AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuit

Analyze My Case
  • Last Updated: November 16th, 2024
Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • AFFF, or firefighting foam, contains toxic PFAS chemicals linked to liver cancer in firefighters and military personnel.
  • Victims exposed to these hazardous substances are consulting with specialized lawyers for potential compensation through lawsuits.
  • Research highlights the risks of PFAS exposure, showing a significant increase in liver cancer cases among those who've used AFFF frequently.

AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuit Overview

On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuit, potential AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts, who qualifies to file an AFFF lawsuit, and much more.

AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuit

Intro to the AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuits

Since the 1960s, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been utilized across different industries to fight fires involving highly flammable liquids or gases.

These firefighting foams often contain PFAS (commonly referred to as “forever chemicals”), which have been associated with various health risks, including liver cancer and other types of cancer.

Currently, lawsuits related to AFFF exposure are being filed nationwide by individuals who believe their health has been impacted by these chemicals.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with liver cancer or another cancer potentially caused by AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to pursue legal action.

The AFFF lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are actively working to provide affected individuals with the resources and support they need to explore their legal options.

You can use the chatbot on this page to instantly check if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.

Our team is ready to assist with any questions you may have about your potential claim.

If you believe you may have been affected by AFFF exposure, don’t hesitate to reach out and learn more about how we can help.

Table of Contents

PFAS Exposure and Liver Cancer Risk

The use of firefighting foam containing toxic PFAS chemicals has been associated with a higher risk of developing liver cancer.

Numerous research studies, including one conducted by the National Cancer Institute, have found that these “forever chemicals” raise the likelihood of developing various cancers.

Researchers at the University of Southern California have also identified a connection between PFAS exposure and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease — one of the primary risk factors for liver cancer.

In this study, researchers analyzed prediagnostic blood samples for six (6) different PFAS types and identified a significant association between perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and an increased future risk of cancer.

The study noted that people in the 90th percentile for blood PFOS levels were 4.5 times more likely to develop hepatocellular carcinoma compared to others in the same region who had lower PFOS levels.

Symptoms of Liver Cancer may include:

  • Abdominal swelling
  • Unexplained weight loss
  • Loss of appetite
  • Pain in the upper abdomen
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • General weakness and fatigue
  • Yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice)
  • White, chalky stools

The primary types of adult primary liver cancer are hepatocellular carcinoma and bile duct cancer, also known as cholangiocarcinoma.

Ongoing Research on PFAS Chemicals and Their Cancer Links

The link between PFAS exposure and cancer is deeply concerning, and further research is necessary to fully comprehend the long-term health impacts of these chemicals.

Studies have increasingly shown that exposure to certain PFAS chemicals, such as PFOA and PFOS, is associated with a higher risk of cancer:

AFFF Cancer Lawsuits: PFAS Chemicals

Multiple companies are currently facing lawsuits over the presence of toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF firefighting foam, which has been connected to cancer and various other serious health issues.

Many firefighting foam products are made with PFAS chemicals, and both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have issued warnings about the dangers of these substances.

PFAS chemicals do not break down easily, persisting in the human body and the environment.

As a result, exposure to these chemicals has been found to increase the risk of several cancers, including bladder, prostate, testicular, kidney, and others.

While many communities have been exposed to PFAS contamination, certain professions face a higher risk due to frequent use of firefighting foam:

  • Airport and military firefighters
  • Military personnel involved in training exercises
  • Firefighters at municipal fire departments
  • Petrochemical workers
  • Other industrial workers

The companies involved in AFFF lawsuits include:

  • Chemours
  • Tyco Fire Products
  • Chemguard Inc.
  • 3M
  • ChemDesign Inc.
  • DuPont
  • Several additional manufacturers

Latest Updates on AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Firefighting foam lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), with more than 9,000 individual AFFF claims currently awaiting resolution.

Although some manufacturers have attempted to dismiss these cases, we remain confident in the strength of the claims being brought forward.

If you believe you or a loved one has been affected by PFAS exposure in firefighting foam, you can use the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify to file an an AFFF cancer lawsuit.

Settlement Amounts in Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

As the lawsuits are still developing, it is too early to predict what the precise AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts will be.

However, based on previous lawsuits involving PFAS contamination, the estimated settlements could range between $20,000 and $1,000,000 (or more).

These figures are only estimates drawn from similar mass tort cases and should not be seen as guarantees of financial compensation.

As the AFFF litigation progresses, we expect more clarity on settlement amounts and will continue to update clients on potential outcomes.

Toxic Firefighting Foam Contamination in Groundwater and Drinking Water

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has had a profound impact on the environment.

It is a major contributor to PFAS-contaminated drinking water.

PFAS chemicals are highly soluble and spread easily through water, leading to contamination in groundwater, drinking water, and natural areas.

In efforts to control hazardous fires, large amounts of AFFF are often used, and this excess foam can leak into surrounding environments.

Across the country, firefighting foam cancer lawsuits have been filed by various state and city governments, along with local water agencies, over the contamination linked to AFFF.

These agencies have taken legal action against the manufacturers of AFFF:

It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury claims — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.

How to File an AFFF Liver Cancer Lawsuit

If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS from AFFF and later diagnosed with liver cancer or other medical issues, you may be eligible for compensation through an AFFF lawsuit.

Contact us for a free consultation by using the chatbot on this page to instantly see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.

Collecting Evidence for AFFF Lawsuits

Gathering strong evidence is important for an AFFF lawsuit.

The firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms will assist in identifying the necessary documentation for your claim.

