Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss an overview of the AFFF Bladder Cancer Lawsuit, projected AFFF lawsuit settlement amounts, how to determine if you qualify to file an AFFF lawsuit, and much more.
Scientific studies have recently associated AFFF firefighting foam with several health issues, such as:
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with bladder cancer and have a history of AFFF exposure, you may be eligible to pursue compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation to file for an AFFF Bladder Cancer Lawsuit.
Firefighters who use aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) are at an increased risk of bladder cancer, primarily due to the presence of toxic PFAS chemicals in the foam.
These substances can accumulate in the human body, leading to various health risks.
Toxic PFAS chemicals, found in AFFF, are known to accumulate in the bloodstream of firefighters.
Here’s why firefighters may have higher levels of PFAS:
Research suggests that firefighters have PFAS in their blood at concentrations higher than those in the general population, which is attributed to their occupational exposure.
The exposure to PFAS from AFFF carries several health risks, including an increased risk of bladder cancer.
These are some of the concerning health effects linked to PFAS exposure:
Several types of cancer, including bladder cancer, have been observed with greater frequency among firefighters, a trend that warrants concern according to a study on firefighters’ health risks.
The litigation landscape is being reshaped as AFFF firefighting foam cases gain prominence due to their associated health risks and environmental impact.
Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) has been widely used for decades by firefighting units for its effectiveness in extinguishing fuel fires.
However, the substances contained within AFFF have been found to contaminate groundwater, leading to a rise in municipal water contamination cases across the United States.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has acknowledged this concern and is working toward addressing PFAS contamination.
The health and environmental consequences of AFFF contamination are significant:
Investigations into AFFF have revealed more direct concerns for human health.
Research has detected PFAS—the chemicals in AFFF—in human urine, indicating widespread exposure.
These chemicals have been associated with an increased risk of several cancers, including bladder cancer.
Studies show a link between PFAS exposure and increased cancer risks:
The discourse around AFFF and its potential health risks continues to develop as more cases are brought to light, reflecting a more informed and concerned public.
When considering an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit and its potential link to bladder cancer, confirming your eligibility is a foundational step.
This process involves a careful assessment of personal circumstances against the legal criteria.
If you’ve been diagnosed with bladder cancer and suspect it may be linked to exposure to firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file an AFFF Bladder Cancer Lawsuit.
To file an AFFF Bladder Cancer Lawsuit, individuals should typically meet the following criteria:
Several factors influence the potential compensation, such as:
Individuals are encouraged to seek legal guidance to help assess their situation and understand the steps to file an AFFF lawsuit.
When examining the outcomes of AFFF bladder cancer lawsuits, the financial compensation awarded to plaintiffs can vary based on numerous factors.
Settlement amounts may reflect the severity of harm, the duration of exposure, and other case-specific details.
The average settlement amounts for AFFF bladder cancer lawsuits are not publicly disclosed as they can be confidential.
However, they generally aim to cover a range of damages:
Looking at specific case settlements, the details are often sealed or undisclosed to the public.
Nevertheless, some notable settlements have been reported:
Each firefighting foam lawsuit involves careful consideration of the unique circumstances, exposure levels, and resulting health impacts.
It’s important to consider that AFFF firefighting foam settlement amounts are influenced by substantial evidence linking the chemical exposure to the plaintiff’s condition.
Exposure to certain chemicals in AFFF firefighting foams has been linked to increased risks of developing various types of cancer.
This section emphasizes the hazardous compounds in these foams and the professions most at risk.
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are primary components that have raised health concerns.
These substances are prevalent in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), widely used by firefighters for its effectiveness in combating fuel fires.
However, they have become central to concerns over potential carcinogenic effects.
Here are a few details about their chemical properties and effects:
Certain professions, particularly firefighting, involve regular contact with AFFF, increasing occupational exposure to harmful chemicals like PFOA and PFOS.
Occupations subjected to an increased risk of AFFF exposure include, but are not limited to:
When considering a lawsuit for bladder cancer related to AFFF, it’s important to understand the role of a qualified attorney and the specifics to look for when choosing legal representation.
An experienced AFFF lawyer can provide essential assistance throughout the legal process.
Here’s how they can help:
Selecting the right firefighting foam attorney is a significant step in seeking justice.
Consider these points:
When aiming to file an AFFF bladder cancer lawsuit, having the right legal support can increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Always ensure that your firefighting foam attorneys are adept in managing such specialized cases.
TruLaw stands out as a leading legal advocate for individuals who have developed bladder cancer potentially linked to AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) exposure.
Their reputation as the top AFFF bladder cancer attorneys is built on a foundation of detailed investigation, robust client representation, and updated knowledge of relevant laws and scientific findings.
Their legal team specializes in AFFF-related cancer lawsuits, providing essential guidance to those affected by the risks associated with firefighting foam.
With a focus on obtaining justice and compensation for victims, they leverage their expertise to challenge entities responsible for AFFF production and distribution.
Here is what distinguishes TruLaw in firefighting foam cancer litigation:
Victims seeking reparation for their suffering can turn to TruLaw as a source of knowledgeable and steadfast legal representation. TruLaw remains committed to upholding the rights of individuals and striving for the accountability of those responsible.
Individuals may be eligible to participate in an AFFF cancer lawsuit if they have been exposed to Aqueous Film Forming Foam and subsequently diagnosed with bladder cancer.
Documented proof of exposure and medical diagnosis is typically required.
The current AFFF litigation is progressing through the court system, with many cases consolidated in multidistrict litigation to streamline the process.
Key decisions and precedent-setting rulings are still unfolding.
Several factors, including the severity of cancer, the cost of medical treatment, lost wages, and the impact on quality of life, all influences the settlement amount in AFFF bladder cancer cases.
Each case is assessed on an individual basis to determine fair compensation.
Yes, veterans who were exposed to AFFF during their service and have developed bladder cancer can file for VA disability benefits.
The condition must be service-connected to qualify for compensation.
Those who have been exposed to AFFF and diagnosed with cancer potentially have legal options including individual lawsuits, joining multidistrict litigation, and in some cases, applying for workers’ compensation or veteran benefits based on service-related exposure.
To choose a competent attorney for an AFFF bladder cancer claim, research attorneys with experience in environmental exposure cases, check their track record of success with similar cases, and ensure they communicate clearly and effectively throughout the legal process.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the AFFF Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?