Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who is filing a Teamfight Tactics lawsuit for video game addiction?
Answer: Players who developed severe gaming addiction from Teamfight Tactics’ auto-battler mechanics and their families are filing lawsuits against Riot Games, alleging the League of Legends spinoff uses infinite playability and randomized rewards to create compulsive gaming behaviors.
These plaintiffs include individuals who became addicted to TFT’s strategy-based gameplay, spending excessive hours pursuing ranked progression while experiencing gamer’s rage, depression, anxiety, and requiring educational accommodations or psychiatric intervention.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, serious health consequences of Teamfight Tactics Addiction lawsuit and much more.
With approximately 30 million monthly players, Teamfight Tactics creates addiction through endless combinations of champions, augments, and items that provide variable rewards similar to slot machine mechanics.
The lawsuits claim Riot Games deliberately designed TFT with frequent updates, seasonal content, and unpredictable outcomes that trigger dopamine responses and make it virtually impossible for vulnerable players to stop playing video games despite negative consequences.
The game’s auto-chess format creates infinite replay-ability through randomized unit combinations and augmentations, ensuring no two games feel identical and compelling players to chase the perfect strategy endlessly.
Riot Games’ frequent patches and rebalancing updates force players to continuously adapt strategies, creating a cycle where mastery is never achieved and engagement remains perpetually high.
If you or someone you love has experienced compulsive gaming from Teamfight Tactics, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit today.
The Teamfight Tactics video game addiction lawsuit represents a groundbreaking legal challenge against Riot Games for allegedly engineering their auto-battler game with psychological manipulation tactics designed to create compulsive playing behaviors, particularly in players under 25.
TruLaw, which has successfully secured over $3 billion in compensation for injured individuals across all 50 states, is now helping families seek justice against video game companies accused of prioritizing profits over player wellbeing through deliberate addiction-inducing game mechanics.
TruLaw’s innovative digital-first approach and instant case evaluation through the chat on this page makes filing accessible to affected families nationwide.
The legal foundation for Teamfight Tactics addiction claims rests on established product liability principles, arguing that Riot Games knowingly designed their game with defective features that create unreasonable dangers to users.
These lawsuits assert that Teamfight Tactics (and many games in the industry) deliberately incorporated psychological manipulation tactics borrowed from gambling industries, including variable ratio reinforcement schedules and dopamine-triggering reward-based systems – effectively bringing these exploits into the gaming industry.
The foundation for TFT addiction claims rests on several established legal theories:
The American Psychiatric Association’s inclusion of Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5 as a condition requiring further study, combined with the World Health Organization’s formal recognition of Gaming Disorder in the ICD-11, provides medical legitimacy to these legal claims.
Courts across the country are increasingly accepting gaming addiction as a legitimate medical condition that creates actionable harm, with recent rulings allowing discovery of internal company documents and recognizing the validity of addiction-based claims against major video game companies who knowingly exploited psychological vulnerabilities for profit.
Teamfight Tactics deliberately employs sophisticated psychological manipulation techniques borrowed directly from gambling industries to create compulsive playing patterns that hijack the brain’s natural reward systems.
These addictive mechanics specifically exploit the developing brains of adolescents and young adults under 25, whose prefrontal cortex and dopamine pathways are particularly vulnerable to variable ratio reinforcement schedules and uncertainty-based rewards that mirror slot machines and casino games.
The distinction between TFT’s specific addiction-inducing features versus general gaming habits proves important for establishing the intentional design argument central to legal claims.
Rather than creating a game that players naturally enjoy in moderation, Riot Games engineered TFT with multiple overlapping systems of randomization, time pressure, and competitive anxiety designed to prevent players from finding natural stopping points or achieving satisfaction that would allow healthy disengagement.
TFT’s elaborate nine-tier ranking system spanning from Iron through Challenger creates perpetual anxiety through its League Points (LP) mechanics, where players must accumulate 100 LP to advance while constantly risking demotion through poor performance.
The system’s most insidious feature involves seasonal resets every 10-12 weeks that force players back down the ladder, erasing months of progress and compelling behavior seen in excessive gamers just to maintain their previous status, creating what psychologists recognize as a “hedonic treadmill” where satisfaction remains permanently out of reach.
