Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • The toxic baby food lawsuit alleges that several major baby food manufacturers, including Gerber, Beech-Nut, and Earth's Best Organic, produced baby foods containing dangerous levels of heavy metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, which may increase the risk of autism spectrum disorders in children.
  • Certain baby food products, such as infant rice cereal, rice puff snacks, carrots, sweet potatoes, and fruit juices, have been found to contain particularly high levels of heavy metals, posing a greater risk for the development of autism spectrum disorders in the ongoing toxic baby food lawsuits.
  • Advocacy groups are calling on the FDA to establish stricter regulations and safety standards for heavy metals in baby food products to protect the health and well-being of infants and young children who may be exposed to toxic baby food and contaminated baby foods.

Overview of the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit, major infant formula manufacturers facing allegations, autism disorders linked to toxic baby foods, and much more.

Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

Intro to the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

Key aspects of toxic baby food lawsuits include, but are not limited to:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorders: The toxic baby food lawsuit alleges that exposure to heavy metals in baby formula can increase the risk of developing autism, Asperger’s syndrome, and other autism spectrum disorders.
  • Major Manufacturers: Several prominent baby food companies, such as Gerber, Beech-Nut, and Earth’s Best Organic, are facing scrutiny in the toxic baby food lawsuit over the presence of heavy metals in their products.
  • High-Risk Products: Certain baby foods, such as infant rice cereal, rice puff snacks, carrots, sweet potatoes, and fruit juices, have been found to contain particularly high levels of heavy metals.
  • FDA Regulations: Advocacy groups are calling on the FDA to establish stricter regulations and safety standards for heavy metals in baby food products.

If your child has been diagnosed with autism or other autism spectrum disorders after consuming toxic baby food from major brands like Gerber, Beech-Nut, or Earth’s Best Organic, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to join others in filing a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Table of Contents

5 Autism Disorders Linked to Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits

Recent toxic baby food lawsuits have alleged a link between certain baby formulas and an increased risk of developing autism spectrum disorders in children.

5 Autism Disorders Linked to Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits

The lawsuits claim that some popular baby formula brands contain dangerous levels of heavy metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury, which may contribute to neurodevelopmental issues.

The autism disorders most commonly mentioned in these toxic baby food lawsuits include:

  1. Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome: Classic autism and Asperger’s are the disorders most commonly claimed in the toxic baby food lawsuits. Autism impairs communication and social interaction, while Asperger’s is a milder form on the spectrum.
  2. Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD-NOS): PDD-NOS includes toxic baby food cases that don’t fully meet the criteria for classic autism but have some autistic features.
  3. Heller’s Syndrome (Childhood Disintegrative Disorder): This rare, late-onset autism disorder involves a major regression in language, social, play, and motor skills starting between ages 2 and 10 after a period of normal development. The toxic baby food lawsuit alleges heavy metal contamination triggered this dramatic decline.
  4. Kanner’s Syndrome (Autistic Disorder): Named after the psychiatrist who first described autism, Kanner’s syndrome refers to the most severe, “classic” form of autism.

If your child has been diagnosed with one of these conditions after regularly consuming certain baby formulas or foods, contact Tru Law today to learn if you are eligible to file a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit: Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome

Autism and Asperger’s Syndrome have been at the forefront of toxic baby food lawsuits due to emerging evidence suggesting a potential link.

Parents and guardians have claimed that exposure to harmful substances in baby formula has contributed to developmental issues in their children.

These allegations have led to increased scrutiny and ongoing legal battles against manufacturers.

Specific toxins identified in these formulas include:

  1. Heavy Metals: Lead, mercury, and arsenic found in some baby formulas may impact brain development.
  2. Pesticides: Residues can disrupt neurological functions.
  3. BPA: A chemical used in packaging linked to developmental neurotoxicity.

In light of these discoveries, regulatory bodies such as the FDA are now implementing stricter guidelines to monitor and control contaminants in baby formulas.

This move aims to reduce the risk of such disorders and ensure safer products for infants.

Autism Spectrum Disorder Linked to Toxic Baby Food

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is an umbrella term that encompasses a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, including Autism, Asperger’s Syndrome, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder.

Recent updates in the toxic baby food lawsuits include:

  • New scientific studies support the connection between heavy metal exposure and ASD.
  • Many families are filing baby food autism lawsuits against major baby formula brands.
  • Growing public awareness of the potential risks associated with cow milk-based formulas.

