Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts and payouts will vary widely and are expected to range from $20,000 to $1,000,000 or more based on the nature and severity of your illness, the extent of your exposure, and many other individualized aspects of your claim.
AFFF cancer lawsuits emerged in response to scientific evidence linking PFAS in firefighting foam to cancer.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts and payouts, high-risk groups for AFFF chemical exposure, factors influencing AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts, and much more.
IMPORTANT: The estimates and figures provided on this page are in no way a guarantee of the settlement values for the AFFF Lawsuit.
These estimates are generalized estimations based on average healthcare expenses, personal damages, and ongoing care costs based on historic settlements from similar litigations.
For a more accurate idea of what these settlement values could look like for you, it’s best to contact an experienced AFFF lawyer to discuss the specific details of your case.
You can do so by using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly see if you are eligible to file an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
The claims made in the AFFF MDL identify major defendants such as 3M Co., DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Products, and other manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) and its components.
The figures and estimates provided on this page are in no way a guarantee of the settlement values for the AFFF Lawsuit.
These estimates are generalized estimations based on average healthcare expenses, personal damages, and ongoing care costs based on historic settlements from similar litigations.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL-2873 is constantly evolving, and we anticipate variability in potential case values as the lawsuit progresses.
While settlements are projected to vary, legal experts can estimate ranges based on previous rulings in similar chemical exposure litigations:
Legal experts providing estimates of the AFFF settlements may also consider pursuing punitive damages if manufacturers are found to have acted recklessly by not disclosing the risks of exposure to these harmful chemicals.
These figures are not guaranteed and should not be considered definitive expectations for your case.
We aim to provide a general idea of what settlement ranges could look like.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
Certain professions face a significantly higher risk of occupational exposure to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam that contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals.” PFAS are linked to serious health conditions, including cancers, liver and kidney damage, and reproductive issues.
AFFF is commonly used in firefighting operations, particularly for high-temperature fuel fires.
Due to the persistent nature of PFAS, individuals in certain professions are more likely to experience harmful levels of exposure over time, especially without proper safety measures.
Professionals who regularly work with AFFF are at higher risk of PFAS exposure.
These groups often encounter the foam in training exercises, active firefighting, and equipment maintenance, which increases their likelihood of absorbing PFAS through skin contact, inhalation, and contamination of local water supplies.
Individuals in these professions who have been exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed cancer may have legal claims against the manufacturers responsible for their exposure.
Jobs with frequent AFFF exposure include:
These professions are particularly vulnerable to PFAS exposure from AFFF, making safety protocols essential to mitigate health risks.
For professionals regularly handling or exposed to AFFF, following specific safety guidelines can help minimize PFAS exposure and protect long-term health.
Employers and workers should implement and adhere to these safety practices to reduce the potential hazards associated with firefighting foam.
Key safety guidelines for high-risk professionals include:
Adhering to these guidelines can help reduce the risks associated with repeated AFFF exposure, promoting the safety and well-being of professionals in high-risk roles.
Employers and industry bodies should also stay updated on PFAS-free alternatives to further safeguard employees from the harmful effects of PFAS in firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
AFFF litigation may be influenced by several factors, such as the severity of health impacts, the cost of medical treatment, and the extent of PFAS exposure.
The ongoing legal processes and expected payout tiers are crucial, with settlements often reflecting the severity of the plaintiffs’ cases.
Plaintiffs seek compensation for damages incurred due to AFFF-related health issues, such as cancer, organ damage, and related medical expenses.
The type and severity of health issues experienced due to AFFF exposure are primary factors in calculating settlement amounts and determining eligibility for financial compensation.
Plaintiffs with serious, life-threatening conditions, such as kidney, liver, or testicular cancer, may receive higher compensation than those with non-cancerous conditions, as the physical, emotional, and financial burdens are typically more significant.
Key considerations related to health impacts and medical costs include:
By documenting these aspects of their health impact, plaintiffs can present a stronger case for fair compensation that fully addresses the effects of AFFF exposure on their lives.
The length and frequency of AFFF exposure significantly influence settlement amounts, as prolonged exposure to PFAS compounds raises the risk of adverse health outcomes.
In AFFF firefighting foam cases, plaintiffs, including military personnel and civilians near contaminated sites, are eligible to file lawsuits.
Experienced attorneys play an important role in pursuing compensation for serious health issues linked to AFFF exposure.
Plaintiffs with extended or high-intensity exposure may be able to demonstrate a clear link between their health conditions and AFFF, which strengthens their claim and may result in higher compensation.
Factors related to exposure duration and extent include:
Settlement amounts in AFFF lawsuits are highly individualized, as they depend on each plaintiff’s unique exposure history and health impact.
Legal professionals specializing in chemical exposure litigation can help plaintiffs understand these factors, maximize compensation, and build a case that accurately reflects the harm caused by AFFF exposure.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) lawsuits involve claims that exposure to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam causes severe health complications, including cancers and organ damage.
Firefighting foam cancer lawsuits are part of ongoing litigation, with eligibility criteria focusing on individuals affected by AFFF foam exposure, such as military personnel and residents near contaminated sites.
