Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who qualifies to file a Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit claim?
Answer: Individuals who consumed PFAS-contaminated drinking water at Travis AFB (Air Force Base) and subsequently developed health problems may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
The Travis Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit investigation addresses concerns regarding persistent chemical compounds in groundwater and drinking water surrounding the military base in California.
The PFAS chemicals detected in the groundwater at Travis Air Force Base have also spread to the area surrounding the military base – contaminating local drinking water supplies as a result and exposing nearby non-military residents to these toxic substances.
These chemicals are linked to serious health conditions, including (but not limited to):
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, examine health issues linked to PFAS exposure at military bases, legal options for Travis Air Force Base PFAS victims, and much more.
The Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit addresses widespread water contamination at this California military installation from toxic forever chemicals used in firefighting foam.
The Air Force detected PFAS levels in groundwater at Travis AFB that exceed EPA drinking water standards of 4 parts per trillion.
These chemicals have seeped into local drinking water supplies impacting both military families and civilian communities in Fairfield and surrounding areas.
If you or someone you love has developed health issues after exposure to contaminated water at Travis Air Force Base, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit today.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis — with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Military bases nationwide have become focal points of concern due to widespread contamination with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
These synthetic compounds, found in aqueous film-forming foam used to extinguish fuel fires, have leached into groundwater at hundreds of installations.
The Environmental Protection Agency has identified these “forever chemicals” as significant health risks based on their persistent nature and bioaccumulative properties.
Service members who lived on affected bases often unknowingly consumed contaminated water for years, sometimes decades, before the dangers became widely recognized.
Recent testing reveals many installations have PFAS levels exceeding safety thresholds by hundreds or even thousands of times, creating an urgent public health challenge.
The most common pathways for PFAS exposure on military bases include:
Studies have established links between PFAS exposure and several severe health outcomes, with cancer heading the list of worries.
Military firefighters face particularly high risks, with research showing they develop testicular cancer at twice the rate of civilians.
Kidney and testicular cancer appear most frequently in medical literature examining PFAS health impacts, alongside thyroid disease, immune system dysfunction, and elevated cholesterol.
The latency period for these conditions means many veterans develop symptoms years after service, complicating the process of connecting their illness to military exposure.
Health monitoring has become crucial for at-risk veterans, as early detection significantly improves treatment outcomes for these life-threatening conditions.
Comprehensive review of military records shows that toxic chemicals have potentially affected hundreds of thousands of service members and their families.
Children living on bases face heightened vulnerability, as developing bodies are more susceptible to PFAS damage.
Veterans seeking compensation must work through detailed documentation requirements, often needing to prove residence on contaminated bases through service records.
The Department of Defense has begun implementing cleanup efforts at priority sites, though remediation costs will likely reach billions.
Meanwhile, many affected veterans have joined lawsuits against chemical manufacturers, seeking accountability for their suffering.
Congress has responded with legislation aimed at improving healthcare access for those exposed, though many veterans still struggle to receive comprehensive coverage for their PFAS-related conditions.
Travis Air Force Base, recognized as the busiest air force base in the United States and home to the 60th Air Mobility Wing, has become the center of significant legal action related to PFAS contamination.
Located in Northern California, 54 miles from San Francisco, Travis AFB serves multiple purposes, including functioning as a medical center, logistics base, airlift facility, and passenger terminal.
Environmental concerns have overshadowed the base’s critical role in military operations as testing revealed alarming levels of toxic chemicals in groundwater surrounding the installation.
Legal actions against the base have emerged as affected service members and civilians seek accountability for health problems allegedly linked to drinking water contamination they were exposed to while living or working at the facility.
The lawsuits primarily target the Department of Defense and chemical manufacturers rather than the base itself, alleging negligence in allowing PFAS contamination to persist despite early knowledge of its dangers.
The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board has issued a notice of noncompliance to Travis AFB regarding jet fuel discharges into Union Creek, which has exacerbated contamination concerns beyond just PFAS chemicals.
As these legal battles progress, many cases are being consolidated into the larger multidistrict litigation involving PFAS contamination at military installations nationwide, while some plaintiffs are pursuing individual claims based on their specific medical records and exposure histories.
The history of PFAS contamination at Travis Air Force Base follows a troubling pattern seen at many military installations across the country.
