Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss AFFF Exposure, the health risks associated with exposure to firefighting foam, who is most at risk for AFFF exposure, and much more.
Exposure to AFFF can occur in various settings that include, but are not limited to:
If you have been exposed to AFFF and have been diagnosed with related health issues, you may be entitled to compensation through an AFFF lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page for a free case evaluation to determine your eligibility for an AFFF lawsuit.
Exposure to AFFF firefighting foam is a significant concern, mainly due to the presence of PFAS, chemicals that have been linked to several serious health conditions.
PFAS contamination from AFFF, often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, has been associated with an increased risk of various types of cancers.
Some of the cancers that have shown potential links to these substances include:
Beyond cancer, AFFF and the potentially harmful substances it contains, including PFAS, have been connected to a range of other health problems.
Here we list other negative effects identified:
Research indicates a breadth of negative health effects stemming from PFAS in AFFF, with continuous discovery shedding light on the health risks faced by those exposed to these toxic firefighting foams.
Exposure to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) poses a health risk, primarily through occupational contact and contaminated drinking water.
Understanding who is most at risk helps to enhance occupational safety and protect public health.
Persons whose work involves frequent contact with AFFF are at higher risk of exposure.
The human body can absorb PFAS chemicals in AFFF through skin contact, inhalation, or ingestion.
Below are some key professions where frequent contact with AFFF increases the likelihood of PFAS exposure:
These occupations increase the chances of direct contact with AFFF and elevate the risk of experiencing the associated health risks over time.
Communities located near facilities that use or manufacture AFFF may experience exposure through drinking water.
PFAS chemicals present can contaminate water supplies:
Drinking water that contains PFAS from AFFF represents one of the most significant risks to the public health of nearby communities.
Identifying and managing these risks is crucial to protect those at the highest risk.
When examining the potential health ramifications of AFFF exposure, it’s important to recognize specific symptoms indicative of PFAS exposure and understand the necessary medical tests to diagnose.
Individuals exposed to AFFF may present a range of symptoms attributed to PFAS.
Key symptoms include:
Several medical tests help identify health effects stemming from AFFF exposure.
Key diagnostic methods include:
Regular monitoring of basic physiological parameters such as cholesterol and liver function tests may also indicate systemic effects of PFAS.
By understanding the symptoms associated with AFFF and utilizing targeted diagnostic tests, healthcare professionals can better manage and address potential health impacts.
When addressing the health risks associated with AFFF exposure, it’s important to understand that medical and lifestyle interventions can help mitigate some negative health effects.
Treatment strategies should be tailored to individual needs, possibly involving medical supervision and lifestyle adjustments.
Medical professionals may recommend a specific care plan when someone has been exposed to AFFF and is facing health conditions.
This treatment can vary based on the severity of symptoms and the specific health complications involved.
Here are some common approaches to medical care for AFFF-related illnesses:
In addition to medical treatments, several lifestyle changes can potentially support better health following exposure to AFFF.
These adjustments can help the body recover and minimize further health risks.
Here are some lifestyle changes that can promote recovery and improve health after AFFF exposure:
Victims of AFFF exposure who have developed health conditions, such as cancer, might have legal recourse to seek compensation.
Here are specifics about initiating a lawsuit and the types of compensation that may be available.
Victims of AFFF exposure, including civilian firefighters and military personnel, can consider filing an AFFF lawsuit if they have developed health problems like cancer believed to be caused by the foams.
Here’s how one might proceed:
Exposure to AFFF can lead to serious health risks, including certain cancers and other chronic illnesses.
Lawsuits filed by victims often focus on the responsibility of manufacturers and distributors for producing and marketing potentially hazardous products.
Financial repercussions of AFFF exposure are significant, and the legal process can help victims obtain compensation for various damages:
Victims seeking compensation should secure legal assistance to understand the full spectrum of what can be claimed.
Legal experts can help navigate the detailed documentation and proof required to demonstrate the connection between AFFF use and subsequent illness.
Symptoms stemming from exposure to fire-fighting foams can include skin irritations, such as rashes, and flu-like symptoms, such as fever or headaches.
Some individuals might also experience issues like eye irritation or nausea.
Several types of cancer have been associated with fire-fighting foam exposure, notably testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer.
Additionally, there have been reports of bladder and leukemia cases related to this exposure.
Treatment for AFFF exposure is typically symptomatic, focusing on managing symptoms as they arise.
In cases of severe contamination, treatments may include methods to remove toxins from the body, such as chelation or activated charcoal.
Yes, veterans may be eligible for disability compensation if their AFFF exposure occurred during military service and they’ve developed related health conditions.
The Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 expanded healthcare eligibility for veterans exposed to toxic substances.
Long-term health effects from AFFF exposure may include an elevated risk of developing cancer, liver damage, thyroid disease, and immune system disorders.
Other concerns encompass hormonal imbalances and potential reproductive issues.
Indeed, a number of lawsuits are currently active concerning health issues attributed to AFFF exposure.
These litigations primarily target foam manufacturers, arguing negligence in informing users of the associated health risks.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?