Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Average Suboxone lawsuit settlement amounts are expected to range from $10,000 to $500,000, with minor dental damage cases settling for $10,000-$50,000, moderate cases for $50,000-$150,000, and severe cases requiring extensive dental work potentially reaching $150,000-$500,000 or more.
Plaintiffs pursuing Suboxone lawsuits typically seek compensation for severe dental issues allegedly linked to Suboxone use to treat opioid addiction, including both economic and non-economic losses such as extensive dental treatments, pain and suffering, and quality of life impacts.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the average Suboxone lawsuit settlement amounts, factors influencing Suboxone lawsuit settlements, Suboxone-related oral health complications, and much more.
Suboxone attorneys nationwide are evaluating cases from individuals who believe that Suboxone contributed to significant dental damage, particularly for those who used the medication over an extended period.
These investigations aim to help plaintiffs pursue compensation for dental treatment costs, emotional distress, and other damages incurred as a result of Suboxone use.
Allegations in the Suboxone tooth decay MDL include, but are not limited to:
These allegations form the foundation of the Suboxone MDL, with plaintiffs seeking accountability from the manufacturer for damages related to extensive dental treatment and reduced quality of life due to oral health complications.
If you or a loved one has suffered severe tooth decay or other dental issues after using Suboxone, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify to file a claim in the Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits today.
Suboxone, commonly used to manage opioid addiction, is administered sublingually (under the tongue) and designed to dissolve in the mouth.
While this method is effective for drug absorption, it exposes the teeth and gums to the medication’s ingredients, which can contribute to oral health issues.
Patients using Suboxone long-term have reported complications such as severe tooth decay, dental erosion, and dry mouth (xerostomia).
These conditions can significantly impact oral health, requiring costly and extensive dental treatments.
One of the most commonly reported side effects of Suboxone use is extensive tooth decay and erosion.
The sublingual administration of Suboxone involves prolonged exposure to the drug’s acidic ingredients, which can gradually erode tooth enamel and make teeth more susceptible to decay. This has led to numerous legal claims, known as the suboxone tooth decay lawsuit, against the manufacturer for severe dental issues caused by the drug’s use.
Key aspects of tooth decay and erosion linked to Suboxone use include:
These effects emphasize the importance of early intervention and preventive dental care for individuals using Suboxone, as untreated decay can lead to further complications and costly restorative treatments.
Suboxone is also associated with xerostomia, or chronic dry mouth, which can increase the risk of dental issues.
Saliva protects your teeth by neutralizing acids and washing away bacteria.
Reduced saliva production makes the mouth susceptible to acid build-up, accelerating decay and other oral health problems.
Important considerations related to xerostomia and its dental impacts include:
Xerostomia contributes to dental decay and impacts a patient’s comfort and overall oral health.
For Suboxone patients, regular dental checkups, improved oral hygiene, and the potential use of saliva substitutes can help mitigate some of these risks and reduce the likelihood of severe dental complications.
Settlement amounts in Suboxone lawsuits can vary significantly based on the specific details of each case.
Plaintiffs typically seek compensation for severe dental injuries that allegedly resulted from prolonged Suboxone use, covering both economic and non-economic damages.
Factors such as the severity of dental issues, ongoing treatment needs, and the impact on a plaintiff’s daily life all play a role in determining final settlement amounts.
Understanding these influencing factors can help plaintiffs and their attorneys build a strong case for fair compensation and potentially secure a substantial suboxone lawsuit payout.
In Suboxone lawsuits, plaintiffs may be eligible to recover various damages that reflect the comprehensive impact of dental injuries.
These damages help address both the immediate and long-term costs associated with dental decay and oral health complications linked to Suboxone.
Types of recoverable damages in the Suboxone lawsuits include, but are not limited to:
These damages allow plaintiffs to pursue comprehensive compensation for the numerous ways Suboxone-related dental injuries have affected their lives.
They also aim to provide financial support for managing ongoing dental and medical needs arising from the injuries.
Settlement amounts in Suboxone tooth decay cases depend on various case-specific factors that influence the financial, physical, and emotional toll of dental injuries for those who have suffered severe tooth decay.
These factors help determine how much compensation a plaintiff may receive, providing a tailored approach that reflects the unique aspects of each claim.
Important determinants of your Suboxone settlement amount may include:
These determinants guide the valuation of Suboxone settlement amounts by addressing each plaintiff’s unique challenges and expenses.
Settlement amounts in Suboxone lawsuits are determined by evaluating both economic and non-economic damages, which represent the comprehensive impact of dental injuries linked to the medication.
Economic damages include concrete financial losses, while non-economic damages address personal, subjective losses like emotional distress and reduced quality of life.
By gathering the right documentation, plaintiffs can build a strong case for fair compensation that encompasses both types of damages. The ongoing Suboxone tooth decay MDL consolidates thousands of plaintiffs with dental issues, aiming to strengthen claims and potentially secure significant settlements.
Economic damages cover the tangible, out-of-pocket costs associated with dental injuries, which can be considerable due to extensive dental care needs.
To substantiate economic damages, plaintiffs should collect specific records detailing past and projected costs related to their injuries.
To support economic damages claims, consider gathering the following documentation:
By organizing these financial records, plaintiffs can provide a clear picture of their economic losses, ensuring that both immediate and future costs are accounted for in the settlement calculation.
Non-economic damages cover personal and intangible losses stemming from Suboxone-related dental injuries.
These damages are essential for highlighting the emotional and psychological toll of living with severe dental issues, which may have a lasting impact on the plaintiff’s confidence, social life, and overall well-being.
