Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF lawsuit, health risks from AFFF chemical exposure, filing process for Navy AFFF claims, and much more.
Health risks associated with AFFF exposure and contamination include:
If you or a loved one served in the military and developed cancer or other health issues after exposure to AFFF firefighting foam, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Naval Station Great Lakes has a long and storied past as a critical training facility for the U.S. Navy.
Founded in 1911, Naval Station Great Lakes has long served as the Navy’s largest training facility and only boot camp.
Key facts about the base’s history:
Today, over 40,000 recruits still pass through Great Lakes each year to complete basic training. The base is also home to advanced training schools for many specialties.
Unfortunately, the decades-long use of AFFF firefighting foam at Great Lakes has led to widespread contamination. Many who lived and worked on the base were unknowingly exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals.
Naval Station Great Lakes plays a vital role in shaping new sailors.
It provides basic training as well as advanced technical instruction.
The base is home to several major training commands:
Over 40,000 recruits complete basic training at Great Lakes annually.
The base has trained millions of sailors throughout its history, including many military firefighters who would later be exposed to AFFF firefighting foam.
Unfortunately, many of these individuals were unknowingly exposed to firefighting foam containing harmful chemicals during their training and service.
Recent revelations about chemical contamination have raised alarms about toxic exposure at Naval Station Great Lakes.
PFAS compounds in firefighting foam pose serious risks to human health.
The use of toxic firefighting foams at military installations has become a significant concern for veterans and environmental advocates alike.
PFAS chemicals have been detected in concerning levels at the Illinois base.
These substances come primarily from the historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).
Sources of PFAS contamination at Great Lakes include:
Testing has found PFAS in both groundwater and drinking water sources at the base.
This puts both military personnel and nearby residents at increased risk of exposure to toxic firefighting foam.
The Environmental Protection Agency has been actively involved in assessing the extent of contamination and developing guidelines for PFAS levels in drinking water.
PFAS chemicals found in AFFF firefighting foam are extremely persistent in the environment and human body. Exposure to these substances can pose health risks that may not appear until long after service.
Sources of PFAS contamination at Great Lakes have included:
AFFF was widely used by the military and other industries before the dangers of PFAS were fully understood. Today, evolving research continues to uncover new links between AFFF exposure and long-term health effects.
If you or a loved one spent time at Great Lakes and later developed cancer or another serious illness, exposure to AFFF may be the cause. Evaluating your legal options can be an important step in seeking justice.
The use of AFFF at Naval Station Great Lakes has left a lasting environmental legacy.
Contamination of water resources poses ongoing challenges for the base and surrounding community.
PFAS chemicals from firefighting foam have infiltrated both surface and groundwater at Great Lakes.
This impacts drinking water quality for the base and neighboring areas.
Key findings on water contamination include:
Annual water quality reports show ongoing PFAS presence, though levels have decreased.
The full extent of contamination from PFAS-containing firefighting foam is still being investigated.
While not on the National Priorities List, Naval Station Great Lakes is undergoing environmental remediation.
The Navy and EPA are working to address contamination across the base.
Current cleanup activities involve:
Complete remediation will likely take years due to the persistent nature of PFAS.
The Navy continues to assess the scope of contamination and necessary cleanup actions, including addressing areas where AFFF firefighting foam was used to combat fires involving flammable liquids.
Veterans and families impacted by AFFF exposure at Great Lakes may have legal options.
Recent firefighting foam lawsuits seek compensation for those harmed by PFAS contamination.
Certain individuals may qualify to file claims related to AFFF exposure at Naval Station Great Lakes.
Eligibility depends on several factors.
Requirements for AFFF lawsuit participation typically include:
Family members who lived on base may also be eligible in some cases.
An experienced attorney can assess individual eligibility to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Taking legal action over AFFF exposure involves several steps.
Veterans should understand the process before pursuing a claim.
The general process for filing an AFFF lawsuit includes:
Working with a law firm experienced in military toxic exposure cases is advisable.
They can guide veterans through the complex legal process, including potential involvement in the AFFF firefighting foam MDL (multidistrict litigation).
Exposure to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam is associated with various adverse health effects.
Veterans should be aware of potential AFFF-related illnesses that may qualify for firefighting foam cancer lawsuits.
Research has connected PFAS exposure to increased cancer risks.
Several types of cancer may qualify for AFFF lawsuit compensation.
Cancers potentially linked to firefighting foam exposure include:
The strength of scientific evidence varies for different cancer types.
An attorney can advise on which diagnoses may qualify for legal action in AFFF lawsuits.
Besides cancer, PFAS exposure is linked to other health issues.
Veterans may seek compensation for several non-cancer conditions.
Additional diseases potentially related to AFFF exposure include:
As research continues, more health effects may be connected to PFAS.
Veterans should monitor their health and report concerns to their doctors, especially if they were exposed to AFFF during their service.
Veterans seeking justice for AFFF exposure can find support through TruLaw.
TruLaw provides no-cost case reviews for affected veterans.
This helps determine eligibility for participation in the AFFF lawsuit.
Our free case evaluation process involves the following:
Veterans can get answers about their rights without financial obligation.
This allows for informed decisions about pursuing a claim related to AFFF firefighting foam exposure.
For eligible veterans, TruLaw offers comprehensive legal representation.
Our team guides clients through every stage of the AFFF lawsuit process.
Services provided to AFFF lawsuit claimants include:
With experienced toxic exposure attorneys, TruLaw fights for maximum compensation for affected veterans.
We strive to hold responsible parties, including firefighting foam manufacturers, accountable for AFFF contamination and its impact on human health.
Veterans and their families who were exposed to AFFF may have legal recourse through firefighting foam lawsuits.
As the scientific understanding of PFAS health impacts grows and AFFF lawsuits progress, it’s crucial for those affected to understand their rights and options.
TruLaw stands ready to assist veterans in navigating the legal landscape of AFFF firefighting foam MDL and individual claims, fighting for the compensation and justice they deserve.
AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam used to combat fuel fires.
The firefighting foam lawsuit centers on AFFF’s toxic PFAS chemicals, which have been linked to serious health issues and environmental contamination.
Navy veterans were exposed to AFFF during training exercises at facilities like Naval Station Great Lakes.
The afff firefighting foam lawsuit alleges that regular use of this foam in firefighting drills and emergency responses led to harmful chemical exposure.
Exposure to AFFF has been linked to various cancers, including kidney, testicular, and pancreatic cancer.
The firefighting foam lawsuit also cites other health risks such as liver damage, thyroid disease, and reproductive issues potentially caused by PFAS chemicals in AFFF.
Veterans and family members who spent at least one year at affected bases like Naval Station Great Lakes may be eligible for the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
Eligibility typically requires a diagnosis of a qualifying health condition linked to PFAS exposure.
Veterans can file a claim by first getting a free case evaluation from experienced attorneys.
The firefighting foam lawsuit process involves gathering medical records, determining the appropriate legal venue, and filing a formal complaint against liable parties, including AFFF manufacturers.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?