The Air Force initiated an investigation of PFAS presence in 2015, discovering levels that exceeded the EPA’s drinking water health advisory.
This initial finding prompted further examination of contaminated groundwater both on and off the base.
The timeline of discovery and response reveals a decades-long awareness of various contaminants at the installation, with PFAS being a more recent focus of environmental investigations.
Key developments in the timeline include:
The slow pace of response has become a focal point in legal arguments.
In 2020, investigations expanded to include off-site drinking water supply wells potentially impacted by contamination, with subsequent testing showing continued excessive levels of PFAS.
This expansion of testing came only after years of potential exposure for service members and nearby communities, fueling claims that the military failed to adequately protect personnel and communicate risks.
The legal landscape surrounding Travis Air Force Base PFAS contamination continues to evolve rapidly.
Current lawsuits are being investigated for individuals, including military service members and others, who consumed PFAS-contaminated drinking water at Travis Air Force Base and subsequently developed health problems.
These cases focus on several serious medical conditions with established links to PFAS exposure, particularly kidney and testicular cancer, which have been documented at higher rates among those exposed to these chemicals.
The litigation strategy has two main components:
Most lawsuits remain preliminary as attorneys gather medical records and environmental testing data to establish causal connections between exposure and illness.
Multiple rulings are expected in early- and mid-2025 that could be favorable to plaintiffs, potentially motivating defendants to consider settlements rather than proceeding to trial.
For affected individuals, the dual path of pursuing both VA benefits and litigation presents a complex but potentially more comprehensive approach to securing compensation for their injuries.
Some progress has been made in addressing the contamination itself, though critics argue remediation efforts remain inadequate.
Despite decades of work, the Air Force’s groundwater remediation actions have fallen short of adequately addressing the widespread and persistent forever chemicals, with PFAS levels in some areas still far exceeding safety standards.
This ongoing contamination motivates new legal claims as more individuals discover potential connections between their health conditions and past exposure to Travis AFB water supplies.
I’ll add a list to the appropriate section and ensure all the requested terms are still included.
Human health impacts from PFAS contamination at Travis Air Force Base have created mounting concerns among residents and officials alike.
Groundwater contamination at levels far exceeding safety standards has forced local communities to confront potential long-term exposure effects.
Unlike Edwards Air Force Base, where contamination was addressed earlier, Travis officials were slower to acknowledge the full scope of the problem.
Volatile organic compounds initially received more attention than PFAS chemicals, despite the latter posing equally serious threats.
Installing drinking water treatment systems for affected households began only after 2020, when testing confirmed dangerous contamination levels in private drinking water wells near the base.
Common health concerns reported by community members include:
Surrounding communities have organized advocacy groups similar to those at Tyndall Air Force Base, where residents faced comparable contamination issues.
These grassroots organizations have pressed military officials for greater transparency about the extent of PFAS contamination and demanded regular testing of residential water supplies.
Local physicians report seeing patterns of illnesses potentially linked to PFAS exposure, though establishing direct causation remains challenging.
County health departments have begun tracking abnormal disease clusters near the base, particularly thyroid disorders and certain cancers that have been associated with PFAS exposure in scientific literature.
The Air Force expanded its testing protocol in 2020 to include properties beyond base boundaries after confirming PFAS had migrated through groundwater systems.
This broader approach came after years of complaints from nearby homeowners who suspected contamination had reached their properties.
Areas with contaminated soil have been identified for remediation, prioritizing locations with direct human contact risk.
Regional water authorities have coordinated with base officials to develop containment strategies that protect municipal water sources from further contamination, though these efforts face technical and financial limitations.
Water quality monitoring has been established at strategic points surrounding the base, particularly downstream from areas where firefighting foam was heavily used.
Unlike Tyndall Air Force Base, where hurricane damage complicated cleanup efforts, Travis benefits from relatively stable environmental conditions for remediation work.
The challenge remains identifying all contamination pathways, as PFAS chemicals can travel through multiple environmental media, including groundwater, surface water, and soil.
Cooperation between base officials and California environmental agencies has improved since 2020, though tension persists over responsibility for off-base contamination costs.
Ongoing monitoring systems now track PFAS levels at multiple locations throughout the base and surrounding areas.
Regular sampling of groundwater wells provides data on contamination movement and concentration changes over time.