As more information emerges about the potential link between toxic baby food and ASD, families are seeking legal action against baby formula manufacturers.

Other Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits

Studies suggest a connection between toxic baby food and several autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

Other Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits

This section examines specific ASDs, including Heller’s Syndrome, Kanner’s Syndrome, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder, and how they are impacted by toxic baby food.

These conditions can significantly impact a child’s development and quality of life.

Risks of Toxic Baby Food: Heller’s Syndrome

Heller’s Syndrome, also known as Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, is a rare condition characterized by a sudden regression in language, social, and motor skills after a period of normal development.

Some families believe that exposure to toxic baby food may trigger this regression.

Symptoms of Heller’s Syndrome typically appear between the ages of 2 and 10 years old and can include:

  • Loss of previously acquired language and communication skills.
  • Deterioration of social skills and interactions.
  • Regression in motor skills and coordination.
  • Development of repetitive behaviors or unusual mannerisms.

If your child has been diagnosed with Heller’s Syndrome and consumed cow milk-based formula, you may have grounds for a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Kanner’s Syndrome Concerns About Toxic Baby Food

Kanner’s Syndrome, or Classic Autistic Disorder, is a severe form of autism characterized by significant challenges in social interaction, communication, and behavior.

Some parents believe that exposure to heavy metals and other toxins in baby formula may contribute to the development of this disorder.

Common signs and symptoms of Kanner’s Syndrome include:

  • Severe impairments in social interaction and communication.
  • Restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior or interests.
  • Difficulty with language development and nonverbal communication.
  • Unusual reactions to sensory stimuli, such as sounds or textures.

Families affected by Kanner’s Syndrome may be eligible to file a toxic baby food lawsuit if their child was fed cow milk-based formula.

Childhood Development: Pervasive Developmental Disorder

Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) is a group of disorders characterized by delays in developing basic skills.

Children may show varying levels of impairment.

Common signs of PDD:

  1. Difficulty in socializing and communicating.
  2. Limited interests and unusual behaviors.
  3. Delayed cognitive abilities.
  4. Sensitivity to environmental stimuli.

Parents need to scrutinize baby formula ingredients to help develop early intervention strategies for PDD.

This population-based case-control study provides additional context on the correlation between toxins and autism spectrum disorders.

Major Baby Food Manufacturers Facing Lawsuits Over Heavy Metals

Several major baby formula manufacturers are facing lawsuits alleging that their products contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Major Baby Food Manufacturers Facing Lawsuits Over Heavy Metals

These lawsuits claim that exposure to these toxins can increase the risk of autism spectrum disorders and other neurodevelopmental issues.

Beech-Nut Nutrition Company’s Legal Battle Over Toxic Baby Food

Beech-Nut Nutrition Company is accused of producing baby food that contains dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Allegations made against Beech-Nut include:

  1. Test results show elevated heavy metal content.
  2. Claims of negligence in quality control processes.
  3. Demand for stricter safety regulations and transparency.
  4. Calls for compensation for affected families.

These issues came to light after various reports and studies highlighted the unsafe levels, prompting lawsuits from concerned parents and advocacy groups.

Beech-Nut Products in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

Beech-Nut products under scrutiny include:

  • Beech-Nut Rice Cereal.
  • Beech-Nut Oatmeal Cereal.
  • Beech-Nut Complete Nutrition Infant Formula.
  • Beech-Nut Organic Pouches.

The legal challenges have pushed Beech-Nut to reassess its manufacturing and safety protocols.

Hain Celestial Group Legal Issues: Toxic Baby Food

Hain Celestial Group, known for its Earth’s Best Organic brand, is also facing multiple tainted baby food lawsuits regarding the heavy metals found in its products.

Plaintiffs argue that the company’s products contain unsafe levels of toxins, posing serious health risks for infants.

Highlighted legal concerns:

  1. Misleading labeling as “organic” and “safe.”
  2. High concentrations of arsenic were reportedly detected.
  3. Failure to warn consumers about potential risks.
  4. Request for regulatory changes in baby formula standards.

The toxic baby lawsuits have driven a call for comprehensive testing and stricter guidelines to ensure the safety of baby formulas marketed as organic or natural.

Earth’s Best Organic Products in the Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit

Earth’s Best Organic products under investigation include:

  • Earth’s Best Organic Infant Formula.
  • Earth’s Best Organic Whole Grain Rice Cereal.
  • Earth’s Best Organic Whole Grain Oatmeal Cereal.
  • Earth’s Best Organic Fruit and Vegetable Pouches.

