AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit

Analyze My Case
  • Last Updated: December 10th, 2024
Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • Firefighting foams like AFFF contain toxic PFAS chemicals that have been linked to cancers such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
  • Victims, including military and civilian firefighters exposed to AFFF, are filing lawsuits for compensation due to inadequate warnings from manufacturers about health risks.
  • Lawsuits aim to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages suffered by those diagnosed with illnesses after using or being exposed to AFFF.

Overview of the AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit , information on average AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts , eligibility criteria to file an AFFF lawsuit , and much more.

AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit

Intro to the AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuits

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been used since the 1960s to suppress fires fueled by liquids or gases.

This firefighting foam contains PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have been associated with an increased risk of several cancers, including Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Although the use of AFFF has been gradually phased out, many individuals have suffered health effects potentially related to exposure.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, other cancers, or any related health issues due to AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit .

Use the chatbot on this page to contact TruLaw and determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit to date.

Thousands of lawsuits have already been filed by those affected by AFFF, and manufacturers are facing increasing litigation due to health risks associated with PFAS chemicals.

If you believe you’ve been impacted, reach out to us with any questions you may have about your potential AFFF lawsuit .

Table of Contents

Links Between AFFF Firefighting Foam and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk

The PFAS chemicals present in AFFF firefighting foam have been connected to an array of cancers, including Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

According to a report by the CDC , prolonged exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), one of the chemicals in AFFF, has been associated with an increased risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, testicular cancer, and kidney cancer.

These chemicals belong to a broader category called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

The American Cancer Society has identified PFOA as a known carcinogen, which means that individuals exposed to PFAS chemicals face a higher risk of developing cancers like Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, along with other health complications.

PFAS Chemicals in AFFF Firefighting Foam and Their Impact on Human Health

For decades, the dangers of PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam have been known, and both the US Navy and chemical manufacturers were aware of these risks.

The US Department of Defense eventually issued a warning about the health risks and environmental contamination caused by AFFF.

Multiple studies have connected PFAS chemicals to increased cancer risks and various other health issues.

Cancers associated with PFAS chemicals include:

Other health problems associated with PFAS exposure include:

  • Thyroid disease
  • Decreased vaccine response in children
  • Increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women
  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Changes in liver enzymes
  • Small decreases in infant birth weights

Research on PFAS Exposure and Associated Health Risks

As research continues to uncover the extent of the risks posed by PFAS chemicals, the number of lawsuits related to AFFF exposure is expected to grow.

Several studies have examined the link between AFFF exposure and various health problems:

If you believe you’ve been affected, we encourage you to reach out to learn more about your options.

It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury claims — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.

What is the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL?

Individuals exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in different forms of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) are filing AFFF lawsuits against the manufacturers.

These toxic chemicals have been connected to serious adverse health effects, including various forms of cancer.

Given the high number of cases, the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits have been centralized into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.

This consolidation, known as MDL 2873 , includes lawsuits from individuals across multiple states who have suffered from AFFF-related health issues.

Sometimes you will see this referred to as the AFFF Class Action MDL — this is incorrect.

Class action lawsuits and multidistrict litigations are similar, but very different.

The experienced firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are actively involved in handling AFFF firefighting foam cases and are currently accepting new clients from all fifty (50) states.

Defendants Involved in AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

The defendants involved in these lawsuits are manufacturers of AFFF, many of which supplied the foam to military bases and other facilities.

These companies are accused of producing and distributing firefighting foams containing harmful PFAS chemicals.

The defendants in the AFFF MDL include the following manufacturers:

  • 3M
  • Chemours
  • DuPont
  • Tyco Fire Products
  • Dynax Corp.
  • UTC Fire & Security Americas
  • Several other manufacturers

What are the Average Settlement Amounts for AFFF Lawsuits?

If the lawsuits lead to favorable outcomes, individuals affected by AFFF exposure may receive settlements.

Although no settlements have been reached yet, we can look at similar large-scale civil cases to estimate potential outcomes.

Based on past tort cases, individual settlements in the AFFF MDL could range from $20,000 to $1,000,000 (or more).

However, the actual settlement amount you may receive will depend on the specific details of your case, such as the level of exposure, the severity of the illness, and other damages you may have experienced.

