E-Cigarettes Include Diacetyl And Is Not A Stop Smoking Aid, Says Experts

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

E-Cigarettes Include Diacetyl And Is Not A Stop Smoking Aid, Says Experts

There is growing evidence that the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as a stop smoking aid to traditional cigarettes is not the solution that it was once thought to be, according to data presented recently at the 17th World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) in Vienna.

diacetyl in e-cigarettes, chemical linked to popcorn lung

Furthermore, the U.S. surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, released a report on December 8th that notes e-cigarettes include harmful ingredients like diacetyl, a chemical flavorant linked to serious lung diseases including bronchiolitis obliterans, or “popcorn lung disease” as it has been referred to in lawsuits.

Table of Contents

E-Cigarettes Associated With Variety of Respiratory Problems

Dr. Charlotta Pisinger, presenter of the new data, said it is possible that the potential harms associated with e-cigarette use are being obscured by studies that have selection biases and reflect extreme conflicts of interest.

She suggested that there are a number of respiratory problems associated with the use of e-cigarettes, particularly from unregulated chemicals present in the fluid or vapor.

The findings contradict a controversial report published by Public Health England (PHE) last year that claimed e-cigarettes to be about 95 percent less harmful to health than tobacco cigarettes.

Concerns were raised over the quality of the studies and the validity of the claims.

E-Cigarettes – A Step Backward instead of Forward

Electronic cigarettes, commonly called e-cigarettes and also known as electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), are battery-operated devices designed to deliver nicotine with flavorings and other chemicals to users in vapor instead of smoke.

Most contain three different components, including:

  • A cartridge, which holds a liquid solution containing nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals
  • A vaporizer (heating device)
  • A power source (battery)

E-cigarettes are being manufactured to resemble traditional tobacco cigarettes, cigars or pipes, or even everyday items like pens or USB memory sticks.

More than 250 different e-cigarette brands are currently on the market.

Recent research suggests that e-cigarettes may serve as a “gateway drug that could make users more likely to use and become addicted to other drugs.

Surgeon General Murthy told the Associated Press that if e-cigarettes drive users to other tobacco products, “then we are going to be moving backward instead of forward”.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources