Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of fire-fighting foam health effects, how fire-fighting foam chemicals enter the body, how to file an AFFF exposure lawsuit, and much more.
Key aspects of the fire fighting foam health effects lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one are a firefighter who has developed cancer or other serious health conditions after exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam, you may be eligible for significant compensation.
Contact TruLaw today for a free consultation and instant case evaluation to see if you qualify to file a fire-fighting foam lawsuit.
Firefighters face significant health risks due to exposure to toxic chemicals in fire-fighting foams.
Many of these foams, known as aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to various types of cancer.
Studies have shown that firefighters who regularly use PFAS-containing foams have a higher incidence of certain cancers compared to the general population.
PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals resistant to heat, water, and oil.
These properties make them effective for fighting fires but also extremely persistent in the environment and the human body.
Scientific research has established a strong link between PFAS exposure and an increased risk of several cancers, including:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recognized the potential health hazards associated with PFAS and is working on developing analytical methods to understand better and regulate these toxic substances.
As more research is conducted, additional cancers may likely be linked to PFAS exposure.
In addition to the cancers mentioned above, PFAS in fire-fighting foam has also been associated with other malignancies.
Firefighters who have used these foams over an extended period may be at a higher risk for:
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is actively studying the health effects of AFFF exposure on firefighters.
Their research aims to understand better the relationship between toxic firefighting foam and cancer diagnosis rates among this high-risk population.
While cancer is one of the most serious health concerns related to fire-fighting foam exposure, PFAS chemicals can cause a range of other health issues as well.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has identified several potential health problems associated with PFAS exposure.
PFAS have been shown to interfere with thyroid function, potentially leading to hypothyroidism or other thyroid disorders.
Symptoms of thyroid disease can include:
Firefighters with a history of fire-fighting foam exposure should have their thyroid function monitored regularly.
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) recommends that firefighters undergo periodic health screenings to detect any potential health issues related to occupational exposures.
Studies have also linked PFAS to various reproductive health problems.
These chemicals may:
The potential impact of PFAS on human health, particularly in the context of reproductive health, is an area of ongoing research.
As more studies are conducted, additional health concerns related to PFAS exposure are likely to be identified.
There are several ways that firefighters can be exposed to the harmful chemicals in fire-fighting foams.
Understanding these exposure pathways is crucial for minimizing health risks.
PFAS contamination can occur through various routes, including inhalation and skin absorption.
When fire-fighting foams are used, they can create a fine, easily inhaled mist.
Breathing in these tiny droplets allows PFAS to enter the lungs and be absorbed into the bloodstream.
Even after the fire is extinguished, these chemicals can linger in the air, prolonging exposure.
Military firefighters and those who fight fuel fires are at a particularly high risk of inhaling PFAS-containing foams.
The Department of Defense has recognized the potential health risks associated with AFFF exposure and is working to phase out the use of these toxic chemicals.
PFAS can also be absorbed through the skin when firefighters come into direct contact with fire-fighting foam.
This can happen when:
Wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to minimize skin contact with these chemicals.
The NFPA has established standards for firefighter PPE that aim to reduce exposure to toxic substances like PFAS.
One of the most concerning aspects of PFAS exposure is the long-term health consequences.
These chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” can persist in the body for years, leading to cumulative effects over time.
Unlike many other toxins, PFAS are not easily broken down or excreted by the body.
This means that even low-level exposures can accumulate over the years, potentially reaching harmful levels.
Firefighters who have used PFAS-containing foams throughout their careers may have significantly higher body burdens of these chemicals.
The persistence of PFAS in the human body is a major concern for public health officials and researchers.
The EPA is working to develop regulations that will limit the use of these toxic chemicals and reduce human exposure.
As PFAS build up in the body, they can cause increasingly severe health problems.
Firefighters with a long history of fire-fighting foam exposure may be at a higher risk for:
The cumulative effects of PFAS exposure are an area of active research.
The ATSDR is conducting better studies to understand the long-term health consequences of PFAS exposures and identify populations at higher risk.
It is essential to take proactive steps to minimize exposure to protect firefighters from the harmful effects of fire-fighting foam chemicals.
The NFPA and other organizations have developed guidelines and standards to reduce the health risks associated with AFFF exposure.
Wearing appropriate PPE is one of the most effective ways to reduce exposure to PFAS in fire-fighting foams.
This includes:
The NFPA 1971 standard sets forth requirements for firefighter PPE, including protection against toxic chemicals like PFAS.
Adherence to these standards is crucial for minimizing exposure and protecting firefighter health.
Proper decontamination procedures should be followed after every incident involving fire-fighting foam.
This may include:
Establishing and adhering to strict decontamination protocols can help limit the long-term accumulation of PFAS in firefighters’ bodies.
The NFPA 1851 standard guides firefighter protective ensembles’ selection, care, and maintenance, including decontamination procedures.
Firefighters must undergo regular health monitoring due to the serious health risks associated with fire-fighting foam exposure.
The NFPA and other organizations recommend that firefighters receive periodic medical evaluations to detect any potential health issues related to occupational exposures.
Firefighters who have worked with PFAS-containing foams should have periodic medical screenings to check for early signs of health problems.
This may include:
The ATSDR has developed a PFAS exposure assessment tool that can help healthcare providers determine the appropriate medical monitoring for individuals with a history of PFAS exposure.
Regular health monitoring can help detect potential health issues related to fire-fighting foam exposure as early as possible.
Early detection is key for:
Firefighters should work closely with their healthcare providers to develop an appropriate screening schedule based on their exposure history and risk factors.
The NFPA recommends that firefighters receive annual medical evaluations and additional screenings based on occupational exposures and health concerns.
PFAS in fire-fighting foam has been linked to several types of cancer, including testicular, kidney, pancreatic, and liver cancer.
As research continues, additional cancers may be identified as being associated with PFAS exposure.
Firefighters can be exposed to harmful PFAS chemicals in fire-fighting foams through inhalation and skin absorption.
Inhaling the fine mist created by the foam or coming into direct contact with the foam can allow PFAS to enter the body.
In addition to cancer, PFAS exposure from fire-fighting foam has been linked to thyroid disease and reproductive issues.
Ongoing research may uncover additional health concerns related to these toxic chemicals.
To minimize health risks, firefighters should wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when using fire-fighting foam and follow strict decontamination procedures after exposure.
Regular health monitoring is also crucial for early detection of potential health issues.
Organizations like the NFPA and EPA are working to establish guidelines and regulations to reduce the use of PFAS-containing foams and minimize firefighter exposure.
Ongoing research aims to develop safer alternatives and better understand the long-term health consequences of PFAS exposure.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?