Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF Lymphoma Lawsuit, connections between AFFF firefighting foam and increased risk of Lymphoma, how to file an AFFF lawsuit, and much more.
This foam contains PFAS chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have been linked to lymphoma and other severe health concerns.
Although the use of AFFF has been phased out over time, many individuals have already experienced PFAS exposure through toxic firefighting foam.
AFFF-related lawsuits are now being filed nationwide by those who have suffered from such exposure.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with lymphoma or another serious health condition potentially tied to AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to pursue legal action.
You can use the chatbot on this page to determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Our team is available to answer any questions you may have about your case and guide you through the process.
If you believe your health has been affected by AFFF exposure, don’t hesitate to reach out for more information.
Research has found that individuals exposed to AFFF face an increased risk of developing lymphoma.
A study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives identified a higher incidence of lymphoma, prostate cancer, and other cancers following exposure to PFAS chemicals, a key component of AFFF foam.
The study focused on residents of a New Hampshire town who had been exposed to PFAS through contaminated water, revealing a troubling link between exposure and cancer diagnoses.
Chemical manufacturers and the U.S. Navy were aware of the toxic effects of PFAS for decades.
Despite early warnings, AFFF firefighting foam continued to be used until more recent efforts to phase it out.
In response to rising concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency urged the U.S. Department of Defense to issue an official warning regarding the health risks and environmental contamination associated with AFFF.
Workers in industries such as firefighting, military service, and chemical manufacturing are particularly vulnerable to these risks.
Key studies on the health impacts of PFAS include:
As highlighted earlier, exposure to AFFF has been linked to an increased risk of cancer and other severe health issues.
Cancers associated with PFAS exposure include:
Other health issues related to PFAS exposure include:
Plaintiffs allege that these companies knew about the dangers of PFAS chemicals in their products but did not properly disclose the risks.
Due to the growing number of lawsuits, an AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) has been established in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina to handle all AFFF firefighting foam cases.
This MDL consolidates the claims of individuals who have suffered health issues due to exposure to PFAS chemicals, including those who have developed cancer.
Those affected are pursuing compensation for a variety of damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses linked to PFAS exposure.
The widespread attention to AFFF lawsuits has also sparked discussions on regulatory oversight and potential changes in guidelines for the use and disposal of PFAS.
Several manufacturers and distributors of AFFF and related products are named as defendants in these lawsuits.
These companies face legal action for their role in exposing individuals to PFAS chemicals and the resulting health consequences.
AFFF manufacturers named in the AFFF MDL include:
At this time, no individual settlements have been reached in the AFFF litigation.
However, projections suggest that settlement amounts could range between $100,000 and $300,000, depending on the facts and circumstances of each case.
It is important to note that these estimates are based on previous mass tort cases and do not guarantee compensation in any specific lawsuit.
As the litigation progresses, we will provide updates on potential settlement amounts.
Be sure to check back regularly for the latest information.
Individuals exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and diagnosed with lymphoma or other health conditions may be eligible to file an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
Currently, all individual claims related to AFFF exposure are being consolidated into the MDL in South Carolina.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other related health issues, you may qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms work tirelessly to provide effected individuals with the legal assistance they need and hold these large companies accountable.
You can use the chatbot on this page to determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit today.
Building a strong case requires gathering relevant evidence to link AFFF exposure to the health issues suffered.
Potential evidence in an AFFF lawsuit may include:
In AFFF foam lawsuits, plaintiffs may seek both economic and non-economic damages for losses incurred as a result of their health problems.
Potential damages in AFFF lawsuits may include, but are not limited to:
Working with experienced AFFF firefighting foam lawyers can be vital for several reasons when pursuing an AFFF claim.
These reasons include, but are not limited to:
Attorneys who focus on AFFF and PFAS litigation have a deep knowledge of the science behind the chemicals, the legal regulations involved, and how these cases typically unfold.
Experienced attorneys are equipped to assess the strength of your claim by evaluating the evidence — such as medical records and exposure history — while also considering the potential liability of the manufacturers.
AFFF lawsuits often involve multiple defendants, from manufacturers to distributors.
Skilled attorneys can identify all responsible parties to ensure that every avenue for compensation is explored.
A successful AFFF claim relies on compelling evidence.
Attorneys experienced in AFFF litigation are familiar with collecting, organizing, and presenting the necessary evidence to build a strong case on your behalf.
As awareness grows about these risks, AFFF lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for endangering public health.
The firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms focus on helping individuals pursue compensation from the companies responsible for producing harmful firefighting foam.
Our goal is to ensure those affected have access to the legal guidance they need during this challenging time.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF and developed cancer or other related health issues, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit and pursue compensation.
Contact our team today for more information by using the chat on this page to instantly determine your eligibility to file an AFFF lawsuit.
If you have any questions about AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits or the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL), don’t hesitate to reach out.
We’re here to provide the support and answers you need.
There has not yet been a settlement reached in the AFFF firefighting foam litigation.
However, attorneys have provided projections for potential settlement amounts in AFFF cases.
AFFF lawsuit settlements may range from $40,000 to $300,000 or more, depending on the strength of the case and other individual factors.
These estimates are not guaranteed and are based on prior mass tort settlements related to similar cases involving cancer diagnoses.
To explore your options, contact the experienced AFFF attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms by using the chatbot on this page to instantly check if you qualify for an AFFF lawsuit.
No, there is not currently a class action lawsuit for AFFF.
Instead, individual claims are being handled through multidistrict litigation (MDL).
MDL is a federal legal procedure that consolidates cases with similar facts into one district court, streamlining the process and ensuring consistency across cases.
Unlike a class action, where plaintiffs share a collective settlement, in an MDL, each plaintiff retains their individual case and can receive compensation based on their unique injuries and circumstances.
Some law firms may refer to the AFFF MDL as a “Class Action MDL” or an “AFFF Class Action Lawsuit,” but this terminology is not accurate.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) contains PFAS chemicals, which have been associated with a variety of serious health risks — the most serious of which are various forms of cancer.
Several types of cancers have been linked to PFAS exposure, including but not limited to:
Other potential health issues related to AFFF exposure include, but are not limited to:
Local governments and water utilities have filed lawsuits against manufacturers of firefighting foam due to PFAS contamination in their water supplies.
This settlement aims to help remediate the pollution caused by firefighting foam in public water systems.
It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury claims — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?