues to progress, with 455 lawsuits currently pending as indicated by the latest filings from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

Over the past month, 16 new cases have been added to the MDL.

The litigation alleges that various social media platforms have contributed to mental health issues among users, especially teenagers and young adults, by promoting addictive behavior and failing to shield users from harmful content.

The lawsuits further claim that these platforms were aware of the detrimental effects of their products but did not take sufficient measures to address these issues.

If you or someone close to you has experienced mental health disorders, suicidal thoughts or behaviors, or other health issues as a result of excessive use of social media, you might be eligible to pursue compensation through a lawsuit.

Please contact our law firm for a free, confidential consultation.

Additionally, you can immediately find out if you qualify for the Social Media Lawsuit by using the chatbot on this page.

April 22, 2024:

The Social Media Lawsuit continues to unfold as more individuals and families affected by the adverse impacts of these platforms seek legal recourse. 

In a poignant instance, a 16-year-old from Arkansas tragically took his own life following exposure to numerous TikTok videos promoting suicide and self-harm.

This case is part of a significant number of lawsuits consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), which alleges that TikTok and other social media platforms create algorithms that may increase young users’ susceptibility to harmful content.

The lawsuit brought by the family of the Arkansas teenager claims that TikTok’s algorithm specifically targeted him with dangerous and inappropriate content, which contributed to his decision to end his life.

The legal team representing the teen’s family argues that TikTok’s platform design is inherently flawed, rendering it an “unreasonably dangerous product” for young users.

They assert that the algorithm significantly amplified the teen’s exposure to damaging content, directly impacting his actions.

There is a growing call among parents and lawyers for a reevaluation of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which traditionally protects platforms like TikTok from being held liable for content posted by users.

A recent study indicates that from 2016 to 2021, hospitalizations and emergency room visits for suicide attempts and ideation among children and teens have increased nationally, signaling a concerning trend in youth mental health and raising questions about the role of social media in these issues.

The Social Media Addiction Lawsuit aims to highlight the potential risks of unregulated content recommendations and drive changes to prevent future tragedies.

If you or someone you care about has experienced mental health problems due to social media usage, you might be eligible to file a claim. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to instantly check your eligibility for the Social Media Addiction Lawsuit.

April 16, 2024:

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been successful in having several lawsuits dismissed that sought to hold him personally responsible for the alleged addictive properties of social media platforms he oversees.

These dismissed claims are part of a larger legal battle that includes hundreds of lawsuits against companies like Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snap.

Despite Zuckerberg’s dismissal, the broader litigation continues, especially regarding allegations that these companies have designed their platforms to be particularly addictive to children.

District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, ruled in Zuckerberg’s favor, determining that the plaintiffs could not establish that he had a personal obligation to protect users.

The court highlighted that corporate law typically shields company executives from personal liability, particularly in large corporations where decision-making is shared among several individuals.

The lawsuits had charged Zuckerberg with disregarding internal concerns about the safety of Facebook and Instagram for children and making public assertions that the platforms were secure.

Nonetheless, Zuckerberg’s defense argued that his statements were either general in nature or protected by the First Amendment’s right to free speech.

This development occurs amidst growing concerns about the influence of social media on the mental health of young people.

In recent years, various entities from school districts to state governments have initiated legal actions against social media companies, attributing them to a mental health crisis among youth.

Although Zuckerberg has been removed from this specific lawsuit, the legal challenges focusing on addiction and other mental health issues affecting young users proceed.

These cases involve major companies such as Meta, Instagram, Snap, TikTok, and Google, and have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Our law firm is actively taking on new clients for the Social Media Lawsuit. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify for the Social Media Lawsuit.

April 1, 2024:

The debate over social media’s effect on mental health is intensifying.

Recent filings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) indicate that 439 lawsuits are now active within the Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation.

These lawsuits argue that prominent social media companies have developed platforms that may worsen mental health conditions, especially among younger users.

Allegations point to the design, algorithms, and operational policies of these platforms as factors fostering addiction, reducing self-esteem, and triggering anxiety and depression, among other issues.

The growing concern highlights the accountability of social media firms to protect user mental health and calls for increased industry regulation and monitoring.

If social media usage has negatively impacted you or someone you know, consulting with a legal professional could provide clarity on your rights and potential actions.

Use the chatbot on this site for a private, no-cost case review to instantly determine eligibility for the Social Media Lawsuit.

March 21, 2024:

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit continues to unfold.

