Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of chemicals with a wide array of uses in industry and in consumer products.
They are considered incredibly useful and have been mass-produced since the 1940s because of their unique ability to repel both water and oil.
As a result, these chemicals can be found in everyday products such as several types of food packaging, cosmetics, shampoos, stain-resistant fabrics, and nonstick cookware.
Of particular note to both firefighters and the general population is the presence of PFAS chemicals in certain firefighting foams.
There is an increasing concern about PFAS chemicals in these foams and in other products because they have an almost unlimited persistence in the environment.
In fact, many people refer to PFAS as “forever chemicals” due to their virtually unlimited resistance to breakdown in the environment.
This concern is magnified by the fact that research has linked exposure to PFAS chemicals in general, and to firefighting foams in particular, with a number of human health risks.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), these concerns include:
In addition to workers who produce PFAS and PFAS-containing products, there is evidence that firefighters are among the groups that are at particular risk for developing these health concerns as a result of exposure to the chemicals including through skin absorption.
Firefighters have used aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) for decades in their efforts to extinguish fires that are particularly difficult to suppress.
Because it is made with water- and oil-repellent PFAS, AFFF has proven especially useful in fires that involve petroleum products or other flammable liquids.
However, recent research has indicated that AFFF use has had grave consequences for the firefighters who work with it and for the communities they work to protect.
One of the main concerns is the negative environmental impact of AFFF discharge.
When these foams are used consistently over long periods of time, as they are in fire training facilities, PFAS chemicals have the potential to accumulate in the soil, and from there, they can get into the groundwater.
As reported by the Environment Working Group (EWG), one such study by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collected data on nearly 900 releases of AFFF into the environment.
Many of these releases occurred in local waterways, creating dangerous levels of contamination in drinking water and the fish populations that live in them.
According to the International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), current research has shown “unequivocal evidence” that firefighters who used AFFF have “unacceptably elevated” levels of PFAS in their blood.
Firefighters’ increased risk of exposure comes from sources such as:
The EWG notes that there are alternatives to AFFF that are both safer and equally effective.
Because of this, several states have prohibited (or are in the process of prohibiting) AFFF and other foams that are made with PFAS.
On the federal level, Congress recently passed legislation requiring federal work safety experts to certify PFAS-free firefighting gear.
Furthermore, the Department of Defense has ordered all its fire departments to stop using PFAS-based foams by 2024.
While the Fire Department Safety Officers Association recommends that all fire departments switch to alternatives that do not contain PFAS, there are no federal regulations in place for fire departments outside of the Department of Defense.
The following guidelines can help fire departments mitigate the environmental and health risks of AFFF:
Researchers and the general public are still learning about the environmental and health risks of PFAS and AFFF.
The more governments and fire departments can educate and inform firefighters and the people in affected communities about the changes that are being made, as well as the shifts that still need to occur, the more prepared everyone can be to keep themselves and their surroundings safe.
TruLaw works with experienced lawyers who are prepared to fight on behalf of individuals harmed by drugs, devices, chemicals and other products.
To determine if you may be eligible for a Firefighting gear case, visit our Firefighter Gear Instant Case Evaluator today.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
In conjunction with the FDA, Sentec/Percussionaire has announced a Class 1 correction to the usage instructions for the Phasitron 5 In-Line Valve, which is used for Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV). The company released the corrections after receiving six reports of injury from patients using recalled
According to the FDA, the Puerto Rican company Avole Inc. (Productos Nita) is recalling at least one lot of their Bacalaitos Criollos Codfish Frying Mix due to the omission of “pollock” (fish) from the list of ingredients. For those with an allergy or sensitivity, consumption
The FDA recently warned the public about a correction issued by Smiths Medical for its paraPAC Plus P300 and P310 Ventilators. The company requests that health care facilities follow all of the steps outlined in the correction recall to prevent injury and death while using