Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss Firefighting Foam Cancer, the types of cancer linked to AFFF exposure, how to seek medical care and legal support for AFFF-related cancer, and much more.
Exposure to AFFF firefighting foam has been linked to several types of cancer, including:
If you have been diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to AFFF, you may be eligible for compensation through a firefighting foam cancer lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw using the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation to learn more about your legal options and how to hold those responsible for your AFFF-related cancer accountable.
Exposure to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has raised significant health concerns due to the presence of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These toxic chemicals persist in the environment and have been associated with several types of cancer and other health issues.
PFAS exposure from firefighting foams has been linked to a higher risk of developing certain cancers.
Research and lawsuits have highlighted a connection to the following:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Fire Protection Association studies support these findings, reinforcing the need for scrutiny and regulation of these substances.
In addition to cancer, AFFF exposure is associated with several other potential health problems.
Key health risks include:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and agencies focused on disease control and occupational safety continue to study these effects on human health to develop appropriate interventions.
Individuals working in certain occupations, particularly firefighters and military personnel, face a notably increased risk of developing cancer due to exposure to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Firefighters at airports and in local fire departments regularly encounter AFFF during routine firefighting and firefighting training exercises.
It’s used for extinguishing fuel fires, which are high-temperature and fast-spreading.
Military firefighters have similar exposure risks, especially during aircraft-related incidents.
Here are key points about their exposure:
Occupational exposure to these substances, especially over extended periods or without proper protective equipment, increases the likelihood that these professionals will develop health complications related to PFAS contamination.
PFAS can enter the body through various pathways and are known to accumulate over time.
This accumulation can lead to a build-up of these toxic substances.
Let’s consider how PFAS commonly make their way into the body:
Once in the body, PFAS bind to proteins and can remain there for a long time due to their chemical structure, which resists breakdown.
This persistent presence in the body intensifies concerns about long-term health effects, including an increased risk of developing cancer.
When considering involvement in an AFFF lawsuit, eligibility hinges on meeting specific criteria related to exposure and resulting health conditions.
Claimants typically must demonstrate a link between their illness and the fire suppressant foam.
To file a claim related to AFFF exposure, individuals must meet specific criteria to demonstrate a connection between their health issues and exposure to firefighting foam.
The process involves gathering medical records and other evidence to support the claim’s validity.
Key factors in determining eligibility:
Successful lawsuits can result in various forms of compensation for claimants, depending on the severity of their condition and its impact on their lives.
These settlements aim to address the harm caused by negligence, providing financial relief to help cover medical bills and other damages.
Claimants may be entitled to:
Each AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit settlement or verdict depends on the case’s unique circumstances, and the financial compensation may vary greatly.
Claimants have joined the AFFF MDL to seek accountability and restitution.
When pursuing AFFF personal injury claims, it’s imperative to understand that each state sets its own deadlines, known as statutes of limitations, which dictate how long plaintiffs have to initiate legal proceedings.
Missing these deadlines can result in the loss of the right to compensation.
Statutes of limitations vary significantly from state to state, and they can affect both personal injury and municipal water contamination claims.
Here are the general time frames:
Some states may have specific statutes of limitations extensions known as “discovery rules,” which extend the time limit based on when the harm was discovered.
For AFFF cancer lawsuits, many states are considering or have enacted legislation to accommodate the unique circumstances of PFAS exposure and its latent effects on health.
It is important to consult a knowledgeable lawyer who specializes in environmental claims to understand the specific limitations applicable to an AFFF-related lawsuit.
Firefighting foam lawsuits often involve complex legal issues and scientific evidence that require specialized knowledge.
Consulting with an experienced lawyer helps you understand the nuances of your case and increases your chances of a favorable outcome.
An experienced firefighting foam attorney is essential due to the intricacies of these lawsuits:
By engaging a law firm with expertise in the field, plaintiffs can navigate the legal landscape more easily and ensure timely filing of their claims.
TruLaw has established itself as a formidable name in representing clients affected by illnesses tied to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF).
Their expertise in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits is significant for individuals who develop cancer linked to toxic exposure.
Recognizing the signs and taking the right steps can be vital after suspecting illness from AFFF exposure.
Anyone experiencing symptoms should:
Firefighting foam, particularly AFFF, has been widely used to extinguish fires, especially those involving flammable liquids.
Historical risks associated with its use include:
Settlement amounts in AFFF lawsuits vary widely, reflecting the specifics of each case.
They consider factors such as the extent of exposure and associated health impacts.
Currently, firefighting foam lawsuits are progressing through courts, with some AFFF personal injury cases achieving settlements while others are scheduled for trial.
Legal developments occur frequently as litigation continues.
Research and lawsuits have linked AFFF foam exposure primarily to kidney, testicular, pancreatic, and prostate cancers.
Medical studies suggest that PFAS chemicals in these foams may increase cancer diagnosis risk.
Individuals directly exposed to AFFF, such as firefighters or those who’ve lived in contaminated areas, and have developed health issues, may be eligible.
Eligibility extends to those who can connect their condition and AFFF exposure.
Exposure to certain PFAS chemicals in firefighting foams has been linked to an increased risk of cancer.
Ongoing litigation and research aim to clarify the causal relationships.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?