Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: How much is the AFFF lawsuit going to payout?
Answer: The AFFF lawsuit payouts are expected to range from approximately $20,000 to $1,000,000 (or more) per plaintiff , depending on various factors.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, the types of exposure covered in the AFFF lawsuit , the role experienced attorneys play in maximizing AFFF payouts for plaintiffs, and much more.
The amount of compensation each plaintiff receives in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits depends on several critical factors:
The amount of your AFFF lawsuit payout will depend on the extent of your exposure and the type of cancer you developed.
Experienced attorneys at TruLaw can fight to get you the maximum settlement amount possible.
The amount of compensation each plaintiff receives in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits will depend on several key factors.
The two most important variables that will determine AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts are the duration and severity of the plaintiff’s AFFF exposure and the specific type of cancer they developed.
Plaintiffs who had frequent, long-term occupational exposure to AFFF firefighting foam , such as firefighters who regularly used the foam, are likely to receive the highest lawsuit payouts.
Those with more limited or short-term exposures will likely fall into lower settlement tiers and receive smaller amounts.
The cumulative extent of a plaintiff’s aqueous film-forming foam exposure over time is one of the most significant factors impacting settlement values.
Regular exposure over many years puts plaintiffs at the greatest risk of developing serious AFFF-caused cancer and health conditions , increasing their lawsuit payout.
Some key factors that will impact AFFF lawsuit settlement based on exposure include:
The specific type of cancer diagnosed is the other major variable affecting AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts.
Scientific evidence has most strongly linked firefighting foam cancer to:
Complaintiffs with these cancer types will likely receive the highest tier payouts.
Those with prostate or other cancers less directly tied to AFFF firefighting foam MDL will receive lower settlement amounts, as well as plaintiffs with non-cancerous conditions like ulcerative colitis or thyroid disease.
While the firefighting foam lawsuits have not yet settled, based on settlement values in comparable mass torts, plaintiffs in the AFFF litigation could potentially expect payouts ranging from around $20,000 for lowest-tier cases to $1,000,000 (or more) for the most severe top-tier cases.
Complaintiffs in the top settlement tier will likely be those with the most extensive occupational exposure to AFFF firefighting foam over many years AND a diagnosis of kidney or pancreatic cancer, the malignancies most strongly associated with the PFAS chemicals in the foam.
These Tier I claims could potentially see AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit payouts ranging from $300,000 to $1,000,000.
The second tier of individual AFFF lawsuit settlements will consist of plaintiffs with significant long-term exposure and testicular cancer or other cancers closely linked to PFAS.
These Tier II claims could potentially see AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit payouts ranging from $100,000 to $300,000.
The lower settlement tiers will include plaintiffs with less directly related cancers, like prostate cancer, and those with more limited AFFF firefighting foam exposure.
The lowest tier may also include non-cancer conditions, like ulcerative colitis.
These Tier III claims could potentially see AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit payouts ranging from $20,000 to $100,000.
Experienced attorneys play an essential role in securing the highest possible payouts for plaintiffs in AFFF firefighting foam cases .
The right lawyer will build the strongest case for compensation by thoroughly documenting the extent of your exposure and working with experts to causally tie your firefighting foam cancer lawsuits to the PFAS in firefighting foam.
In mass tort cases like the AFFF MDL , settlement amounts are negotiated by the lead attorneys appointed to the plaintiffs’ steering committee.
These lawyers will aggressively push the defendants for a settlement structure that maximizes payouts for the injured plaintiffs.
Your own attorney will then fight to ensure you receive the highest compensation tier within that settlement based on the individual facts of your firefighting foam lawsuit .
At each stage of litigation, it is critical to have skilled counsel advocating for your interests and working to get you every dollar you deserve.
Having a skilled lawyer experienced in AFFF litigation can significantly impact your AFFF lawsuit payout.
Knowledgeable AFFF lawyers will know how to fully document the extent of your exposure and work with medical experts to demonstrate how your cancer is connected to AFFF clearly.
This builds the strongest case, placing you in the highest possible settlement tier.
Look for AFFF attorneys who have:
Your choice of legal representation is one of the most important decisions affecting your AFFF settlement amount .
