FDA Issues Class 1 Recall of Zimmer Shoulder Replacement Device
- Last Updated: August 4th, 2023
Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
FDA Issues Class 1 Recall of Zimmer Shoulder Replacement Device
In February 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an urgent recall of the Zimmer Shoulder Replacement device due to a high rate of fracture.
According to Zimmer Biomet, problems with the device are due to its design, not a manufacturing error.
Fracture of the device is known to cause permanent loss of shoulder function, pain, infection, and other severe injuries.
The Class 1 recall, the highest level possible, indicates that a reasonable probability exists that use of the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death, according to the FDA.
Table of Contents
Reverse Shoulder Replacement Considered Problematic
Reverse shoulder replacement, less common that total shoulder replacement, is most often performed on patients who have sustained large rotator cuff tears that have caused them to develop a painful kind of arthritis known as cuff tear arthropathy.
Many reverse shoulder replacement patients have already undergone an unsuccessful total shoulder replacement procedure.
Reverse total shoulder replacement is by nature considered problematic, with a complication rate of four times that of conventional total replacement surgery.
Zimmer Biomet in particular has had issues with its shoulder replacement devices.
- In 2010, Zimmer Biomet recalled the Comprehensive Shoulder Humeral Tray with Locking Ring after receiving complaints regarding the fracturing of the device.
- Then on December 20, 2016, the company recalled the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder because the device was fracturing at a higher rate than stated in the labeling. Fractures could lead to revision surgeries and cause a number of adverse health consequences, including permanent loss of shoulder function, infection, and death.
- On February 16, 2017, the FDA identified the 2016 recall a Class I, the most serious type of recall the agency issues.
In 2016, Biomet Inc. agreed to pay $350,000 to a Colorado man who filed a Biomet lawsuit alleging failure of two Zimmer Biomet Reverse Shoulder Injuries, due to the component that the company had recalled in 2010.
Please share this article with individuals worried about loss of shoulder function from fractures due to design error of Zimmer Shoulder Replacement.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
