Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit claims revolve around Depo-Provera, a popular injectable contraceptive manufactured by Pfizer Inc.
These Depo Provera Lawsuits allege that the Depo-Provera birth control shot increases the risk of developing brain tumors, specifically meningiomas.
On this page, we will discuss an overview of the Depo-Provera Lawsuit, new research linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors in women, who may qualify for the Depo-Provera Lawsuits, and much more.
Lawyers across the United States are actively investigating and accepting cases related to Depo-Provera use and subsequent brain tumor diagnoses.
These investigations are in the early stages, with attorneys gathering evidence and assessing potential claims.
Key points about the current state of Depo-Provera lawsuits include:
As the litigation develops, more information about the scope and potential outcomes of these lawsuits is expected to emerge.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a meningioma or another brain tumor potentially tied to Depo-Provera use, you may qualify to pursue legal action.
You can use the chat on this page to instantly determine if you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
Our team is available to answer any questions you may have about your potential claim and guide you through the next steps.
Lawsuits claim that Depo-Provera, a contraceptive medication manufactured by the defendants, caused significant harm, with scientific research linking medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the active ingredient in Depo-Provera, to meningiomas.
A recent database analysis found that the injectable form of MPA raised the risk of developing meningiomas by 53%, with the risk increasing the longer the drug was used.
Additionally, data from 2004 to 2015 show a notable rise in meningioma cases, particularly among females, African Americans, and younger individuals.
Plaintiffs argue that the defendants were aware of this danger for decades but failed to warn U.S. patients and healthcare providers.
In contrast to the U.S., warnings about meningiomas have been added to the labels for Depo-Provera in Europe and Canada.
Depo-Provera’s known risks include:
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our team is currently accepting new clients.
Contact TruLaw’s Depo-Provera Lawyers for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
The Depo-Provera lawsuit is ongoing.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits continue to be actively filed in federal courts, with projections suggesting over 30 cases by the end of November.
These filings are primarily concentrated in the Northern District of California and the Southern District of Texas.
A significant Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) hearing is set for December 5, 2024, to consider potential case consolidation.
However, the formation of an official multidistrict litigation (MDL) is not expected before year-end.
An MDL typically forms when 25 or more related cases, addressing similar legal issues and involving the same defendants, are pending in various federal courts.
This threshold is anticipated to be met with the Depo-Provera cases.
While plaintiffs may prefer California as the coordination venue, defendants are expected to oppose this and suggest New York instead.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our team is currently accepting new clients.
Contact TruLaw’s Depo-Provera Lawyers for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
The Depo-Provera lawsuit is ongoing.
A new case has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accusing the makers of Depo-Provera of contributing to the development of a meningioma brain tumor in a woman who used the birth control shot for nearly 25 years.
The plaintiff is bringing legal action against Pfizer, Viatris, Greenstone, Prasco, and Pharmacia & Upjohn, claiming the companies did not provide adequate warnings in the U.S. regarding the risk of brain tumors—a warning that has been included on Canadian labels since 2015.
According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff began using Depo-Provera injections in 2000 and received a total of 91 doses over her treatment period.
In 2020, she started experiencing severe symptoms, including headaches, blurred vision, vertigo, and ear itching, leading to the diagnosis of a calcified meningioma brain tumor that continued to grow.
Due to its calcified nature, surgical removal has been deemed too dangerous, leaving her with chronic pain and ongoing symptoms.
The complaint further alleges that Pfizer and related companies failed to adequately research and disclose the potential risks of long-term Depo-Provera use, which could include the development of meningiomas.
This case adds to the increasing number of Depo-Provera lawsuits being filed nationwide.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw’s experienced Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
The Depo-Provera lawsuits have highlighted important legal issues regarding the statute of limitations in such cases.
There are two key factors that may allow individuals to file lawsuits for Depo-Provera-related injuries without being hindered by the statute of limitations.
The first is the “discovery rule,” which is recognized in many states and allows the statute of limitations to be extended.
This rule delays the filing deadline until the injured party becomes aware of both the injury and its cause.
