Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: How are Transvaginal Mesh Problems Diagnosed?
Answer: Transvaginal mesh problems are diagnosed through a combination of patient symptom evaluation, physical examination, and advanced diagnostic testing, including pelvic ultrasounds, MRIs, and cystoscopy, with healthcare providers examining for signs of mesh erosion, exposure, infection, and organ perforation.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, covering diagnostic procedures for transvaginal mesh complications, warning signs of mesh erosion and exposure, and the connection between properly diagnosed mesh injuries and transvaginal mesh lawsuits.
Attorneys nationwide continue pursuing compensation for women who have received medical diagnoses confirming transvaginal mesh complications, including mesh erosion, organ perforation, chronic infection, and recurrent urinary problems.
Thousands of women have undergone diagnostic procedures revealing serious mesh-related injuries that manufacturers allegedly knew about but failed to adequately warn patients or doctors about these risks.
Common diagnostic findings in mesh lawsuits include:
TruLaw is currently accepting clients seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of quality of life, and the emotional trauma associated with these complications.
If you’ve been diagnosed with transvaginal mesh complications, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Our Transvaginal Mesh attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.
With extensive experience in product liability cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman works with litigation leaders and medical experts to prove how defective mesh devices cause patient harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering from manufacturers who knew about problems but continued selling dangerous products.
We understand the physical and emotional toll that transvaginal mesh complications have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Transvaginal Mesh attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you won’t face any upfront costs for your legal representation.
Our fee is only collected if we are successful in securing compensation on your behalf.
This arrangement allows us to focus on achieving a positive outcome in your case by:
Our instant case evaluation process simplifies the legal process of qualifying and filing your claim, providing you with the knowledge and confidence needed to make informed decisions about your case.
If you or a loved one experienced complications from transvaginal mesh implants, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit today.
Healthcare providers use various diagnostic approaches to identify transvaginal mesh complications, from initial assessments to advanced imaging techniques.
The evaluation process typically begins with a thorough patient history and physical examination, followed by specialized imaging when needed to confirm the diagnosis and determine the extent of mesh-related issues.
The first step in diagnosing transvaginal mesh problems involves a detailed patient history and symptom evaluation.
Women experiencing complications often report pelvic pain, vaginal discharge, bleeding, painful intercourse (dyspareunia), and urinary symptoms.
These symptoms may develop immediately after mesh placement or years later.
During the physical examination, healthcare providers perform a thorough vaginal examination to identify:
This initial assessment helps determine whether symptoms are related to mesh complications and guides decisions about further diagnostic testing.
If symptoms persist or the examination reveals signs of mesh-related problems, healthcare providers may recommend advanced imaging to fully evaluate the condition.
When physical examination findings suggest transvaginal mesh complications, healthcare providers may use several advanced imaging techniques to confirm the diagnosis and plan appropriate treatment:
The combination of physical examination findings and advanced imaging results enables healthcare providers to make accurate diagnoses and develop personalized treatment plans for women experiencing transvaginal mesh complications.
If you have concerns about potential mesh-related symptoms, contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.
Healthcare providers use specific examination techniques to assess the presence of mesh-related issues and determine appropriate treatment options.
Women experiencing symptoms after mesh surgery should seek medical evaluation by providers with experience in recognizing mesh complications.
Pain is among the most common complications following transvaginal mesh surgery, often described as pelvic pain, vaginal pain, or pain during sexual intercourse (dyspareunia).
Pain following mesh placement requires methodical evaluation to distinguish between various potential causes and determine the most appropriate treatment approach:
Pain after surgical treatment may be immediate or develop years after the procedure.
The pattern, timing, and intensity of pain provide valuable diagnostic information.
Persistent pain following a mesh sling surgical procedure often requires evaluation by healthcare providers familiar with mesh complications.
Mesh exposure or erosion occurs when the mesh material becomes visible through vaginal tissue or protrudes into surrounding organs.
Diagnosing mesh complications begins with careful visual inspection, which allows clinicians to identify exposure or erosion that may require intervention:
Mesh exposure can cause symptoms including vaginal discharge, spotting or bleeding, pain during sexual intercourse, and recurrent urinary tract infections.
In some cases, mesh exposure may be present without obvious symptoms, making regular follow-up examinations important after mesh placement.
If physical examination reveals signs of mesh complications, healthcare providers may recommend additional diagnostic tests, including imaging studies, to fully assess the extent of the problem and develop a treatment plan.
If you’ve been diagnosed with mesh exposure or erosion following transvaginal mesh surgery, contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to seek compensation for medical expenses and other damages.
