Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
It is no secret that large pharmaceutical companies spend big bucks marketing their drugs, and it has been reported that nine out of 10 large drug companies spend more money on marketing than on research.
Not so surprisingly, most of this marketing is directed toward those who prescribe the drugs the companies are trying to sell, not those who take them.
In 2012, drug companies spent more than $3 million marketing to U.S. consumers, and a whopping $24 billion marketing directly to medical professionals, according to a Washington Post report.
Because pharmaceutical sales representatives often get little or no face-to-face time with doctors, drug companies get around this hurdle with a tactic known as “white coat marketing.”
This approach involves improperly promoting medications, either through the use of a third party to deploy nurse educators to promote certain drugs or by providing free nurses and reimbursement support services to doctors in exchange for prescription of certain medications.
As a result of these schemes, Medicare and Medicaid have been duped into inappropriately paying for these prescriptions, prompting federal lawsuits alleging that several companies violated federal kickback laws, including:
Bayer Corporation, as well as subsidiaries Onyx Pharmaceuticals, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and the Lash Group, face a federal lawsuit involving several medications, including Betaseron (a Bayer product approved to treat multiple sclerosis), Nevasar (a product co-marketed by Bayer and Onyx to treat cancer).
The lawsuit charges that the companies:
Bayer also faces thousands of lawsuits concerning its controversial permanent contraception device Essure.
In a May 2015 news release, Bayer issued a post-market report on the safety of Essure but failed to disclose that the study’s lead author is a paid consultant to Bayer.
In response to a subpoena sent last January by federal officials, Sanofi employees were directed by a subsequent memo to locate all payments made to any patient charity that provides financial assistance to Medicare patients, all agreements with the consulting firm the Lash Group, and co-pays for Medicare payments who are taking two MS medications.
While drug makers commonly provide educational and financial assistance to patients, patient charities have been under increasing scrutiny over concerns that pharmaceutical companies are using these organizations to illegally jumpstart the sales of certain expensive medications.
Case in point: The Patient Access Network Foundation, the same charity that Pfizer used illegally to pay kickbacks to Medicare patients, also operates Medicare patient assistance programs for both Sanofi multiple sclerosis drugs, Aubagio and Lemtrada.
While there is no indication that the Patient Access Network Foundation has done anything wrong in connection with Sanofi, Pfizer recently agreed to pay nearly $24 million to resolve charges that the company illegally used the charity to cover co-pay costs for Medicare patients buying three of its drugs.
A new study conducted by researchers at Boston Medical Center found that even picking up the tab for a meal or two greatly increased a pharmaceutical company’s chances of a doctor prescribing their drugs – even opioids – despite an overall decline in opioid prescribing rates.
The researchers from Boston Medical’s Grayken Center for Addiction found that doctors who received any amount of opioid marketing increased their prescribing of such drugs in 2015, writing nine percent more prescriptions than those who received no marketing.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?