Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What is Transvaginal Mesh?
Answer: Transvaginal mesh is primarily used to treat conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women. These conditions can occur due to weakened or damaged pelvic organs, often as a result of childbirth, surgery, or aging.
Here are some key points about its use:
Despite its benefits, the use of transvaginal mesh has become controversial due to reports of complications and adverse effects.
On this page, we’ll provide an in depth answer to “what is Transvaginal Mesh?”, discuss complications from Transvaginal Mesh implants, review the FDA’s ban on Transvaginal Mesh, introduce the alternatives to Transvaginal Mesh surgical procedures, and much more.
Transvaginal mesh is a synthetic net-like substance that is inserted through an incision in the vaginal wall to provide extra support to weakened or damaged internal tissue used in the treatment of two specific medical conditions: Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).
While transvaginal mesh can provide relief, it has been associated with a number of complications.
These include excruciating pain, infection, erosion of the mesh into the vagina, and organ perforation.
The transvaginal mesh is a synthetic or biological material utilized in reconstructive pelvic surgeries to provide support for weakened or damaged tissues, available in various types and serving distinct purposes.
Transvaginal mesh stands as a medical device, often used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women.
Its primary function involves providing additional support to weakened or damaged tissues around the bladder, rectum, and uterus.
The use of this surgical mesh intends to address significant health concerns like discomfort or embarrassment caused by these conditions.
However, it’s also crucial to note that transvaginal permanent mesh is linked with lower instances of repeat surgery compared to native tissue repair, even though its usage corresponds with higher rates of potential complications.
Three primary types of transvaginal mesh exist.
Polypropylene mesh, the most frequently used type, is a synthetic option featuring large pores and monofilament construction which allows tissue growth through its spaces.
Absorbable or biological mesh, made from animal tissues such as cowhide or pigskin, is another option – it gradually dissolves and encourages new tissue growth in patients.
Lastly, composite meshes are available; these hybrids boast polypropylene layers combined with absorbable coating that prevents exposure to surrounding organs.
Each type suit different needs based on the patient’s condition and surgeon’s preference.
Transvaginal mesh is primarily utilized in surgeries for treating conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence among women.
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery is an operation to address a condition where one or more pelvic organs descend into the vagina.
This medical issue often affects women after childbirth, as pregnancy and delivery can weaken the muscles that support these organs.
Surgeons have historically used transvaginal mesh in this procedure to provide extra support.
The mesh, typically made of synthetic plastic, serves as a sturdy scaffold for your body’s tissues to grow around.
However, recent studies indicate higher rates of complications with this surgical approach versus others not involving transvaginal mesh.
As such concerns grow, surgeons are now exploring alternative treatments, both surgical and non-surgical for pelvic organ prolapse.
Stress urinary incontinence surgery is a procedure primarily used when non-surgical treatment options fail to improve this condition.
Surgeons often utilize transvaginal mesh for support during the operation, including the commonly performed midurethral sling procedure.
The goal of these surgical interventions is to provide an effective and long-term solution for women experiencing stress urinary incontinence—a common issue characterized by involuntary leakage of urine during physical activities such as coughing or sneezing.
However, it’s essential to know that permanent mesh implementation may come with higher rates of de novo stress incontinence and serious complications reported by the FDA, such as erosion and bladder sling issues.
The ban on transvaginal mesh by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) effectively halted its use in repairs of pelvic organ prolapse, significantly impacting women’s healthcare options.
In 2019, the FDA issued a ban on transvaginal mesh for treating pelvic organ prolapse and ordered companies to stop selling these products.
This action was necessary due to growing concerns about women’s health risks associated with its use.
Transvaginal mesh used in surgeries for stress urinary incontinence and other types of pelvic surgery were not affected by this ban.
The decision arrived after careful scrutiny and research into the complications arising from the usage of transvaginal mesh implants for POP repairs.
Instead of providing relief, many women experienced pain, discomfort, infections or even erosion issues leading to follow-up procedures.
The FDA stood firm in taking this decisive step focusing on safeguarding women’s health over any other considerations.
The FDA’s ban on transvaginal mesh has significant implications.
Women seeking treatment for conditions like pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence will need to explore other options.
Doctors cannot propose this solution anymore, given the health risks associated with it.
Countries worldwide have taken similar steps, impacting women’s healthcare choices globally.
Though it may seem concerning initially, safe surgical alternatives are available.
For instance, the FDA recommends transabdominal surgical mesh as a viable alternative for treating pelvic organ prolapse.
These changes aim to ensure women’s safety and prevent complications arising from using transvaginal mesh.
This section will explore the various complications that arise from transvaginal mesh implants, including severe pain and discomfort, infections, and the troublesome erosion of the mesh.
Transvaginal mesh implants have been associated with significant pain and discomfort for some women.
These complications can occur during everyday activities or even at rest, affecting quality of life.
It is not uncommon to feel a persistent ache in the lower abdomen or pelvic area.
Many women also report intimate troubles due to this medical device.
The implant can induce painful sexual intercourse, known in medical terms as dyspareunia.
This results from the mesh eroding into surrounding tissues, causing irritation and inflammation.
In severe cases, you may find it difficult to sit comfortably for extended periods or engage in physical activities without distress.
