Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Paraquat is a powerful herbicide that has been shown to increase a person’s risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, in addition to other serious illnesses.
People who accidentally ingest paraquat often suffer severe internal injuries or death.
Paraquat has been banned in dozens of countries around the world, including European Union countries and the United Kingdom, due to its extremely toxic nature.
Paraquat has been widely used in the United States since the middle of the 20th century, and it is still commonly used today.
However, within the last decade, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has placed significant limitations on the use of paraquat in the United States.
Paraquat is now considered a “restricted use” herbicide.
To legally purchase paraquat in the United States, the purchaser must be a licensed applicator who has received special certification and training through the EPA.
As weeds have become more resistant to certain herbicides, such as Roundup (a potentially carcinogenic weed killer), commercial farmers and agricultural workers have increasingly turned to herbicides containing paraquat.
Paraquat has been manufactured by many different companies since the 1960s and has been marketed and sold under numerous brand names.
One of the most common is Gramoxone.
Companies that manufactured herbicides containing paraquat and failed to warn customers of the potential risks associated with their product (including Parkinson’s disease) may be held financially liable for the injuries that resulted from exposure to the chemical.
Paraquat is an ingredient in a wide range of herbicide products, some of which are still sold today in the United States and some of which are no longer on the market.
Some of the most common trade names associated with paraquat include:
The two biggest manufacturers of paraquat in the United States are Chevron and Syngenta, though many other companies manufacture the herbicide as well.
In fact, the vast majority of paraquat products sold today are manufactured by Chinese companies.
Some of the most prominent paraquat manufacturers in the U.S., aside from Syngenta and Chevron include Sinon USA, Innvictis Crop Care, Drexel, Adama Group, United Phosphorus, and Helm Agro.
The workers who are most at risk of being exposed to paraquat are licensed applicators who regularly mix, load, spray, or otherwise handle paraquat-containing products.
These include agricultural workers, farmers, tank fillers, crop dusters, and chemical mixers.
Still, even though paraquat is not available to the general public and can only be used by certified applicators, that doesn’t mean other people can’t be exposed to this toxic product.
For example, individuals who reside in agricultural areas where paraquat is regularly used can potentially be exposed to the herbicide.
People who live near cropland or commercial farms could be exposed to paraquat through contaminated water or spray drift.
Herbicides containing paraquat are used on many different kinds of crops, so it is found nearly everywhere.
In fact, according to research published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, exposure to paraquat within 500 meters of a home raised the residents’ risk of developing Parkinson’s disease by 75 percent.
There are numerous ways that a person can be exposed to herbicides containing paraquat.
Paraquat exposure often occurs via accidental ingestion.
Paraquat manufacturers have put a number of safeguards in place to help prevent ingestion incidents, such as adding a pungent odor to the substance and dyeing it blue so that it cannot be mistaken for a beverage.
Paraquat also contains an agent to induce vomiting if it is accidentally swallowed.
It is also unlawful to transfer a paraquat-containing herbicide from the container in which it is purchased to another container.
Unfortunately, people still sometimes accidentally consume paraquat.
The two other primary ways that paraquat exposure occurs are through skin contact and inhalation.
Unlike ingestion, skin contact is almost never fatal, but it is still possible to be poisoned through the skin if the paraquat concentration in an herbicide is particularly high and the contact is prolonged.
Paraquat can also enter the body through an open wound in the skin.
Inhalation is also dangerous, particularly to the lungs.
If paraquat enters the lungs, it has the potential to cause severe lung damage.
In recent years, individuals who have been exposed to paraquat and later developed serious health issues, including Parkinson’s disease, have begun bringing lawsuits against the manufacturers of various paraquat-containing herbicides, including Chevron and Syngenta.
Plaintiffs in paraquat lawsuits have alleged that the manufacturers of paraquat never disclosed the dangers of using the herbicide to the public.
TruLaw and their attorneys are investigating paraquat lawsuits today.
Use our instant Case Evaluation tool to learn if you are eligible to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer of paraquat today.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?