Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
According to a Kaiser Permanente study, IVC filter fracture complications four or more years after insertion are “relatively common,” occurring 37.5 percent of the time for Cordis Optese and 23.1 percent for Trapease filters.
The study reviewed all IVC filters implanted in patients from January 2007 through December 2009 at multiple healthcare facilities throughout the U.S. The researchers identified all patients that had imaging of the filter taken at four years or more after implantation, and of those patients, IVC filters that had fractured were identified.
This is not the first study to determine that Cordis filters have high filter rates if left in place long term.
In 2012, another study published in JAMA Internal Medicine examined the complication rate of 20 patients implanted with TrapEase IVC filters for an average of 50 months and found that half of those filters had fractured.
After four years, the fracture rate increased to 64 percent.
Researchers recommended that patients implanted with Cordis filters be monitored closely by healthcare practitioners and consider having the devices removed.
The study concluded that patients with Cordis filters are “at an extremely high risk of strut fractures as early as two or three years after IVCF placement.”
IVC filters are small, cone-shaped devices that are implanted in the inferior vena cava, the large vein in the abdomen that returns blood from the lower body to the heart, These devices are designed to capture blood clots that have broken loose from one of the deep veins of the legs and prevent it from reaching the heart and lungs, where it can cause severe complications or even death.
IVC filters are frequently placed in patients who have a history of developing blood clots in the legs, particularly those who have been diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis, or DVT.
Until recently, IVC filters were designed to be implanted permanently, but newer devices, called optionally retrievable filters, have the option to be permanent or to potentially be removed later when the risk of a clot traveling to the lungs has passed.
Cordis Optese are retrievable IVC filters, while the Trapese filters are permanent.
Cordis IVC filter lawsuits are likely to move forward similarly to the Bard and Cook IVC filter lawsuits.
IVC filter lawyers are currently filing lawsuits by individuals implanted with the Cordis IVC filter and experiencing complications.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
Late last week, Youngstown Grape Distributors Inc. issued a voluntary recall of two lots of their Happy Moose Juice, citing a production error and an increased risk of bacterial contamination. The recall was initiated on October 4th, and the FDA shared the company’s announcement on
Philips Respironics, Inc. has issued an Urgent Medical Device Correction for their series of Trilogy Evo ventilators due to concerns of aerosol deposits on the flow sensor when using in-line nebulizers. According to the FDA, the correction involves a field safety notice with updated guidelines
The Wisconsin-based company Jack and the Green Sprouts, Inc., is recalling two lots of its Alfalfa and Alfalfa Onion sprouts due to possible contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. According to the FDA, the company announced the recall on October 4th. The recalled products are sold in