The number of lawsuits targeting social media corporations are on the rise, with individuals demanding accountability from major networks for various harms and grievances.

Our legal team is actively enrolling clients for the Social Media Addiction Lawsuit, as the companies face mounting pressures from numerous directions.

In New York, a state judge has permitted a wrongful death claim to move forward against social media giants, including Meta, Alphabet, Reddit, and 4chan, for their role in the radicalization of the individual behind the 2022 mass shooting in Buffalo, New York.

The judge rejected the platforms’ request for dismissal, recognizing the claims that their algorithm-driven engagement tactics played a part in the gunman’s adoption of destructive beliefs.

The judge pointed out that these media conglomerates profit from the dissemination of violent content, aimed at boosting user interaction.

Simultaneously, in Tennessee, a collective of over 30 public school districts has initiated a lawsuit against various social media networks.

Joining a nationwide movement, hundreds of public educational institutions have launched similar legal challenges, with Tennessee’s largest school districts now participating.

This legal effort seeks to increase the platforms’ accountability and improve the provision of critical resources for child protection, highlighting the gaps in current safeguards, oversight, and regulatory frameworks on these networks.

These lawsuits underline the escalating concerns about the influence of social media on mental well-being and its potential contribution to violence in society.

If you or someone close to you has been affected by mental health issues linked to social media usage, you might have grounds to pursue a claim.

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the ChatBot on this page for an immediate case evaluation.

March 1, 2024:

The Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing

The Social Media Addiction MDL has recently seen an increase in activity, with eleven new cases added over the past month, elevating the total from 399 cases as of February 1st to 410 by March, according to the latest updates from the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

This surge reflects growing concerns regarding the impact of social media on adolescent mental health, with the lawsuits alleging that platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat have played a significant role in exacerbating mental health issues among young users.

The core of the allegations points to negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and the creation of a public nuisance by these social media companies through mechanisms that allegedly exploit user engagement to the detriment of mental well-being.

The lawsuits aim to hold these companies accountable for not adequately warning or protecting users, particularly children and young adults, from the potential mental health hazards associated with their platforms.

Individuals who have experienced mental health issues potentially linked to social media use are urged to explore their legal options. 

TruLaw is providing free consultations for those who believe they may be affected and eligible to participate in the Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit. 

Immediate assistance is available through the ChatBot service on this page.  

February 14, 2024:

The Social Media Addiction and Teen Mental Health Lawsuit is ongoing.

On February 14th, New York State made headlines by initiating legal action against five major social media platforms, alleging their contribution to worsening the youth mental health crisis.

The lawsuit accuses these companies of culpability through their actions and negligence, asserting they played a part in fostering the mental health challenges faced by young people.

The state calls upon these tech giants to amend their practices and provide compensation for the perceived threat to mental health they’ve purportedly fostered.

This legal move comes shortly after the State Health Commissioner issued an advisory last month, likening unrestricted social media access to a public health danger, drawing parallels with past measures taken against tobacco and firearms.

The advisory recommends limiting social media engagement until children reach 14 years old, and offers guidance to parents, educators, and other influencers on safeguarding children from potential harm.

Mayor Adams underscored the detrimental impact of social media platforms on children’s mental well-being, highlighting how the constant influx of harmful content has contributed to a national crisis in youth mental health.

Corporation Counsel Hinds-Radix criticized the prioritization of profit over children’s welfare by these social media giants, alleging they intentionally designed platforms with addictive features to maximize financial gain.

Dr. Vasan, the commissioner for the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH), drew a striking comparison between social media and environmental toxins such as lead or air pollution.

February 1st, 2024:

The Senate Judiciary Committee recently held a hearing titled “Big Tech and the Crisis of Online Child Sexual Exploitation.”

During this session, CEOs from prominent tech firms, including Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, underwent rigorous questioning concerning the potential harm their products pose to teenagers.

During the hearing, Zuckerberg issued an apology, expressing regret for the pain experienced by affected families and pledging to work collaboratively across the industry to prevent such harm.

The hearing, which featured other executives like Linda Yaccarino from X (formerly Twitter), Shou Zi Chew from TikTok, Evan Spiegel from Snap, and Jason Citron from Discord, concluded after a four-hour examination.

Senate Chair Dick Durbin called for bipartisan legislation to address the crisis of online child sexual exploitation.

Emotional testimonies from parents who tragically lost their children to online harms were also included in the proceedings.

Topics of discussion encompassed platform tools for child protection, Section 230 legal protections, and support for bills such as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the Stop CSAM Act.

