Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: How to file a Transvaginal mesh lawsuit?
Answer: The process of filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit typically involves gathering medical documentation, providing a detailed history of your symptoms and treatments, and working with your legal team to pursue compensation for damages such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, transvaginal mesh complications reported, investigate transvaginal mesh failure rates, and much more.
Legal specialists across the country continue to seek compensation for injury claims connected to transvaginal mesh complications.
More than 100,000 women have been awarded compensation through lawsuits holding manufacturers accountable after receiving defective implants.
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits allow injured women the opportunity to seek compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and other damages related to defective medical devices.
If you or a loved one has experienced transvaginal mesh complications, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Our Transvaginal Mesh attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients throughout the process of filing a product liability lawsuit.
With proven success in handling similar cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, provides personalized guidance and advocacy to clients affected by transvaginal mesh complications.
Our team combines extensive legal expertise with genuine care for each client’s unique situation.
We understand the physical and emotional challenges that transvaginal mesh complications bring to your life, which is why we focus on simplifying the legal process of seeking the compensation you deserve.
Meet our lead Transvaginal Mesh attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you won’t face any upfront costs for your legal representation.
Our fee is only collected if we are successful in securing compensation on your behalf.
This arrangement not only removes the financial risk of pursuing your case, it allows us to focus our resources on achieving a positive outcome in your case by:
Our investment in representing you demonstrates our unwavering commitment to seeking the compensation you deserve.
If you or a loved one experienced complications from transvaginal mesh, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Transvaginal mesh complications have affected thousands of women across the United States, leading to numerous lawsuits against medical device manufacturers.
These surgical mesh implants, originally designed to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), have been associated with severe complications that can significantly impact quality of life.
The impact of transvaginal mesh complications extends far beyond physical symptoms, affecting every aspect of women’s daily lives.
Many survivors have courageously shared their experiences to help others understand the profound changes they’ve endured.
Common experiences reported by women affected by mesh complications include:
These personal accounts highlight the long-lasting impact of mesh complications and underscore the importance of legal advocacy for affected individuals.
The pursuit of compensation through transvaginal mesh lawsuits aims to address both tangible and intangible damages suffered by affected women.
Types of damages commonly sought in transvaginal mesh cases:
The compensation process involves careful documentation of all damages and working with experienced attorneys who understand the complexities of medical device litigation.
Collecting all relevant medical records is an important step in filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.
These records provide a comprehensive view of the medical history and complications that have arisen due to using the mesh.
Proper documentation is essential as it serves as evidence and strengthens the claims made in the lawsuit.
Without these records, validating the issues related to the surgical procedure and ongoing complications becomes challenging.
Surgical records are vital when preparing to file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit as they include detailed information about the type of device implanted.
Typically, surgical records will also show the implant/device log, which provides precise details necessary for establishing the connection between the device and the complications experienced.
Accurate identification of the device is critical for the success of such lawsuits as it directly links the medical issues to a specific cause. Ensuring these records are complete and available before filing is fundamental.
Obtaining medical records involves identifying certain key documents, such as:
Having access to the surgical records that show device information is pivotal in constructing a strong case.
It provides the necessary context and foundation to support claims of defect or negligence against manufacturers.
Without these records, proving that a specific device was used and that it caused harm could become significantly more challenging.
Proper documentation of complications is imperative in pursuing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Complications such as chronic pain, mesh erosion, and infections must be detailed in the medical records to support the legal claims.
This documentation process not only illustrates the severity of the issues but also helps demonstrate the direct link between the implantation and the resulting health problems.
The absence of clear documentation can weaken the case, making it difficult to prove the extent of harm caused by the mesh implantation.
Thorough documentation of complications should cover several aspects, including but not limited to:
Documenting complications thoroughly establishes the basis for compensation claims, highlighting how the device has impacted the individual’s health and lifestyle.
By ensuring that every aspect of the complication is recorded, the plaintiff strengthens their position against the manufacturers.
Effective documentation aids in showcasing the progression and persistency of the health issues, which are often essential in achieving favorable outcomes in these lawsuits.
Transvaginal mesh complications have affected thousands of women across the United States, leading to serious physical and emotional trauma.
The surgical mesh, initially marketed as a solution for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), has been associated with severe complications that have prompted FDA warnings and resulted in billions of dollars in settlements.
The impact of transvaginal mesh complications extends far beyond physical symptoms, affecting every aspect of women’s daily lives.
Their experiences highlight the devastating consequences of mesh failure and the importance of legal recourse.
Women who have experienced transvaginal mesh complications commonly report the following life-altering changes:
The profound impact of these complications has led many women to seek both medical intervention and legal assistance to address their suffering.
The investigation of vaginal mesh implantshas revealed alarming patterns of complications and led to significant regulatory actions.
In April 2019, the FDA ordered all manufacturers to stop selling and distributing transvaginal mesh products for pelvic organ prolapse, citing failure to demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
The evolution of FDA oversight regarding transvaginal mesh has been shaped by mounting clinical evidence and adverse event reports.
Key findings from clinical studies and FDA investigations reveal:
These findings have been instrumental in supporting legal claims and driving regulatory changes to protect patient safety.
These specific pelvic mesh products involved in complications helps patients and attorneys build stronger cases. Multiple manufacturers have faced litigation over defective mesh products.
Major manufacturers and their problematic mesh products include:
Identifying these specific products and their documented transvaginal mesh implant complications has strengthened the legal position of affected women seeking compensation through the courts.
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were injured by these defective medical devices.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the transvaginal mesh litigation.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your transvaginal mesh lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered mesh erosion, organ perforation, or other complications after being implanted with a transvaginal mesh device, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the transvaginal mesh litigation today.
The most common transvaginal mesh complications include chronic pelvic pain, painful intercourse, mesh erosion, and organ perforation.
These complications often require multiple surgeries and can significantly impact a woman’s quality of life.
The FDA issued multiple safety warnings between 2008 and 2016 before ultimately ordering manufacturers to stop selling transvaginal mesh products for pelvic organ prolapse in 2019.
The agency reclassified these devices as Class III high-risk devices due to safety concerns and lack of effectiveness evidence.
Complete medical records, including surgical reports, implant/device logs, and detailed documentation of complications are typically required to file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.
These records help establish the connection between the specific device and the resulting complications.
Compensation claims typically cover medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. Both past and future damages are considered when determining compensation amounts in transvaginal mesh cases.
Major manufacturers including Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, and American Medical Systems have faced significant litigation over defective mesh products.
These companies have paid hundreds of millions in settlements to affected women.
Mesh complications can severely impact mobility, prevent regular employment, and cause chronic pain during basic activities.
Many women experience significant changes in their intimate relationships and mental health, often requiring ongoing medical and psychological support.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?