Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss AFFF Exposure VA Disability, the process of obtaining VA disability benefits for AFFF-related health issues, the requirements for a successful claim, and much more.
To qualify for VA disability benefits related to AFFF exposure, you must meet several criteria, including:
If you’re a veteran struggling with health issues related to AFFF exposure during your military service, you may be eligible for VA disability benefits.
Contact TruLaw using the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation to learn more about your rights and how to pursue the benefits you deserve.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of AFFF exposure, VA disability, VA disability benefits, aqueous film-forming foam, and much more.
The military and other agencies have widely used Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) for firefighting and training exercises purposes.
Veterans who have been exposed to AFFF may be at risk for certain human health conditions and can seek VA disability compensation for ailments associated with this exposure.
Key Facts about AFFF Exposure and its Implications:
By understanding the relationship between AFFF exposure and potential health risks, veterans can better assert their rights for deserved disability compensation.
Veterans who were exposed to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) during military service may qualify for disability VA compensation if they’ve developed health concerns linked to this exposure.
Rigorous toxic chemical risk assessments have identified specific medical conditions associated with PFAS chemicals commonly found in AFFF.
The Department of Veterans Affairs recognizes several cancers as potentially connected to military exposure to PFAS forever chemicals.
Veterans diagnosed with any of the following may be eligible for benefits:
Each condition is evaluated individually, considering the veteran’s service records and toxic exposure history.
Beyond cancers, there are additional disabling conditions that may be associated with AFFF exposure.
Veterans experiencing these health issues may also be considered for disability compensation:
These conditions are part of a broader conversation concerning PFAS-related health concerns, which can manifest after serving in areas where AFFF firefighting foam was commonly used.
To successfully file a VA disability claim for conditions related to AFFF exposure, service members need to demonstrate how their military occupation led to the exposure and provide evidence that supports their AFFF foam lawsuit.
Certain military roles had a heightened risk of exposure to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), a firefighting substance used extensively at military installations.
Here are prominent roles with a higher exposure likelihood:
Establishing a service connection for VA disability claims hinges on sufficient evidence.
To this end, claimants should consider the following sources:
Veterans who have been exposed to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) may be entitled to VA benefits if health complications arise.
The VA disability ratings play a critical role in determining the level of financial compensation.
The VA assesses each AFFF-related disability based on its severity and impact on the veteran’s life.
Here’s how the process works:
Strong medical evidence is vital to support a veteran’s claim for AFFF exposure disabilities.
Keep the following in mind:
When Veterans are faced with a denial of their AFFF-related VA disability claim, understanding why the claim was denied and the appeal process is essential.
Veterans Affairs (VA) may deny AFFF exposure claims for several reasons.
Here are some key factors leading to denials:
Veterans have options for appealing a denial of their AFFF-related VA claim, which can involve several legal processes.
Before starting an appeal, Veterans should consider:
In the appeal process, Veterans may need to provide additional evidence or attend hearings, and support from legal experts can be particularly helpful.
The goal is to ensure that all aspects of the claim are thoroughly evaluated and that the Veteran secures the compensation benefits and medical care they deserve.
When a veteran is affected by AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) exposure, understanding the steps to take for VA disability compensation is vital.
These steps can help affected individuals manage their health conditions and secure the disability benefits they may be entitled to.
TruLaw has a reputation for being highly proficient in handling AFFF-related VA disability claims.
They guide veterans through the process of accessing their VA benefits.
Here’s what individuals should consider when pursuing an AFFF disability claim:
Veterans face unique challenges post-service, particularly with exposures that can long-term affect their health.
Metrically taken steps can positively impact the outcome of their claims for the benefits they deserve.
The Department of Veterans Affairs and Environmental Protection Agency recognizes several health concerns linked to AFFF exposure, including testicular cancer, kidney cancer, and other medical conditions.
Veterans who experience these symptoms may be eligible for disability benefits.
The Navy assesses AFFF exposure cases by evaluating potential health impacts and documenting exposure incidents.
Service members reporting illnesses potentially related to AFFF are advised to file a claim with the VA.
VA disability ratings for PFAS-related conditions vary depending on the severity of the condition.
Conditions like cancer may warrant a higher disability rating, reflecting the significant impact on a veteran’s health.
The VA acknowledges certain presumptive conditions from AFFF exposure, such as adult leukemia, aplastic anemia, and other myelodysplastic syndromes.
Veterans diagnosed with these conditions are presumed to be service-connected for disability compensation.
Toxic exposure on military bases can lead to presumptive disability benefits for veterans.
The VA examines the link between service on contaminated bases and subsequent health issues when determining entitlements to benefits.
Recent legislation like the Honoring Our PACT Act expands healthcare eligibility and disability benefits for veterans exposed to toxic PFAS.
The Act aims to support those who have suffered health consequences due to PFAS exposure during military service.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?