Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the SSDI medical evaluation process, recent changes in the SSDI evaluation process, tips for a successful SSDI application, and much more.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a five-step sequential evaluation process to determine an individual’s eligibility for SSDI benefits.
The five (5) steps of the SSDI evaluation include:
If you or a loved one is struggling with a medical condition that prevents you from working, you may be entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for a free SSDI consultation to see if you qualify and learn more about the application process today.
To qualify for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), individuals must meet specific criteria set by the Social Security Administration (SSA).
SSDI applicants must have accumulated enough work credits through employment covered by Social Security.
Additionally, SSDI defines disability as a condition that prevents substantial gainful activity and is expected to last at least one year or result in death.
Accumulating a sufficient amount of work credits within a specified time period is required to qualify for social security disability benefits.
Individuals earn work credits based on their annual income from employment or self-employment to earn up to 4 credits each year.
The number of work credits required to qualify for SSDI varies with age:
If you have accumulated enough work credits, then you must consider whether your medical conditions meet the SSA’s definition of disabled.
First, you must have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment that:
If your condition meets that criteria, it must also prevent you from performing substantially gainful activity (SGA).
The SSA defines substantial gainful activity (SGA) as work that:
Other aspects considered when the SSA is determining if an applicant is prevented from performing substantial gainful activity include, but are not limited to:
Other aspects in the SSA’s definition of a disability include, but are not limited to:
The SSA uses a 5-step sequential evaluation process to determine if someone meets this definition of disability.
This includes assessing the person’s current work activity, severity of impairment, ability to do past work, and ability to adjust to other work.
It’s important to note that this is considered a strict definition of disability.
The SSA states that their disability beneficiaries are “among the most severely impaired in the country” and are more than three times as likely to die in a year compared to others their age.
If you or someone you love is struggling with a medical condition inhibiting your ability to perform SGA, you may be entitled to monthly social security benefits.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for a free SSDI consultation and learn more about financial assistance options and support available to you today.
The Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) medical evaluation process involves assessing whether an applicant can engage in substantial gainful activity, the severity of their condition, and their ability to perform past or any other work.
This evaluation is conducted by Disability Determination Services (DDS), which reviews medical evidence and makes determinations on disability claims.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a five-step sequential evaluation process to determine an individual’s eligibility for SSDI benefits.
The five (5) steps of the SSDI evaluation include:
The Disability Determination Services (DDS) consider various factors when evaluating medical evidence to ensure accuracy and consistency while determining the unique characteristics of your claim.
These evaluations may include, but are not limited to:
The medical evidence used to prove your disability can include various sources, such as detailed medical records, comprehensive lab results, and professional statements provided by physicians.
A disability medical exam is arranged and carried out when additional information is needed to facilitate a thorough and informed decision-making process.
A wide array of medical evidence enhances your SSDI claim by providing robust support for your case.
The variety and completeness of your documentation can be used to demonstrate the severity of your condition to the SSA.
The following types of medical evidence that may be used include:
A consultative examination (CE) is an additional medical evaluation performed by a treating source or another qualified medical professional at the request and expense of the SSA.
The information obtained by a disability examiner during your consultative exam (CE) provides the SSA with current records to compare against your medical history to support your disability claim.
The doctor performing your consultative disability exam will typically conduct:
An SSDI lawyer can help you request and compile the medical evidence required for your application.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for a free consultation today to see if we can help you in successfully applying or appealing for SSDI benefits.
In 2024, the Social Security Administration (SSA) introduced a significant change to the disability evaluation process by reducing the past work evaluation period from 15 years to 5 years.
This change aims to simplify the process for applicants by focusing on their most recent and relevant work experiences.
The previous requirement of providing a detailed work history spanning 15 years often led to incomplete or inaccurate reporting, as it was challenging for individuals to recall such extensive details.
The SSA implemented this change to lessen the administrative burden on applicants and improve the quality of information received by decision-makers.
By concentrating on a shorter timeframe, the SSA can make more accurate determinations regarding an applicant’s current skills and capabilities, which better reflect today’s job market.
This update is part of a broader effort to modernize the vocational policy used in disability decisions.
The reduction in the past work evaluation period is expected to positively impact approval rates for SSDI applicants.
By focusing on recent employment history, the SSA acknowledges that job skills and requirements evolve rapidly, making older work experiences less relevant.
This change allows for a more accurate assessment of an applicant’s ability to perform substantial gainful activity based on current skills.
Early data following the implementation of this rule suggests an increase in approval rates, as it reduces the number of denials based on outdated work history.
This process also decreases administrative costs and backlogs to provide applicants with timely decisions.
A well-prepared Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) application is key to improving your chances of approval.
Thorough documentation and attention to detail can make a significant difference in the outcome of your claim.
Proper medical documentation forms the backbone of a strong SSDI application.
It provides concrete evidence of your condition and its impact on your ability to work.
Providing complete and accurate medical records is important for a strong SSDI application:
An experienced SSDI attorney can be a valuable asset in navigating the application process.
They can help you avoid common mistakes and strengthen your case.
Seeking legal guidance can greatly enhance your application’s chances of success:
Being aware of potential mistakes can help you steer clear of issues that could jeopardize your application.
Attention to detail and consistency are key factors in a successful SSDI claim.
Be mindful of these frequent mistakes that can harm your application:
The appeals process includes reconsideration, an ALJ hearing, Appeals Council review, and federal court review.
New evidence can strengthen an appeal if the initial application is denied.
The appeals process is vital for applicants whose initial claims have been denied.
Each step offers an opportunity to present your case and provide additional evidence to support your claim.
Presenting new, relevant evidence can significantly improve your chances of a favorable decision on appeal.
More medical evidence can help address any gaps or weaknesses in your initial application that may have led to the denial.
Remember, the key to a successful appeal is providing comprehensive, up-to-date evidence that clearly demonstrates how your condition meets the SSA’s definition of disability.
No, SSDI and SSI are not the same.
While both are disability programs administered by the Social Security Administration, they have key differences:
The SSDI medical evaluation process involves a five-step sequential assessment to determine an individual’s eligibility for disability benefits. This includes evaluating the applicant’s ability to engage in substantial gainful activity, the severity of their impairment, compliance with medical listings, and capacity to perform past or other work.
In 2024, the SSA reduced the work evaluation period from 15 to 5 years to simplify the process and enhance information quality. This change bases decisions on the applicant’s current skills and is likely to increase approval rates for SSDI benefits.
A successful SSDI application requires thorough medical documentation, including relevant tests, lab results, imaging studies, and detailed statements from treating physicians. Working with an experienced SSDI attorney can help avoid common mistakes and strengthen your case.
Disability Determination Services (DDS) reviews medical evidence, communicates with applicants, and makes determinations on disability claims. They may arrange for consultative examinations to obtain additional information and ensure accuracy and consistency in the evaluation process.
The SSDI appeals process includes reconsideration, an ALJ hearing, Appeals Council review, and federal court review. Each step offers an opportunity to present your case and provide additional evidence to support your claim.
Presenting new, relevant evidence can significantly improve your chances of a favorable decision on appeal for SSDI benefits. This may include recent medical records, detailed employment records, personal statements, and updated assessments from treating physicians that demonstrate how your condition meets the SSA’s definition of disability.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Social Security Disability Insurance by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?