Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the AFFF Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit, estimates of possible AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts, eligibility criteria to file an AFFF lawsuit, and much more.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) was created in the 1960s through a collaboration between the U.S. Navy and 3M to effectively combat fires involving Class B materials.
These fires, often involving jet fuel, oils, and other hazardous substances, were effectively managed by spraying AFFF.
However, AFFF contains PFAS chemicals, commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have been linked to several types of cancer, including ovarian cancer.
Many individuals exposed to AFFF have reported serious health issues, including cancer.
AFFF foam lawsuits are being filed across the nation by individuals who believe they were harmed by exposure to AFFF firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or another health problem linked to AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to pursue legal action.
You can use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Our team is available to answer any questions you may have and guide you through the process.
If you believe you have been affected by AFFF exposure, don’t hesitate to reach out and learn more about how we can assist.
Exposure to AFFF has been associated with an increased risk of various cancers, including ovarian cancer.
Research has connected PFAS chemicals present in AFFF to an increased risk of cancer and other significant health issues.
A study featured in Environmental Health Perspectives indicated that exposure to PFAS chemicals, such as those found in firefighting foam, may elevate the risk of cancers like ovarian cancer, lymphoma, and prostate cancer.
Although PFAS chemicals do not break down easily, they can accumulate in the body over time, potentially disrupting organ functions and contributing to uncontrolled cell growth.
A recent study published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology indicates that PFAS and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals may contribute to the development of ovarian cancer and various other serious health conditions.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and later diagnosed with ovarian cancer, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw for a free consultation by using the chatbot on this page to instantly check your eligibility.
Research has shown that the manufacturers of AFFF, including the U.S. Navy, were aware of the toxic effects of PFAS chemicals for decades.
Despite this knowledge, these chemicals continued to be used, potentially putting countless individuals at risk.
Studies have consistently linked PFAS exposure to an increased risk of cancer and other serious health problems.
Some notable research findings include:
Due to growing health concerns, AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873) in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.
Multidistrict litigation, or MDL, is a legal process used to streamline these cases by consolidating similar lawsuits into a single court for pretrial proceedings.
Individuals exposed to AFFF firefighting foam who have developed cancer or other health problems are likely to have their cases included in this MDL.
AFFF lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for producing and distributing firefighting foam that may have exposed individuals to harmful chemicals.
Plaintiffs argue that these manufacturers were aware of the potential risks associated with PFAS compounds and failed to take appropriate measures to protect the public.
As of now, no settlements have been reached in the ongoing AFFF litigation.
However, based on similar cases, AFFF firefighting foam lawyers estimate that potential settlement amounts may range from $20,000 to $1,000,000 (or more), depending on the details of each case.
These projections are based on previous mass tort cases and are not a guarantee of compensation.
For more information about settlement values, it’s important to speak with a law firm that is handling AFFF lawsuits.
Currently, there is no AFFF firefighting foam class action lawsuit in place.
The AFFF cases are consolidated into an MDL, which is different from a class action.
In an MDL, each plaintiff’s case is handled individually, with compensation determined by the specifics of each case.
This allows for a more personalized approach compared to class actions, where settlements are distributed evenly among all plaintiffs.
Multiple companies have been identified as defendants in the ongoing AFFF cancer lawsuits.
These companies are responsible for the manufacturing and distribution of AFFF products that may have exposed individuals to harmful chemicals.
The defendants include:
PFAS, the chemical found in AFFF, is water-soluble, which makes it highly susceptible to spreading through various water sources.
Over time, this contamination has impacted water tables, underground reservoirs, and drinking water systems across the country, leading to widespread concerns about public health all over the country.
As these chemicals seep into the ground, PFAS builds up, resulting in high concentrations that can affect the health of millions.
Civilians may be unknowingly consuming small amounts of these chemicals in their drinking water every day, which can accumulate in their bodies over time.
The challenge with PFAS is that it is not easily removed from water sources.
Referred to as “forever chemicals,” PFAS can remain in aquifers and water tables for hundreds to potentially thousands of years.
This means that many generations may continue to face the consequences of PFAS contamination.
As a result, several states and local governments have taken legal action by filing AFFF lawsuits, including Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Vermont.
Various towns and cities, such as Baltimore, MD; Pittsboro, NC; and Philadelphia, PA, have also joined the effort to address the long-term impacts of PFAS contamination.
It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury claims — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.
Lawsuits related to AFFF exposure are being filed against manufacturers, with cases being consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
These lawsuits seek to hold manufacturers responsible for the damage caused by exposure to PFAS chemicals present in firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam and developed cancer or other health risks, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
You can use the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
We are committed to helping individuals through the legal process, including gathering evidence and assessing damages.
In an AFFF lawsuit, it is important for plaintiffs to provide evidence supporting their claims of harm caused by toxic exposure to firefighting foam.
The firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms work to assist clients in collecting and preserving the evidence required to build a strong case.
Evidence in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits may include:
Potential compensation in these lawsuits reflect the total losses suffered due to exposure to toxic AFFF chemicals.
Attorneys work closely with clients to calculate and assess both economic and non-economic damages.
Damages in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits may include:
Through thorough legal representation, clients can seek compensation for the harm they’ve endured due to exposure to PFAS in firefighting foam.
Exposure to toxic chemicals found in firefighting foam has been linked to several types of cancer and other serious health conditions.
The AFFF firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are dedicated to holding large corporations and firefighting foam manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by AFFF exposure.
If you or a loved one has developed cancer or experienced other adverse health effects due to regular exposure to firefighting foam, you may be eligible to pursue legal action and seek compensation.
Contact us today for a free consultation by using the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL consolidates individual lawsuits filed by those who have developed health issues or been diagnosed with cancer following exposure to AFFF.
Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a federal procedure designed to group cases with similar facts and circumstances into one court.
This streamlines the legal process and ensures consistent decision-making across cases.
Sometimes you will see this referred to as the AFFF class action MDL — this is incorrect.
Although MDLs and class action lawsuits might appear similar, they have distinct differences.
In an MDL, each claimant’s compensation is determined based on their individual situation, such as medical costs and duration of exposure.
In contrast, a class action would provide equal compensation to all claimants, regardless of their specific circumstances.
An experienced AFFF attorney can guide clients through every step of the legal process.
AFFF attorneys work to build strong cases by gathering evidence, assessing damages, and presenting your situation accurately.
They also help ensure that all deadlines are met and necessary documentation is submitted.
The goal is to secure a fair settlement that reflects the impact of your exposure to firefighting foam.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to AFFF and developed health problems, you may qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw for an instant case evaluation by using the chat on this page to quickly determine if you qualify for an AFFF lawsuit.
Individuals who have been exposed to AFFF and suspect that their health problems are linked to this exposure may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Those filing AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits often include airport and military firefighters, municipal firefighters, military personnel involved in training with AFFF, and others who were regularly exposed to the foam.
To learn more about whether you qualify for an AFFF lawsuit, reach out to the experienced firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms for more information.
You can do so by using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Research has shown that exposure to firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals is linked to several serious health issues, including various cancers.
Cancers and other health issues associated with AFFF exposure include, but are not limited to:
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?