Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of Transvaginal Mesh alternatives, risks and complications associated with Transvaginal Mesh implants, surgical and non-surgical Transvaginal Mesh alternatives, and much more.
There are several transvaginal mesh alternatives for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
The alternatives to a transvaginal mesh implant include:
If you’ve experienced vaginal mesh complications, injuries, or adverse effects from a transvaginal mesh implant- you may be eligible to file for the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced Transvaginal Mesh Attorneys at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We’re here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.
Native tissue repair is a surgical treatment that uses the patient’s own tissue to repair pelvic organ prolapse.
This approach avoids the use of synthetic mesh and can provide effective support for the prolapsed organs.
Some key points about native tissue repair include:
Biological graft repair is another alternative to transvaginal mesh implants.
This approach involves using a graft from a source such as human or animal tissue to support the vaginal prolapse.
Some key points about biological graft repair include:
Pubovaginal sling is a surgical procedure that uses the patient’s own tissue to create a sling that supports the bladder and urethra.
It can be an effective alternative for stress urinary incontinence.
Some key points about pubovaginal sling include:
In conclusion, there are several alternatives to transvaginal mesh implants for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
These alternatives include native tissue repair, biological graft repair, and pubovaginal sling.
Transvaginal mesh is a medical device designed to support weakened pelvic tissues.
Predominantly made from Type I monofilament, large-pore polypropylene mesh, this urogynecological tool serves the purpose of treating specific conditions such as stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
It is surgically implanted into the pelvic region providing reinforcement and stability.
The utilization of transvaginal mesh became a widely adopted practice owing to its lower rates of prolapse awareness, repeat surgery, and protrusion upon examination.
However, it’s crucial for women to understand that transvaginal mesh isn’t synonymous with laparoscopic procedures or mesh slings.
Each carries separate implications and uses tailored to address distinct medical conditions.
Unfortunately, it can lead to severe complications impacting a woman’s physical and emotional health.
Non-surgical practices such as pelvic floor therapy, medications, and strength-building exercises like Kegels serve as viable alternatives.
There are also different surgical approaches that do not involve the transvaginal mesh, but instead use traditional surgeries or natural tissue grafts.
Manufacturers have come under heavy scrutiny for producing this harmful device and numerous lawsuits have been filed against them, leading to settlements in favor of the victims.
New technological advances have given rise to other alternatives such as Transobturator tape (TOT), tension-free transvaginal tape (TVT), and adjustable slings which are gaining popularity among medical professionals for treating SUI & POP.
Transvaginal mesh is primarily used in treating conditions such as Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), this involves a surgical procedure that provides support to weakened pelvic organs.
Dive deeper into the usage, effectiveness, and potential risks of transvaginal mesh in the following sections.
Surgeons commonly use transvaginal mesh to treat two specific conditions: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). SUI is a medical condition where pressure on the bladder leads to involuntary leakage of urine.
Activities such as sneezing, laughing, lifting heavy objects or exercise can trigger this. Women often experience it due to weakened pelvic muscles following childbirth, with age being another significant risk factor.
On the other hand, POP happens when one or more of the pelvic organs slip down from their regular position and protrude into the vagina due to loss of support from surrounding muscles and tissues.
This causes discomfort and complications like constipation or difficulties during intercourse.
Procedures that involve implanting a surgical mesh through the vaginal wall provide reinforcement for weakened structures are typically performed when non-surgical treatments fail to address these issues effectively.
Transvaginal mesh surgery is a treatment option for women suffering from conditions like stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
The steps of the transvaginal mesh surgical procedure include:
Transvaginal mesh implants can lead to various physical and emotional complications such as infection, bleeding, pain during intercourse and even organ perforation; these issues emphasize the importance of being informed before choosing a course of action.
Dive deeper into this matter to learn more about potential risks and find safer alternatives for you.
While transvaginal mesh can successfully treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, it is often associated with a host of complications and side effects.
The following are commonly reported:
The physical toll of transvaginal mesh complications can be significant, leading to persistent pain and discomfort.
This chronic pain may arise from poor tissue integration or the formation of additional scar tissue around the surgical site.
It’s common for women who experience these complications not only to face physical challenges, but also suffer emotionally.
Additionally, emotional distress often accompanies these health concerns as they interfere with a woman’s daily life quality.
Constantly dealing with unexpected health problems may lead to feelings of frustration and hopelessness over time which can then evolve into anxiety or depression.
Thus, understanding the potential impact on both physical and emotional well-being is crucial when considering transvaginal mesh implants.