Families whose children developed autism spectrum disorders after consuming Earth’s Best Organic baby formula may have grounds for a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Gerber Lawsuit Concerning Heavy Metals in Baby Food

Gerber Products Company, a leading name in baby food, is being sued over the presence of heavy metals in its products, raising widespread concern.

Key allegations include:

  1. Studies reveal high levels of heavy metals in popular products.
  2. Claims of inadequate safety measures in place.
  3. Misrepresentation of products is safe for infants.
  4. Demands for improved safety protocols and ingredient transparency.

These lawsuits highlight the urgent need for better regulatory oversight to protect vulnerable consumers.

Nurture Inc. Lawsuit for Heavy Metals in Baby Food

Nurture Inc., the maker of Happy Family Organics, is facing a significant baby food autism lawsuit over the heavy metal contamination of its baby foods.

This has sparked a national conversation about the safety of baby food products.

Key legal points raised against Nature Inc. include:

  1. Detection of harmful metals in various baby foods.
  2. Concerns over long-term health effects on infants.
  3. Accusations of deceptive marketing practices.
  4. Calls for more stringent manufacturing standards.

Parents and consumer advocacy groups demand stricter regulations from the FDA and more robust safety testing of baby food products to ensure they are free from harmful contaminants.

Baby Food Products Highest in Autism-Linked Heavy Metals

Certain types of baby food products have been found to contain higher levels of heavy metals than others.

Baby Food Products Highest in Autism-Linked Heavy Metals

These products are of particular concern in the ongoing toxic baby food lawsuits, as they may pose a greater risk for the development of autism spectrum disorders.

Risks of Infant Rice Cereal Containing Heavy Metals

Infant rice cereal has been identified as one of the baby food products most likely to contain high levels of heavy metals such as arsenic.

High levels of arsenic exposure are concerning because they can impact brain development and increase the risk of autism.

Some of the risks associated with heavy metal exposure from infant rice cereal include:

  • Increased risk of autism spectrum disorders
  • Impaired cognitive development and lower IQ scores
  • Behavioral problems and attention deficits
  • Delayed language and motor skill development

If your child consumed infant rice cereal and was diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you may be eligible to file a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Health Risks of Rice-Based Puff Snacks Made of Rice for Infants

Puff snacks made from rice, such as those marketed for teething infants, have also been found to contain high levels of heavy metals.

These snacks can pose a significant risk to young children, as they are often consumed in large quantities and can easily dissolve in the mouth, leading to increased exposure to toxins.

Potential health risks associated with rice puff snacks for infants include:

  • Increased risk of autism spectrum disorders
  • Impaired neurodevelopment and cognitive function
  • Behavioral and attention issues
  • Delayed growth and development

Families whose children developed autism spectrum disorders after consuming rice puff snacks may have grounds for a toxic baby food lawsuit.

Heavy Metals in Carrots and Sweet Potatoes for Babies

Carrots and sweet potatoes are rich in nutrients, yet they can also contain high levels of lead and cadmium.

These vegetables absorb metals from contaminated soil, which then get transferred to babies when consumed.

These considerations include:

  • Lead and cadmium can be harmful to brain development.
  • Organic produce may not necessarily be lower in heavy metals.
  • Diverse diets can help mitigate exposure risks.

It’s important to be aware of the potential risks associated with heavy metals in carrots and sweet potatoes when considering them for your baby’s diet.

Fruit Juice Contaminated with Heavy Metals

Fruit juices, often given to babies and young children, have been found to contain various heavy metals such as lead and arsenic.

These contaminants can come from the fruit itself or processing methods.

Key aspects of fruit juice contamination include:

  • Fruit juices can contain lead and arsenic.
  • High consumption increases the risk of exposure.
  • Whole fruits are generally safer alternatives to juices.

Parents should consider the potential risks of heavy metals in fruit juices when choosing beverages for their children.

Popular Baby Food Brands: Potential Concerns Over Heavy Metals

While not currently named in the toxic baby food lawsuits, several popular store brands have faced concerns over potential heavy metal contamination in their products.

Popular Baby Food Brands_ Potential Concerns Over Heavy Metals

Companies like Plum Organics, Parent’s Choice, Kroger, and Sprouts Organic Foods have been questioned about the safety of their baby food offerings.

These concerns have increased parents’ awareness and calls for stricter regulations in the baby food industry.

