Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF Leukemia Lawsuit, potential AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts, who qualifies to file an AFFF lawsuit, and much more.
Since their introduction in the 1960s, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been used across various industries to suppress fires fueled by flammable liquids or gases.
While AFFF has proven effective in firefighting, it contains PFAS chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have been linked to several health risks, including leukemia, thyroid cancer, and other forms of cancer.
As concerns over AFFF exposure grow, lawsuits are being filed nationwide by individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer or other health conditions potentially related to this toxic foam.
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with leukemia, another type of cancer, or a related health issue following exposure to AFFF, you may be eligible to pursue legal action.
The AFFF firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are here to guide those affected through the legal process.
You can use the chatbot on this page to instantly check if you may qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit.
If you have any questions or wish to learn more about your potential claim, we are here to provide support and help you understand your options moving forward.
Exposure to PFAS chemicals has been associated with a heightened risk of developing leukemia.
According to the National Cancer Institute, studies indicate that PFAS exposure may contribute to an increased cancer risk, including leukemia.
Additional research has supported these findings, suggesting that individuals exposed to PFAS could be at higher risk for certain cancers.
Leukemia is a cancer that impacts the blood-forming tissues of the body, particularly the bone marrow and lymphatic system.
There are four main types of leukemia:
The symptoms of leukemia can vary but often include:
Research has shown that specific PFAS chemicals, such as PFOA and PFOS, are linked to increased cancer risks.
While research is ongoing, the evidence linking PFAS exposure to cancer is alarming, and continued studies are necessary to better understand the full extent of health impacts associated with these chemicals.
Several companies are now facing lawsuits for the inclusion of toxic chemicals in AFFF Firefighting Foam products, which have been linked to cancer and other severe health issues.
Many firefighting foam products contain PFAS chemicals, commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.
Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have issued warnings about the dangers of PFAS chemicals in AFFF, highlighting that exposure may contribute to a variety of serious health risks.
PFAS chemicals do not break down over time, remaining in the body and in the environment for extended periods.
This exposure has been linked to an increased risk of several cancers, including bladder, prostate, testicular, and kidney cancer, among other health issues.
Certain professions are particularly at risk for adverse health outcomes due to regular exposure to firefighting foam, including:
The companies currently facing AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits include:
Firefighting foam lawsuits are being handled through multidistrict litigation (MDL), with over 4,000 individual AFFF lawsuits currently pending.
While manufacturers of AFFF have made multiple attempts to dismiss these claims, TruLaw remains committed to pursuing justice for those affected.
The AFFF lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms are here to help individuals explore their legal options if they have been affected by AFFF firefighting foam exposure.
Use the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit today.
It is still too early to determine the exact settlement amounts for AFFF lawsuits.
However, based on previous lawsuits involving PFAS contamination, estimates suggest that AFFF settlements could range between $20,000 and $1,000,000 (or more).
These figures are based on prior mass tort cases and are not guarantees of compensation in the AFFF litigation.
As the AFFF lawsuits continue to progress, more information will emerge, we will have a clearer understanding of potential AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts.
The environmental impact of AFFF firefighting foam has been wide-spread, particularly in terms of water contamination.
AFFF is considered the leading contributor to PFAS contamination in drinking water.
Because PFAS chemicals are highly soluble, they spread easily through water sources, contaminating groundwater, drinking water, and surrounding ecosystems.
Firefighting foam, used in large quantities to suppress dangerous fires, can often seep into the environment, contributing to widespread pollution.
In response to the environmental harm caused by AFFF, several state and local governments, as well as municipal water authorities, have filed lawsuits against AFFF manufacturers.
These lawsuits seek to address the contamination of water supplies and hold manufacturers accountable for the resulting damage.
Some of the plaintiffs include:
Many other cities and local water agencies have also joined the legal efforts, seeking to mitigate the environmental damage caused by AFFF and ensure safe, clean drinking water for their communities.
It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury lawsuits — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS chemicals from AFFF firefighting foam and later diagnosed with leukemia or other health issues, you may be eligible to seek compensation through an AFFF lawsuit.
