Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss Navy AFFF Exposure, health risks associated with AFFF exposure in the Navy, how to seek medical care for AFFF-related health issues, and much more.
Navy personnel may have been exposed to AFFF in various ways, including but not limited to:
If you or a loved one served in the Navy and have been diagnosed with cancer or other health issues potentially related to AFFF exposure, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation to determine if you qualify for an AFFF lawsuit.
The Navy has widely utilized Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in various capacities.
Notably, it is used at installations and bases, during routine maintenance, and in firefighting training exercises.
This has led to lawsuits as concerns over environmental and health impacts come to light.
AFFF has been a key firefighting agent at military bases due to its effectiveness against flammable liquids.
It creates a blanket-like foam that suffocates fire by removing oxygen, which is essential for operations involving aircraft and vehicle fires.
The following are areas and people commonly involved with AFFF:
In recent years, concerns over AFFF’s environmental impact led to stringent restrictions and ongoing AFFF litigation called the Navy firefighter foam lawsuit.
Regular maintenance and testing of firefighting equipment are essential, and AFFF plays a significant role in these activities.
These activities could potentially affect the environment and the health of those exposed.
Below are some common uses of AFFF during equipment maintenance and testing:
Focused legal scrutiny, part of the AFFF firefighting foam MDL, examines the broader implications of such extensive usage.
Firefighting training is rigorous and involves applying AFFF to prepare navy firefighters for real-world scenarios.
Here are some common training exercises that use AFFF:
As awareness of AFFF’s potential risks grows, the military and other stakeholders re-evaluate its widespread use.
This has led to significant discussions within the context of the firefighting foam controversies.
Military firefighters and service members engaged in operations face risks due to occupational exposure to AFFF firefighting foam.
This foam contains PFAS, often called forever chemicals due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.
Military firefighters frequently use AFFF foam to control and extinguish fires, especially in jet fuel situations.
This foam is highly effective and a significant PFAS exposure source.
Here are key factors contributing to AFFF exposure during military firefighting operations:
The risks associated with AFFF continue even after the flames are extinguished.
Cleanup efforts can be a significant source of toxic exposure.
Here are some common hazards during post-fire suppression cleanup:
In recognizing these risks, service members and firefighters exposed to firefighting foam may consider their legal options to address health concerns related to PFAS exposure.
Exposure to AFFF firefighting foam has been connected to several serious health concerns affecting Navy firefighters and other military personnel.
Scientific and medical research has pinpointed an elevated risk for specific types of cancers and other illnesses potentially linked to these chemicals.
Exposure to AFFF among Navy firefighters has been notably associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer.
Studies investigating the adverse effects of AFFF have found:
Prostate cancer presents a significant threat to health among military firefighters with AFFF exposure.
Key points include:
The link between testicular cancer and AFFF firefighting foam is a serious concern for Navy firefighters.
Research has revealed:
AFFF exposure is not only linked to various types of cancer but also to thyroid disease.
Important observations include:
The use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in firefighting has raised significant concerns due to its environmental impacts, including water contamination and harm to wildlife.
These foams contain PFAS, substances linked to various environmental and health issues.
Groundwater and surface water pollution from AFFF is the first critical issue.
It has led to:
AFFF can trigger a process where toxic chemicals incrementally concentrate within organisms, known as bioaccumulation.
Here’s how AFFF affects the food chain:
The materials in AFFF persist, causing widespread and lasting effects on ecosystems where firefighting foams have been used.
The environmental toll is significant, with current actions seeking to mitigate the damage and prevent future harm.
When considering participation in an AFFF lawsuit, individuals must assess their eligibility and prepare accordingly.
Evidence is the cornerstone of any AFFF lawsuit.
To build a strong case, plaintiffs should gather:
Assessing the full impact of damages caused by AFFF is essential for legal proceedings.
Plaintiffs should consider:
Selecting a trusted attorney is vital for navigating an AFFF lawsuit.
TruLaw and its team of experienced firefighting foam cancer lawyers are equipped to handle:
TruLaw has decades of experience litigating cases related to firefighting foam.
The AFFF firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw focus on the impact of AF on human health and the environment, which is caused by the presence of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the foam’s composition.
Why Choose TruLaw’s Firefighting Foam Attorneys?
As experienced firefighting foam lawyers, TruLaw offers resources and guidance to those affected and works tirelessly to hold responsible parties accountable.
They manage all facets of the litigation process, from initial case evaluation to courtroom representation.
TruLaw’s firefighting foam attorneys remain determined to seek justice on behalf of their clients, ensuring informed decision-making and tenacious advocacy at every turn.
The eligibility criteria for filing a lawsuit typically require the plaintiff to have been exposed to AFFF and to have suffered injuries or developed health issues as a result.
Additionally, there may be time limits known as statutes of limitations that dictate the timeframe within which you must file your claim.
Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals, particularly PFAS, has been linked to various health issues.
Symptoms often include thyroid disorders, developmental effects during pregnancy or to breastfed infants, and certain types of cancer.
Settlement amounts in firefighter foam lawsuits are generally based on the extent of exposure, the severity of the injury, the defendant’s degree of negligence, and the financial and emotional impact on the victim.
Each case is assessed on a case-by-case basis to determine fair compensation.
Litigation concerning the national firefighter registry AF foam is ongoing, with cases consolidated in multidistrict litigation to streamline the process.
The aim is to resolve claims related to the health impacts of exposure to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foams used by military and civilian firefighters.
Previous VA claims have been varied in their outcomes.
Some veterans received compensation for health impacts linked to AFFF exposure, while others were denied.
The adjudication hinges on the ability to demonstrate a connection between service-related AFFF exposure and subsequent health issues.
Claims against military gas chamber exposure are not typically associated with AFFF lawsuits.
AFFF lawsuits focus specifically on exposure to certain chemicals found in firefighting foams and the resulting adverse health effects.
Firefighting foam manufacturers are facing legal action due to the adverse health and environmental effects of AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam), which contains perfluoroalkyl and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Lawsuits allege that these manufacturers were aware of the risks but continued to produce and market AFFF to military and civilian organizations without adequate warnings.
As a result, numerous lawsuits have been filed against these manufacturers, seeking compensation for medical costs, loss of income, and other damages related to exposure to AFFF foam.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?