Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: What is the Air Force Plant 6 PFAS lawsuit?
Answer: The Air Force Plant 6 PFAS lawsuit encompasses individual toxic exposure claims by military personnel, Lockheed Martin employees, and Marietta-area residents who developed cancer and other serious illnesses from exposure to contaminated groundwater at this 926-acre aerospace facility northwest of Atlanta.
These cases are part of the larger AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL 2873) in South Carolina federal court, which has consolidated over 10,000 lawsuits against chemical manufacturers of toxic firefighting foam containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Plaintiffs allege that decades of AFFF use for aircraft fire suppression and training exercises at Air Force Plant 6 contaminated soil and groundwater with cancer-causing chemicals that persist indefinitely.
The litigation seeks compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering while holding manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and Tyco accountable for supplying dangerous products to this government-owned, Lockheed Martin-operated facility since the 1960s.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, potential health risks associated with PFAS Exposure from Air Force Plant 6, eligibility requirements for filing an Air Force Plant 6 PFAS Lawsuit, and much more.
PFAS testing at Air Force Plant 6 revealed PFAS levels in groundwater exceeding EPA health advisory limits by more than 100 times, affecting drinking water wells throughout the Marietta area.
The facility’s long history as a military aircraft manufacturing site, including B-29 bomber production during World War II and ongoing Lockheed Martin operations, created multiple contamination sources from firefighting training areas and aircraft hangars.
Thousands of veterans, defense contractors, and local residents potentially face elevated cancer risks from decades of exposure, making Air Force Plant 6 one of Georgia’s largest PFAS contamination sites requiring extensive remediation.
If you or someone you love worked at Air Force Plant 6 and developed cancer, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit today.
Air Force Plant 6, also known as Air Force Plant 44 (AFP 44), sits within the sprawling Tucson International Airport Area Superfund Site, where decades of industrial operations have created a 10-square-mile zone of groundwater contamination affecting thousands of residents.
The facility, located approximately eight miles south of downtown Tucson, has emerged as a focus in nationwide PFAS litigation as contamination levels reaching 53,000 parts per trillion—over 13,000 times the EPA’s safety standard—continue to threaten public health and force costly remediation efforts throughout the region.
Military installations across the United States began using Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) in the 1970s as a primary firefighting agent for fuel-based fires, and Air Force Plant 6 followed this standard protocol for decades.
The facility utilized AFFF extensively during crash crew training exercises, hangar system operations, equipment testing, and emergency response situations from the 1970s through recent years, releasing thousands of gallons of the PFAS-laden foam into the environment.
The documented AFFF usage at AFP 44 included, but was not limited to:
These firefighting foams, prized for their ability to quickly suppress petroleum-based fires, contained high concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that would ultimately seep through soil and concrete, creating a toxic plume in the regional aquifer.
While the EPA has established a safety standard of just 4 parts per trillion for certain PFAS compounds in drinking water, PFAS detected at the Tucson Airport Remediation Project (TARP) treatment plant revealed contamination levels as high as 53,000 parts per trillion—a concentration that represents an extraordinary public health threat requiring immediate intervention.
The PFAS pollution emanating from Air Force Plant 6 has created an environmental crisis spanning approximately 10 square miles, encompassing not only the Tucson International Airport but also the Morris Air National Guard Base and surrounding residential communities.
This expansive contamination zone threatens the water supply for tens of thousands of Tucson residents, with the toxic plume continuing to migrate northwest through the aquifer system toward additional municipal wells.
The most severely impacted areas include, but are not limited to:
The scope of this environmental disaster has forced the City of Tucson to shut down 31 municipal wells to prevent further exposure to contaminated water, creating strain on the city’s water infrastructure and supply capacity.
According to the city’s December 2024 lawsuit, Tucson has already invested $71.1 million in PFAS-related remediation efforts, including specialized laboratory equipment to analyze over 1,800 water samples annually, construction of new pretreatment facilities and filtration systems, and ongoing operational costs for alternative water sources to serve affected communities.
If you or a loved one consumed PFAS-contaminated water from wells near Air Force Plant 6 and developed serious health conditions, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit today.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency administrative order in May 2024 directing the U.S. Air Force and Arizona National Guard to immediately address the PFAS contamination threatening Tucson’s drinking water supply.
The order emphasized that no extraction and treatment system existed for containing or treating PFAS-contaminated groundwater from AFP 44 or the Morris Air National Guard Base, allowing toxic chemicals to continue migrating throughout the regional aquifer unchecked.
The Air Force responded to EPA enforcement actions through several documented legal and administrative measures:
However, mounting public pressure and the threat of substantial penalties led to a shift in October 2024, when the Air Force reached a compliance agreement with the EPA to begin addressing the contamination crisis.
The agreement establishes a framework for cost-sharing on treatment infrastructure, with the Air Force committing to cover 50% of expenses for new PFAS removal systems while also conducting comprehensive site investigations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) to determine the full extent of contamination and develop long-term remediation strategies.
Scientific research has established clear links between PFAS exposure and numerous serious health conditions affecting military personnel, civilian employees, and Tucson residents who consumed contaminated water from Air Force Plant 6.
These “forever chemicals” bioaccumulate in human tissue over time, with effects ranging from immediate health impacts to cancers and chronic diseases that may not manifest for years or even decades after initial exposure, raising concerns among environmental health experts and federal agencies.
The C8 Science Panel and subsequent epidemiological studies have identified kidney cancer and testicular cancer as having the strongest associations with PFAS exposure, with research from the National Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control confirming elevated risks for individuals exposed through contaminated drinking water.
According to the CDC’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, multiple peer-reviewed studies published through 2024 demonstrate that PFAS compounds, particularly PFOA and PFOS found at Air Force Plant 6, disrupt normal cellular function and may trigger malignant transformations in kidney, testicular, liver, and thyroid tissues.
Medical research has identified several types of cancer associated with PFAS exposure through contaminated water, occupational contact, and environmental sources:
The bioaccumulation process allows hazardous substances like PFAS chemicals to bind to proteins in the blood, liver, and kidney, where they remain for years due to their exceptionally long biological half-lives—often 3-8 years for compounds like PFOA and PFOS.
Recent meta-analyses examining cancer incidence rates have shown dose-dependent relationships, meaning higher exposure levels and longer duration of contaminated water consumption correlate directly with increased cancer risks, particularly for individuals exposed to concentrations exceeding 50 parts per trillion over extended periods.
Beyond cancer risks, PFAS exposure has been definitively linked to thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol, and immune system suppression that reduces vaccine effectiveness and increases susceptibility to infections.
Children exposed to PFAS face particularly severe consequences, including developmental delays, lower birth weights, accelerated puberty, bone variations, and potential cognitive impairments that can affect academic performance and quality of life throughout childhood and beyond.
Populations at highest risk for severe PFAS-related health effects include:
Fertility impacts represent another serious concern for families exposed to PFAS-contaminated water, with studies documenting decreased fertility rates in both men and women, increased time to pregnancy, and elevated risks of miscarriage.
Pregnant women exposed to toxic substances like PFAS face heightened risks of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and delivering low birth weight infants, while the chemicals’ ability to pass through breast milk creates additional exposure pathways for nursing infants in affected communities.
If you or a loved one developed cancer or other serious health conditions after consuming PFAS-contaminated water from Air Force Plant 6, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit today.
Early detection of PFAS-related health conditions requires vigilance in monitoring symptoms that may seem unrelated but could indicate chemical exposure effects, including unexplained fatigue, hormonal imbalances, elevated cholesterol levels, liver enzyme abnormalities, or changes in kidney function.
Individuals with documented exposure to Air Force Plant 6 contamination should undergo comprehensive medical screening, particularly if experiencing any symptoms associated with PFAS-linked conditions or if they belong to high-risk demographic groups.
Healthcare providers typically recommend specific medical tests to monitor health impacts in patients with documented PFAS exposure:
Maintaining detailed medical records becomes paramount for supporting future legal claims, requiring patients to document all health changes since exposure began, preserve water quality notices, and obtain copies of all test results and physician notes as medical evidence.
Legal experts recommend creating a comprehensive health timeline that correlates symptoms with residence near Air Force Plant 6, water consumption patterns, and any diagnoses received, as this documentation will prove invaluable when establishing causation between PFAS exposure and subsequent health conditions during the legal process.
Military service members, civilian contractors, family members, and Tucson residents exposed to PFAS-contaminated water from Air Force Plant 6 may qualify for compensation if they meet specific criteria regarding exposure duration and medical diagnoses.
The eligibility framework draws from established precedents in PFAS litigation, including the landmark C8 Science Panel findings that identified six conditions with “probable links” to PFAS exposure, forming the foundation for current legal claims across the country.
Service members and civilian contractors who worked at Air Force Plant 6 for at least six consecutive months after 1970 may pursue legal action if they developed qualifying health conditions linked to PFAS exposure.
Family members who lived on or near the installation, including spouses and children of military personnel or contractors, also maintain the right to file claims if they consumed contaminated water during their residence and subsequently experienced PFAS-related health impacts.
Individuals who may qualify for compensation related to PFAS contamination from Air Force Plant 6 operations in Tucson:
Tucson residents who consumed municipal water from contaminated wells face unique eligibility considerations, as the extensive contamination plume affects neighborhoods far beyond the immediate military installation boundaries.
Individuals living in affected areas, including North of Los Reales Road, the San Xavier District, and communities near Hughes Access Road, must demonstrate at least six to twelve months of cumulative exposure through residential water consumption.
The C8 Science Panel’s groundbreaking research established “probable links” between PFAS exposure and six specific health conditions, creating the scientific foundation for current litigation efforts nationwide.
These findings, combined with subsequent research, have expanded the list of compensable conditions as courts recognize the growing body of evidence linking PFAS chemicals to various cancers and chronic diseases affecting multiple organ systems.
Medical conditions qualifying for PFAS litigation include:
Medical documentation requirements demand comprehensive records establishing both the diagnosis and potential causation, including pathology reports confirming cancer diagnoses, treatment records detailing disease progression, and physician statements addressing possible environmental factors.
Plaintiffs strengthen their cases by providing blood test results showing elevated PFAS levels, though such testing is not mandatory for filing claims, as historical exposure can be established through residence records and water contamination data from the affected timeframe.
If you or a loved one meets these eligibility criteria after exposure to contaminated water at Air Force Plant 6, you may qualify for substantial compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuit today.
Arizona law generally provides a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims, but the discovery rule impacts PFAS cases where health effects may not manifest for years or decades after initial exposure.
The limitations period typically begins when a plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered both their injury and its potential connection to PFAS exposure, allowing individuals diagnosed years after leaving Air Force Plant 6 to still pursue legal remedies.
Legal time limits for filing PFAS contamination lawsuits vary based on several factors that determine when the clock starts and stops:
The evolving nature of PFAS science means courts increasingly recognize that plaintiffs could not have reasonably discovered the connection between their water consumption and subsequent health conditions until recent years when contamination data became public.
Prompt action remains advisable once diagnosed, as delays in filing can complicate evidence preservation and witness availability while potentially limiting recovery options if global settlement negotiations advance without your participation in the consolidated proceedings.
Our PFAS Contamination attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a PFAS Contamination lawsuit.
With extensive experience in chemical exposure cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders to prove how toxic PFAS chemicals in water supplies caused human health impacts.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, property damage, lost income, and ongoing health monitoring resulting from your PFAS exposure.
We recognize the health and environmental impacts of PFAS exposure on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead PFAS Contamination attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced health complications from exposure to PFAS-contaminated water that include forms of cancer, immune disorders, liver damage, or thyroid disease, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed by individuals nationwide who experienced health problems from exposure to PFAS chemicals in drinking water, with similar contamination issues reported at facilities like Blue Grass Army Depot and McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, where veterans exposed to these chemicals face serious health risks.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the PFAS contamination lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your PFAS contamination lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered health problems related to PFAS-contaminated water, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit today.
PFAS lawsuit settlement amounts typically range from $175,000 to $350,000 per person, with top-tier cases involving severe conditions like kidney or pancreatic cancer potentially receiving $200,000 to $500,000.
Cancer cases are likely to reach $200,000-$500,000, though no results are guaranteed.
Settlement amounts depend on severity of health impacts, exposure duration, and quality of legal representation.
Mid-tier settlements for conditions like ulcerative colitis may range from $150,000 to $300,000.
Air Force Plant 6 has PFAS concentrations of 121,000 ppt, exceeding safe limits by over 1,700 times, potentially strengthening claims.
Each legal case has distinct details and circumstances that can greatly impact the result.
This information does not constitute legal advice and does not address your specific situation.
To gain a more precise evaluation of your case’s potential value, we recommend using the chat on this page to connect with a qualified attorney who can help you seek compensation today.
Yes, veterans in cancer remission can file PFAS claims.
The VA evaluates cancer in remission differently from active cancer, considering residual treatment effects and risk of recurrence.
The VA disability rating system accounts for both active and remission states, managing risk of recurrence.
You remain eligible for compensation related to your diagnosis, ongoing medical expenses, and quality of life impacts.
Veterans with specific cancers linked to PFAS exposure, such as kidney, testicular, or liver cancer, are strong candidates for lawsuits.
Consider filing both VA disability claims and joining the AFFF litigation for maximum recovery options.
Settlement amounts depend on extent and duration of contamination, number of plaintiffs, severity of health issues, and economic damages including remediation costs, medical expenses, and property value loss.
Primary determinants include strength of evidence connecting AFFF exposure to diagnosis, with prolonged occupational exposure cases receiving higher settlements.
Each factor plays an important role within the severity of health impacts, exposure duration, and quality of legal representation affecting final compensation.
Plaintiffs are ranked in a tiered system based on severity of injuries and strength of claim. Top-tier cases involve advanced-stage cancers with documented long-term exposure.
The current PFAS class action requires drinking water contaminated with PFAS for six consecutive months at any time since 1990, combined with certain cancers or ulcerative colitis.
Most PFAS claims require at least one cumulative year of exposure at contaminated military bases, though suspected PFAS contamination at numerous Air Force Base locations means many veterans may have experienced multiple exposures.
However, shorter exposure periods may still qualify depending on contamination levels and resulting health conditions.
Air Force Plant 6’s extreme PFAS levels—53,000 ppt—could strengthen claims with shorter exposure periods.
Consult a PFAS attorney to evaluate your specific circumstances, as individual cases are assessed based on multiple factors.
Yes, family members can pursue PFAS claims for deceased veterans.
The VET PFAS Act covers medical expenses of affected family members of veterans, including those in utero, who resided in military bases.
Family members who spent time on contaminated military bases and developed diseases might be eligible to file PFAS claims with evidence of their stay and medical records.
Lawsuits can seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages from chemical companies responsible for producing these toxic substances.
Wrongful death claims may include funeral expenses and loss of companionship. Contact an experienced attorney promptly, as statutes of limitations apply.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?