During the hearing, both Zuckerberg and Spiegel personally extended their apologies to families affected by online harm.

The Senate inquiry emphasized concerns about the adverse impact of social media on children’s mental well-being and the proliferation of child sexual abuse materials.

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle advocated for a package of bills aimed at bolstering online safety for children, including the STOP CSAM Act.

Internal documents revealed that in 2021, Zuckerberg had rejected requests to expand the child safety team, leading to calls for increased regulatory oversight of tech companies.

TikTok also faced scrutiny regarding its purported ties to the Chinese government, which it vehemently denied.

Critics stressed the necessity of congressional action to comprehensively combat online child exploitation.

January 1st, 2024:

A group of social media and tech firms, led by NetChoice, has filed a federal lawsuit against Utah challenging its social media regulations, scheduled to be enforced in March.

The lawsuit alleges that the laws violate the First Amendment by imposing broad restrictions on youth access to social media platforms, including age-verification and limitations on targeted advertising. NetChoice argues the regulations constitute “age-gating,” requiring all users, including adults, to submit identification, violating free expression rights.

December 19th, 2023:

TikTok has implemented modifications to its terms of service in the United States.

These alterations involve the elimination of provisions that previously mandated the resolution of user disputes through private arbitration and the establishment of a one-year time limit for initiating legal action in cases of alleged harm stemming from app usage.

These adjustments could potentially pose obstacles for those seeking legal recourse against the company.

A coalition comprising more than 40 state attorneys general is currently conducting an inquiry into TikTok’s treatment of young users.

Their objective is to ascertain whether the company has engaged in unfair and deceptive practices that may have negatively impacted the mental well-being of children and teenagers.

A federal judge has ruled that a case involving numerous lawsuits against prominent tech companies, including TikTok, can proceed.

Attorney Kyle Roche, representing a group of over 1,000 guardians and minors with claims related to TikTok usage, has raised objections to the updated terms.

Roche contends that his clients, who are minors, are not in a position to consent to these new terms.

The adjustments made to TikTok’s terms are widely perceived as a response to the potential litigation that may arise from the state attorneys general investigation and the lawsuit in California.

Legal experts have suggested that TikTok may encounter challenges in defending these modifications to its terms of service in court, particularly if consumers were not adequately informed about these changes.

December 4th, 2023:

New Buffalo Area, St. Joseph, and Eau Claire Public schools in Berrien County, Michigan, have joined a nationwide lawsuit against social media platforms, including Facebook, alleging failure to protect students’ mental health and interference with learning.

Over 800 school districts are involved, with the lawsuit calling for safeguards against explicit content and potential harm to students.

Other schools can join until December 29th, with the trial estimated to conclude within two years. The U.S. Surgeon General supports the initiative, recommending digital and media literacy in education to mitigate social media risks.

November 15th, 2023:

A federal court has ruled against Meta, ByteDance, Alphabet, and Snap, mandating that they must face lawsuits alleging their social media platforms negatively impact children’s mental health.

These tech giants had attempted to dismiss numerous lawsuits that accused their platforms of being addictive to kids.

The legal actions were initiated by school districts across the United States, asserting harm to children’s physical and emotional well-being.

The court’s decision indicates that the First Amendment and Section 230, which provides online platforms some legal protections, do not shield these companies from all liability in this matter.

The judge acknowledged that many of the plaintiffs’ claims were related to alleged flaws within the platforms, such as inadequate parental controls, a lack of robust age verification systems, and a cumbersome process for deleting accounts.

Addressing these issues, the judge stated, would not necessitate altering the content disseminated on the platforms.

However, certain other claimed defects, like the use of “addictive” algorithms and the absence of time limits on platform usage, were protected under Section 230.

The attorneys representing the plaintiffs welcomed the court’s ruling as a significant victory for families affected by the potential dangers of social media.

The decision challenges the tech companies’ assertions that Section 230 and the First Amendment provide them with complete immunity against claims of harm caused by their platforms.

Google defended its actions, refuting the allegations in the complaints and highlighting its implementation of age-appropriate features for children on YouTube.

This ruling has the potential to pave the way for more safety-related claims against social media platforms, even in the absence of new legislation, and could make it more challenging for these platforms to mount legal defenses against such claims.

November 13th, 2023:

Allegations have arisen in an ongoing lawsuit that Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has hindered efforts to improve the well-being of teenagers on Facebook and Instagram, based on internal communications that have been made public.

