How to Join the Suboxone Lawsuit

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key takeaways:

  • Suboxone litigation involves allegations of anticompetitive behavior by its manufacturer.
  • Eligible individuals may join the lawsuit to seek judicial remedies.
  • The lawsuit proceedings offer an avenue for compensation but require careful deliberation.

Overview of the Suboxone Lawsuit

On this page, we’ll provide a step-by-step guide on how to join the Suboxone Lawsuit, who qualifies to file a Suboxone lawsuit, the benefits of working with TruLaw to pursue a Suboxone injury case, and much more.

Intro to the Suboxone Lawsuit

To join the Suboxone lawsuit, follow these steps:

  • Gather evidence of your Suboxone use and the injuries you have experienced, such as medical records and photographs.
  • Contact a reputable law firm handling Suboxone cases, such as TruLaw.
  • Provide the law firm with information about your case during a free consultation.
  • If the law firm determines that you qualify to join the Suboxone lawsuit, they will guide you through the process of filing a claim.

Working with an experienced law firm like TruLaw can help ensure that your rights are protected and that you receive the compensation you deserve.

Use the chat on this page for a free case evaluation and to learn more about how to join the Suboxone lawsuit.

Table of Contents

Understanding the Suboxone Lawsuit

This section delves into the Suboxone lawsuit, focusing on allegations against Indivior and claims of anticompetitive behavior.

Understanding the Suboxone Lawsuit

Overview of the Allegations Against Indivior

Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, faced legal challenges alleging serious misconduct related to the sale and marketing of the drug.

Suboxone is a medication prescribed for the treatment of opioid addiction.

The company has been embroiled in controversy, facing several serious accusations, as outlined below:

  • Allegation 1: Accused of falsely promoting Suboxone film as safer and less prone to abuse than similar drugs.
  • Allegation 2: Alleged to have misrepresented safety data to obstruct generic competition.
  • Allegation 3: Indivior was involved in a scheme to maintain a monopoly over the market.
  • Allegation 4: The company is said to have shifted from a tablet to a film version to extend patent protection under the guise of safety concerns.

Plaintiffs’ Claims of Anticompetitive Practices

Plaintiffs in the Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits argued that Indivior engaged in practices that violated antitrust laws.

They pointed to specific actions they believed were intended to suppress generic competition and maintain high prices.

Outlined below are the specific claims brought forward by the plaintiffs:

  • Claim 1: Indivior is accused of employing “product hopping,” a strategy of making minor changes to a product to extend its patent life.
  • Claim 2: Actions are said to have delayed the entry of cheaper generics, keeping costs high for those in need.
  • Claim 3: The company is accused of creating barriers to entry for generic competitors through legal and regulatory tactics.
  • Claim 4: Plaintiffs also claim that these practices amounted to setting up an illegal monopoly, causing financial harm to consumers and healthcare providers.

Eligibility Criteria for Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

Before considering participation in the Suboxone lawsuit, individuals must understand the specific criteria for being a plaintiff.Eligibility Criteria for Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

This section outlines these criteria and guides on how to compile the necessary evidence.

Determining If You Qualify as a Plaintiff

Eligibility to join a Suboxone lawsuit hinges on a few key considerations.

Primarily, individuals must have been affected directly by the use of Suboxone, whether through personal health complications like tooth decay, dental injuries, alleged overpricing, or other damages.

Key criteria for determining eligibility to participate in the lawsuit are as follows:

  • Statute of Limitations: This legal time frame varies by state but requires potential plaintiffs to file within a certain period after they first became aware of the harm caused.
  • Involvement with Suboxone: Those prescribed Suboxone within the specified time frames, especially between March 1, 2013, and February 28, 2019, may qualify.
  • Proof of Purchase: Claimants must provide evidence of having obtained Suboxone through legal channels.
  • Health Impacts: Documentation of Suboxone-related health issues, such as tooth decay, is necessary for joining the Suboxone tooth decay litigation.