Pelvic reconstructive surgery addresses structural abnormalities that develop when a woman’s pelvic floor tissues weaken or tear.
This comprehensive evaluation typically begins with a detailed patient history and systematic pelvic examination that assesses the type and degree of support defects present.
For patients experiencing pelvic organ prolapse, an examination using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) helps determine the severity of displacement, with measurements taken at specific vaginal points to document the precise anatomical changes and stage the condition from 0-4.
Women with stress urinary incontinence undergo specialized testing including urodynamic studies that measure bladder pressure, urine flow rates, and sphincter function during various activities to assess the extent of urethral hypermobility or intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Prior to considering transvaginal mesh placement—a surgical technique that has faced scrutiny from regulatory agencies—patients require thorough counseling about alternative treatment options including non-surgical approaches and native tissue repairs without synthetic materials.
Surgical mesh placement may be considered in specific cases of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (stages 3-4) where native tissue repairs have previously failed or when patients have risk factors for recurrence such as chronic high intra-abdominal pressure or connective tissue disorders.
Since the FDA’s 2019 order removing transvaginal mesh products for prolapse from the market, abdominal approaches using mesh (like sacrocolpopexy) have become the preferred surgical option when mesh reinforcement is deemed necessary, with studies showing success rates up to 90% for long-term anatomical support.
The decision-making process must include a personalized risk-benefit analysis, as mesh-related complications including erosion, pain, infection, and organ perforation can impact the quality of life and often require additional surgical interventions for correction.
Physicians must document that patients fully understand that while mesh may provide superior anatomical support in certain cases, it carries unique risks that non-mesh procedures do not and that some mesh-related complications can be permanent despite surgical correction attempts.
For women who have previously undergone mesh procedures and are experiencing complications, evaluation begins with a focused history detailing symptom onset, progression, and specific triggers for urinary symptoms, pain, or vaginal discharge.
A thorough pelvic examination may reveal mesh erosion (exposure through vaginal tissue), palpable bands causing pain or dyspareunia, or signs of infection, while specialized tests including cystoscopy or proctoscopy may be needed to diagnose mesh penetration into adjacent organs.
Women with pelvic floor disorders frequently experience overlapping conditions, requiring careful differentiation between mesh-related symptoms and other conditions like overactive bladder, interstitial cystitis, or myofascial pain that may coexist or mimic mesh complications.
Imaging studies including pelvic ultrasound, MRI, or CT scans with specific mesh protocols help visualize the exact location of mesh implants and their relationship to surrounding structures.
Vaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who were injured by defective vaginal mesh implants.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the vaginal mesh injury lawsuits.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your vaginal mesh injury case include:
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from a defective vaginal mesh implant, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the vaginal mesh injury lawsuits today.
Yes, you can still file a transvaginal mesh lawsuit.
TruLaw is still accepting cases and helping women who have been injured by transvaginal mesh.
Contact us using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation today.
Transvaginal mesh complications often manifest as pelvic pain, discomfort during intercourse, vaginal bleeding or discharge, recurrent urinary tract infections, and mesh erosion through vaginal tissue.
Some patients also experience urinary problems including leakage, frequency, or difficulty emptying the bladder completely.
Studies indicate that transvaginal mesh complications occur in approximately 2.3% to 6.1% of cases requiring additional intervention.
The most frequently reported issues include mesh exposure (erosion/extrusion), chronic pain, and urinary problems.
Complication rates vary based on mesh type, surgical technique, and individual patient factors.
Yes, transvaginal mesh can migrate from its intended placement site, leading to serious complications like fistulas, adhesions, and infections.
When mesh migration occurs, patients may experience symptoms including pelvic pain, nausea, fever, swelling, and unexplained weight loss that worsen over time and require medical attention.
Some degree of urinary leakage affects approximately 16-50% of women following transvaginal mesh or prolapse procedures, with higher rates occurring in surgeries without a continence component.
This side effect varies in severity and duration, with some cases resolving naturally while others require additional treatment.
Long-term transvaginal mesh problems can include chronic pain, mesh erosion through vaginal tissues, painful intercourse (dyspareunia), recurrent infections, urinary dysfunction, and emotional distress.
Some complications may develop years after the initial surgery and potentially require mesh removal or revision procedures.
Non-mesh alternatives for treating pelvic organ prolapse include native tissue repairs, pessary devices, pelvic floor physical therapy, and lifestyle modifications.
Surgical options without transvaginal mesh utilize the patient’s own tissues for support and may be recommended for those concerned about mesh-related complications.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?