Settlement amounts in AFFF lawsuits are often structured in tiers, with compensation varying based on the severity of health conditions, documented exposure, and the impact of the injuries on the plaintiff’s life.
Settlement tiers help categorize cases, ensuring that compensation aligns with the degree of harm suffered.
Settlement tiers in firefighting foam lawsuits offer a general framework for evaluating compensation based on case specifics.
These lawsuits discuss various aspects of legal actions related to AFFF exposure, including the types of cases with higher probabilities of success, expected settlement amounts, and the complexity of determining liability among numerous manufacturers.
While actual amounts vary by individual case, the following tiers provide insight into estimated settlement ranges:
These settlement tiers serve as guidelines, with actual payouts depending on the specifics of each plaintiff’s exposure, medical expenses, and long-term health outlook.
Working with experienced attorneys ensures plaintiffs’ cases are accurately evaluated and positioned to maximize compensation.
Extensive research has linked PFAS chemicals in AFFF to several types of cancer and other serious health conditions.
Studies indicate that PFAS compounds, known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and human body, may accumulate over time and disrupt cellular processes, leading to cancerous growth.
The scientific findings around AFFF and PFAS exposure support the claims in many lawsuits, as they highlight significant health risks posed by these chemicals.
The ongoing AFFF firefighting foam MDL (multi-district litigation) process provides insights into the legal battles over these toxic chemicals, with various cancer types linked to AFFF exposure impacting lawsuit settlement amounts.
Major manufacturers are involved, and bellwether trials are anticipated.
Key findings from research on PFAS and cancer include:
This research substantiates many of the claims in AFFF lawsuits, providing a foundation for understanding the serious health risks associated with PFAS exposure and supporting plaintiffs’ demands for compensation.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
Calculating settlement amounts in AFFF lawsuits involves a thorough evaluation of each plaintiff’s individual circumstances, including health impact, medical costs, and duration of PFAS exposure.
Compensation aims to cover both economic and non-economic losses, addressing the financial and personal toll of health conditions related to AFFF exposure.
Individuals affected by AFFF firefighting foam exposure are encouraged to file an AFFF lawsuit to seek compensation for related health issues, particularly cancer, and to consult with experienced lawyers for personalized guidance.
For plaintiffs affected by cancers and other severe illnesses linked to PFAS, settlement amounts reflect the severity and persistence of health issues as well as long-term care needs.
Several key criteria are used to assess and calculate AFFF settlement amounts, ensuring that compensation aligns with each plaintiff’s specific losses and suffering.
These criteria help standardize settlement values while considering individual variations in health impacts.
Primary criteria for calculating AFFF settlement amounts include:
These criteria provide a structured approach to determining AFFF settlement amounts, helping ensure that plaintiffs receive compensation that accurately reflects their specific losses.
Collecting detailed medical records and treatment costs is crucial for building a strong AFFF claim and supporting compensation calculations.
Medical documentation substantiates the health impacts of PFAS exposure and provides an itemized view of treatment-related expenses, strengthening the case for adequate compensation.
Key documentation to collect includes:
By working closely with an experienced legal team to gather these records, plaintiffs can strengthen their case, ensuring that all aspects of their injuries and losses are accounted for in settlement calculations.
This comprehensive documentation is vital for securing fair compensation that addresses the full impact of AFFF exposure on each plaintiff’s life.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
AFFF lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to the toxic chemicals found in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the AFFF lawsuit settlement.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your AFFF lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify to join others in filing a claim in the AFFF MDL today.
The expected settlement amounts for AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits can vary significantly based on several factors, including the severity of health conditions, the extent of exposure, and individual circumstances.
Generally, settlement amounts range from $20,000 for moderate claims to over $1,000,000 for severe or fatal claims.
IMPORTANT: These estimates are in no way a guarantee of the settlement values for the AFFF Lawsuit.
These estimates are generalized estimations based on average healthcare expenses, personal damages, and ongoing care costs based on historic settlements from similar litigations.
For a more accurate idea of what these settlement values could look like for you, it’s best to contact an experienced AFFF lawyer to discuss the specific details of your case.
You can do so by using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly see if you are eligible to file an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
High-risk professionals include firefighters, military personnel, airport workers, and chemical plant workers who regularly handle or are exposed to AFFF foam.
These individuals face increased health risks due to frequent exposure through training exercises, active firefighting, and equipment maintenance.
Research has strongly linked PFAS chemicals in AFFF to several types of cancer, including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and pancreatic cancer.
Studies have also shown connections to thyroid disorders and liver damage from prolonged exposure to these “forever chemicals.”
Settlement amounts are calculated based on factors including the severity of health conditions, documented medical expenses, duration of exposure, and impact on quality of life.
The calculation also considers lost wages, pain and suffering, and potential future medical needs.
Claimants need comprehensive medical records documenting their diagnosis, treatment costs, and ongoing care requirements related to PFAS exposure.
Additional documentation should include employment records, exposure history, and evidence of pain and suffering.
Individuals who were exposed to AFFF and subsequently diagnosed with cancer or other serious health conditions may be eligible to file a claim.
This includes military personnel, firefighters, and civilians living near contaminated sites who can demonstrate exposure to PFAS chemicals.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?