These documents indicate that Zuckerberg overruled top executives, including Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri and President of Global Affairs Nick Clegg, who had advocated for measures aimed at safeguarding the well-being of Instagram’s more than 30 million teenage users in the United States.

One specific instance highlighted in the lawsuit involves Zuckerberg’s rejection of a 2019 proposal to disable Instagram’s “beauty filters,” which digitally alter users’ appearances and have been associated with promoting unrealistic body image ideals among teenagers.

Despite widespread support for the proposal, including from other high-ranking Meta officials, Zuckerberg declined it, arguing that there was a “demand” for the filters and no evidence of harm.

The recently disclosed communications also reveal tensions within Meta regarding well-being initiatives and Zuckerberg’s preference for a data-centric decision-making approach.

Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges that Meta exploited the psychology of adolescent users to increase engagement on Instagram.

Technology advocacy groups have criticized Zuckerberg and Meta for their handling of these issues, with some asserting that even senior leadership encountered obstacles in addressing concerns related to well-being tools.

In response, Meta has defended its actions, stating that it prohibits filters that overtly promote cosmetic surgery or extreme weight loss and offers tools to support teenagers and families, such as screen-time limits and options to hide like counts on posts.

However, the lawsuit suggests that some of these well-being initiatives may not have been effectively implemented.

November 6th, 2023:

YouTube has introduced new limitations on recommending certain videos associated with body image and social aggression to teenage users in the United States in response to concerns about their mental health impact.

This action comes as a response to an increase in lawsuits against social media platforms.

The restrictions aim to lessen potential harm caused by repeated viewing of content that glorifies specific body attributes or portrays non-contact altercations and intimidation.

These changes specifically target teenage users in the U.S., with gradual plans to extend these measures to other countries.

YouTube is collaborating with experts and its Youth and Families Advisory Committee to evaluate the effects of online content on the mental well-being of teens.

The platform reiterated its dedication to upholding Community Guidelines by removing content that breaches safety, hate speech, and harassment policies.

Moreover, YouTube is enhancing existing features such as Take a Break and Bedtime reminders, initially introduced in 2018.

They are also expanding crisis resource panels for users seeking content related to self-harm or suicide.

November 2nd, 2023:

Two Ventura County school districts are taking legal action against social media companies, alleging that popular cell phone apps are causing widespread psychological harm to students. Simi Valley Unified School District and Conejo Valley Unified School District are suing companies behind platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube in a “mass action lawsuit.” They claim that these companies have contributed to a “mental health crisis” among children and teenagers, leading to issues such as depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-harm thoughts, and cyberbullying.

November 2nd, 2023:

Multiple law firms and attorneys are vying for leadership roles in a California federal MDL involving allegations against tech companies harming young people’s mental health.

Seeking to represent school districts and local governments, applicants emphasize their experience in similar MDLs, stressing the need for dedicated representation due to unique legal challenges. They argue for an organized framework to efficiently address the distinct concerns of educational and governmental entities, setting the stage for potential lawsuits by major school districts and local governments within this MDL.

October 27th, 2023:

42 state attorney generals are taking legal action against Meta, the company responsible for Facebook and Instagram.

Their contention is that these social media platforms are intentionally engineered to foster addiction and specifically target minors and adolescents.

This united effort transcends political affiliations and signifies a substantial legal challenge to Meta’s operations.

The legal complaints assert that Meta purposefully structured its platforms to maintain the constant engagement of young users through mechanisms such as algorithms, alerts, notifications, and infinite scrolling features.

Additionally, they accuse Meta of causing harm to the mental well-being of teenagers by encouraging social comparison and body image concerns.

Furthermore, Meta is alleged to have violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act by gathering personal information from users under the age of 13 without parental consent.

The states participating in these legal actions aim to curtail what they view as harmful practices by Meta, and they are seeking both penalties and restitution.

The attorneys general contend that Meta was well aware of the adverse effects of its platform design on young users, citing leaked internal research documents disclosed by a whistleblower.

These attorneys general argue that this legal action is part of a wider investigation into the practices of social media companies, potentially leading to settlement discussions or individual lawsuits against other firms employing similar strategies.

The lawsuits underline the bipartisan interest in safeguarding consumers concerning online safety and align with the national emphasis on protecting the online safety and mental health of children.

October 16th, 2023:

Several companies, including Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc., TikTok Inc., and Google LLC, have been confronted with multiple lawsuits alleging that their social media platforms contribute to addiction and harm in children.

Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl in Los Angeles County rejected the companies’ legal defenses, asserting that they cannot employ the First Amendment or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to shield themselves from allegations that their platforms were intentionally designed to ensnare young users, leading to depression and anxiety.

These lawsuits have introduced a novel legal concept, treating social media platforms as products with design flaws in order to circumvent Section 230 protections.

The judge clarified that the plaintiffs are holding the companies accountable for how they crafted and operated their platforms, rather than the content hosted on them.

A similar case is currently underway in a federal court in California, potentially setting a precedent for these state-level lawsuits.

The ruling is regarded as highly significant for the families involved in these cases, and a hearing in the federal multidistrict case is scheduled for October 27th.

October 2nd, 2023:

Pinellas County Schools in Florida has joined other school districts in suing social media companies such as Meta and TikTok, alleging that these platforms are contributing to a mental health crisis among students, impacting their performance in the classroom.

he district will be represented by the same attorneys who handled a recent vaping lawsuit and will participate in multi-district litigation against parent companies, including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube.

If successful, the district aims to recover taxpayer resources spent addressing these issues.

September 1st, 2023:

The Board of Education of Charles County, Maryland has filed a lawsuit against social media companies, including Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, and TikTok, alleging that their addictive products are harming youth mental health. The lawsuit claims that these platforms are designed to target and addict children, manipulate users to spend excessive time online, and do not provide sufficient safeguards to verify users’ ages.

The school system argues that these companies prioritize profits over safety and contribute to mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among students.

Charles County joins a hundreds of additional school systems across the U.S. suing the social media giants for detrimental affects on students’ mental health.

July 26th, 2023

Approximately 200 school districts across the country have filed a lawsuit against social media giants, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube, claiming harm caused to students, particularly regarding cyberbullying and mental health issues linked to social media usage.

The case, consolidated in a U.S. District Court in California, questions the implications of Section 230, which protects social media companies from significant liability for user-generated content. The schools argue that Section 230 should not apply in this situation, citing addictive algorithms and product design affecting vulnerable students.

July 28th, 2023

The Las Virgenes and Conejo Valley Unified school districts are among the numerous districts joining a lawsuit against social media companies alleging their negative impact on students’ mental health and financial burden on schools.

The school districts’ trustees have voiced differing opinions on the litigation, with some expressing concern over social media’s influence on students and the need for accountability from the companies involved. The lawsuit addresses issues related to age verification, parental controls, targeted algorithms, constant notifications, and endless scrolling designed to addict students to social media platforms.

The Penn Hills School District in Pennsylvania recently joined the growing number of educational institutions taking legal action against major social media companies.

By voting in favor, the board joined a civil lawsuit that claims social media platforms, including Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube, have played a role in exacerbating a youth mental health crisis. The board members highlighted their concerns regarding the detrimental impact of social media on school-age children, citing issues such as heightened bullying and conflicts, as well as the diminishing importance of real-life experiences.

Montgomery County, Maryland, the state’s largest school district, has joined the ongoing federal lawsuit against social media giants such as TikTok, Snapchat, and Facebook.

Following a series of disturbing incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic that seemed to be connected to viral videos on these platforms, the local school system has become increasingly concerned about the impact of social media on students.

With approximately 160,550 students across 210 schools, Montgomery County Public Schools believes that social media is fueling body dissatisfaction, eating disorders, low self-esteem, and even violence.

Three districts in Oregon have now filed lawsuits against social media platforms under the belief that they are placing profits over the health of students.

Washougal and Salem-Keizer school districts have both filed lawsuits against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Google, YouTube, and TikTok.

This comes after the Gervais school district filed a lawsuit back in March.

An increasing number of public schools have filed lawsuits against various social media platforms after the initial lawsuits were placed earlier this year.

The school systems are seeking financial compensation along with the hope that courts declare social media companies’ practices as a public nuisance.

These cases are currently still in the early phases as more and more schools in various states continue to file lawsuits.

Multiple public schools have filed lawsuits against Meta, TikTok, Snapchat, and other social media platforms.

The first lawsuits were filed by Seattle Public Schools in January.

Since then, school districts in New Jersey and Florida have filed lawsuits.

In March, Bucks County, located in Pennsylvania, filed a lawsuit alleging that social media companies are designing and marketing their platforms in way that encourages “youth addiction.”

While there has not been an update on these cases, social media companies have responded stating that there are parental control and kids’ safety features placed on their platforms for younger users.