FAQ: Do I Need A Transvaginal Mesh Attorney To File a Case?
- Last Updated: March 12th, 2025
Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Key takeaways:
- Transvaginal mesh lawsuits have resulted in approximately $8 billion in settlements across 48 states, with manufacturers facing litigation for serious complications including mesh erosion, chronic pain, and organ damage in women who received these implants.
- The FDA banned sales of all transvaginal mesh products for pelvic organ prolapse in April 2019, following years of safety concerns and a regulatory timeline that began with the first public health notification in 2008.
- Settlement values typically range from $150,000 to $400,000 per case, with compensation based on factors including medical expenses, revision surgeries, pain and suffering, and overall impact on quality of life.
FAQ: Do I Need A Transvaginal Mesh Attorney to File a Case?
Question: Do I Need A Transvaginal Mesh Attorney to File a Case?
Answer: A transvaginal mesh attorney can guide you through the medical and legal aspects of seeking compensation from the manufacturers of your defective transvaginal mesh implants for damages such as medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question, in further depth, major defendants in transvaginal mesh litigation, common transvaginal mesh complications and injuries, and much more.
Legal Experts Investigate Defective Transvaginal Mesh Implants
In April 2019, the FDA ordered manufacturers to stop selling all transvaginal mesh products used for pelvic organ prolapse repair, citing safety concerns and insufficient evidence of clinical benefits.
The ban came after years of regulatory scrutiny that began as early as 2011 when the FDA identified serious risks associated with these devices.
More than 100,000 women have been awarded compensation through lawsuits holding manufacturers accountable after receiving defective implants.
If you or a loved one has experienced transvaginal mesh complications, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine your eligibility to join others in filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit today.
Table of Contents
How Can A Transvaginal Mesh Attorney from TruLaw Help You?
Our Transvaginal Mesh attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients throughout the process of filing a product liability lawsuit.
With proven success in handling similar cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman provides personalized guidance and advocacy to clients affected by transvaginal mesh complications.
Our team combines legal expertise with genuine care for each client’s unique situation.
We understand the physical and emotional challenges that transvaginal mesh complications bring to your life, which is why we focus on simplifying the legal process of seeking the compensation you deserve.
Meet the Lead Transvaginal Mesh Attorney at TruLaw
Meet our lead Transvaginal Mesh attorney:
- Jessica Paluch-Hoerman: With years of experience representing clients in product liability cases, Jessica specializes in simplifying the legal process of recovering damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and various other forms of damages. Her dedication to holding negligent parties accountable for their actions has led to over $3 Billion in compensation for her clients nationwide through verdicts and negotiated settlements.
How much does it cost to hire a Transvaginal Mesh lawyer from TruLaw?
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you won’t face any upfront costs for your legal representation.
Our fee is only collected if we are successful in securing compensation on your behalf.
This arrangement not only removes the financial risk of pursuing your case, it allows us to focus our resources on achieving a positive outcome in your case by:
- Court Filings and Legal Documentation: Handling all necessary paperwork, including filing fees and procedural documents, to ensure your case proceeds smoothly through the legal system.
- Research/Data Analysis: Dedicating resources to thoroughly investigate your case and gather the best possible evidence.
- Expert Testimony: Consulting with leading experts in the field to support your case and demonstrate the strength of your case to the court.
- Negotiations and Trial Preparation: Allocating resources to negotiate potential settlements and, if needed, preparing comprehensive trial strategies to present your case in court effectively.
Our investment in representing you demonstrates our unwavering commitment to seeking the compensation you deserve.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications from transvaginal mesh, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Overview of the Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
Vaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed nationwide by thousands of women who suffered severe health complications from these implant devices.
To date, settlements total approximately $8 billion for claimants across 48 states.
While most cases have been resolved, new claims continue to be filed in 2025 by women experiencing ongoing complications from surgical mesh procedures.
The Transvaginal Mesh Litigation Crisis Explained
The Transvaginal Mesh Litigation encompasses lawsuits filed against transvaginal mesh manufacturers for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications from these medical devices.
Surgical mesh, also known as pelvic mesh or vaginal mesh, is a medical device surgically implanted to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
These conditions often develop after childbirth, menopause, or hysterectomy when pelvic floor muscles weaken.
The use of transvaginal mesh has been highly controversial in the medical community.
While initially touted as an effective treatment for urinary incontinence, thousands of women have reported serious complications and injuries after transvaginal mesh surgery, resulting in extensive litigation against manufacturers.
Following years of complaints and growing safety concerns, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned sales of all transvaginal mesh products for pelvic organ prolapse in April 2019.
The Evolution of Transvaginal Mesh Devices and Regulatory Oversight
Transvaginal mesh products were introduced to the market in the 1990s.
In 1996, these devices became eligible for FDA approval through the expedited 510(k) process, which permits approval without rigorous clinical trials if a device is deemed similar to previously approved products.
This regulatory pathway allowed numerous mesh products to enter the market without comprehensive safety testing.
The FDA timeline regarding surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse POP and stress urinary incontinence SUI includes:
- 2008: First Public Health Notification warning healthcare providers about potential risks
- 2011: FDA identified transvaginal mesh for POP as high-risk
- 2012: FDA ordered manufacturers to conduct post-market surveillance studies
- 2016: FDA reclassified transvaginal mesh for POP as class III (high risk)
- 2019: FDA ordered all manufacturers to stop selling mesh for transvaginal POP repair
Major Defendants in Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
Multiple medical device transvaginal mesh manufacturers have faced lawsuits over their products.
The primary defendants include:
- Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson): Manufacturer of Gynecare TVT, Gynecare Prolift, and other mesh products
- C.R. Bard, Inc.: Producer of Avaulta, Pelvilace, and other mesh systems
- American Medical Systems (Endo International): Creator of Perigee, Apogee, and Elevate systems
- Boston Scientific Corp.: Manufacturer of Pinnacle, Advantage Fit, and other mesh devices
- Coloplast Corp.: Producer of Restorelle, Novasilk, and other mesh products
- Cook Medical, Inc.: Manufacturer of Surgisis Biodesign products
- Neomedic: Producer of various mesh implant devices
Current Status of Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
Despite the completion of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) proceedings for many transvaginal mesh cases, attorneys continue to investigate and file vaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of injured clients.
While most plaintiffs have received compensation through the MDL process, new lawsuits are still being filed in state courts nationwide.
History of Transvaginal Mesh MDL Cases
By 2012, due to the surge in lawsuits, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated transvaginal mesh cases into separate MDLs based on the manufacturer.
This streamlined the judicial process for thousands of similar claims.
MDL is a legal procedure that consolidates multiple similar cases from different jurisdictions into one court to improve efficiency.
Unlike class actions, where all plaintiffs receive similar compensation, MDL settlements are individualized based on each plaintiff’s specific damages.
The most recent MDL for transvaginal mesh injuries was centralized in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia under Judge Joseph Goodwin.
This MDL was closed in November 2022, with the remaining cases remanded back to their original state courts.
Transvaginal Mesh Settlements and Verdicts
Since litigation began, manufacturers have paid over $8 billion in settlements and jury verdicts to women injured by defective transvaginal mesh devices.
Transvaginal Mesh Settlement Values Explained
Settlement amounts in vaginal mesh lawsuits vary widely depending on the individual’s specific injuries, complications, number of revision surgeries, and overall impact on quality of life.
Compensation is determined based on tangible and intangible losses (damages).
Affected women may receive compensation for:
- Medical expenses (past and future)
- Revision surgeries
- Lost wages and earning capacity
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress
- Loss of consortium
- Diminished quality of life
- Other severe complications
The average projected settlement value for transvaginal mesh lawsuits ranges between $150,000 and $400,000, though individual cases may result in significantly higher or lower amounts depending on specific circumstances.
If you or a loved one experienced serious complications from transvaginal mesh, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Common Transvaginal Mesh Complications and Injuries
Surgical mesh implants have been associated with numerous serious complications that form the basis of litigation.
These vaginal mesh complications often require additional surgeries, ongoing medical treatment, and can cause permanent disability.
Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Mesh
Common complications that may qualify for legal action include:
- Mesh erosion: The mesh wears through the vaginal wall or surrounding tissues
- Chronic Pain: Persistent pelvic, vaginal, or groin pain
- Infection: Recurring or severe infections at the implant site
- Organ Perforation: Damage to bladder, bowel, or other pelvic organs
- Bleeding: Abnormal vaginal bleeding
- Sexual Dysfunction: Pain during intercourse (dyspareunia)
- Urinary Problems: Incontinence, retention, or frequent infections
- Nerve Damage: Resulting in chronic pain or numbness
- Mesh Shrinkage: Contraction causing pain and organ displacement
- Vaginal scarring: Formation of scar tissue that can cause pain and dysfunction
- Failed Repair: Recurrence of prolapse or incontinence
Recent scientific research has raised additional concerns about the material used in these implants.
A 2024 University of Sheffield study revealed that polypropylene mesh begins to degrade within 60 days of implantation, with further deterioration by 180 days.
This degradation contributes to inflammation, tissue damage, and persistent pain.
Recognizing Symptoms of Mesh Complications
Patients who have undergone mesh surgery should be aware of symptoms that may indicate complications:
- Persistent pelvic, vaginal, or groin pain
- Pain during intercourse
- Vaginal bleeding or discharge
- Recurrent urinary tract infections
- Difficulty urinating or bowel movements
- Visible mesh through the vaginal wall
- Fever or other signs of infection
- Return of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence symptoms
Early recognition of these symptoms is essential for appropriate medical intervention and may strengthen potential legal claims.
Eligibility Criteria for Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits
While many transvaginal mesh cases have been resolved, attorneys continue to accept new clients who have suffered injuries from these devices. Knowing the eligibility criteria can help determine if you have a valid claim.
Key Factors in Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Qualification
To qualify for a vaginal mesh lawsuit, several factors must be established:
- Documented Mesh Implant: Medical records confirming the implantation of a transvaginal mesh device
- Timing Considerations: The date of mesh surgery and discovery of complications may affect the statute of limitations
- Serious Complications: Evidence of significant complications requiring medical intervention
- Causation: Establishing that the mesh device caused the injuries
- Manufacturer Liability: Determining the responsible manufacturer and their potential negligence
An experienced transvaginal mesh attorney can evaluate these factors to determine eligibility for legal action. Many law firms offer free consultations to assess potential claims.
Building a Strong Transvaginal Mesh Case
Compelling medical evidence is essential to building a successful vaginal mesh lawsuit.
Important medical documentation typically includes:
- Medical Records: Detailed documentation of the transvaginal mesh surgery procedure
- Treatment History: Records of complications, additional surgeries, and ongoing treatment
- Expert Testimony: Medical opinions linking injuries to the mesh device
- Financial Documentation: Evidence of medical expenses, lost wages, and other economic damages
- Personal Impact Statement: Documentation of how the injuries have affected quality of life
Your attorney will help gather and organize this evidence to build the strongest possible case against the manufacturer.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
What is Transvaginal Mesh?
Surgical mesh is a synthetic, net-like implant used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
It’s designed to provide permanent support to weakened pelvic tissues but has been linked to numerous serious complications.
-
Are Women Still Able to File Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits?
Yes, despite the closure of MDL proceedings in 2022, women can still file individual lawsuits in state courts.
If you’ve experienced complications from a transvaginal mesh implant, consulting with an attorney is recommended to evaluate your potential claim.
-
What Can Be Done to Avoid Transvaginal Mesh Injury?
For women who already have mesh implants, monitoring for symptoms of complications is essential.
Any unusual pain, bleeding, infection, or urinary incontinence should be promptly reported to a healthcare provider. Some doctors recommend regular follow-ups to check for mesh-related issues.
-
Can Transvaginal Mesh Be Removed?
Complete removal of transvaginal mesh is challenging once the mesh integrates with surrounding tissue.
Even after multiple surgeries, fragments often remain, potentially causing ongoing problems.
Mesh removal procedures should be performed by specialists experienced in these surgeries.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