In the case of Depo-Provera, recent studies have uncovered a possible link between the drug and brain tumors, a connection that was not widely known before.
Because this evidence has only recently emerged, plaintiffs were not expected to know about the potential link between their conditions and Depo-Provera until now.
The second factor is the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, which could also apply.
This legal doctrine allows the statute of limitations to be paused if the defendant deliberately hides key safety information.
Plaintiffs claim that Depo-Provera’s manufacturers concealed the drug’s risks by altering safety warnings and product labeling, making it difficult for consumers to identify the potential connection between Depo-Provera and brain tumors like meningiomas.
This alleged concealment means plaintiffs may argue they were unable to learn of the risks in time, effectively extending their window to file a lawsuit.
Together, the discovery rule and fraudulent concealment may provide a strong foundation for plaintiffs to challenge statute of limitations issues in the Depo-Provera lawsuits.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
Lawyers across the United States are actively investigating potential lawsuits against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, due to the alleged link between the contraceptive injection and an increased risk of brain tumors, specifically meningiomas.
The most recent Depo-Provera legal claims include various allegations against Pfizer.
The current Depo-Provera lawsuits primarily claim that:
The Depo-Provera birth control shot has faced multiple lawsuits over the years, with legal actions dating back to the early 2000s.
Previous lawsuits filed in relation to Depo-Provera injectable contraceptive shots include, but are not limited to:
The new wave of lawsuits focusing on the link between Depo-Provera and brain tumors are still in the early stages, with no multidistrict litigation (MDL) formed yet and no settlements or jury verdicts reported.
If you believe you or a loved one may have developed a brain tumor or meningioma after using Depo-Provera birth control injections, we encourage you to reach out to TruLaw to discuss the specifics of your case.
You can use the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly see if you may qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
Currently, the Depo-Provera litigation is still in its early stages.
Lawyers across the United States are actively investigating and filing individual lawsuits on behalf of women who developed meningiomas or other brain tumors after using Depo-Provera.
These lawsuits are primarily being filed in state and federal courts against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera.
The number of lawsuits is expected to rise in the coming months as more women learn about the potential connection between Depo-Provera use and brain tumors.
While there have been no major court rulings specifically related to Depo-Provera brain tumor cases yet, a few notable developments have occurred:
In cases where numerous personal injury claims are filed over the same issue or product, the federal court system allows the consolidation of these cases into a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
If consolidation efforts for Depo-Provera Lawsuits are undertaken, it could mean a more systematic approach for victims to advocate for proper compensation.
An MDL would centralize all federal Depo-Provera lawsuits before a single judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings, including discovery and potential settlement negotiations.
Key points regarding a potential MDL include, but are not limited to:
As the Depo-Provera litigation continues to evolve, more developments are expected in the coming months.
Potential plaintiffs and their attorneys are closely monitoring the situation for any updates that could impact their cases.
If you or a loved one have used Depo-Provera birth control injections and subsequently developed a meningioma or other brain tumor, you may be eligible to seek compensation through a Depo Provera lawsuit.
To explore your options, reach out to us for more information by using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation and quickly find out if you may qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
Depo-Provera is an injectable birth control method that uses medroxyprogesterone acetate, a man-made version of the hormone progesterone.
The shot is typically administered every (12) weeks and works by:
Depo-Provera is prescribed to patients for a variety of use cases.
Of these use cases, Depo-Provera is most commonly used for:
While Depo-Provera is an effective contraceptive, it has been associated with several side effects and potential health risks.
Side effects and potential health risks linked to Depo-Provera include, but are not limited to:
An important development in Depo-Provera research came from a March 2024 study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).
Key findings include:
In response to these findings, Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, is working with regulatory authorities to update product labels and patient information regarding this potential risk.
This recent research has led law firms to begin accepting cases from women who repeatedly used Depo-Provera and subsequently developed meningiomas.
It’s important to note that while this study shows a correlation, it does not definitively prove causation.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a brain tumor or meningioma after using Depo-Provera birth control injections, you may be eligible to file a claim for compensation.
We encourage you to reach out to us with any questions about your potential case.
Our team is here to guide you through the process — you can use the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly determine if you qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
To determine if you qualify for a Depo-Provera lawsuit, you must meet specific criteria related to your use of the birth control medication and subsequent health issues.
To qualify for a Depo-Provera lawsuit, potential claimants must meet specific requirements that establish a connection between their use of the medication and their health condition.
To be eligible for a Depo-Provera lawsuit, you generally must meet the following criteria:
It’s worth noting that individuals who used Depo-Provera for extended periods might have stronger legal claims compared to those who used it only a handful of times.
The criteria above is strictly intended to give you an idea of factors that may be weighed when determining your eligibility for a Depo-Provera lawsuit — this should not be taken as a guarantee that you will qualify to file a claim or as legal advice.
To ensure your right to file a lawsuit is preserved, it’s important to seek legal advice as soon as you notice any side effects that could potentially be linked to your usage of Depo-Provera.
The statute of limitations for filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit differs by state and can greatly affect your ability to pursue legal action:
Given the detailed nature of these time limits and the potential for variations based on individual circumstances, it’s strongly advised to consult with an experienced Depo-Provera lawsuit attorney as soon as possible.
The product liability attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms are investigating the potential for a Depo-Provera lawsuit, and are here to help you understand your legal rights if you’ve developed a brain tumor or meningioma after using Depo-Provera birth control injections.
As we’re investigating this lawsuit, TruLaw can help you determine potential deadlines that may apply to your case and ensure that your rights are protected.
You can use the chat on this page to connect with our team and instantly determine if you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
Pursuing a Depo-Provera lawsuit involves carefully following several key steps — this can help ensure your case is strong and increase your chances of a successful claim.
The first and most important step in filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit is to hire an experienced product liability lawyer.
Here’s why this is important:
Gathering thorough evidence is extremely important for building a strong case.
Your lawyer will help you gather evidence, such as:
Your lawyer will help you assess the potential damages you can recover.
These may include, but are not limited to:
Your lawyer will take all the necessary steps to ensure your case is properly presented in court.
Once all evidence is gathered and damages are assessed, your lawyer will file the lawsuit:
Your lawyer will guide you through each step, keeping you informed and advocating for your rights throughout the process.
If you believe you have a case, it’s important to act quickly, as there are time limits (statutes of limitations) for filing such lawsuits.
You can use the chat on this page to connect with our team and instantly determine if you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
When it comes to estimating potential settlement amounts for Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits, it’s important to recognize that this litigation is still in the very early stages.
As a result, any projections about possible compensation remain uncertain at this time.
We still need to determine whether the scientific evidence linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors will be considered admissible in court.
However, we can make an educated guess based on similar tort cases that involve comparable injuries and facts.
It’s important to note that the projections discussed below are strictly to give affected individuals a general idea of what these settlement values could end up looking like if claims are successful — as the litigation progresses, more accurate estimates may become possible.
If the causation evidence stands up in court, lawyers believe that successful Depo-Provera brain tumor cases involving significant complications could potentially have a settlement value ranging from $100,000 to $500,000.
These estimates should not be taken as a guarantee and actual settlement amounts in successful Depo-Provera claims may vary substantially based on a wide variety of factors.
This wide range reflects the different degrees of severity associated with meningiomas.
The symptoms, treatment options, and long-term prognosis for different forms of meningioma can vary greatly based on the grade of meningioma:
Grade I meningiomas are generally less serious and not life-threatening:
Grade III meningiomas are much more dangerous and could be life-threatening:
Other factors that may influence settlement amounts include, but are not limited to:
It’s still too early to predict how many cases will fall into each of these categories, but some attorneys expect that Depo-Provera cases involving Grade III meningiomas could lead to substantial compensation.
If these cases go to trial, some settlements could reach millions of dollars.
While a global settlement might not result in average payouts at this level, it’s possible that some individual cases could settle for over $1 million, depending on how this litigation unfolds.