The base has installed specialized equipment to track contamination plumes and verify containment measure effectiveness, though groundwater contamination at some test sites continues to show concerning PFAS levels.
California Water Service, which supplies drinking water to many surrounding communities, has implemented additional filtration processes specifically designed to remove PFAS chemicals.
These upgraded systems complement the treatment facilities installed at individual homes with contaminated private wells.
Base officials have committed to quarterly water quality reporting, making data available to both regulatory agencies and the public.
This transparency represents a significant improvement over previous information-sharing practices, though some community advocates argue that monitoring should be conducted by independent third parties rather than military personnel to ensure credibility.
PFAS water contamination lawsuits related to Travis Air Force Base exposure continue to gain momentum as medical evidence strengthens.
Veterans and civilians who consumed PFAS-contaminated water while living or working at the base are exploring multiple legal pathways.
Those affected by exposure since World War II operations at the site may qualify for different compensation programs depending on their service timing and subsequent health conditions.
The legal process typically begins with documenting exposure history and collecting medical records that demonstrate health problems consistent with PFAS toxicity.
These earlier cases have helped define the serious health risks recognized in litigation, though each case presents unique exposure circumstances.
Law firms specializing in environmental contamination have established dedicated teams to handle Air Reserve Station cases.
For cases involving severe health conditions like cancer, attorneys typically prioritize claims based on diagnosis timing and contamination level documentation.
Families facing adverse health effects from Travis AFB water contamination may qualify for multiple compensation sources.
VA benefits cover certain conditions with established links to military service exposures, though the burden of proof can be substantial.
Civilian workers and family members generally pursue compensation through litigation against chemical manufacturers rather than directly against the government.
The radioactive burial site and other contaminated sites at Travis present additional complications for claimants attempting to isolate PFAS exposure from other potential toxins.
Settlements in similar cases have covered medical expenses, ongoing health monitoring, property value losses, and pain and suffering damages.
Serious health consequences like kidney cancer and thyroid disease have resulted in larger compensation amounts, reflecting the significant impact on quality of life and earning potential.
The compensation process involves extensive documentation of both exposure history and health risks linked to specific PFAS compounds identified at the base.
Financial recovery rarely happens quickly, with most cases requiring years of litigation before reaching resolution.
Individuals affected by Travis contamination can join ongoing efforts through class action participation or individual claims.
The consolidated multi-district litigation addressing PFAS contamination at military installations nationwide includes provisions for Travis victims.
Health risks linked to PFAS have been well documented in these legal proceedings, creating a strong foundation for new claimants.
Cases involving significant PFAS contamination typically require specialized legal representation familiar with both environmental law and military procedures.
Law firms handling these cases generally work on a contingency basis, making legal action accessible regardless of financial resources.
The first step involves screening for eligibility based on residence period, proximity to contamination sources, and documented health conditions.
Many advocates recommend pursuing legal action even for those without current symptoms, as some health effects may develop years after exposure.
The ongoing litigation continues to evolve as scientific understanding of long-term PFAS health impacts improves and regulatory standards become more stringent.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Most PFAS lawsuit settlements range between $175,000 and $350,000 per plaintiff.
The exact compensation depends on several factors, including the severity of health impacts, the duration of exposure to contaminated water, and the quality of legal representation in your Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit.
Travis Air Force Base groundwater shows PFAS contamination levels significantly exceeding the EPA’s 2024 drinking water standard of 4 parts per trillion (ppt).
This contamination resulted from decades of using PFAS-containing firefighting foam during training exercises and emergency response activities on the base.
Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield, California faces extensive environmental contamination challenges.
Years of using AFFF firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals, along with various industrial activities on base, have resulted in widespread soil and groundwater pollution that potentially affects military personnel and nearby communities.
Yes, individuals exposed to PFAS at Travis Air Force Base may have legal grounds to sue the companies that manufactured PFAS-containing products used on base.
Military personnel, their families, and civilians who lived or worked on the base and suffered health effects may be eligible to seek compensation.
PFAS exposure has been associated with serious health conditions including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, and high cholesterol.
The Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit seeks to connect these health issues to long-term exposure to contaminated drinking water on or near the military installation.
You may qualify for the Travis Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit if you lived or worked on the base for at least one year, consumed contaminated water, and subsequently developed a qualifying health condition.
An experienced environmental contamination attorney can evaluate your specific circumstances and potential claim eligibility.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?