What is a Bellwether Trial?
- Last Updated: July 7th, 2023
Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
What is a Bellwether Trial?
It is highly unlikely that your case will be selected as a “bellwether case.”
However, the bellwether process is likely to impact later trials and possible settlements, including your case.
Bellwether is a tool used by federal courts in multidistrict litigation (MDL) – that is litigations that include many individual plaintiffs harmed by a single common product.
It is a procedure best used when there is a large number of cases that require similar rulings early in the life cycle of a lawsuit.
Table of Contents
How do Bellweather Trials work?
In bellwether proceedings, a small group of plaintiffs are selected and their cases are fast tracked for any remaining discovery and trial.
During the bellwether process, other plaintiff’s cases are generally “stayed” meaning the legal process pauses while the attorneys and court concentrate on the bellwether cases.
This may feel like your case is being ignored, and you may become frustrated that the courts and lawyers are concentrating on other cases, but, it is important to remember that decisions made during the bellwether process are likely to impact your case.
Bellwether cases are important data points for lawyers in that it provides information regarding the likely outcome of other cases at trial, such as:
- How well or poorly the parties’ fact and expert witnesses perform in a trial setting; and
- Decisions on key legal issues and the admissibility of key evidence.
- Learn what sorts of damages a jury might deem appropriate for certain types of alleged injuries
The outcome of these trials produces a great deal of value for your lawsuit as it is likely to give your lawyer a more realistic idea of what is likely to happen in future trials.
The bellwether cases often result in strategic plans organized on your behalf.
Verdicts/outcomes of bellwether cases often result in baselines or criteria of understanding strong or weak cases.
This understanding can lead to some constructive settlement conversations with defense counsel and the courts.
If you are not selected for the bellwether process, it may seem as if your case is not moving forward.
This is not the case.
Although we may not be asking for your direct involvement, the bellwether process is likely to directly impact your case and we will keep you posted regarding the results and when we will proceed with your trial or settlement.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?