Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss Instagram Addiction Lawsuits, the impact of Instagram addiction on mental health, legal grounds for filing an Instagram lawsuit, and much more.
Some key aspects of Instagram Addiction Lawsuits include:
If you or a loved one has suffered from mental health issues due to Instagram addiction, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to determine if you qualify to join others filing Instagram Addiction Lawsuits.
Utah has taken legal action against Meta Platforms, Inc., the parent company of social media giants Facebook and Instagram, citing deceptive practices and designing addictive features detrimental to youth.
Utah’s government asserts that Meta knowingly incorporated addictive features into Instagram, specifically targeting young users. These features, they claim, are crafted to retain users’ attention for extended periods, potentially leading to addiction. The lawsuit filed by Utah points out several aspects:
Through these elements, Utah is holding social media companies accountable for what they deem to be unethical design choices that prioritize user engagement over well-being.
The allegations extend beyond just the addictive mechanics; Utah charges that Meta favored financial gain over user safety. Here’s what the state has highlighted:
By bringing forth this lawsuit, they seek to hold tech giants like Meta responsible for maintaining a balance between profitability and the safety of its users, especially the vulnerable youth demographic.
Instagram’s legal challenges are part of a wider trend as social media addiction garners more attention.
By shedding light on the inner workings of social media companies, these lawsuits aim to ensure that the welfare of users, especially minors, is not undermined by corporate practices. The Instagram addiction lawsuits signify a critical moment for legal and ethical scrutiny into the influence of technology on mental health.
The pervasive use of social media has raised concerns about its effects on the mental health of young users. Cases of depression and anxiety have been linked to social media use, while habitual scrolling can lead to harmful social comparison.
Recent research has established connections between social media usage and the development of mental health issues in adolescents. These studies suggest a significant association:
The negative impact of social media often arises from a culture of continuous comparison and the pursuit of unattainable standards:
In a digital age where image is often seen as currency, the impacts of social media on body image and eating disorders have become a focal point of legal and medical concern.
A growing number of lawsuits have emerged, with plaintiffs arguing that social media platforms contribute to the development of eating disorders like anorexia, bulimia, and binge eating.
These legal actions underscore the negative impacts that platforms can have on users, particularly on young adults and teens.
Key factors these lawsuits underscore:
One notable case involves Instagram, where social media litigation argues that the platform’s design is inherently flawed in a way that maximizes screen time at the cost of users’ mental health.
Recent research highlights a link between social media and issues surrounding body image and self-perception.
There’s an inherent tendency for users to engage in appearance comparisons, which often lead to body dissatisfaction and can exacerbate conditions such as low self-esteem and body dysmorphic disorder.
Significant findings include:
These insights emphasize the need for a closer examination of content on social media platforms and their potential role in the spread of eating disorders.
Social media platforms have been meticulously engineered to encourage excessive use and foster an addictive nature through their interactive features and content delivery algorithms.
Social media apps are often likened to slot machines, employing random rewards and anticipation to keep users engaged.
Algorithms play a central role in dictating the user experience on social media by curating content that maximizes engagement.
The design features of social media platforms, from the variable rewards system to the algorithmic curation of content, contribute to their addictive quality and the problematic excessive use by individuals.
Meta, Instagram’s parent company, is facing significant scrutiny over the contrast between its internal research and public statements, which highlights a lack of transparency and accountability.
The implications have spurred a series of lawsuits challenging the social media behemoth’s behavior.
Internal documents released in various lawsuits have shown that Meta was aware of the adverse effects of its platforms on young users.
They highlight the company’s deep understanding of addiction-related features and the mental health ramifications.
Yet, public statements seemed to downplay these insights, often portraying the platforms as benign environments.
Key details about public reports include:
With the lawsuits against Meta, there is an increasing demand for transparency in how social media giants conduct internal research and communicate findings.
Accountability is also a key factor, as the public and legal bodies seek to ensure the company takes responsible actions based on their knowledge.
As the spotlight intensifies on these tech companies, several core issues have emerged that illustrate why transparency and accountability are crucial:
The unfolding legal situation could set a precedent for holding tech giants to a higher standard and ensuring they wield the considerable influence of their platforms with greater responsibility.
Litigation against major social media entities has initiated a pivotal shift towards industry accountability and the reinforcement of youth protection measures.
Social media lawsuits are beginning to mirror the legal challenges previously faced by opioid and tobacco companies.
These legal battles share common grounds:
Amid growing concerns, school districts and parents are becoming more proactive, demanding better child safety practices in social media usage.
They often turn to legal action as a vehicle for change.
Points of concern include:
Actions taken by social media attorneys to seek justice place considerable pressure on these companies, giving rise to the likelihood of significant industry shifts toward safeguarding young audiences.
Through social media lawsuits, stakeholders propose cohesive strategies to modify negligent practices and promote transparency.
The legal landscape is evolving as the investigation into claims that Meta’s Instagram platform has negatively affected young individuals’ mental health continues.
The lawsuits are progressing through the courts, presenting a critical juncture for potential changes in how social media platforms operate.
Attorney General Rob Bonta of California and other attorneys general have initiated a new lawsuit alleging that Instagram’s design contributes to excessive use and mental health issues among minors.
The allegations include severe outcomes like suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts as a direct result of excessive social media use.
Bellwether trials in cases like this often serve as important indicators for how similar cases may be resolved.
They allow for a thorough examination of evidence in a few cases representative of the larger issues.
Individuals in social media addiction lawsuits may seek monetary damages for psychological treatment costs, loss of quality of life, and punitive damages intended to deter wrongful company behavior.
They could also pursue restitution for profits companies gained through their alleged wrongful actions.
To prove harm or damage in a case against social media companies, plaintiffs must typically provide evidence of the addiction’s negative impact on their mental health, supported by expert testimony.
They must also establish a causal link between their use of the platform and the harm suffered.
Recent developments in lawsuits include state attorneys marching together to file legal actions and multi-district litigation (MDL) consolidation to address claims in a coordinated manner.
A noticeable uptick in public awareness campaigns has also been evident, raising the profile of these cases.
Notable law firms representing clients in these cases include those with significant experience in class-action and multi-district litigation, such as those previously involved in litigation over tobacco or opioids.
Some firms have established dedicated teams to handle these specific social media cases.
While direct precedents related to social media addiction may be sparse, similar cases in the realms of pharmaceuticals and tobacco have paved the way for arguments around duty of care and product liability.
These cases often center around the company’s knowledge of potential harm and their responsiveness to it.
Joining a class-action lawsuit typically involves contacting a law firm that is handling the suit and providing information about one’s experience with social media addiction.
If the case is certified as a class action, individuals who fit the class definition are automatically included unless they opt out.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Media Harm Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?