Gathering Evidence to Support Your Claim

Building a strong claim requires gathering comprehensive evidence to back the allegations against Suboxone.

Claimants should focus on assembling detailed documentation to fortify their lawsuit participation.

Essential pieces of evidence that claimants need to gather include:

  • Medical Records and Diagnoses: These documents should clearly show any health issues, particularly Suboxone tooth decay, due to Suboxone usage.
  • Financial Records: Receipts or insurance claims related to the purchase of suboxone tablets are critical in substantiating the claim of overpricing under the class action.
  • Correspondence: Any communications with healthcare providers regarding Suboxone, its effects, or treatment for its side effects should be compiled.
  • Legal Notice Acknowledgment: Proof that the claimant has been informed of the lawsuit and understands the scope of the Suboxone class action lawsuit is necessary.

The Process of Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

Participating in a Suboxone lawsuit involves specific steps, primarily focusing on whether to file a complaint or join an existing suit and selecting a legal representative with expertise in this particular area.

The Process of Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

This structured approach ensures that individuals are given the best opportunity to seek compensation.

Filing a Complaint or Joining an Existing Class Action

For individuals who have experienced adverse effects or financial harm due to Suboxone, the opportunity to seek justice and compensation through legal action is available.

Understanding the process and requirements for filing a new complaint or joining a class action lawsuit already in motion is essential.

To initiate or become part of a Suboxone lawsuit, interested parties should:

  1. Identify whether a class action lawsuit already exists, which might be related to allegations of overcharging or misleading practices by Suboxone’s manufacturer.
  2. Evaluate their eligibility based on the time frame and circumstances outlined by existing suboxone teeth lawsuits, such as prescription suboxone film in the United States at certain times.
  3. Complete the necessary paperwork, either to file a new complaint or to join an already filed class action lawsuit. This includes providing details about their usage of Suboxone and any harm suffered.
  4. Submit the documents to the appropriate legal body, adhering to the deadlines and procedures to ensure their involvement is registered and accepted.

Working with an Experienced Suboxone Lawsuit Attorney

Engaging the services of an attorney well-versed in Suboxone lawsuits can be a game-changer in seeking justice and compensation.

Such legal experts bring invaluable insights and strategies, ensuring your case is handled with the utmost expertise.

Selecting a suitable attorney is essential, as they can navigate the legal aspects and advocate on one’s behalf:

  1. Look for attorneys who specialize in pharmaceutical lawsuits and have a track record of dealing with cases against Suboxone’s manufacturer.
  2. Consult with Suboxone lawyers to understand the potential for a successful lawsuit based on previous case outcomes and specific circumstances.
  3. Discuss the complete fee structure, including any contingent fees which are payable only upon a successful settlement or court decision.
  4. Engage extensively with the attorney to develop a compelling case, providing them with all relevant information and documentation relating to Suboxone use.

Working with a legal professional experienced in Suboxone lawsuits can significantly affect the outcome.

They provide the necessary expertise to file a lawsuit or join an existing class action successfully.

Potential Compensation for Suboxone Lawsuit Plaintiffs

Victims of anti-competitive practices involving Suboxone may be entitled to financial restitution.

Potential Compensation for Suboxone Lawsuit Plaintiffs

This section examines what plaintiffs may expect in terms of damages and how the value of their claims could be assessed.

Types of Damages Recoverable in Antitrust Litigation

Antitrust litigation aims to address and rectify the economic harm caused by monopolistic practices and unfair competition.

Victims of such practices have several avenues for recovery, reflecting the multifaceted nature of antitrust violations.

The following are key forms of damages that can be pursued in antitrust litigation involving Suboxone:

  • Restitution of overcharges: Plaintiffs can seek compensation for excess amounts paid due to monopolistic actions.
  • Disgorgement of profits: Companies found to have violated antitrust laws may be required to surrender profits garnered from such conduct.
  • Civil penalties: Regulatory agencies might impose fines on companies that are found to have breached antitrust legislation.
  • Tripled damages: Under certain antitrust laws, plaintiffs might be eligible for triple the amount of actual damages incurred.

Estimating the Value of Your Suboxone Lawsuit Claim

Understanding the potential value of your Suboxone lawsuit requires a thorough analysis of both direct financial losses and broader economic effects.

By examining past legal outcomes and calculating overpayments, plaintiffs gain insight into the compensation they might expect.

To estimate the financial value of a Suboxone claim, plaintiffs should consider these factors:

  • Historical expenses: They need to calculate the total overcharged amount for Suboxone prescriptions during the relevant time frame.
  • Impact assessment: Assessing the broader economic impact, including barriers to accessing more affordable alternatives, is essential.
  • Legal precedents: Previous settlements, like the FTC’s involvement leading to a $60 million settlement for consumers, can guide value estimation.
  • Duration and extent of overcharge: The length of time and the amount by which consumers were overcharged due to anti-competitive practices affects claim value.

The Status of the Suboxone Lawsuit

The Suboxone lawsuit has seen significant developments, with a focus on both the current state of legal proceedings and potential resolution timeframes.

The Status of the Suboxone Lawsuit

Expected Timeline for Resolution or Settlement

Negotiations are progressing toward a conclusion for the Suboxone lawsuit.

Recent developments include settlement announcements and legal consolidations under the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, all of which aim to streamline the process and achieve a fair resolution.

As multidistrict litigation (MDL) continues, the timeline for the final resolution of the Suboxone lawsuit remains a topic of keen interest:

  • Settlements have been announced with the company, suggesting an approach towards resolution.
  • The Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has been instrumental in consolidating cases, indicating a move towards efficiency in legal proceedings.
  • While a definitive timeline remains unestablished, recent settlements signal progression toward closure.
  • Affected parties are encouraged to stay informed on updates from respective state attorney general offices concerning claim eligibility and deadlines.

Alternatives to Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

For individuals seeking options separate from a class action, exploring personal legal actions or contributing to governmental proceedings against Indivior may be viable paths.

Alternatives to Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

These provide more control over their claims or participation in broader regulatory efforts.

Pursuing an Individual Claim Against Indivior

Individual lawsuits allow a person to seek damages specific to their experience.

Such claims may be suitable for those with particular grievances not adequately represented by a group lawsuit.

To effectively pursue an individual claim against Indivior, consider the following steps:

  • Evaluate individual impact: Determine how the individual’s actions specifically affected personal health or finances.
  • Consult a legal expert: Seek the advice of an attorney focusing on pharmaceutical litigation.
  • Gather evidence: Document personal use of Suboxone and any related dental issues if claiming severe tooth decay. Collect medical records and financial statements as proof of damages.
  • Consider timeliness: Be mindful of statutes of limitations that apply to personal claims.

Risks and Benefits of Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

When considering the litigation against Indivior for its Suboxone product liability lawsuits, individuals need to weigh the pros and cons of entering into a class action lawsuit or pursuing individual Suboxone claims.

Risks and Benefits of Joining the Suboxone Lawsuit

Potential Drawbacks and Challenges of Antitrust Litigation

Antitrust litigation, especially when it involves pharmaceuticals, can be lengthy and complex.

Individuals should consider:

  1. Time Commitment: These cases can take years to resolve, which might affect personal timelines and expectations.
  2. Possibility of Dismissal: There is always a risk that the court may dismiss the lawsuit, potentially leaving claimants without recourse.
  3. Uncertain Outcomes: The amount of Suboxone settlement received can vary widely, and some participants might find the reward insufficient.
  4. Legal Fees: Although typically contingency-based, meaning fees come from the settlement, this can still reduce the compensation for claimants.

Advantages of Collective Action in Holding Indivior Accountable

When individuals come together to hold Indivior accountable, they leverage the power of unity and shared purpose to challenge corporate misconduct.

This collective approach amplifies each voice, ensuring that the concerns surrounding the Suboxone manufacturer are heard loud and clear.