To substantiate non-economic damages, consider collecting the following types of documentation:
Collecting these records helps to illustrate the profound effect that Suboxone-related dental injuries have on personal well-being and daily life.
By documenting both economic and non-economic damages, plaintiffs can build a compelling case for a settlement amount that accurately reflects the full scope of their injuries and challenges.
In addition to economic and non-economic damages, plaintiffs may pursue punitive damages in cases where manufacturer negligence or misconduct is evident.
Punitive damages aim to penalize the defendant and discourage similar actions in the future.
If it can be shown that Suboxone’s manufacturer failed to warn users of potential dental risks or engaged in misleading practices, plaintiffs may have grounds to seek punitive damages. Federal Suboxone lawsuits are being consolidated into a single multidistrict litigation (MDL) to streamline legal processes and improve settlement negotiations.
Key considerations for punitive damages include:
While punitive damages are awarded less frequently than compensatory damages, they can significantly increase settlement amounts if awarded.
Including evidence of manufacturer negligence can increase compensation and hold the manufacturer accountable for the harm caused by their product.
By gathering thorough documentation for economic, non-economic, and potentially punitive damages, plaintiffs can build a robust case for fair compensation in Suboxone lawsuits, capturing the full scope of their injuries and their life impact.
As Suboxone-related dental injury lawsuits progress, plaintiffs and attorneys are beginning to estimate potential settlement payouts for Suboxone users.
Although individual settlements can vary significantly depending on the specifics of each case, projected ranges offer a general sense of the compensation plaintiffs may expect.
These projections are informed by the types of damages typically awarded in similar pharmaceutical injury cases, such as compensation for economic losses, personal suffering, and in some cases, punitive damages.
Settlement amounts for Suboxone-related dental injuries are expected to vary widely, reflecting each claim’s individual circumstances and severity.
While no firmly established average payout has been established, settlements in pharmaceutical injury cases with similar claims and damage types generally fall within specific ranges.
Based on these comparable cases, projected settlement amounts for Suboxone dental lawsuits may include:
These estimates provide a general idea of the possible financial recovery for Suboxone plaintiffs, but actual amounts will depend on the unique details of each case and the evidence presented.
Suboxone settlement amounts can differ widely among plaintiffs based on factors that influence the strength and value of each claim.
Even within projected ranges, the actual compensation awarded can vary due to the following key factors:
These factors contribute to variability in Suboxone settlement payouts, underscoring the importance of detailed documentation and legal guidance from Suboxone lawyers.
By understanding the elements that influence settlement values, plaintiffs can better anticipate potential outcomes and build a case that accurately reflects their unique situation and needs.
Filing a Suboxone lawsuit requires experienced legal representation to help plaintiffs address the complex issues surrounding pharmaceutical injury cases.
To file a Suboxone lawsuit, it is essential to outline the necessary steps, eligibility criteria, and the importance of legal representation. Suboxone lawsuits involve claims that the medication caused severe dental damage, often requiring plaintiffs to prove a direct link between their injuries and the drug, document extensive financial losses, and present evidence of potential negligence on the part of the manufacturer.
Given these challenges, selecting a qualified attorney is crucial for building a compelling case that maximizes the chance of a favorable outcome.
Product liability attorneys with experience in pharmaceutical injury cases bring specific skills and knowledge that can be invaluable for Suboxone plaintiffs.
These specialized attorneys understand the regulatory standards governing drug manufacturers, the nuances of proving medical causation, and the strategies needed to pursue compensation in product liability claims effectively.
Key reasons for choosing a specialized product liability attorney include:
Selecting a specialized product liability attorney ensures that plaintiffs have a knowledgeable advocate who can navigate the Suboxone litigation.
With experienced legal representation, plaintiffs can build a strong case that addresses all aspects of their injury, presents comprehensive evidence, and seeks fair compensation for the full range of damages.
While settlement amounts vary based on case specifics, Suboxone dental injury settlements are projected to range from $10,000 to $500,000 depending on severity.
Minor cases involving single tooth decay may settle for $10,000-$50,000, while severe cases requiring extensive dental work could reach $150,000-$500,000 or more.
The main dental complications associated with Suboxone include severe tooth decay, dental erosion, and chronic dry mouth (xerostomia).
The sublingual administration of Suboxone exposes teeth to acidic ingredients that can gradually erode tooth enamel and increase susceptibility to decay.
Individuals who experienced severe dental damage after using Suboxone for opioid addiction treatment may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Plaintiffs must demonstrate a connection between their dental injuries and Suboxone use, with documentation of dental treatments and related expenses.
Suboxone lawsuits typically seek compensation for both economic damages (dental treatment costs, lost wages) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, quality of life impacts).
Additional punitive damages may be available if manufacturer negligence can be proven.
The statute of limitations for filing a Suboxone lawsuit varies by state and depends on when you discovered the connection between Suboxone and your dental issues.
It’s important to consult with a product liability attorney promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the legal deadline.
Key evidence includes dental treatment records, documentation of Suboxone use, and proof of financial losses related to dental procedures.
Supporting documentation should also include medical records, photographs of dental damage, and expert testimony linking Suboxone use to dental injuries.
Currently, there is no Suboxone class action lawsuit.
Instead, Suboxone tooth decay cases are being organized into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
This legal process is designed to efficiently manage numerous claims from individuals who have experienced injuries due to the same product or event.
Although some law firms may refer to these cases as “Suboxone Class Action Lawsuits” or “Suboxone Class Action MDL,” these terms are not accurate.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Suboxone Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?