Exploring non-surgical alternatives to transvaginal mesh, we delve into effective methods such as pelvic floor therapy, lifestyle modifications, and prescribed medications that have been successful in treating conditions like Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).
Pelvic floor therapy stands out as an effective non-surgical alternative to transvaginal mesh.
As part of this therapeutic approach, physical therapy is employed to strengthen pelvic floor muscles and alleviate symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
Unlike surgical implantation of transvaginal mesh, which could potentially lead to complications such as mesh erosion and scar tissue formation, the practice of pelvic floor therapy prioritizes patient comfort and safety.
Moreover, this treatment option offers significant benefits, including lower rates of condition recurrence compared to traditional native tissue repair procedures.
Several prescription medications prove beneficial in the management of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
For instance, anticholinergic drugs or alpha-adrenergic agonists are viable options for women experiencing mild symptoms.
These medicines work by relaxing bladder muscles to control involuntary urine leakage.
Some hormones, mainly topical estrogen therapy, can strengthen your vaginal tissues if you’re postmenopausal.
The hormone treatment improves urinary incontinence by replenishing estrogen levels in the body, thus improving overall health of the pelvic floor muscles.
However, always discuss side effects and potential risks with your healthcare provider before starting any new medication regimen.
Kegel exercises have emerged as a simple yet effective alternative to transvaginal mesh implants for treating pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
These exercises aim to strengthen the pelvic floor muscles that support bladder, uterus, rectum and small intestine.
Some key points about this alternative to transvaginal mesh includes:
This section delves into surgical substitutes for transvaginal mesh implants, with a focus on conventional stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
The use of natural tissue grafts as an alternative is also discussed, highlighting the pros, cons and potential outcomes of these procedures.
In traditional surgeries for SUI (Stress Urinary Incontinence) and POP (Pelvic Organ Prolapse), no mesh is used, which serves as an alternative to transvaginal mesh implants.
The procedures involve repairing or reconstructing the natural tissues that hold the pelvic organs in place.
Surgeons utilize stitches to strengthen the weakened muscles and ligaments, facilitating adequate support for pelvic organs like bladder, rectum, and uterus.
While abdominal POP surgery seems to present lower rates of complications compared to its transvaginal counterpart when using a mesh implant, it’s crucial to note that traditional operations without meshes still remain a viable option.
The effectiveness of these surgical options varies depending on each patient’s unique circumstances including:
Natural tissue grafts serve as a notable alternative to transvaginal mesh implants. Surgeons often utilize the patient’s own tissues or biological material during prolapse surgery, enhancing the outcomes of these procedures.
This surgical option involves using durable materials that are compatible with the human body and can provide similar support and function without some of the risks associated with synthetic meshes.
The benefits of natural tissue grafts extend beyond their compatibility.
These grafts also contribute significantly to reducing complications associated with pelvic floor surgeries.
By harnessing native tissue repair techniques, medical professionals can manage issues such as scar tissue formation or erosion more effectively than when dealing with synthetic implant materials.
While this approach may require careful consideration and skilled surgery, for many women it offers a viable and safer version of treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
Exploring other alternatives to vaginal mesh implants such as transobturator tape, tension-free transvaginal tape, and adjustable slings can provide safer solutions to urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse without the risks associated with mesh use.
Surgeons often turn to the use of transobturator tape as an alternative for vaginal mesh implants in cases of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.
This surgical option offers relief when non-surgical treatments fail to generate satisfactory results.
The procedure involves careful placement of a specially designed tape through the obturator foramen, creating a support system for the urethra and bladder neck.
Just like any other surgery, it also carries potential risks that patients should consider before opting for this treatment.
In certain situations when complications arose from using mesh implants, total removal of transobturator tape has successfully resolved these issues.
However, always consult with your healthcare provider to discuss the best solution tailored to your specific medical condition.
Tension-free transvaginal tape, often referred to as TVT, has emerged as a reliable surgical alternative to transvaginal mesh for women suffering from stress urinary incontinence.
This revolutionary technique offers significant benefits with high satisfaction rates and confirmed safety over long-term use.
Many studies have shown that TVT can help resolve symptoms of bladder control problems effectively and efficiently among many women.
It is also noteworthy that the chances of experiencing pain post this procedure are quite low, making it an acceptable choice for patients concerned about comfort and quality of life after surgery.
A readjustable sling offers an innovative solution for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.
This state-of-the-art device functions as a versatile alternative to traditional transvaginal mesh implants.
Conceived with flexibility in mind, the design enables doctors to make adjustments according to each patient’s unique needs.