Riot Games engineered TFT’s ranking system with calculated psychological manipulation tactics:
Neuroscience research demonstrates that competitive ranking systems trigger dopamine responses identical to those observed in gambling addiction, with brain imaging studies showing increased activity in the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex during rank-related wins and losses.
The average player must invest 3-5 hours daily just to maintain their rank against decay and the constant influx of climbing players, with Challenger-tier players reporting 8-12 hour daily sessions during competitive seasons, creating excessive gaming habits that mental health professionals classify as pathological gaming behavior meeting DSM-5 criteria for addiction.
TFT’s entire economic model revolves around randomized reward mechanics that function identically to slot machines, with champion shops refreshing unpredictably, item drops following random distributions, and augment selections creating layers of uncertainty that trigger addictive behaviors.
These Random Ratio (RR) reinforcement schedules, as documented in gambling psychology research (and implemented by popular gaming companies like Epic Games), create stronger addictive responses than any other reward pattern because the brain releases maximum dopamine during uncertain outcomes rather than guaranteed rewards – exploiting the same neural pathways that make casino gambling addictive.
TFT’s monetization strategy revolves around these documented gambling-like features:
Research published in neuroscience journals confirms that variable ratio reinforcement schedules, particularly those involving near-misses and loss-disguised-as-wins, create the strongest behavioral addictions by hijacking dopamine pathways normally reserved for survival behaviors.
If you or a loved one has experienced financial hardship from excessive in-game purchases in Teamfight Tactics, contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to determine if you qualify for compensation through the video game addiction lawsuit.
Riot Games faces mounting legal challenges over Teamfight Tactics’ aggressive update schedule and psychological manipulation tactics that allegedly exploit Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) to create compulsive gaming behaviors.
The auto-battler game releases patches every two weeks without fail, introduces entirely new sets every four months, and constantly rotates limited-time events, seasonal rewards, and exclusive content that pressures players (particularly minors) to maintain continuous engagement or risk falling behind.
Plaintiffs argue that this relentless cycle of updates is specifically engineered to prevent players from taking breaks, as missing even a few days can result in lost opportunities for rare items, ranking decay, or exclusion from time-sensitive competitive advantages.
The lawsuits identify multiple FOMO-inducing mechanisms deliberately embedded in Teamfight Tactics’ design:
Legal experts argue that Teamfight Tactics’ approximately 30 million monthly players are subjected to what amounts to psychological manipulation through these constantly evolving mechanics.
The game’s design creates an environment where players feel obligated to log in daily, spend money on limited offers, and sacrifice real-world responsibilities to keep pace with the endless content treadmill.
TruLaw is actively pursuing compensation for families whose children have developed gaming addiction, suffered academic decline, experienced social isolation, or incurred financial harm from the game’s allegedly predatory FOMO tactics.
If your child has developed physical health problems from excessive Teamfight Tactics play, you may be eligible to recover medical expenses and future treatment costs through the gaming addiction lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to learn more about filing a TFT Addiction Lawsuit and securing compensation for your family.
The documented physical and mental health impacts experienced by TFT addiction victims mirror those observed in substance abuse disorders, with the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-5 recognizing Internet Gaming Disorder as a condition requiring clinical attention that manifests through severe functional impairment.
These devastating health consequences form the foundation of TruLaw’s pursuit of compensation for affected families, as medical research from institutions like The World Health Organization confirms that excessive video gaming can lead to serious physical, psychological, and social deterioration.
The recognition of gaming disorder as a legitimate mental health condition has strengthened claims that Riot Games failed to warn players about the potential for developing addiction-related conditions from playing their strategically designed game.
Recent longitudinal studies examining North American Teamfight Tactics players have found correlations between excessive gameplay and the development of other mental health conditions, particularly depression, anxiety, and symptoms consistent with Internet Gaming Disorder.
The lawsuits claim that despite knowing these risks, Riot Games and similar major gaming companies failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential for psychological harm, especially among players who begin gaming before age 24.
The behavioral and mental health disorders specifically linked to Teamfight Tactics addiction include:
To qualify for legal action, plaintiffs must demonstrate they played Teamfight Tactics for at least three hours daily over five weeks or more, started playing before age 24, and experienced mental health struggles or behavioral disorders before age 25.
Legal experts are gathering evidence including medical records, mental health evaluations, game usage logs, and expert testimony linking the game’s randomized rewards, infinite gameplay loops, and frequent updates to the development of these disorders.
Teamfight Tactics addiction lawsuits highlight severe physical health consequences that develop from prolonged gaming sessions, with plaintiffs reporting medical complications ranging from repetitive stress injuries to cardiovascular problems.
Medical experts have documented that players who engage in excessive gaming sessions lasting 10-20 hours experience multiple physiological disorders, including carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic eye strain, and severe sleep deprivation that disrupts circadian rhythms.
The documented medical complications associated with Teamfight Tactics and similar gaming addictions include:
Plaintiffs seek compensation for medical expenses including treatment for repetitive stress injuries, cognitive behavioral therapy, sleep disorder treatment, and rehabilitation services.
The litigation emphasizes that these physical complications often require long-term medical intervention and can result in permanent disabilities, particularly when gaming addiction develops during important developmental years in minors under age 25.
Teamfight Tactics addiction lawsuits increasingly document severe disruptions to players’ educational and career trajectories, with plaintiffs reporting academic decline beginning as early as elementary school and extending through college years.
The game’s addictive nature, fueled by frequent updates, randomized rewards, and competitive ranked systems, encourages compulsive gaming behavior and contributes to issues such as social isolation, anxiety, and reduced academic performance, similar to patterns seen with highly addictive games across multiple gaming platforms.
The lawsuits detail specific patterns of academic and professional impairment caused by TFT addiction:
Research supporting these claims demonstrates that video game addiction may cause a failure in teenagers’ academic performance, with affected students showing higher impulsivity levels and difficulty delaying gratification.
Legal documentation reveals that attempts to limit gaming often trigger gaming withdrawal symptoms including rage, emotional distress, and threats of self-harm, making it extremely difficult for parents and individuals to regain control without professional intervention.
Legal action may also push many video game companies to implement better safeguards to prevent excessive gaming and financial harm in the future.
If your family has been devastated by Teamfight Tactics addiction and the resulting academic, professional, or relationship damage, you may be entitled to substantial compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page for a free case evaluation to see if you qualify for the TFT Gaming Addiction Lawsuit today.
Successfully pursuing a Teamfight Tactics addiction claim requires methodical documentation and strategic evidence gathering, areas where TruLaw’s decade of experience in mass tort litigation proves invaluable.
Jessica Paluch-Hoerman’s leadership ensures that every aspect of your case receives meticulous attention, from initial evidence collection through final resolution, with the firm’s digital-first approach streamlining the traditionally cumbersome legal process while maintaining the personal touch families need during this difficult journey.
Building a compelling TFT addiction case requires diverse evidence types that collectively demonstrate the causal relationship between Riot Games’ manipulative game mechanics and your family’s devastating losses, with medical records serving as the cornerstone of proving recognized gaming disorder diagnoses.
TruLaw’s legal team excels at obtaining comprehensive documentation through the discovery process, including internal Riot Games communications, design documents, and psychological manipulation strategies that prove intent to addict, even when families lack complete initial records due to the chaos that gaming addiction creates in daily life.
Building a strong TFT addiction case requires gathering diverse forms of evidence:
The discovery phase of litigation allows TruLaw’s attorneys to obtain evidence directly from Riot Games that individual families could never access, including algorithmic manipulation data, A/B testing results on addiction features, internal emails discussing player retention through psychological exploitation, and revenue projections based on addictive design implementation.
Preserving digital evidence before accounts get deleted or modified requires immediate action, which is why TruLaw provides detailed instructions for capturing screenshots, downloading account data, and creating contemporaneous gaming diaries that document the ongoing impact of TFT addiction on daily life, strengthening claims for both past and future damages.
Video game addiction damages encompass far more than just the money wasted on Little Legend eggs and battle passes, extending to profound life disruptions that TruLaw’s experienced attorneys know how to quantify for maximum compensation.
Compensation calculations encompass multiple categories of harm suffered by victims:
TruLaw operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning families pay nothing upfront and no fees unless we successfully recover compensation, with our attorneys advancing all case costs including expert witnesses, economic analysis, and medical evaluations.
