Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What damages are linked to vaginal mesh complications?
Answer: Vaginal mesh complications can cause physical injuries including mesh erosion through vaginal tissue, pelvic pain, infection, bleeding, dyspareunia, voiding dysfunction, and recurrent urinary tract infections.
These complications often require revision surgeries and ongoing medical care, leading to substantial financial damages and decreased quality of life.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, exploring physical damages from transvaginal mesh failure, legal recourse for female urinary incontinence treatment, and much more.
Vaginal mesh complications occur when surgical mesh devices implanted to treat pelvic floor disorders or female stress urinary incontinence cause adverse events in patients.
Mesh erosion represents the most frequently reported complication where the implant wears through vaginal tissue causing discharge, bleeding, vaginal pain during intercourse, and infection.
These physical damages often require mesh revision surgery and can lead to permanent injuries that affect daily activities and intimate relationships.
If you or someone you love has experienced complications following transvaginal mesh placement, you may qualify to seek compensation for your medical expenses, vaginal pain, and suffering.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Vaginal Mesh Complications lawsuit today.
Our Transvaginal Mesh attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit.
With extensive experience in product liability cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and medical experts to prove how defective mesh implants caused you harm through synthetic mesh complications.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, mesh revision surgery, pain and suffering, lost income, and other damages resulting from your transvaginal mesh injuries.
We understand the physical and emotional toll that synthetic mesh complications have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Transvaginal Mesh attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis – with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced vaginal pain, bleeding, infection, organ perforation, mesh erosion, or other persistent postoperative symptoms from transvaginal mesh procedures, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit today.
Transvaginal mesh failure can lead to multiple physical complications including vaginal apical pain that can affect a woman’s daily functioning and quality of life.
These physical damages often require extensive surgical treatment and can persist for years after the initial implantation.
Medical documentation of these specific physical harms forms the core evidence in vaginal mesh lawsuits, as these tangible injuries demonstrate the direct impact of mesh-related complications and risk factors.
Chronic pelvic pain represents one of the most common and debilitating consequences of transvaginal mesh surgery failure.
This pain often results from mesh erosion, contraction, or migration, creating ongoing discomfort that can range from mild to severe and disabling.
Medical approaches to treating mesh-related pelvic pain include, but are not limited to:
Medical records from these various treatment approaches provide valuable documentation for litigation, demonstrating both the existence and extent of pain-related damages.
Expert testimony can help connect the documented pain directly to mesh failure rather than to other potential causes.
Ironically, many women who received transobturator mid urethral slings to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) experience either persistent or worsened urinary symptoms after mesh complications develop.
These urinary issues, including bladder outlet obstruction, incomplete bladder emptying, and problems affecting the bladder neck, often become more problematic than the original condition the mesh was intended to treat.
Treatment approaches for post-mesh urinary dysfunction include, but are not limited to:
Documentation of these treatments in medical records helps establish the severity and permanence of urinary dysfunction following mesh failure.
Many lawsuits include testimony from urologists who can explain how mesh-related damage to urethral tissues or nerves directly caused these ongoing urinary issues.
The combination of chronic pain and urinary dysfunction often creates substantial life limitations for affected women.
Medical documentation showing work restrictions, mobility limitations, and impact on intimate relationships provides compelling evidence of how mesh complications have fundamentally altered patients’ lives.
These records form the foundation for damages related to lost wages, medical expenses, and diminished quality of life in vaginal mesh litigation.
If you or someone you love has experienced complications following transvaginal mesh placement, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Vaginal Mesh Complication Lawsuit today.
Women who experience complications from transvaginal mesh surgery often require various medical interventions including mesh sling removal to address their symptoms and improve their quality of life.
These treatment approaches range from conservative management to vaginal mesh procedures, depending on the type and severity of complications.
Healthcare providers must tailor treatment plans to each patient’s specific situation, considering factors such as the location of the mesh, extent of tissue involvement, and the patient’s overall health status.
Vaginal exposure (also called erosion) occurs when the implanted material protrudes through the vaginal tissue.
This common complication requires prompt medical attention to prevent further tissue damage and infection.
Detection methods for vaginal mesh exposure include:
Management approaches for mesh exposure typically follow a stepped protocol:
Medical records documenting these detection and management approaches provide valuable evidence in litigation, as they clearly establish both the existence of mesh exposure and the interventions required to address it.
If you or someone you love has experienced complications following transvaginal mesh placement, you may qualify to seek compensation for your medical expenses, vaginal pain, and suffering.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Vaginal Mesh Complications lawsuit today.
Urinary problems represent another common complication following transvaginal mesh procedures.
These dysfunctions may include difficulty emptying the bladder (retention), involuntary leakage (incontinence), frequent urination, or recurrent urinary tract infections.
Diagnostic approaches for mesh-related voiding dysfunction include:
Treatment options for mesh-related voiding dysfunction may include:
The medical documentation of these diagnostic tests and treatments provides compelling evidence of how mesh complications have affected a basic bodily function.
Experts can testify to the relationship between the mesh placement and subsequent voiding dysfunction, helping establish causation in legal proceedings.
For many women, treating these mesh-related complications involves multiple specialists, repeated procedures, and ongoing management – details that substantiate claims of extensive medical expenses and diminished quality of life in vaginal mesh litigation.
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed by women across the country who suffered serious complications from pelvic mesh implants used to treat pelvic floor disorders and female stress urinary incontinence.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your Transvaginal Mesh lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered pain, infection, bleeding, organ damage, or other complications after receiving a tension free vaginal tape or midurethral mesh sling insertion, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit today.
The most common vaginal mesh complications include pain in the groin and thighs, mesh erosion through the vaginal wall, infection, bleeding, and incontinence.
Many women also report scar tissue formation which can cause ongoing discomfort and pain during intercourse.
These complications may occur immediately after surgery or develop years later.
Alternative treatments to vaginal mesh include native tissue repair using the patient’s own tissues, biological graft repair using human or animal tissue, and pubovaginal slings created from the patient’s natural tissue.
These options may have fewer long-term complications while still providing effective support for pelvic organ prolapse.
Symptoms of vaginal mesh erosion typically include persistent pelvic pain, pain during intercourse, vaginal bleeding or discharge, recurrent urinary tract infections, and the feeling of something protruding from the vagina.
Your partner might feel the mesh during intercourse.
These symptoms require immediate medical evaluation by a urogynecologist.
Yes, vaginal mesh complications can emerge years after the initial implantation.
Late-developing issues include mesh erosion, chronic pain, organ perforation, and autoimmune responses.
Regular follow-up appointments are important for monitoring potential complications, even if you initially recovered without problems.
Bladder mesh problems often present as recurring urinary tract infections, difficulty emptying the bladder, urinary urgency or frequency, and pain during urination.
Some women experience new or worsening stress incontinence, pelvic pressure, or back pain that radiates to the legs.
These symptoms warrant immediate medical attention.
Mesh removal surgery is a treatment option for severe vaginal mesh complications, though complete removal can be challenging as tissue grows around the mesh.
The procedure carries its own risks including organ damage, increased pain, or worsening of original symptoms.
Many specialists now offer partial or complete removal depending on the specific complications.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?