These estimates are not guarantees, and outcomes will vary based on individual circumstances.

Process for Filing an AFFF Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Lawsuit

AFFF lawsuits are being filed by individuals diagnosed with cancer, such as Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, after being exposed to toxic firefighting foam.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or another cancer due to AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to join the ongoing lawsuits.

Contact TruLaw to receive an instant case evaluation by using the chat on this page.

Collecting Evidence for Aqueous Film-Forming Foam Lawsuits

Building a strong AFFF case requires gathering solid evidence to support your claim.

Potential evidence for an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit may include:

  1. Detailed medical records
  2. Witness statements
  3. Employment history or records of occupational exposure
  4. Documentation of your contact with AFFF (if available)
  5. Other relevant records showing your involvement with AFFF foam

Potential Compensation in Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Damages refer to the losses an individual suffers as a result of PFAS exposure, including both economic and non-economic factors.

In an AFFF lawsuit , the legal team can help determine and calculate the full extent of these damages.

Potential damages in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits may include:

  • Medical expenses
  • Lost wages due to illness or injury
  • Disability or long-term health effects
  • Pain and suffering
  • Reduced quality of life

If you’ve lost a loved one due to a PFAS-related illness, such as Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, you may also be eligible to claim damages through a wrongful death lawsuit.

These claims can seek compensation for loss of companionship, funeral expenses, and other related costs.

The Importance of Selecting the Right Legal Team for Your AFFF Lawsuit

Pursuing legal action against AFFF manufacturers involves both scientific and legal challenges.

To ensure your rights are protected and that you are treated fairly, it is important to work with attorneys who have experience in handling cases of this nature.

From gathering evidence to negotiating potential settlements, we strive to support our clients as they pursue compensation for their health and financial losses caused by AFFF exposure.

TruLaw: Your Firefighting Foam Cancer Law Firm

Exposure to firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals, whether through incidental contact or occupational use, has been associated with significant health risks.

If you were regularly exposed to firefighting foam and have since developed health issues, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit .

The firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are dedicated to holding large corporations and firefighting foam manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by AFFF exposure.

Reach out to us today to learn more by using the chatbot on this page to instantly see if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Is there an AFFF class action lawsuit?

    No, there is currently no AFFF class action lawsuit.

    Instead, AFFF lawsuits have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.

    This MDL consolidates individual claims against manufacturers for health issues and damages related to AFFF exposure.

    It’s important to note that MDL is distinct from a class action lawsuit.

    In an MDL, compensation is awarded based on the unique circumstances of each case, while in a class action lawsuit, compensation is distributed equally among all claimants, regardless of individual factors.

    Some law firms may incorrectly refer to the AFFF MDL as an “AFFF Class Action Lawsuit,” but these terms are not interchangeable.

  • What diseases and health problems have been linked to AFFF foam?

    Exposure to PFAS chemicals found in firefighting foam has been associated with numerous cancers and other health issues.

    Cancers associated with PFAS exposure include:

    Other health problems potentially linked to PFAS exposure include:

    • Decreased vaccine response in children
    • Increased cholesterol levels
    • Changes in liver enzymes
    • Small decreases in infant birth weights
    • Thyroid disease
    • Increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia during pregnancy

    These risks highlight the dangers associated with long-term exposure to firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals.

  • What is the average AFFF lawsuit settlement amount?

    No settlements have been reached so far in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.

    However, legal experts predict that future settlement amounts may range between $20,000 and $1,000,000 (or more) per individual .

    These figures are based on settlements in other mass tort cases, but they do not guarantee compensation in the AFFF lawsuit.

    The actual settlement amount will depend on the details of each individual case and its strength.

  • What is the difference between AFFF personal injury claims and AFFF municipal water contamination cases?

    AFFF Personal Injury Claims involve individuals who have been directly exposed to AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) and suffered health consequences.

    This often includes firefighters, military personnel, or those living near contaminated sites.

    AFFF Municipal Water Contamination Cases focus on the contamination of public water supplies by AFFF.

    These cases typically involve municipalities or water providers suing the manufacturers of AFFF for the costs of cleanup and remediation.

    It’s important to note that TruLaw is strictly accepting clients with AFFF personal injury claims — we are not accepting clients for AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources