Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On July 14th, 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) is set to release a regulatory re-evaluation of aspartame.
Aspartame is a popular artificial sweetener used in thousands of foods, beverages, and consumer products.
The WHO’s cancer research arm, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), conducted a safety review of aspartame artificial sweeteners and will release two reports on July 14th.
Legal action for cancer risk related to aspartame consumption is being investigated.
If you or a loved one consumed aspartame containing products and subsequently developed cancer, you may be eligible to file an Aspartame Cancer Lawsuit claim.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a legal claim instantly.
Contact TruLaw for a free consultation.
Research on the increased cancer risk related to aspartame and other artificial sweeteners is highly debated, and more scientific studies are necessary to understand the impact these food additives might have on human health.
Aspartame is a popular artificial sweetener or food additive that has been ever-present in the food industry since the 1980s.
Aspartame is chemically composed of aspartic acid and phenylalanine, which are amino acids.
The sweetening power of aspartame is much greater than that of sugar, allowing for its use in smaller quantities to achieve the desired level of sweetness.
It is estimated to be approximately 200 times sweeter than sucrose (table sugar).
Due to its intense sweetness, only small amounts of aspartame are needed to achieve the desired taste, resulting in significantly fewer calories.
Since its approval by the FDA, it has been incorporated into a wide range of consumer products, including diet sodas, sugar-free desserts, chewing gum, and various other food and beverage items.
The approval of aspartame opened up new possibilities for providing a sweet taste in products while reducing overall sugar content and calorie intake.
Aspartame is considered safe for consumption by regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), when used within the acceptable daily intake (ADI) limits established by these organizations.
Aspartame has been the subject of ongoing debate and research regarding its potential to cause cancer and other health problems, with conflicting findings and inconclusive evidence necessitating further investigation.
Aspartame is commonly found in various products, including beverages, chewing gum, and toothpaste, and has been reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which considers it safe for the general population.
Products that may contain aspartame include:
Aspartame is set to be declared as possibly carcinogenic to humans by the the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the World Health Organization’s cancer research arm.
Decades after its approval by the FDA and other regulatory agencies, concerns regarding the safety of aspartame have prompted global health bodies to reevaluate its potential links to cancer and other adverse health effects.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has undertaken a comprehensive analysis, while the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, a joint committee of WHO and the United Nations, is updating its risk assessment.
The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer analyzed existing research to determine the potential carcinogenic effects of aspartame.
The findings of this analysis, along with the recommendations from the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, are set to be released on July 14th, 2023.
These expert committees comprise independent health professionals from around the world, providing a comprehensive evaluation of aspartame’s safety.
Understanding the potential link between aspartame consumption and cancer is essential for individuals seeking to make informed choices about their diet and overall health.
Cancers that researchers believe may be associated with aspartame consumption include:
It is crucial to note that the existing body of evidence does not establish a definitive link between aspartame consumption and cancer.
Many studies have yielded inconsistent results, highlighting the need for further research to better understand the potential risks associated with aspartame.
Regardless, our investigation into potential legal claims related to aspartame and cancer is ongoing.
Other than cancer risk, researchers have also identified other potential health concerns related to aspartame use.
These health problems or symptoms may include, but are not limited to:
In the event of an aspartame cancer litigation and your qualification to participate, various factors go into building a case and strategizing for a successful outcome.
These steps include gathering and retaining evidence related to aspartame use, as well as assessing and calculating damages resulting from health problems potentially attributed to aspartame.
Your lawyer would help you with both of these steps in an aspartame cancer lawsuit, but it is important to consider these before contacting an attorney.
Evidence that you used aspartame products and developed a related health condition would be included in an aspartame lawsuit claim.
Potential evidence might include:
In the event of an aspartame litigation, individual claimants’ damages would refer to the total amount of losses related to aspartame use and related health conditions.
Potential damages may include:
Damages would be unique to an individual’s case and an experienced attorney would be able to help you identify and calculate all possible damages in your case.
TruLaw is currently investigating the viability and potential strategy of an aspartame cancer lawsuit.
Visit this page for further updates.
TruLaw aims to connect people with legal representation that best suits their needs.
We are directly connected and informed by top attorneys in mass tort litigation, and we understand the importance of expert legal representation in any challenges you may be facing.
Contact us today and learn about how we can help you.
Regulatory agencies, FDA officials, and other health authorities have stated that aspartame is safe for human consumption and is one of the most thoroughly researched ingredients.
However, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer research arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), conducted a revised risk assessment for aspartame and is set to declare aspartame as possibly carcinogenic.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is not a food safety body and only makes classifications based on all the published evidence concerning aspartame and cancer risk.
This recent news about the artificial sweetener aspartame will undoubtedly send shockwaves through the health and legal communities.
Further investigation on all fronts is required: scientific, journalistic, and legal.
Our attorneys are currently investigating the science behind aspartame and cancer risk, strategizing whether legal action is viable.
Acceptable daily intake refers to the amount of aspartame that is considered safe to consume each day.
Some regulatory agencies have identified an acceptable daily intake of aspartame, with varying metrics in different geographic locations.
The European Food Safety Authority states that the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame is 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.
FDA scientists have outlined acceptable daily intake levels for different types of artificial sweeteners, and states that the acceptable daily intake for aspartame is 50 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.
Currently, there is NOT an active aspartame cancer lawsuit.
Legal action for potential health effects related to aspartame consumption is under investigation.
This page will be updated according to potential developments and litigation strategy.
Aspartame is used in thousands of products and by major food and beverage companies worldwide.
All the available evidence is not enough to outline every specific danger that may be associated with aspartame artificial sweeteners.
Again, the research on aspartame’s cancer risk and other health concerns is limited.
The following health problems may be linked to aspartame, according to research:
The scientific opinion on aspartame’s links to cancer are highly debated.
Agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Food Safety Authority, National Cancer Institute (NCI), and more have outlined the conflicted nature of research on aspartame’s health concerns.
Some studies have said that human consumption of aspartame leads to a slightly higher cancer risk.
The studies that address the cancer risk have been completed both on cohort studies and also on laboratory animal studies.
Some researchers say that these findings are widely discredited research and needlessly mislead consumers, and that aspartame is one of the most thoroughly researched ingredients.
Others say that aspartame is possibly cancer causing and aspartame intake may contribute to brain tumors, malignant tumors, breast cancer, and other serious concerns.
More research is required.
All the published evidence might not be enough to fully assess the potential impacts of aspartame intake on human health.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?