Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Suboxone Settlement for dental damage lawsuits, eligibility criteria for Suboxone settlements, the Suboxone lawsuit timeline and process, and much more.
Key aspects of the Suboxone Settlement include:
If you or a loved one has suffered from dental issues after using Suboxone sublingual films, you may be eligible to participate in the Suboxone Settlement.
Contact TruLaw today using the chat on this page for a free case evaluation to determine your eligibility.
Suboxone is a prescription medication used to treat opioid addiction.
In recent years, it has been in the news due to a Suboxone Settlement involving its manufacturers.
This settlement comes as a result of suboxone teeth lawsuits filed against the maker of Suboxone, Indivior Inc., for allegedly using illegal tactics to maintain a monopoly on the drug.
Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid dependence, has faced legal issues due to suboxone tooth decay claims of causing dental injuries such as severe tooth decay.
Patients have filed Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits, alleging that the manufacturer failed to warn about the potential risks associated with the drug’s use.
The primary issues mentioned in these cases include:
Dental injuries caused by Suboxone have become a significant concern for patients taking the medication, leading to several litigations against the manufacturers.
In addition to the dental injury suboxone claims, Suboxone’s manufacturer has faced suboxone tooth decay litigation related to their efforts to maintain a monopoly on the drug.
This legal battle has revolved around the company’s alleged attempts to switch the Suboxone market from tablets to film to preserve its exclusivity.
The impact on generic competition and prices includes:
As a result, the manufacturer has been compelled to pay significant settlements ranging into billions of dollars to resolve these allegations.
The Suboxone settlement involves a total amount of $102.5 million reached between Indivior Inc. and 42 states in federal court.
This suboxone tooth decay lawsuit stems from Suboxone’s maker, Indivior, being accused of using illegal means to switch the Suboxone market from tablets to film, thus violating antitrust laws.
This case is part of a larger body of federal Suboxone lawsuits, consolidated as multidistrict litigation and mass tort lawsuits in the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio.
The funds are allocated based on the extent of each state’s grievances and the population affected by the monopolistic practices of Indivior.
This structured distribution ensures that states most impacted by the company’s actions receive appropriate compensation.
The $102.5 million settlement is distributed among the 42 involved states:
Not all state-specific settlement amounts are detailed in the search results, but the allocation should be proportionate to the impact each state suffered due to Indivior’s alleged monopolistic strategies.
The settlement comes as a result of a suboxone dental lawsuit against Indivior Inc., the maker of Suboxone, for alleged illegal monopoly tactics.
As part of the settlement, Indivior has agreed to pay a total of $102.5 million to the plaintiff states.
The distribution of the settlement funds will follow a specific process:
The exact timeline for the payout process may vary depending on multiple factors.
However, here is a generalized estimated timeline based on the information available:
Remember that this timeline is an estimation and is subject to change.
It is always a good idea to monitor any updates from your state Suboxone lawyers, the attorney general’s office, or the designated Suboxone settlement administrator.
To be considered for a settlement payment, individuals must demonstrate they were directly impacted by the pricing and sales tactics used for Suboxone during the specified period.
These payments are part of an effort to address consumers’ financial burdens due to these practices.
To qualify for a payment from the Suboxone settlement, you must fulfil the following criteria:
You might be eligible for a payment if you meet these criteria.
Please note that the statute of limitations for this case has passed, and the application deadline was December 1, 2020.
The Suboxone settlement involves a payout of nearly $60 million to those prescribed Suboxone film and were victims of an allegedly deceptive scheme by Reckitt Benckiser Group and Indivior, Inc.
If you qualify for a payout, there are essential steps you need to take.
Upon receiving the eligibility notice for the Suboxone settlement, confirm that the details are accurate and take action to complete the application process promptly.
Following these steps will help you secure the settlement payment without any delays.
Once you receive an eligibility notice for the Suboxone settlement, it’s important to follow these steps:
It might be beneficial to consult with a Suboxone lawyer with experience handling suboxone tooth decay cases.
A consultation with a suboxone lawsuit lawyer from a reputable law firm can offer valuable insights and help you receive the highest compensation possible.
Here are a few reasons to consult with a Suboxone lawyer:
To find a reliable Suboxone lawsuit lawyer, consider researching law firms with a proven track record of handling Suboxone settlements.
An experienced Suboxone lawyer can provide the support and knowledge you need to ensure you receive your rightful compensation.
Individuals can verify the authenticity of their settlement fund checks by referring to the explanation and case details included with the payment or claim form.
The case should also be listed on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) website, along with the company name, issuing payments, and a phone number for questions.
The antitrust lawsuit participants may receive varying payout amounts due to individual eligibility requirements and the total number of claimants.
However, specific payout amounts were not provided in the search results.
When applying for a settlement payment, individuals can choose to receive their money via check or prepaid card.
Details about the prepaid card disbursement will be included in the instructions accompanying the payment offered during the application process.
Unfortunately, the provided search results do not include information on the lawsuit’s implications for those who experienced tooth decay attributed to the product.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Suboxone Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?