Why Are There So Many Bad Drug Lawsuits?

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Why Are There So Many Bad Drug Lawsuits?

Companies release new drugs every day and most of them are helpful, necessary and carry side effects.

If the drug company sufficiently warns the public about potential side effects or injuries as a result of taking the drug, there is no reason to file a lawsuit.


On the other hand, some side-effects go unnoticed or there may be reasons the drug company chose not to warn the public of these side-effects.

TruLaw believes that injured individuals not warned of the risk of injury have the right to hold the company responsible for those injuries accountable – this results in a bad drug lawsuit.

Table of Contents

Where do we learn of these bad drugs?

Calls from injured individuals who note they would not have taken the drug if they were told of the side effect/injury generally prompt investigations by a lawyers.

We also learn of injuries from individuals who chose to file complaints with the FDA.

Lawyers investigate these claims and if they can find that other individuals also experienced similar injuries, they may decide to pursue litigation.

The decision to pursue a bad drug lawsuit against BIG PHARMA is not one taken lightly by lawyers.

Lawyers filing such a lawsuit understand that they will face teams of highly compensated lawyers and lobbyists on the other side.

Lawyers filing suits on behalf of individuals are compensated ONLY if they win and its likely that is 3-5 years from the date they start investigating.

Therefore, lawyers filing bad drug lawsuits must truly believe in a successful outcome or they will go broke facing BIG PHARMA.

Why are there so many bad drug commercials on TV or on the internet?

We hate these ads too!

But, since you likely noticed these ads, let’s just agree that they are effective, and move onto why we need them.

By the time you notice any given drug ad, you have likely seen it a number of times, and you can assume that the reason for the push for that particular drug or medical device advertising is because there is an impending date after which any injured individual will be barred from filing a lawsuit or being included in a settlement.

Lawyers involved with these lawsuits often step up their advertising just before dates that will restrict the filing of lawsuits in order to reach anyone that may qualify.

This time bar on filing a lawsuit is generally due to a statute of limitations or a settlement of the lawsuit.

A statute of limitation is a state law that defines the time-period in which the claimant may file a lawsuit.

In drug and medical device cases it is generally defined as a certain number of years after the date you were injured or discovered your injury.

There is nothing more heartbreaking than having to turn away the lawsuit of an injured individual who should have qualified under the terms of the drug company’s settlement, but who didn’t learn about the lawsuit until after the drug company bars any further lawsuits.

Written By:
Jessie Paluch
Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three.  She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune’s water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Helpful Sites & Resources