Look for attorneys with deep experience in PFAS contamination cases and a track record of success taking on big chemical companies like 3M and DuPont .
The right lawyer can mean the difference between a low-tier payout and a top-tier, six-figure settlement.
The AFFF lawsuit has seen several significant developments in recent months.
Most notably, in June 2023, defendant manufacturers 3M, DuPont, and others announced a settlement deal to resolve hundreds of water contamination claims filed by local governments.
This deal did not include the individual AFFF lawsuits that are still moving forward.
For plaintiffs looking to file an AFFF lawsuit , the firefighting foam litigation is entering a key phase.
After several years of consolidated discovery and pre-trial proceedings, the first bellwether trials in the MDL are expected to begin in mid-2024.
These initial test cases will provide the first indications of how juries will respond to the evidence and what kind of verdicts plaintiffs can expect.
Depending on the results of the bellwether trials , a global settlement may follow later in 2024 or 2025 .
The outcome of these early cases will heavily influence the settlement amounts that AFFF manufacturers will be willing to pay.
Plaintiffs should work closely with their lawyers to track the latest lawsuit updates and understand how these developments may impact their cases and expected payout.
In June 2023 , manufacturers 3M, DuPont, and other companies involved in the AFFF litigation struck a deal to settle claims filed by local governments alleging foam-related drinking water contamination.
While those cases were part of the larger firefighting foam MDL , this settlement only covers the water contamination claims, not individual AFFF lawsuits whose cases are still proceeding.
With the first firefighting foam settlement announced, many plaintiffs are anxious to know when they can expect a resolution and payout of their individual cases.
While there is not yet a clear timeline, the consolidated AFFF cases will likely not settle until after the first round of bellwether test trials, previously expected to begin in 2024.
Now that the water contamination claims have been settled, the court may move up that bellwether trial schedule.
Still, based on this trajectory, individual AFFF plaintiffs can hopefully expect a global settlement and resulting payouts beginning in mid-to-late 2024 and into 2025.
At TruLaw, we believe that AFFF exposure victims deserve the highest possible compensation for the harm they’ve suffered.
Our team of experienced attorneys is committed to holding the manufacturers accountable and fighting for every dollar our clients are owed.
We understand the intricate scientific evidence needed to prove the link between firefighting foam and cancer.
Our lawyers will invest the time and resources necessary to build the strongest possible case on your behalf and ensure you receive the maximum compensation available.
When you work with TruLaw, you can have peace of mind knowing that your case is in the most capable hands.
With our dedicated advocacy in your corner, you can focus on your health and recovery while we handle every aspect of your legal claim.
At TruLaw, our experienced AFFF firefighting foam attorneys are committed to fighting for every dollar you deserve from the manufacturers who exposed you to PFAS chemicals.
If you or a loved one developed cancer after exposure to AFFF, contact us today for a free consultation.
You pay nothing upfront, and we only collect a fee if we recover a settlement for you.
Let us put our skills to work to get you the maximum AFFF lawsuit payout possible.
The two most important variables that will determine AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts are the duration and severity of the plaintiff’s AFFF exposure and the specific type of cancer they developed.
Plaintiffs who had frequent, long-term occupational exposure to AFFF firefighting foam are likely to receive the highest lawsuit payouts.
Scientific evidence has most strongly linked firefighting foam cancer to kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, and testicular cancer.
Plaintiffs with these cancer types will likely receive the highest tier payouts.
Based on settlement values in comparable mass torts, plaintiffs in AFFF litigation could potentially expect to see payouts ranging from around $20,000 for the lowest-tier cases to $1,000,000 (or more) for the most severe top-tier cases.
Tier II AFFF payouts could potentially range from $100,000 to $300,000.
Experienced AFFF attorneys can significantly impact your AFFF lawsuit payout by thoroughly documenting the extent of your exposure and working with medical experts to demonstrate how your cancer is connected to AFFF clearly.
They will fight to ensure you receive the highest compensation tier within the settlement based on the individual facts of your case.
Individual AFFF plaintiffs can hopefully expect a global settlement and resulting payouts beginning in mid-to-late 2024 and into 2025 after the first round of bellwether test trials .
The outcome of these early cases will heavily influence the settlement amounts that AFFF manufacturers will be willing to pay.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?