Joining a class action lawsuit has particular merits, such as:

  1. Shared Resources: Claimants benefit from a consolidation of resources and expertise from specialized attorneys.
  2. Higher Impact: A class action can exert more pressure on a corporation than individual cases, leading to more substantial settlements.
  3. Reduced Financial Risk: Individuals share the costs associated with litigation, mitigating personal financial risks.
  4. Community Support: Plaintiffs gain support from being part of a group with similar grievances against the Suboxone manufacturer.

TruLaw: #1 Suboxone Lawsuit Attorneys

TruLaw stands out for its notable experience in representing individuals in the Suboxone lawsuit.

TruLaw #1 Suboxone Lawsuit Attorneys

They’ve built a reputation for their dedicated and informed legal counsel for those affected by Suboxone, bringing their professional insight to each case with a clear and knowledgeable approach.

Suboxone class action lawsuits have surged, with claimants alleging improper conduct by drug manufacturers.

TruLaw attorneys have become a prominent name, ensuring that affected parties are thoroughly represented.

They navigate legal proceedings with a firm understanding of the particulars surrounding Suboxone claims.

Key Aspects of TruLaw’s Approach:

  • Expertise: Specialized knowledge in pharmaceutical litigation, particularly Suboxone lawsuits.
  • Attention to Detail: Individual evaluation of claims to ensure personalized and accurate representation.
  • Resource Allocation: Utilizing extensive resources to support clients’ cases effectively.
  • Client Communication: Prioritizing clear and consistent updates for clients throughout the legal process.

TruLaw’s legal team is adept at drawing upon a wealth of experience to meticulously handle each lawsuit.

They attentively work to uphold the rights of those negatively impacted by Suboxone, seeking just compensation on their behalf.

Their steady confidence in addressing legal challenges, coupled with their neutral stance, makes them a trusted ally for many seeking justice in the wake of the Suboxone controversy.

For those looking into Suboxone lawyers or considering joining a Suboxone class action lawsuit, TruLaw provides a reliable point of contact.

They offer a clear route forward for individuals seeking to file Suboxone claims and obtain rightful recompense.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How can one join the ongoing Suboxone litigation process?

    Individuals who were prescribed Suboxone film and believe they were affected by the alleged improper actions of the manufacturer may be eligible to join the litigation process.

    It is often necessary to demonstrate that they purchased Suboxone during a specific time frame and were harmed by the conduct in question.

  • What compensation amounts are being awarded in the Suboxone settlements?

    While settlement amounts can vary based on individual circumstances, they are typically determined by factors such as the extent of harm suffered and the cost of Suboxone purchased.

    Individuals involved in the suit have received various compensation awards, reflecting the unique aspects of each case.

  • What is the deadline to file a claim in the Suboxone lawsuit?

    The deadline to file a claim can depend on the specific details of the suboxone tooth decay lawsuit and any settlements reached.

    Previously, there have been deadlines set, such as the one for claim submission which was December 1, 2020.

  • Are there specific legal requirements to qualify for the Suboxone lawsuit?

    Yes, there are legal requirements that must be satisfied to qualify for the Suboxone lawsuit.

    Typically, claimants must prove they purchased Suboxone during a specific period and were financially harmed by the alleged actions of the manufacturer.

  • How does tooth decay relate to the Suboxone legal claims?

    Tooth decay as a condition is not directly related to the Suboxone legal claims, which primarily focus on the company’s business practices and alleged antitrust violations.

  • What are the latest updates regarding the Suboxone litigation?

    The most recent information regarding the Suboxone litigation includes large settlements and ongoing claims processes.

    Significant updates include a $102.5 million settlement that was reached with multiple states and compensation distributions to individuals who were affected.

Published By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

You can learn more about the Suboxone Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

AFFF Lawsuit

AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.

Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.

Suboxone Lawsuit

Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.

Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.

Social Media Lawsuits

Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.

Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.

Bair Hugger Lawsuit

Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).

Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.

Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources