Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss the best law firm for an AFFF lawsuit, TruLaw’s experience in assisting with AFFF lawsuit claims, a comprehensive overview of the AFFF litigation, and much more.
When considering legal representation for an AFFF lawsuit, it’s important to choose a law firm that can handle the complexities of these cases.
At TruLaw, we work with our partner law firms to ensure that clients are connected to experienced legal teams who can guide them through the process.
Here are some key factors to consider when hiring the right firm for your AFFF claim:
If you or a loved one has been affected by AFFF exposure, choosing the right legal team is a critical step toward seeking compensation.
Contact TruLaw today through the chat on this page to receive a free case evaluation and learn more about your options for pursuing an AFFF lawsuit.
TruLaw has a strong reputation for assisting clients with claims related to AFFF exposure.
Our expertise and dedicated team make us a top choice to connect individuals and communities facing serious health risks due to toxic firefighting foams with legal representation that meets their unique needs.
TruLaw and our partner law firms have successfully assisted clients in numerous toxic exposure litigations similar to the AFFF lawsuits.
TruLaw’s client-focused strategy and commitment to effective legal advocacy in Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) exposure cases has established our firm as a leading choice for AFFF-related claims.
While the AFFF litigation is still ongoing and no settlements have been reached yet, our focus remains on advocating for individuals impacted by AFFF exposure.
TruLaw and our partner law firms are committed to:
We are deeply committed to addressing the serious health risks linked to AFFF exposure, including firefighting foam cancer claims.
Our dedication to protecting public health and pursuing justice for affected individuals remains at the forefront of our efforts in these cases.
At TruLaw, we have cultivated a strong network of attorneys who specialize in AFFF exposure claims.
Our partnerships with experienced legal teams across the country ensure that each client is connected to a network with a wide range of expertise and resources.
Our network allows us to provide comprehensive legal support, addressing the unique processes related to AFFF litigation while tailoring our approach to meet the specific needs of each client.
Key benefits of working with TruLaw include, but are not limited to:
Our network enhances our ability to deliver exceptional service to individuals affected by AFFF exposure.
By working closely with attorneys and specialists who understand the intricacies of AFFF lawsuits, we are able to pursue justice for our clients effectively and efficiently.
Whether handling claims involving occupational safety or other contamination sources, we are committed to ensuring that every client receives the highest level of legal advocacy through our broad network of AFFF lawsuit attorneys.
The AFFF litigation addresses serious health risks associated with exposure to firefighting foams containing PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).
These chemicals have been linked to various adverse health effects, leading to increasing legal actions.
Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) is a firefighting foam commonly used to suppress flammable liquid fires, particularly in aviation, military, and industrial settings.
It contains PFAS, a group of synthetic chemicals designed for their water and oil-repellent properties, making AFFF highly effective in extinguishing fires quickly.
However, PFAS are known as “forever chemicals” because they persist in the environment and accumulate in the human body, leading to potential health risks such as cancer, liver damage, and developmental issues.
At TruLaw, we are committed to understanding the dangers associated with AFFF exposure and providing clients with up-to-date insights.
TruLaw and our partner law firms are focused on cases involving health conditions linked to AFFF — including kidney and testicular cancer, other cancers, and other diseases like thyroid issues.
Some of the key areas we focus on include:
Our work focuses on assisting individuals who believe their health has been compromised due to AFFF exposure.
The complex legal landscape surrounding AFFF lawsuits is evolving, with multiple claims being brought forward by individuals affected by long-term exposure to these chemicals.
The AFFF litigation involves allegations of severe health conditions caused by this toxic exposure.
Key components of these lawsuits include:
TruLaw, in collaboration with our partner law firms, is prepared to support those affected by AFFF exposure as they navigate the legal process — helping them pursue their claims and seek the justice they deserve.
When pursuing compensation for AFFF-related damages, selecting the right legal team is critical.
At TruLaw, we work closely with our partner law firms to ensure our clients receive the attention their claims deserve.
AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits require attorneys who understand the unique challenges these cases present.
From how the chemicals in firefighting foam affect human health to the intricate legal procedures involved, it’s important to have knowledgeable legal support.
The attorneys we collaborate with possess the necessary insight to advocate for fair compensation on behalf of clients.
Here are some key reasons it’s important to choose the right legal team for your AFFF claim:
Successfully navigating the legal process often involves multidistrict litigations (like the cases centralized in South Carolina).
A thorough understanding of PFAS-related health impacts, combined with strong legal strategy, can significantly influence the outcome.
The attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms are committed to guiding clients through every step — from initial filings to negotiating potential settlements — allowing our clients to focus on their health and recovery.