Parent’s Choice Brand: Potential Heavy Metals in Baby Food

Parent’s Choice, a Walmart store brand, has been part of the ongoing discussion surrounding heavy metals in baby food.

While not currently facing lawsuits, concerns have been raised about the potential presence of contaminants in their products.

Potential concerns over heavy metals in Parent’s Choice baby food include, but are not limited to:

  • Product Testing: Some tests have suggested the possibility of heavy metals in various Parent’s Choice products.
  • FDA Involvement: The FDA continues to monitor and evaluate the safety of baby food products across all brands.
  • Consumer Awareness: Parents and guardians are increasingly vigilant about the quality and safety of the food they provide to their children.
  • Industry Standards: Ongoing efforts are to improve testing and ensure the highest safety standards across all baby food brands.
  • Transparency: Many companies, including Parent’s Choice, are working to enhance transparency and maintain open communication with consumers.

As a precautionary measure, parents may wish to stay informed about any developments or updates concerning Parent’s Choice baby food products.

Kroger Baby Formula: Potential Heavy Metal Concerns

Kroger, a well-known supermarket chain, has been part of the discussion surrounding heavy metals in baby formula.

While not currently facing lawsuits, the brand has faced some concerns over the potential presence of contaminants.

Potential concerns over heavy metals in Kroger baby formula include:

  • Safety Discussions: Reports have raised questions about the potential presence of heavy metals in baby formula across various brands, including Kroger.
  • Reputation Management: Kroger, like other brands, is working to maintain economic and consumer policy and ensure the safety of its products.
  • Legal Landscape: While not currently facing lawsuits, the baby food industry as a whole is under increased scrutiny.
  • Safety Enhancements: Kroger and other brands are continually working to improve safety protocols and maintain high standards in baby food production.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: The company has stated its commitment to compliance with safety guidelines and ongoing improvements.

Parents may choose to monitor any updates or developments concerning Kroger’s baby formula as a precautionary measure.

Sprouts Organic Foods: Discussions on Baby Food Safety

Sprouts Organic Foods, a notable name in the organic baby food market, has been part of the ongoing discussion about heavy metals in baby products.

While not currently named in lawsuits, the brand has faced some concerns.

Potential concerns over heavy metals in Sprouts Organic Foods baby products include:

  • Product Inquiries: Questions have been raised about the potential presence of heavy metals in organic baby food products, including those offered by Sprouts.
  • Consumer Reactions: Parents are increasingly aware of and concerned about the safety of the baby food products they purchase.
  • Industry Developments: While Sprouts is not currently facing lawsuits, the baby food industry is under increased scrutiny, and brands are working to address concerns.
  • Regulatory Landscape: There are ongoing calls for tighter regulation and oversight of baby food products, including organic options.
  • Brand Commitments: Sprouts, like other brands, has stated its dedication to quality control and providing safe products for infants.

As a precaution, parents may wish to stay informed about any updates or developments concerning Sprouts’ baby food products.

Plum Organics: Baby Food Safety Discussions

Plum Organics, a popular organic baby food brand, has been part of the ongoing discussion surrounding heavy metals in baby products.

While not currently facing lawsuits, concerns have been raised about the potential presence of contaminants.

Potential concerns over heavy metals in Plum Organics baby food include:

  • Product Evaluations: Questions have been raised about the potential presence of heavy metals in various organic baby food products, including those offered by Plum Organics.
  • Health Considerations: Parents are increasingly aware of the potential health implications of contaminants in baby food products.
  • Industry Landscape: While Plum Organics is not currently named in lawsuits, the baby food industry as a whole is facing increased scrutiny.
  • Brand Response: Plum Organics has emphasized its commitment to adhering to safety standards, while also acknowledging the need for ongoing improvements across the industry.

As a precautionary step, parents may choose to monitor any updates or developments concerning.

Advocates Demand Baby Food Safety Regulations From FDA

Several advocacy groups, including the Environmental Defense Fund and the American Academy of Pediatrics, have called on the FDA to establish clear standards and regulations for heavy metals in baby food products.

Advocates Demand Baby Food Safety Regulations From FDA

These groups argue that stricter regulations are necessary to protect the health and well-being of infants and young children who may be exposed to toxic and contaminated baby food.

These efforts aim to protect infants and young children from the potential risks associated with heavy metal exposure.