Reach out to us for a free consultation today to discuss the specifics of your case with our team and see if you are eligible for the AFFF lawsuit.
Use the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify for an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.
Having strong evidence is important in any AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms will assist you in gathering the necessary documentation to support your claim.
Evidence in AFFF lawsuits may include:
Assessing damages is an important step in determining the compensation owed in an AFFF lawsuit.
These damages encompass both economic and non-economic losses suffered due to AFFF exposure.
The AFFF attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms will work closely with you to calculate the full scope of your damages and demand appropriate compensation from the responsible parties.
Common damages in AFFF lawsuits may include:
It’s important to work with attorneys who have experience handling cases related to toxic exposure and product liability.
The firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms have vast experience handling AFFF claims and are dedicated to guiding clients through the process.
We recognize that AFFF exposure can lead to life-altering medical conditions, including cancer, which deeply impact a person’s quality of life.
That’s why we are committed to supporting our clients’ best interests and ensuring that they receive the compensation they deserve for the health consequences they have faced.
Any law firm you choose for your AFFF claim should demonstrate a strong commitment to securing fair compensation.
Carefully consider your options when selecting a legal team to handle your case.
TruLaw is actively assisting individuals explore their legal options if they have been impacted by Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) exposure.
Our focus is on ensuring that large corporations and chemical manufacturers are held accountable for the harm caused by the toxic firefighting foam they produced.
Many individuals who have been exposed to AFFF are seeking compensation for the health issues that have developed as a result of these products.
If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with cancer or experienced other health problems after consistent exposure to firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file an AFFF lawsuit.
Use the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to determine if you qualify to file an AFFF cancer lawsuit today.
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) are a group of human-made chemicals widely used across industries due to their resistance to heat, water, oil, and stains.
These unique properties have made PFAS a staple in products ranging from firefighting foam to non-stick cookware.
PFAS are toxic, persistent chemicals that do not break down easily in the environment.
Over time, they can accumulate in the human body, potentially leading to serious health effects, such as cancer, birth defects, and other complications.
Increased awareness of their risks has led to bans and restrictions in several states and countries globally.
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) is a type of firefighting foam commonly used in industries such as aviation, military, and petrochemical for fire suppression.
AFFF works by creating a barrier between the fire and the oxygen, which smothers and extinguishes fuel-based fires.
Developed in the 1960s by companies like 3M, Chemguard, and Tyco Fire Products, AFFF has been a key tool in extinguishing jet fuel fires, especially on military bases and airports.
PFAS chemicals are not limited to firefighting foam — they are found in many everyday products due to their durable, water-resistant properties.
These products include:
Those most at risk for exposure to firefighting foam are individuals whose work duties regularly involve the use or handling of AFFF products.
Exposure can also occur through contaminated drinking water, especially in areas near fire training facilities.
People most likely to suffer occupational exposure include:
Exposure to PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam has been associated with a range of serious health conditions.
These potential health risks include, but are not limited to:
The defendants in AFFF cancer lawsuits are companies that have manufactured or supplied firefighting foam to various industries, including fire departments, military bases, and airports.
Some of the companies named in AFFF lawsuits include:
The AFFF MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) was established in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina.
MDL is a special legal process used to consolidate cases that share common issues.
This consolidation speeds up the litigation process by grouping pretrial proceedings into a single court.
In the AFFF litigation, the AFFF firefighting foam MDL helps manage thousands of lawsuits related to firefighting foam exposure more efficiently.
AFFF Lawyers experienced in firefighting foam litigation can assist you through every stage of the legal process.
Some of the ways the AFFF firefighting foam lawyers at TruLaw and our partner law firms can support you include, but are not limited to:
The experienced firefighting foam attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront legal fees for pursuing your firefighting foam lawsuit.
If no settlement or compensation is awarded, you won’t owe any legal fees.
This contingency structure ensures that you can move forward with your case without financial risk on your end.
It’s important to note that TruLaw is only accepting clients with AFFF personal injury cases — we are not accepting clients for the AFFF municipal water contamination lawsuits.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?