If you or a loved one has been affected by AFFF exposure, you may qualify to pursue compensation.
Contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine your eligibility to join others in filing for the AFFF MDL today.
At TruLaw, we believe every client affected by AFFF exposure deserves personalized attention throughout the legal process.
We prioritize building strong, trusting relationships with each individual, ensuring their unique circumstances are carefully considered as we assist with their claims.
No two AFFF exposure cases are alike.
That’s why we dedicate time and resources to thoroughly understanding each client’s specific situation and the impact AFFF exposure has had on their health and well-being.
Key aspects of our personalized approach include:
By focusing on these areas, we ensure that our clients feel supported and heard throughout the process.
Securing strong legal representation can play a crucial role in the outcome of an AFFF lawsuit.
At TruLaw, we collaborate with experienced partner law firms that use a range of negotiation strategies to ensure clients receive the attention their claims require.
The attorneys we work with are committed to advocating for fair compensation and have developed specialized approaches to handle the nuances of AFFF litigation.
Our team, in partnership with other law firms, uses a comprehensive strategy to help position AFFF claims for the best possible settlements.
Every case is unique, and a tailored approach is essential in addressing the specific circumstances of each client’s exposure.
Some of the key elements include:
This multi-faceted approach ensures that claims are well-prepared for negotiations, with a focus on securing fair compensation.
At TruLaw, we believe that individuals affected by AFFF contamination should have the opportunity to pursue justice without financial barriers.
Many law firms, including those we partner with, operate on a contingency fee basis, which means clients can access experienced legal representation without any upfront costs.
This fee structure allows individuals to seek legal support regardless of their financial situation, ensuring that everyone has the chance to pursue compensation for their AFFF-related damages.
We work on a contingency fee basis for AFFF claims, meaning clients don’t need to worry about paying any fees unless there is a favorable outcome.
This arrangement ensures that the financial risk remains with the law firm, allowing clients to focus on their recovery and the legal process.
Key benefits of our contingency fee structure include:
This approach ensures that the legal process aligns with the interests of both the client and the law firm, fostering a shared goal of achieving the best possible outcome.
At TruLaw, we are dedicated to guiding individuals affected by Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) exposure.
Together with our partner law firms, we work to ensure that clients’ claims are handled with the attention and care they deserve.
Our commitment to supporting those impacted by AFFF contamination reflects our dedication to justice.
Alongside our partner law firms, we understand the significant health risks associated with PFAS chemicals, and we’re focused on ensuring that every client’s case is thoroughly evaluated.
Here are some key aspects of our approach:
With this approach, we aim to support clients as they pursue the justice they deserve in their AFFF lawsuits.
When you choose TruLaw, you’re selecting a firm that is focused on providing dedicated support for AFFF claims.
We work closely with our partner law firms to bring extensive experience in toxic exposure litigation, similar to AFFF-related injury claims.
Key reasons to work with TruLaw include:
By choosing TruLaw, you are aligning with a team that is committed to helping you navigate your AFFF lawsuit with confidence, working to ensure your voice is heard and your case is handled with care.
Connecting with legal professionals for your AFFF lawsuit is now easier than ever with the chat on our website.
Through the chat, you can quickly get in touch with the attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms to discuss the details of your firefighting foam exposure claim.
At TruLaw, we are committed to helping individuals affected by AFFF exposure find the legal support they need.
If you’ve been exposed to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam and have suffered health impacts, we can assist in connecting you with legal teams that offer tailored guidance for your specific situation.
Using the chat on this page, you can:
Our chat is quick and accessible, offering an efficient way for firefighters and others affected by AFFF exposure to begin the legal process.
We’re here to help you take the first step towards securing the legal representation you deserve.
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a toxic firefighting foam that contains dangerous chemicals called polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These chemicals have been linked to serious health issues like cancer and thyroid disease.
Anyone who has been regularly exposed to AFFF products, such as firefighters, military personnel, and airport workers, and has developed health problems like kidney cancer may be eligible to file an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits typically involve personal injury claims, wrongful death claims, and product liability claims against the manufacturers of AFFF firefighting foam.
These lawsuits are often consolidated into multidistrict litigation (AFFF firefighting foam MDL) for more efficient handling.
Look for law firms with experience handling AFFF claims and a proven track record of success in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits.
The best law firms will have firefighting foam lawyers who understand the complex legal and scientific issues involved in these cases.
AFFF contamination has been reported in many states, including South Carolina, where a major AFFF firefighting foam MDL is currently underway.
If you believe you have been affected by AFFF exposure, it’s important to speak with an experienced attorney who can help you understand your legal options, regardless of where you live.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?