Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss the AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit, harmful effects of exposure to AFFF firefighting foams, how to file an AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit, and much more.
The AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma lawsuit alleges manufacturers knew about these dangers but failed to adequately warn users or the public.
Factors leading up to AFFF litigation include:
If you’ve suffered from non-Hodgkin lymphoma after exposure to AFFF, you may be eligible to take legal action.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to find out if you qualify to file in the AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma lawsuit.
Concerns about the health impacts of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) have come to light, revealing a range of potential health risks from exposure to toxic chemicals and their associated adverse health effects.
AFFF contains per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are chemicals that can persist in the environment and in the human body, leading to serious health concerns.
A closer look at the chemical makeup of AFFF reveals why PFAS is a significant concern:
The persistence of PFAS in the environment and their accumulation in the human body over time exacerbate these health risks, underscoring the need for immediate action to limit exposure and mitigate potential impacts.
The widespread use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting and training exercises has raised serious health concerns.
Studies have linked exposure to AFFF, which contains per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), to an increased risk of developing several cancers.
The carcinogenic potential of AFFF has been a particular point of concern, with several types of cancer associated with its use:
The initiation of lawsuits has highlighted the grave concern over Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma following AFFF exposure.
Individuals who have been diagnosed with this type of cancer are currently pursuing compensation through the legal system.
Firefighting professionals are particularly vulnerable due to their exposure to AFFF during emergency response and training scenarios.
This occupational hazard is compounded by the toxic nature of PFAS, which accumulates in the body and may increase the risk of cancer and other serious health issues.
The increased risks faced by firefighters include, but are not limited to:
The information presented emphasizes the critical health concerns associated with AFFF and PFAS exposure, particularly among firefighters and other high-risk groups.
It highlights the urgent need for continued research, regulatory action, and protective measures to safeguard the health of those most at risk.
The litigation landscape regarding AFFF firefighting foam covers a multitude of lawsuits due to its alleged link to cancer, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma, among firefighters and those regularly exposed to the chemicals.
In response to the rising number of AFFF lawsuits, the judicial system has consolidated these cases into multidistrict litigation (MDL) to streamline the pretrial proceedings.
The AFFF Class Action MDL serves to handle claims that aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a fire suppressant foam used to extinguish class B fires, caused harmful contamination and illnesses.
Key points in this section cover:
Those pursuing the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit are understandably concerned about the potential value of settlements.
While no settlements for AFFF firefighting foam cases have been announced so far, attorneys have made preliminary estimates based on previous similar cases.
The projections for settlement amounts vary considerably:
If you have developed health issues, particularly cancer, as a result of exposure to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), it’s essential to understand your rights and the steps necessary to seek justice and compensation.
This guidance aims to provide a clear pathway for those affected to seek compensation for their AFFF-related health concerns.
If you believe your health issues, including cancer, are linked to AFFF exposure, initiating a lawsuit could be a critical step toward obtaining compensation.
Legal actions against manufacturers and entities responsible for AFFF distribution have been successful in highlighting the dangers associated with its use and securing settlements for the affected parties.
Consider the following FAQs to determine your eligibility:
These AFFF foam lawsuits highlight various issues related to the use and exposure to toxic chemicals in firefighting foam, outlining a pattern of health risks.
Upon confirming these baseline criteria, the following steps are recommended:
Individuals affected by AFFF can seek compensation for damages, which not only addresses their immediate and long-term health needs but also acknowledges the broader impact of their exposure.
Legal avenues are available to pursue claims for medical bills, lost wages, and other related expenses, providing a form of redress and support in coping with the consequences of exposure.
Compensation may cover a range of impacts including, but not limited to:
The widespread use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) for firefighting has raised significant environmental and health concerns, primarily due to the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These concerns have prompted extensive research and regulatory scrutiny to understand and mitigate the impact of AFFF on the environment and public health.
The persistence of PFAS in the environment and their resistance to degradation exacerbate the contamination challenges.
Efforts to assess and remediate affected sites have become critical to protecting ecosystems and public health.
Here’s how these substances affect the ecosystem:
Acknowledging the severity of AFFF contamination, regulatory agencies and industry stakeholders have initiated comprehensive measures aimed at controlling and eventually eliminating PFAS emissions into the environment.
Regulatory bodies have taken steps to address the issue:
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been used extensively for firefighting, particularly in fuel-based scenarios.
However, accountability for the harmful impacts of AFFF on health has become a subject of legal scrutiny, focusing on the manufacturers of these products.
The push for holding AFFF manufacturers accountable stems from the growing evidence of the health risks associated with PFAS exposure.
Companies like 3M and DuPont face significant legal challenges for their roles in producing and marketing AFFF without adequate disclosure of its potential to harm human health and the environment.
Nevertheless, litigation has revealed potential oversights and omissions:
As the legal battles unfold, the focus intensifies on the need for greater transparency and responsibility from AFFF manufacturers.
This includes not only providing clear warnings about the risks associated with their products but also taking proactive steps to mitigate the environmental and health impacts of PFAS.
Through litigation and regulatory measures, there is a growing demand for these companies to contribute to the solutions required to address the legacy of pollution and health issues they have helped create.
The scientific community has focused its efforts on understanding the implications of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) use, particularly in relation to its environmental and health impacts.
This focus stems from the recognition of PFAS chemicals as persistent environmental pollutants with potential long-term health consequences.
Advancements in analytical techniques and increased environmental awareness have led to a deeper investigation into the chemical properties and ecological footprint of AFFF.
These efforts aim to unravel the complexities associated with PFAS compounds, highlighting their persistence and potential pathways of human and ecological exposure.
A comprehensive overview of PFAS Chemicals in AFFF reveals concerning findings:
The exploration of PFAS exposure and its health impacts has significantly evolved, leveraging epidemiological and toxicological research to establish clearer associations between PFAS exposure and adverse health outcomes.
These studies underscore the urgency of addressing PFAS contamination and mitigating exposure risks to protect public health.
The link between PFAS exposure and significant health concerns has been increasingly documented through rigorous research:
To participate in an AFFF lawsuit, eligibility depends on factors like documented exposure to AFFF firefighting foam, medical diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or other forms of cancer linked to exposure, the time frame between exposure and diagnosis, and employment history.
AFFF lawsuits are based on the link between PFAS chemicals in AFFF foam and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, failure to warn of the risks, potential negligence or misconduct on the manufacturers’ part, and violations of consumer protection laws.
To choose the right legal representation for dangerous chemicals litigation, claimants should research firms with experience in similar environmental lawsuits, evaluate past client testimonies and case studies, and consider the firm’s resources and financial stability to handle complex litigation.
AFFF non-Hodgkin lymphoma lawsuits are ongoing with individual and class action cases filed across the country.
Multidistrict litigation proceedings are consolidating similar cases, and settlement negotiations are underway.
Firefighters are a major group of plaintiffs due to their high-risk exposure to AFFF during firefighting activities.
They are involved in personal injury and individual AFFF lawsuits, advocating for better protection against toxic exposure.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.
Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?