FDA Actions and Investigations on Heavy Metals in Baby Food

The FDA has taken some steps to address the issue of heavy metals in baby food, including conducting investigations and issuing guidance to manufacturers.

However, many advocates argue that these actions are insufficient and that more stringent regulations are needed to ensure the safety of infant formula and other baby food products.

The recent FDA actions related to heavy metals in baby food include:

  • Issuing a report on the levels of heavy metals found in popular baby food products
  • Providing guidance to manufacturers on reducing heavy metal content in their products
  • Conducting ongoing surveillance and testing of baby food products for heavy metal contamination

Despite these efforts, many families affected by toxic baby food believe that the FDA has not done enough to protect infants and young children from the risks associated with heavy metal exposure.

The FDA’s Role in Regulating Baby Food Safety

The FDA is responsible for regulating the safety and quality of baby food products.

However, critics argue that the agency’s current regulations and oversight are inadequate to protect infants and young children from the potential risks associated with heavy metal exposure.

Some of the key issues related to the FDA’s role in regulating baby food safety include:

  • Lack of specific limits for heavy metal content in baby food products
  • Insufficient testing and monitoring of baby food products for heavy metal contamination
  • Limited enforcement actions against manufacturers who violate safety standards
  • Inadequate public education and awareness about the risks associated with heavy metals in baby food

As the number of toxic baby food lawsuits continues to rise, pressure is mounting on the FDA to take more decisive action to protect infants and young children from the dangers of heavy metal exposure.

Advocacy Groups Push for Baby Food Safety Regulations

Activist groups continue to demand stricter regulations from the FDA to enhance the safety of baby foods.

These groups argue that existing regulations are insufficient to protect infants from potential harm.

Responsibilities of baby food safety regulations include:

  1. Infant Formula Act: This act mandates specific safety and nutritional requirements for infant formulas.
  2. Food Safety Modernization Act: Provides broader authority to the FDA to prevent contamination in baby food products.
  3. Labeling Requirements: Enforcing accurate and clear labeling guidelines to inform consumers about product contents.
  4. Inspection Programs: Regular inspections of manufacturing facilities to ensure adherence to safety standards.
  5. Testing Requirements: This includes testing for harmful substances not only in baby foods but also in related products like human milk fortifiers.

Advocacy groups push for these changes to ensure a safer food supply for infants, emphasizing the importance of stringent standards like those found in the Infant Formula Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are the toxic baby food lawsuits alleging?

    The toxic baby food lawsuits allege that exposure to toxic heavy metals in certain baby food brands can increase the risk of developing autism spectrum disorders and other neurodevelopmental issues in children.

    These product liability lawsuits claim that some major baby food companies failed to adequately test and regulate the levels of toxic substances in their products.

  • Which baby food companies are facing toxic baby food litigation?

    Several major baby food brands, including Gerber, Beech-Nut, Earth’s Best Organic, and Sprout Organic Foods, are facing scrutiny in the toxic baby food MDL (multidistrict litigation) over the presence of toxic metals in their products.

    These baby food producers are accused of consuming baby food contaminated with dangerous levels of heavy metals, which may contribute to autism and other developmental disorders in children.

  • What actions are being taken to address the issue of toxic heavy metal exposure in baby food?

    Advocacy groups like Healthy Babies Bright Futures are calling on the FDA to establish stricter regulations and safety standards for heavy metals in baby food products.

    The proposed Baby Food Safety Act aims to set limits on toxic metal exposure and require baby food manufacturers to test for and report lead levels in their products.

    Additionally, law firms are filing baby food class action lawsuits on behalf of affected families, seeking compensation for the alleged harm caused by consuming baby food contaminated with toxic heavy metals.

  • What types of baby food products are highest in autism-linked heavy metals?

    Certain baby food products, such as infant rice cereal, rice-based puff snacks, carrots, sweet potatoes, and fruit juices, have been found to contain particularly high levels of heavy metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

    These products are of particular concern in the ongoing toxic baby food litigation, as they may pose a greater risk for the development of autism spectrum disorders in children who consume them regularly.

  • What should I do if I suspect my child has been affected by toxic baby food?

    If you believe your child has developed autism spectrum disorders or other neurodevelopmental issues due to exposure to heavy metals in baby food, it’s important to seek legal assistance.

    Toxic baby food lawyers specialize in handling cases related to contamination in baby food products.

    These baby food lawyers can help you understand your legal rights, assess the strength of your case, and pursue compensation for any harm caused by toxic baby food.

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources