Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What are the legal options for those affected by PFAS contamination at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base?
Answer: Military personnel, their families, and nearby residents exposed to PFAS at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base may qualify to file lawsuits seeking compensation for health conditions linked to these chemicals.
On this page, we’ll answer this question in further depth, health effects of PFAS exposure at military installations, filing a Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit, and much more.
The Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS lawsuit centers on contamination from toxic forever chemicals used in firefighting foam at the North Carolina military installation.
PFAS chemicals have been detected in groundwater and drinking water supplies both on the base and in surrounding communities.
The Air Force has identified six testing areas at Seymour Johnson where PFOS and PFOA levels exceed safety standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency.
If you or someone you love has been exposed to PFAS at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base and developed serious health issues, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS contamination at military bases presents serious health threats to service members, families, and nearby communities.
These “forever chemicals,” primarily from firefighting foam used in training exercises, have seeped into groundwater at hundreds of military installations nationwide.
Scientific studies increasingly link PFAS exposure to numerous health problems, with certain patterns emerging among military populations.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has begun reviewing the connection between military PFAS exposure and specific diseases for possible presumptive status.
Scientific research has established strong connections between PFAS exposure and several serious health conditions, with some showing particularly high prevalence among veterans.
Medical research on the effects of PFAS exposure includes, but is not limited to:
The strongest scientific evidence supports the kidney cancer connection.
The National Cancer Institute confirmed higher blood levels of PFOA (one common PFAS) correlate with increased kidney cancer risk across diverse study populations.
In September 2024, the VA announced a formal review to potentially make kidney cancer a presumptive condition for veterans exposed to PFAS.
A landmark study published in the Journal of Exposure Science found elevated cancer rates in counties with known military PFAS contamination compared to national averages.
The research documented cancer clusters near bases with particularly high PFAS levels.
Beyond immediate health impacts, PFAS exposure creates concerning long-term risks, particularly for children and reproductive health in military families.
Research shows PFAS can cause:
Children living on or near military bases face unique vulnerabilities.
Their developing bodies absorb proportionally more PFAS through water, and early-life exposure during critical developmental windows can have permanent health consequences.
Studies of children born to military families near highly contaminated bases have documented higher rates of birth defects and developmental disorders compared to national averages.
For veterans, PFAS exposure may continue affecting health decades after service ends.
These chemicals persist in the human body for years, with some having half-lives of over five years, meaning they remain at detectable levels long after initial exposure stops.
This prolonged presence explains why health effects often manifest years after leaving military service.
If you or someone you love has been exposed to PFAS at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base and developed serious health issues, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
Individuals exposed to PFAS chemicals at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base may qualify for legal compensation if they developed health problems linked to contamination.
The North Carolina installation, located near Goldsboro, has confirmed high levels of PFAS in groundwater samples, with some readings exceeding 300,000 parts per trillion—far above the EPA’s health advisory limit of 70 parts per trillion.
These toxic “forever chemicals” have seeped into the surrounding environment, potentially affecting both on-base residents and nearby communities.
If you lived or worked at Seymour Johnson AFB or resided near the base in Goldsboro, you have several potential legal pathways to pursue compensation for PFAS exposure.
The main legal options available include:
To qualify for most legal actions, you typically need to demonstrate you were exposed to PFAS for at least one year through contaminated water while living or working on base or within approximately one mile of Seymour Johnson AFB.
The base’s location alongside the Neuse River and Stoney Creek has allowed contamination to spread beyond military boundaries, affecting civilian areas of Goldsboro.
Recent court rulings have created openings for cases against chemical manufacturers like 3M and DuPont, who produced the firefighting foam used at Seymour Johnson.
While the military has claimed sovereign immunity in many PFAS cases, several courts have allowed lawsuits against the private companies that manufactured these chemicals to proceed.
If you or someone you love has been exposed to PFAS at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base and developed serious health issues, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit today.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Based on similar PFAS contamination cases, individuals affected by the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS contamination may receive settlements ranging from $175,000 to $350,000.
The actual compensation depends on various factors that include exposure duration, health impacts, and proximity to the contamination source.
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base is among the hundreds of military installations identified with PFAS contamination.
While specific measurement levels vary, the base joins other military sites where firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals was regularly used, potentially affecting groundwater and surrounding communities.
Individuals who lived or worked at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base or resided in surrounding communities and experienced health issues potentially linked to PFAS exposure may qualify for the lawsuit.
This includes military personnel, their families, civilian employees, and nearby residents affected by contaminated water.
Health conditions potentially qualifying for compensation in the Seymour Johnson PFAS lawsuit include various cancers (kidney, testicular, pancreatic), thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and other conditions scientifically linked to PFAS exposure.
Documentation connecting these conditions to base contamination strengthens claims.
The statute of limitations for Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS claims varies by state and circumstance.
Generally, claimants have 2-3 years from discovery of PFAS-related illness or from official notification of contamination.
Consulting with an attorney specializing in PFAS litigation is highly recommended to understand applicable deadlines.
Supporting a Seymour Johnson Air Force Base PFAS claim typically requires documentation of your connection to the base, medical records detailing PFAS-linked health conditions, evidence of contaminated water usage, and proof of timeline alignment between exposure and illness development.
Environmental testing results and expert testimony may strengthen your case.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?