Depakote Birth Defect Case Results in $15 Million Verdict
- Last Updated: August 4th, 2023
Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Depakote Birth Defect Case Results in $15 Million Verdict
Earlier this month, a federal jury awarded $15 million in compensatory damages to a 10-year-old boy whose mother alleged her son suffered a Depakote birth defect.
She was on AbbVie Inc.’s bipolar drug Depakote while she was pregnant.
The boy was born with spina bifida, a condition his mother alleged resulted from her taking Depakote to treat bipolar disorder while she was pregnant, claiming she was not adequately warned about the risk of birth defects associated with the medication.
The lawsuit also made allegations that the drug was defectively designed and inadequately tested.
Table of Contents
Depakote Used to Treat Seizure Disorders
Depakote, an anticonvulsant, and mood stabilizing medication, is used to treat several conditions, including epilepsy, bipolar disorder, migraine headaches, mania, and behavioral problems associated with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia.
The Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (NEAD) study published in the August 2006 issue of Neurology found that approximately 20.3 percent of pregnant women who took Depakote suffered serious adverse side effects related to their birth of their offspring, as compared to only one to 10.7 percent with other similar medications.
In response to this study, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Black Box warning several months later.
Depakote Side Effects
According to the FDA, the use of Depakote by pregnant women can produce teratogenic effects at birth children resulting in congenital malformations such as spina bifida, brain defects, and malformations of the face, skull or cardiovascular system.
Depakote is also known to cause decreased IQ scores in children.
In addition, Depakote has also been linked to valproate syndrome, a rare condition that can cause children to develop facial deformities that may take time to evolve.
For this reason, the FDA warns that women of childbearing age must weigh the risk of taking Depakote against these known side effects in their offspring.
Depakote Birth Defect Lawsuits
Mothers who believe a drug they took during pregnancy could have caused a birth defect continue to file lawsuits against Abbvie, the maker of Depakote.
According to Abbvie, approximately 695 injury claims are currently pending and Depakote lawyers continue to speak with families who believe they may qualify for a lawsuit or settlement on their child’s behalf.
Families who believe their child’s birth defects could have resulted from taking this migraine/seizure medication while pregnant should speak with a birth defect lawyer and consider joining the other families in filing a Depakote birth defect lawsuit.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
