Legal Loophole Keeping Essure Lawsuits From Being Filed
- Last Updated: July 27th, 2023
Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Legal Loophole Keeping Essure Lawsuits From Being Filed
Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has received more than 10,000 complaints and 30,00 adverse event reports connected to the permanent birth control device Essure since its approval in 2002, only a little over 1,000 lawsuits have been filed.
Table of Contents
Preemption and Essure
The relatively small number of Essure lawsuits brought may be due to a legal doctrine known as preemption, which basically means that federal law trumps local law.
Since Essure was approved by a federal agency through the FDA’s 510(k) Pre-Approval Process, Bayer (the manufacturer of Essure) cannot easily be held liable for violations of state and local consumer protection laws.
To overcome the doctrine of preemption that is currently protecting Bayer from liability, injured parties will have to prove that the company was negligent in violation of federal law.
Unfortunately, it often doesn’t matter how negligent the company is, as long as there has been no violation of federal law.
Hope for Women Injured by Essure?
Preemption has been an issue for the Essure lawsuits, but the tide may be turning for Essure plaintiffs.
Earlier this month, a state judge in California granted a motion allowing 55 of these lawsuits to be coordinated and assigned to one court.
This move could allow Essure lawsuits to move forward quickly, and could also have implications for other cases against drug makers and medical device manufacturers as well.
Two bipartisan bills are also currently making their way through Congress that could close the preemption loophole, at least for makers of health care products.
One of these, Ariel Grace’s Law, named for an infant who was stillborn to a mother with an Essure device, would allow patients to sue manufacturers of Class III devices, regardless of whether or not it was approved under the FDA’s PMA process.
A companion bill, the Medical Device Guardians Act, would require individual physicians and clinics to file adverse event reports with the FDA, as hospitals and health care industry institutions are already required to do.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