Success rates have shown significant improvement with the use of adjustable slings in second-line surgical management after midurethral procedures.
Moreover, this method has demonstrated fewer complications compared to other options, providing patients not only with effective treatment but also peace of mind knowing they are less likely to experience potential issues associated with other surgical interventions.
Leveraging this modern approach could serve as a turning point in managing conditions such as stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.
There are several manufacturers and brands that produce transvaginal mesh implants, including Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, and Bard Medical.
Recent years have seen a surge in lawsuits against these companies due to severe complications caused by their products.
Several manufacturers produce different types of transvaginal mesh.
Each brand has its own design, purpose, and specifications.
Major manufacturers of Transvaginal Mesh include:
Major manufacturers of transvaginal mesh like Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, and C.R. Bard find themselves in legal hot water as an influx of lawsuits surface.
Women treated with their products have been reporting severe complications, leading to life-altering conditions.
In light of these disturbing revelations, thousands of affected patients are resorting to the courts for justice.
Since 2012 alone, at least 20 verdicts have gone in favor of these women, tallying an estimated sum of $300 million in damages awarded.
The misconduct allegations brought against these companies range extensively from issues relating to product safety down to their marketing practices.
There is significant legal action being pursued against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh due to the serious complications many women have experienced.
At TruLaw, we’re dedicated to helping those affected navigate these complex lawsuits and seek the justice they deserve.
Several transvaginal mesh manufacturers are currently facing legal actions for their products.
These lawsuits are primarily based on allegations that the companies failed to warn patients and doctors about potential complications related to mesh implants.
In recent years, thousands of legal claims have been resolved favorably for the plaintiffs, with settlements surpassing $8 billion in total.
The main contention is that these devices were marketed without adequate safety testing or alerting users to possible severe side effects such as pain, infection, bleeding and perforation of organs.
TruLaw extends a helping hand to those negatively impacted by transvaginal mesh implants.
If you’ve experienced vaginal mesh complications, injuries, or adverse effects from a transvaginal mesh implant- you may be eligible to file for the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
This legal aid includes individuals who’ve suffered complications such as infections, chronic pain, or recurrence of incontinence after surgery.
Contact the experienced Transvaginal Mesh Attorneys at TruLaw today for a no-obligation consultation.
We’re here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.
Exploring alternatives to transvaginal mesh opens up a range of potential solutions that may better suit individual needs and scenarios.
Nonsurgical actions can involve pelvic floor therapy, medications and regular Kegel exercises – all aimed at strengthening the pelvic muscles.
For those considering surgery, traditional SUI (stress urinary incontinence) and POP (pelvic organ prolapse) operations present an option, as does the use of natural tissue grafts for repair.
Other medical aids such as tension-free vaginal tape or a readjustable sling offer less invasive alternatives for treatment while reducing associated risks and complications.
Individuals may seek alternatives to these devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Here are some of the most common surgical and non-surgical Transvaginal Mesh alternatives available to women:
Surgical treatments (other than mesh):
Non-surgical options:
It is important to consult with a healthcare professional to determine the most suitable alternative treatment option based on individual circumstances.
Yes, there are other materials used as Transvaginal Mesh alternatives to synthetic meshes used in surgeries.
Some of these alternatives include:
It’s important to note that the choice of mesh material depends on various factors, including the specific surgical procedure, the patient’s condition, and the surgeon’s preference.
Yes, Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can be treated without surgery using non-surgical methods such as the use of a vaginal pessary.
A vaginal pessary is a removable device made of rubber or silicone that is placed into the vagina to hold prolapsed organs in place.
Some key benefits of using Transvaginal Mesh alternatives such as a vaginal pessary include:
Using a vaginal pessary can be an effective alternative to surgery for managing pelvic organ prolapse and is frequently recommended for use in women experiencing mild-to-moderate prolapse.
Physical therapy and pelvic floor exercises are non-invasive approaches that aim to strengthen the pelvic floor muscles and improve symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.
These interventions may be effective for some individuals, particularly those with mild to moderate prolapse.
Some key takeaways from these Transvaginal Mesh alternatives include:
However, the effectiveness may vary depending on the severity of the prolapse and individual factors.
Transvaginal mesh removal is performed by a urogynecologist.
Complete removal of the mesh is possible for some women, while in other cases, only part of the mesh can be removed due to complicated issues related to the type of mesh used.
Mesh removal may require the rebuilding of the abdominal wall and can be performed by a general surgeon or in collaboration with a plastic surgeon.
The procedure aims to remove the mesh implant and, if necessary, repair any damage or complications caused by the mesh.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?