Another factor to consider is that Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, is a company valued at over $150 billion.
With its recent profits, Pfizer has the financial resources to support substantial settlements if necessary.
Unlike some other mass tort cases where a defendant’s ability to pay is a concern, this isn’t an issue in the Depo-Provera litigation.
Previous settlements in cases with comparable injuries can also help provide a benchmark for potential outcomes in Depo-Provera litigation.
To provide context, we can look at settlements in other pharmaceutical cases involving similar injuries:
Given the early stage of the litigation, it may be several years before any settlements are reached.
Typically, pharmaceutical mass tort cases follow this general timeline:
You can use the chat on this page to discuss the specifics of your case with our team and instantly determine if you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
TruLaw is actively investigating potential Depo-Provera lawsuits for women who have developed brain tumors following the use of this contraceptive injection.
As the litigation is still in its early stages, the experienced product liability attorneys at TruLaw and our partner law firms are working to gather evidence, review medical records, and monitor the latest scientific studies that link Depo-Provera to an increased risk of meningiomas.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a meningioma or brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, we encourage you to reach out to TruLaw for a free, no-obligation case evaluation.
You can do so by using the chat on this page for an instant case evaluation to quickly see if you may qualify to file a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
Our experienced team is ready to review your case, explain your legal options, and fight for the compensation you deserve.
As this litigation evolves, TruLaw will continue to provide updates and support to those affected by Depo-Provera’s potential side effects.
We remain dedicated to seeking justice for our clients and ensuring that pharmaceutical companies prioritize patient safety over profits.
Pfizer Inc. is the current manufacturer of Depo-Provera, a popular long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC).
The drug was initially developed by Upjohn, a pharmaceutical company that eventually merged with Pharmacia and was subsequently acquired by Pfizer in 2003.
While Depo-Provera is FDA-approved, it has been associated with some serious side effects.
Studies have linked its use to bone density loss and an increased risk of meningioma brain tumors.
To address these concerns, the FDA added a black box warning about bone density loss in 2004.
Pfizer has not issued any specific recalls related to brain tumors in Depo-Provera.
However, at the FDA’s request, the company added a black box warning to the drug’s label in 2004 to highlight the potential risk of bone density loss with prolonged use.
Several factors could disqualify you from filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit.
These include, but are not limited to:
Depo-Provera can have serious side effects, including but not limited to:
Depo-Provera can cause many common minor side effects, including but not limited to:
These minor side effects often improve over time as the body adjusts to the hormone.
If you experience any side effects that are bothersome or persist, it’s important to consult with your healthcare provider.
Approximately 2 million women in the United States regularly receive the Depo-Provera shot.
This makes it a popular long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) option.
Globally, injectable contraceptives (including Depo-Provera and other options) are used by around 74 million women.
There are two (2) primary types of Depo-Provera:
Both options offer effective birth control but may have different side effect profiles.
Depo-Provera works by releasing the hormone progestin, which prevents pregnancy in three (3) ways:
While there is currently no active Depo-Provera class action lawsuit specifically for brain tumor claims, individual lawsuits are being filed.
Women who have developed meningiomas after using Depo-Provera are pursuing legal action.
These cases are currently in their early stages, and attorneys are investigating potential claims.
There’s a possibility that these individual cases may be consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the future, but this has not occurred yet.
The primary legal claims in Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits are failure to warn and product liability.
Plaintiffs allege that Pfizer, the manufacturer, failed to adequately inform users and healthcare providers about the increased risk of developing meningiomas (brain tumors) associated with prolonged use of Depo-Provera.
These claims suggest that Pfizer knew or should have known about the risk but failed to take appropriate measures to protect consumers.
Yes, there is a study linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors.
A March 2024 study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) found a significant association between long-term use of medroxyprogesterone acetate (the active ingredient in Depo-Provera) and an increased risk of developing intracranial meningioma.
This study analyzed data from over 18,000 women who underwent surgery for meningioma.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?