Infection stands as a common complication linked to transvaginal mesh implants.
After undergoing an operation, signs of infection may surface, like severe pain and bleeding.
A medical professional will confirm these symptoms and execute culture tests for proper diagnosis.
Occasionally, the mesh device becomes contaminated during surgery leading to chronic infections that persist over time.
These chronic infections can escalate complications including organ perforation – a serious condition where holes form in nearby organs such as the bladder or bowels.
Thus, it is critical to monitor your condition closely after receiving transvaginal mesh implants and report any irregularities promptly for timely treatment.
Erosion of mesh stands as a common issue with transvaginal mesh implants.
This complication occurs when the mesh begins to protrude through the surgical incision and into the vaginal canal.
Various symptoms can indicate its occurrence, including irregular vaginal bleeding or discharge, pelvic pain, discomfort during sex, or bladder and bowel problems.
In rare cases, this condition may even lead to serious complications if the mesh erodes into organs like the bladder, rectum or bowel.
Treatment is essential once signs are identified; this typically involves further medical management from healthcare professionals.
This section will explore other treatment options for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, discussing both non-surgical methods and alternative surgical procedures that can be considered as safer alternatives to transvaginal mesh.
Exploring non-surgical treatments provide options for those who prefer to avoid surgery.
Let’s discuss some non-surgical treatments:
Pelvic floor disorders can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life, often requiring a comprehensive treatment approach.
The non-surgical treatments mentioned above are particularly effective ways to treat pelvic floor disorders, offering patients options that can be tailored to their specific needs.
Apart from transvaginal mesh, several other surgical options exist for treating pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
These surgical options may include, but are not limited to:
Mesh surgery and transvaginal repair is a specialized surgical procedure that offer targeted solutions to treat urinary incontinence.
These surgical options complement the range of treatments available, providing a comprehensive approach that can be customized to meet individual patient needs
Explore the rising number of lawsuits relating to transvaginal mesh complications, understand why it’s crucial to contact a knowledgeable attorney, and learn about your legal rights concerning these troubling medical cases.
Thousands of women have pursued legal action against the makers of transvaginal mesh.
Many accuse these companies of negligence, design flaws, and warranty breaches.
The concerned manufacturers have settled numerous lawsuits, tallying over $8 billion in personal injury settlements.
Notably, the FDA issued a safety alert in 2011 highlighting serious complications associated with surgical mesh intended for pelvic organ prolapse repair are not rare occurrences.
These severe adverse events can drastically alter lives and cause persistent pain among recipients.
Thus far, this wave of litigation has seen tens of thousands of cases filed by women who received transvaginal mesh implants suffering from chronic complications.
Engaging an attorney in transvaginal mesh cases can help you navigate the complexities of these specific lawsuits.
These legal professionals are well-versed in medical terminology, understand procedural nuances, and have extensive knowledge about the FDA regulations surrounding mesh implants.
They’re here to empower you by clearly outlining your rights and exploring all available options for compensation.
Communication with corporations or their insurance companies dealing with such claims can be daunting without a lawyer’s assistance.
An adept attorney ensures that your voice gets heard while they advocate on your behalf during negotiations or court proceedings.
It is crucial to put yourself in capable hands if you choose to pursue litigation following complications from a transvaginal mesh implant.
Receiving legal assistance can change the outcome of your transvaginal mesh complications significantly.
Mesh implants, as noted, result in serious medical issues such as erosion through the vaginal mucosa.
Recovering needs expertise and financial support that lawsuits offer.
Vaginal Mesh Attorneys understand and navigate these complex requirements better than victims alone could manage.
They can help you file claims for compensation to handle health impacts caused by failed mesh implants, including, but not limited to:
Exploring this option is not just about seeking justice but also crucial for your health recovery plan.
If you’re experiencing complications with your transvaginal mesh implant, don’t suffer in silence.
Let the experienced team at TruLaw provide the guidance and support you need.
Reach out to us today for a free consultation — we’re ready to help you navigate through this challenging time.
Transvaginal mesh is primarily used to treat conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women.
These conditions can occur due to weakened or damaged pelvic organs, often as a result of childbirth, surgery, or aging.
Here are some important points about transvaginal mesh:
Transvaginal mesh is a synthetic net-like substance that provides extra support to repair weakened or damaged internal tissue.
It is implanted in a surgical procedure via the vagina and can also be known as transvaginal tape, sling, ribbon, or hammock.
The mesh is used to reinforce and support the vaginal wall, urethra, or bladder neck.
Here are some key points about how transvaginal mesh works:
Yes, certain factors can increase the risk of pain after Transvaginal Mesh surgery.
These include younger age, post-operative pain, fibromyalgia, and poor physical health.
Key points to note about the risk factors of using transvaginal mesh include, but are not limited to:
Yes, the Transvaginal Mesh can be removed if complications arise.
However, it’s important to note that the removal process, also known as revision surgery, may not always result in the complete removal of the mesh.
Here are some key points to consider when discussing Transvaginal Mesh removal due to complications:
Not every woman is suitable for a procedure involving transvaginal mesh.
The suitability of this procedure depends on various factors including the woman’s health condition, the severity of her symptoms, and her personal preferences.
Here are some key points to consider when evaluating the suitability of a transvaginal mesh procedure:
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?