Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss the responsibilities of a Transvaginal Mesh Attorney, common problems with transvaginal mesh implants, how to find a qualified transvaginal mesh lawsuit, and much more.
The complications commonly reported from transvaginal mesh implants include:
If you or a loved one has experienced complications with your transvaginal mesh device, you may be able to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to learn if you qualify to file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit today.
Transvaginal mesh is a net-like implant.
Doctors use it to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women.
Made from synthetic or biological material, this mesh supports organs like the bladder and uterus.
It can prevent them from falling into the vaginal canal.
Many brands make these devices, but they don’t all work well for everyone.
Some women have had serious complications after their surgeries.
Problems with transvaginal meshes include erosion into surrounding tissues and pain during sex.
This has led to many transvaginal mesh lawsuits against manufacturers.
Women who have received transvaginal mesh implants often face a host of complications, leading to physical and emotional distress.
These adverse issues can range from discomfort to severe medical conditions, prompting many affected individuals to seek legal recourse for their suffering and losses.
Erosion of vaginal tissue is a serious problem for many who have had transvaginal mesh implants.
This condition happens when the mesh wears away at the vaginal lining.
Pain and discomfort are common signs that erosion is happening.
Some women may need surgery to fix this damage.
Even after surgery, pain and scarring can last.
Mesh erosion also leads to other health issues like infection or bleeding.
Doctors thought transvaginal mesh was a good way to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
However, this type of mesh has caused problems for many patients.
The FDA reported over 1000 cases of complications from transvaginal mesh by 2008.
If you suffer from mesh complications, it’s vital to seek legal help immediately.
Transvaginal mesh can cause many problems.
It may hurt your body in different ways.
In addition to the known complications, transvaginal mesh can also lead to the following other side effects:
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits have become a focal point for legal action as numerous patients report severe complications following their procedures.
These cases often hinge on detailed allegations against manufacturers, citing inadequate warnings and faulty design — factors that underscore the gravity of selecting a specialized attorney to navigate this challenging legal landscape.
Manufacturers of transvaginal mesh devices face numerous accusations.
Many people claim these companies sold unsafe mesh products.
They say the manufacturers did not fully test the meshes’ safety before selling them.
The FDA has warned that these surgical meshes can cause serious harm to patients.
People also say the companies knew about the risks but still pushed their products for POP and SUI surgeries.
Victims have suffered because of these defective transvaginal mesh implants.
Reports show women faced erosion of vaginal tissue, excruciating pain, and other severe side effects after getting mesh surgery.
Some needed multiple revision surgeries to fix problems caused by the meshes.
These cases led to new vaginal mesh lawsuits across America.
The lawsuits accuse several manufacturers, including Boston Scientific Corp and American Medical Systems, of not warning about potential dangers.
These businesses may have put patients at an increased risk for physical injuries like organ perforation and blood vessel damage near vital organs.
Because so many people reported problems between 2008 to 2010, this sparked concerns over how safe pelvic meshes really are for treating conditions like POP and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Settlements and verdicts are vital parts of vaginal mesh cases.
They show how much money courts have awarded to people who suffered mesh complications.
Settlements and verdicts in vaginal mesh cases often reflect the compensation awarded for various mesh-related injuries, including:
Securing a seasoned law firm is paramount in the intricate landscape of transvaginal mesh litigation.
Such legal professionals are equipped with specialized knowledge in personal injury and product liability law—critical when seeking justice and compensation for harm caused by these medical devices.
Hiring a transvaginal mesh attorney means getting an expert in personal injury and product liability law.
These lawyers know the ins and outs of cases involving medical devices like bladder slings and surgical mesh devices.
They understand how to prove that a product has harmed you.
The firm’s history shows its expertise in fighting for clients’ rights.
They have won over $1.3 billion for people injured by dangerous products.
This includes those hurt by transvaginal mesh implants used in procedures like repairing POP or treating SUI.
With dedicated lawyers, most being women, the firm offers strong representation with an understanding of vaginal mesh problems such as erosion of vaginal tissue or complications after corrective surgery.
A transvaginal mesh attorney can guide you through the legal process of filing a claim.
They have experience in personal injury and product liability cases.
The role of a transvaginal mesh attorney in filing a case encompasses a range of responsibilities, such as:
If you’re thinking about filing a transvaginal mesh case, having an expert attorney can make all the difference.
They know the ins and outs of such lawsuits and fight for your rights.
You may be entitled to compensation for pain, medical bills, and more.
An experienced lawyer in this field gives you a strong chance in court.
Remember, you don’t have to face this alone; help is out there.
Pelvic mesh, also known as transvaginal mesh, is a medical device used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women.
There are numerous transvaginal mesh lawsuits because many women have experienced serious vaginal mesh complications after the implant.
These complications include tissue erosion, infection, pain during sexual intercourse, and urinary problems.
The transvaginal mesh lawsuit claims that manufacturers did not adequately test the safety of these devices or warn about potential risks.
Before filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit, it’s crucial to understand the extent of your injuries and gather all medical records related to your implant and subsequent complications.
Consulting with a specialized attorney experienced in such cases can provide you with an understanding of your legal rights and the compensation you might be entitled to.
An attorney can also guide you through the complex legal process and handle the necessary paperwork and evidence collection.
Common vaginal mesh complications include erosion of the mesh into the vaginal tissue, chronic pain, infection, bleeding, painful intercourse, urinary problems, and organ perforation.
These complications can significantly decrease the quality of life and may require additional surgeries to remove or repair the mesh.
Filing vaginal mesh lawsuits involves several steps.
First, consult with a qualified attorney who specializes in transvaginal mesh cases.
Your attorney will review your medical history, gather evidence of your complications, and advise you on your legal options.
They will then file a lawsuit on your behalf, negotiate settlements, or represent you in court if necessary.
The process requires meticulous preparation and understanding of product liability law.
Pursuing a vaginal mesh case can lead to compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages.
The outcome of each case depends on the individual circumstances, such as the severity of the complications and the evidence available.
Experienced attorneys in this field can provide the best chance of a favorable outcome, whether through settlement negotiations or court proceedings.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?