Evidence in AFFF lawsuits may include:

  • Personal and witness testimony
  • Medical records
  • Cancer diagnosis details
  • Employment records
  • A history of AFFF exposure
  • Other relevant proof of exposure to firefighting foam

Potential Damages in Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Damages in AFFF lawsuits refer to the various losses, both economic and non-economic, that may have resulted from exposure to toxic firefighting foam.

We will work with you to assess and calculate these damages.

Common damages in AFFF lawsuits may include:

  • Future medical and therapy costs
  • Medical expenses and bills
  • Lost wages due to illness
  • Diminished quality of life
  • Permanent disability
  • Emotional distress and suffering
  • Loss of future earning capacity
  • Loss of consortium
  • Other compensatory damages

The Importance of Choosing the Right Legal Team for Your AFFF Claim

The AFFF lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms have vast experience in toxic torts and chemical exposure cases.

We understand the intricacies involved in AFFF claims and are committed to guiding you through each step of the process.

While dealing with the challenges of a cancer diagnosis or other serious health conditions, it’s important to have a legal team that prioritizes your best interests.

Any firm you work with should be fully committed to securing the compensation you deserve.

TruLaw: Your Firefighting Foam Cancer Law Firm

The firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms are actively working to assist those affected by Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) exposure.

We are dedicated to helping impacted individuals seek the compensation they deserve for health issues potentially caused by these harmful chemicals.

Our focus is on providing clients with the legal resources they need to pursue justice and hold corporations accountable for the harm caused by AFFF exposure.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer or experienced other adverse health effects due to regular exposure to firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit and pursue compensation.

Contact TruLaw for more information by using the chat on this page to instantly see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are PFAS chemicals?

    PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) are synthetic chemicals commonly used across various industries due to their durability and resistance to heat, water, oil, and stains.

    These chemicals are known to be harmful, as they do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the human body over time.

    Prolonged exposure to PFAS has been associated with serious health risks, including cancer, developmental issues, and other adverse effects.

    Due to the dangers they pose, PFAS are increasingly being restricted or banned in several states and countries.

  • What is Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)?

    Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) is a firefighting foam commonly used in high-risk industries like aviation, military, and petrochemical to suppress fires involving flammable liquids.

    AFFF works by creating a film barrier between the fuel and oxygen, helping to extinguish fires quickly and effectively.

    AFFF has been used since the 1960s and was developed by multiple manufacturers, such as 3M, Chemguard, and Tyco Fire Products.

    These companies have supplied AFFF to various industries worldwide, and they are now facing lawsuits related to the foam’s potential health risks.

  • What products are PFAS chemicals in?

    PFAS chemicals are not only found in firefighting foam but are also present in many consumer and industrial products.

    Common products containing PFAS include:

    • Personal care products (e.g., shampoo, dental floss, nail polish)
    • Stain-resistant coatings on carpets and upholstery
    • Cleaning products
    • Water-resistant fabrics (e.g., rain jackets, tents)
    • Grease-resistant paper
    • Nonstick cookware
    • Microwave popcorn bags
    • Plastic bottles and wrappers

  • Who is at risk for exposure to firefighting foam?

    Individuals at risk of PFAS exposure from firefighting foam are typically those whose work involves direct contact with the foam or its products.

    Exposure can also occur through contaminated water sources.

    Those at higher risk of exposure include:

    • Airport and military firefighters
    • Municipal firefighters
    • Industrial workers in refineries or similar facilities
    • Workers on flight decks
    • Individuals working for AFFF manufacturers
    • Transporters of AFFF firefighting foam
    • Workers at incineration facilities handling firefighting foam disposal

  • What health problems may AFFF firefighting foam be linked to?

    Exposure to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam may be associated with several health risks, including:

    These risks highlight the serious long-term health concerns associated with PFAS exposure.

  • Who are the defendants in AFFF lawsuits?

    Lawsuits involving AFFF are being filed against companies that have supplied firefighting foam to sectors like fire departments, military bases, and airports.

    Companies named as defendants in AFFF lawsuits include:

    • Chemguard Inc.
    • ChemDesign Inc.
    • 3M
    • DuPont
    • Chemours
    • Tyco Fire Products
    • Several other manufacturers

    These companies are facing allegations that their products contributed to serious health risks due to PFAS exposure.

  • What is the AFFF MDL?

    The AFFF firefighting foam MDL, or multidistrict litigation, has been established in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.

    An MDL is a legal process that consolidates multiple related lawsuits to streamline pretrial procedures and make the litigation more efficient.

    When many individuals file lawsuits involving similar claims, like those related to AFFF exposure, an MDL helps manage these cases by handling discovery, depositions, and other pretrial processes in one court.

  • How can firefighting foam lawyers help me?

    Attorneys experienced in firefighting foam lawsuits can provide support throughout the legal process.

    They can assist by:

    1. Gathering evidence for your AFFF lawsuit
    2. Assessing the extent of your damages from PFAS exposure
    3. Identifying responsible parties and determining liability
    4. Guiding you through the legal process and answering your questions
    5. Working toward securing a settlement for your AFFF foam cancer lawsuit

    Hiring attorneys familiar with these AFFF firefighting foam cases can help you consider your best legal options and seek the compensation you deserve.

  • How much does it cost to hire a firefighting foam attorney?

    The firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning you will not pay any legal fees upfront.

    You will only be responsible for legal fees if your case results in a successful settlement or verdict.

    If no compensation is awarded in your AFFF lawsuit, you will not owe any legal fees, ensuring there is no financial risk in pursuing your claim.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Related Articles

Helpful Sites & Resources