Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit, average Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit settlements and payout amounts, complications and injuries linked to Vaginal Mesh problems, and much more.
If you or a loved one has been injured by complications related to vaginal mesh or pelvic mesh, it is still possible to file a product liability lawsuit against the implant manufacturer.
The most frequently reported injuries linked to Vaginal Mesh include, but are not limited to:
The potential settlement value of the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit is estimated to range from 150,000 to 450,000, depending on a variety of factors.
If you’ve experienced vaginal mesh complications, injuries, or adverse effects from a transvaginal mesh implant- you may be eligible to file for the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We’re here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.
Vaginal mesh, also known as transvaginal mesh or surgical mesh, is a net-like implant used in female pelvic reconstructive surgery to support weakened vaginal walls and treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
The primary function of vaginal mesh is to manage symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
SUI is a condition that results in involuntary urine leakage during physical activities or even when sneezing or coughing.
On the other hand, POP occurs when weakened vaginal walls fail to support pelvic organs like the uterus, bladder, and rectum.
The mesh acts as a scaffolding to hold these organs in their correct positions, thereby improving comfort and functionality.
Various materials are used in the construction of surgical mesh devices for treating pelvic floor disorders.
These treatments include:
The surgical mesh is implanted through a small incision made in the vaginal wall.
This incision allows surgeons to place the mesh around weakened or damaged tissue, providing extra support for prolapsed organs.
The commonly used mesh for this purpose is the Type I monofilament, large-pore polypropylene mesh. Once implanted, the mesh serves as a reinforcement structure, helping to maintain the appropriate positioning of pelvic organs.
The vaginal mesh has become a subject of intense debate.
Concerns have also been raised linking the surgical mesh devices to autoimmune problems – escalating debates on the safety of these synthetic meshes used in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
The complications associated with vaginal mesh have led to a surge in lawsuits and have sparked significant concern within the medical community.
Some of the reported issues include:
Recent studies have suggested a link between vaginal mesh implants and autoimmune disorders such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.
While not yet conclusively proven, this relationship has been noted by researchers worldwide and adds an additional layer of complexity to the ongoing debate about the safety of these devices.
The challenge lies with doctors correctly identifying this correlation since symptoms often mimic those associated with other health conditions.
Accurate statistics on the total number of women who have received mesh implants are difficult to obtain.
However, a recent survey indicated that 59% of women respondents reported experiencing problems with their pelvic mesh implant.
This suggests that a significant number of women have undergone such procedures and have faced complications, leading to legal actions like vaginal mesh lawsuits and settlements reaching up to $188.7 million.
The difference between Transvaginal Mesh and Vaginal Mesh depends on the brands, their specific uses, and how they impact women undergoing these procedures.
Some of the notable manufacturers include:
Stress urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition affecting many women, particularly post-childbirth or during menopause.
In such cases, transvaginal mesh implants are often recommended.
These implants provide crucial support to weakened pelvic muscles, enabling them to withstand increased bladder pressure without leaking urine.
The durability and tissue-integration capabilities of these materials make them effective solutions for patients affected by SUI.
Various complications have been linked to vaginal mesh implants, causing widespread distress among women who have undergone these procedures for conditions like stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.
Mesh erosion is a severe issue that occurs when the surgical mesh protrudes through the surgical incision into the vaginal canal.
This complication can lead to:
In extreme cases, mesh erosion can extend to other organs like the bladder, rectum, or bowel, necessitating immediate medical intervention.
Pain is a common adverse effect, often linked to mesh erosion. It can manifest in various forms, such as:
The persistence of these symptoms can have life-changing implications, affecting the quality of life severely.
Infections occur in 0-8% of all cases and can be triggered by mesh exposure.
Symptoms to watch for include:
Immediate medical attention is crucial for those experiencing suspected infection post-implantation.
Organ perforation is a life-threatening complication where the mesh punctures or tears through organ walls.
This condition often requires urgent medical intervention and additional surgeries for mesh removal or repair.
