Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit
- Last Updated: April 14th, 2025
Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
Legally Reviewed
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
Fact-Checked
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Key takeaways:
- Potential settlement amounts in the Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit will likely depend on the severity of your illness, PFAS exposure duration, your age at exposure, future medical costs, and lost income.
- Attorneys play an important role in linking exposure to specific base operations, using historical evidence like firefighting foam use and base records.
- PFAS exposure at the Maxwell Air Force Base primarily occurred through contaminated drinking water that (a lot of people)
Overview of the Maxwell AFB PFAS Litigation Process
The Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit represents one of many legal challenges emerging across Air Force base facilities nationwide where toxic chemicals have compromised water safety.
The Environmental Working Group has documented PFAS pollution at numerous bases, highlighting the widespread nature of this issue affecting military families and surrounding communities.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Maxwell Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit, who qualifies to file in the Maxwell Water Contamination Case, expected compensation amounts for PFAS exposure victims, and much more.
Maxwell AFB PFAS Contamination Source Identified
PFAS chemicals at Maxwell Air Force Base primarily came from aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) used during firefighting training exercises and fuel fire suppression.
These activities led to substantial groundwater and drinking water contamination affecting military personnel and nearby communities.
Individuals who lived or worked at Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base and developed health issues linked to PFAS exposure may qualify for financial compensation.
This includes military personnel, family members, and civilians who spent time at the installation and later experienced related health problems.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications after being exposed to harmful PFAS chemicals, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Lawsuit.
Table of Contents
How Can A PFAS Contamination Attorney from TruLaw Help You?
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We understand the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet the Lead PFAS Contamination Attorney at TruLaw
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
- Jessica Paluch-Hoerman: As founder and managing attorney of TruLaw, Jessica brings her experience in product liability and personal injury litigation to her client-centered approach by prioritizing open communication and personalized attention with her clients. Through TruLaw and partner law firms, Jessica has helped collect over $3 billion dollars on behalf of injured individuals across all 50 states through verdicts and negotiated settlements.
How much does hiring a PFAS Contamination lawyer from TruLaw cost?
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications after being exposed to harmful PFAS chemicals, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
Who Qualifies for the Maxwell Water Contamination Case
Individuals associated with Maxwell Air Force Base who experienced toxic exposure may qualify for legal claims.
The Air Force has acknowledged health risks related to these contaminants, opening pathways for affected individuals to seek compensation.
Exposure Duration and Timing Requirements
Eligibility typically requires demonstrating sufficient connection to Maxwell Air Force Base during relevant contamination periods.
Your military service records establishing presence at Maxwell Air Force or another affected force base are crucial evidence.
Service members must generally show they were stationed at the base during periods when contamination was present and had reasonable exposure through water consumption.
Qualifying exposure periods generally include:
- Minimum 30-day presence on base
- Documentation of housing location
- Evidence of water source usage
- Periods aligning with known contamination
- Other severe health conditions
Expected Compensation Amounts for Affected Parties
Potential recovery includes consideration for VA disability claims related to exposure, although these are separate from litigation against chemical manufacturers.
Financial compensation through lawsuits aims to address medical expenses and suffering caused by exposure to chemicals presenting a significant health risk.
Factors Determining Settlement Amounts
Case valuation depends largely on comprehensive medical evidence documenting the connection between toxic contamination and specific health conditions.
Claims involving serious illness typically receive higher valuations.
The presence of hazardous substances in blood or tissue samples provides compelling evidence of exposure, as does documentation of contact with hazardous materials during service.
Key factors affecting settlement amounts may include, but are not limited to:
- Severity and type of illness
- Duration and intensity of exposure
- Age at time of exposure
- Future anticipated medical needs
- Loss of income or earning capacity
Range of Potential Compensation Outcomes
Cases involving contamination of drinking water supplies generally yield higher settlements due to the direct exposure pathway.
When PFAS affects drinking water supplies serving base housing, evidence of consumption strengthens claims.
Individuals with documented PFAS-contaminated water exposure and related illness typically see more favorable outcomes than those with limited exposure evidence.
Steps to Initiate Your Maxwell Water Contamination Claim
The legal process begins with connecting with a qualified law firm experienced in military contamination cases.
Most offer a free consultation to evaluate claim viability.
Collecting medical records early in the process establishes the foundation for linking exposure to illness.
Documentation Needed to Support Your Legal Case
Successful claims require evidence establishing presence at Maxwell and exposure to contaminated water.
Military personnel and family members who lived on base should gather housing records and proof of residence periods.
Documentation of drinking water consumption patterns and access to specific drinking water systems strengthens the exposure narrative.
Essential documentation includes:
- Military service records
- Housing assignment documentation
- Medical diagnosis records
- Treatment history
- Expert opinions linking the condition to exposure
Working with Attorneys Through the Claim Process
Your legal team will investigate connections to specific areas such as Gunter Annex, where contamination may have been concentrated.
Historical context, such as Maxwell’s beginning as the first civilian flying school founded in 1910, provides timeline references for contamination periods.
Legal Time Limits for Filing Your Maxwell Water Contamination Claim
Claims related to aqueous film forming foam exposure face specific filing deadlines.
These forever chemicals, also known as PFAS chemicals, have unique legal considerations due to their persistence.
Unlike typical industrial chemicals with clear exposure periods, PFAS creates complicated timing questions for litigation.
State-Specific Statutes of Limitations
Alabama law governs timing requirements for Maxwell claims, though federal considerations may apply.
The dangerous chemicals’ persistent nature has led some courts to adopt “discovery rule” approaches for PFAS exposure cases.
Evidence of PFAS contamination may toll standard limitations periods when widespread contamination was concealed or unknown to potential claimants.
State law considerations include, but are not limited to:
- Standard personal injury limitations (typically 2 years in Alabama)
- Discovery rule applications
- Special military service exceptions
- Federal tort claim requirements for government liability
Special Considerations for Military Personnel
Military veterans face unique legal considerations when pursuing claims.
Military bases often operated training exercises and emergency responses using PFAS-containing foams for decades before understanding their dangers.
Service members working as firefighters or in areas where firefighting foams were regularly used face particularly strong exposure cases.
The legal landscape for Maxwell AFB water contamination continues to evolve as more scientific evidence emerges about these persistent chemicals.
Air Force Bases with Confirmed PFAS Contamination:
- England Air Force Base – Extensive groundwater testing revealed widespread issues
- Warren Air Force Base – Community wells affected beyond base boundaries
- Holloman Air Force Base – Some of the highest recorded PFAS levels in the country
- Cannon Air Force Base – Contamination affecting agricultural areas and private wells
- Ellsworth Air Force Base – Community organization leading testing initiatives
- Rock Air Force Base – Citizen monitoring programs supplementing official testing
- Wurtsmith Air Force Base – Advocacy groups pushing for expanded healthcare monitoring
- Sawyer Air Force Base – Demonstrates how contamination persists decades after closure
- Tyndall Air Force Base – Similar contamination patterns identified through testing
- Dover Air Force Base – Contamination extends miles beyond the base perimeter
- Eaker Air Force Base – Groundwater plumes continue to spread despite interventions
- Eielson Air Force Base – Harsh climate conditions complicate remediation efforts
- Malmstrom Air Force Base – Shows how geological conditions affect contamination patterns
- Nellis Air Force Base – Proximity to population centers raises additional concerns
- Tinker Air Force Base – Investigations established new protocols for assessment
Other Military Facilities Affected:
- Pease Air Force Base – Studies here helped scientists understand chemical migration
- Naval Station Newport – Concerning levels documented in nearby waterways
- Air Force Plant facilities – Similar contamination patterns across multiple states
- Air Reserve Station facilities – Facing challenges with legacy contamination
- Blue Grass Army Depot – Remediation complicated by extensive chemical spread
- Naval Air Station Jacksonville – Shows impact on diverse ecosystems
- Air National Guard bases – Similar contamination profiles nationwide
- Horsham Air Guard Station – Community actively advocating for expanded testing
The use of these foams to extinguish jet fuel fires during both training and actual emergency response created contamination hotspots across bases.
Petroleum fires required specialized firefighting approaches, leading to regular use of PFAS-containing materials throughout military operations.
For individuals concerned about potential exposure, consulting with an experienced attorney provides the best pathway to understanding legal options.
Time limitations make prompt action important, as delay may compromise recovery possibilities.
With proper documentation and experienced legal representation, affected individuals can pursue fair compensation for injuries caused by these dangerous military contaminants.
TruLaw: Accepting Clients for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
- If We Don’t Win, You Don’t Pay: The PFAS contamination lawyers at TruLaw and our partner firms operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if you win.
- Expertise: We have decades of experience handling toxic exposure cases similar to the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
- Successful Track Record: TruLaw and our partner law firms have helped our clients recover billions of dollars in compensation through verdicts and negotiated settlements.
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS Contamination Lawsuit Frequently Asked Questions
-
What health conditions qualify for Maxwell AFB claims?
Health conditions qualifying for Maxwell AFB claims include kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, liver damage, and several other cancers linked to PFAS exposure.
Documentation connecting your condition to base contamination strengthens eligibility.
-
How much compensation do Maxwell PFAS victims receive?
Maxwell PFAS victims typically receive between $175,000 and $350,000 in compensation, with amounts varying based on exposure duration, medical condition severity, and treatment costs.
Higher settlements often involve multiple serious health conditions or lengthy exposure periods.
-
Can family members file Maxwell PFAS lawsuits?
Family members can file Maxwell PFAS lawsuits if they lived on base housing, regularly visited, or consumed contaminated water while spending time with military personnel stationed at Maxwell-Gunter AFB and subsequently developed qualifying health conditions.
-
How do I prove exposure to Maxwell AFB contamination?
Proving exposure to Maxwell AFB contamination requires documentation of your time at the base through military records, housing assignments, employment verification, or medical records indicating treatment at base facilities during the contamination period before symptoms appeared.
-
Is Montgomery city water affected by Maxwell AFB PFAS?
Montgomery city water has shown PFAS contamination linked to Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base operations.
Local water testing has detected these chemicals at levels exceeding safety guidelines, potentially affecting residents who use municipal water supplies near the base.
-
What documentation helps strengthen a Maxwell AFB claim?
Documentation strengthening a Maxwell AFB claim includes military service records, base housing history, medical diagnoses of qualifying conditions, treatment records, and evidence showing your presence at Maxwell-Gunter during periods when AFFF was actively used in training exercises.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