Symptoms may include:
Urinary issues are common and can range from discomfort and frequent urination to an inability to pass urine. The FDA has noted that these complications are not rare, raising concerns about the safety of these devices.
Mesh erosion can lead to scarring and contraction of the vaginal tissue, causing:
These complications have led many to seek legal recourse against manufacturers.
The complications associated with vaginal mesh implants underscore the need for patients to thoroughly evaluate all surgical risks.
If you’ve experienced complications from a transvaginal mesh implant, you may be eligible for legal recourse.
Contact the experienced Transvaginal Mesh Attorneys at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We’re here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.
Women who have experienced complications from vaginal mesh implants have legal avenues available to seek justice.
This process can involve claims against medical professionals, as well as the manufacturers of these surgical mesh devices.
Various parties involved in the production and distribution of transvaginal mesh can be held accountable for complications.
Here’s a list of some potential defendants:
The recent settlements and verdicts in vaginal mesh lawsuits underscore the severe consequences of complications arising from these medical devices.
Women nationwide have bravely come forward as plaintiffs, shedding light on the health risks associated with surgical procedures involving transvaginal meshes, polypropylene mesh, and other surgical mesh devices.
The financial impact on victims is substantial, as evidenced by the variability in payout amounts:
These figures not only highlight the gravity of the complications but also indicate the courts’ willingness to award significant compensation to victims.
The emotional toll is equally significant.
Many women have publicly shared their experiences, while some have chosen to remain anonymous.
These testimonials provide a harrowing glimpse into the lives of those affected by vaginal mesh complications.
If you or a loved one has suffered from complications related to vaginal mesh implants, consult with the experienced Vaginal Mesh Lawyers at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We are committed to helping you secure the compensation you rightfully deserve.
The complications associated with transvaginal mesh have led many to seek alternative treatments for conditions like stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse.
Surgery is not the only route for treating SUI.
Here are some non-surgical options:
Transvaginal mesh is not the only surgical option for treating pelvic organ prolapse.
Here are some alternatives:
As the lawsuits and complications surrounding vaginal mesh continue to unfold, more women are seeking justice and reparation.
It’s important for patients considering these implants to stay informed and understand their legal rights.
If you’ve experienced complications from a transvaginal mesh implant, you may be eligible for legal recourse.
Contact the experienced Transvaginal Mesh Attorneys at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We’re here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.
The most common Vaginal Mesh problems are related to the mesh’s interaction with the body post-surgery.
These complications include:
Yes, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides detailed information about mesh slings, specifically their use in the repair of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).
The use of mesh slings in transvaginal SUI repair introduces a risk not present in traditional non-mesh surgery for SUI repair.
Erosion of mesh slings through the vagina is the most commonly reported mesh-specific complication from surgeries.
The FDA emphasizes that these complications associated with the use of surgical mesh slings are not linked to a single brand of mesh.
Vaginal mesh exposure can be treated using a variety of methods, often chosen based on the specifics of the patient’s case.
One common approach is conservative management, which may involve observation alone, the usage of topical estrogens or antiseptics, and systemic or topical antibiotics.
If conservative management fails or is deemed inappropriate due to the severity of the case, surgical options may be pursued.
According to a study reported by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), mesh exposure was reported in 2.7–4.4% of patients, voiding dysfunction requiring surgery in up to 3%, urinary tract infections (UTIs) in 10.7–17.1%, and neurological symptoms in 5.4–9.7%.
It was found that 42% of patients experienced at least one adverse event and 12% had at least one serious adverse event.
If you’ve experienced complications from a transvaginal mesh implant, you may be eligible for legal recourse.
Contact TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
No, it is not always necessary to have another operation after experiencing complications with an initial procedure using surgical meshes.
Common complications like the tissue covering the mesh wearing away, causing the mesh to poke through the skin, can sometimes be managed without additional surgery.
However, severe complications, such as infections or the mesh causing the tissue around it to tighten, may necessitate further surgical intervention.
It’s crucial to discuss any symptoms or concerns with your healthcare provider to determine the appropriate course of action.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?