If you or someone you love has experienced any of these damages while playing Teamfight Tactics, you may qualify to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine your eligibility to join others in filing a Video Game Addiction lawsuit today.
The journey from initial TFT addiction recognition to final compensation typically spans 18-36 months, though TruLaw’s streamlined digital processes and participation in the JCCP No.5363 coordinated proceedings can accelerate individual resolutions through shared discovery and collective legal strategies.
Understanding realistic timelines helps families prepare emotionally and financially for the legal process ahead, while TruLaw’s transparent communication ensures clients always know their case status, upcoming milestones, and any developments that might affect their ultimate recovery.
The legal timeline and process for Teamfight Tactics addiction lawsuits involves several phases, such as:
Families pursuing Teamfight Tactics addiction claims should recognize that the legal process typically spans several years from initial filing to resolution, with most cases following a path through state courts rather than federal venues.
The California consolidation under Judge Samantha P. Jessner provides a centralized forum for pretrial proceedings, allowing plaintiffs to share resources and coordinate discovery efforts while maintaining individual damage claims.
If you or a loved one has experienced financial hardship from excessive in-game purchases in Teamfight Tactics, you may qualify for compensation through the video game addiction lawsuit.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to determine if you’re eligible to join the Teamfight Tactics Video Game Lawsuit today.
Our Video Game Addiction attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing a Video Game Addiction lawsuit against companies like against companies like Riot Games, Electronic Arts, and other major defendants.
With extensive experience in product liability cases, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and mental health professionals to prove how games like TFT and many other video games with deliberately addictive features caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for mental health treatment expenses, academic and career setbacks, family relationship damages, and other losses resulting from your video game addiction injuries while offering free consultations to explore your legal options.
We recognize the psychological and social toll that Video Game Addiction issues have on your life and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice against companies that prioritize engagement metrics over player well-being.
Meet our lead Video Game Addiction attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced addiction, depression, sleep disorders, social isolation, or other mental health problems from excessive video game use, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Video Game Addiction lawsuit today.
Video game addiction lawsuits are being filed by individuals and families across the country who suffered mental health injuries and addiction from video games designed with manipulative features.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the video game addiction lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your video game addiction lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered from video game addiction or related mental health problems, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the video game addiction lawsuit today.
Yes, active TFT addiction actually strengthens your legal claim by demonstrating ongoing harm and the game’s powerful psychological hold that prevents players from stopping despite negative consequences, exactly what addiction researchers expect to see.
TruLaw can connect you with intervention resources and treatment providers while simultaneously pursuing legal remedies, as these dual approaches often work synergistically with the lawsuit serving as a wake-up call that motivates players to seek help for their gaming disorder.
TruLaw operates exclusively on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay absolutely nothing upfront, no fees during the case, and only receive payment if we successfully recover compensation through settlement or trial verdict.
This structure includes all case expenses such as expert witnesses, medical evaluations, economic analysis, court costs, and document preparation, ensuring that financial barriers never prevent deserving families from seeking justice against billion-dollar gaming corporations exploiting their children.
While medical records diagnosing gaming disorder and financial records showing in-game purchases strengthen claims, TruLaw routinely builds successful cases even when families lack complete documentation, using discovery tools to obtain evidence directly from Riot Games.
Basic helpful evidence includes gameplay hours, rank history, purchase receipts, academic records showing decline, employment issues, and family observations, but our attorneys excel at developing cases through witness testimony and expert analysis even when formal records are limited.
The August 15, 2025 deadline applies to certain claims within the California JCCP No. 5363 coordinated proceedings, while individual state statutes of limitations typically range from 2-4 years from when the addiction’s harm became apparent.
Immediate consultation with TruLaw ensures you don’t miss important deadlines, as our attorneys can quickly assess your specific timeline based on your state’s laws and when your loved one’s gaming addiction began causing documented harm.
Compensation in TFT addiction cases encompasses economic damages (medical costs, therapy, lost wages, educational expenses, in-game purchases), non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of life enjoyment), and potentially punitive damages for Riot’s intentional exploitation of minors.
Individual recoveries vary dramatically based on addiction severity, documented harm, and life impact, but settlements can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars, with TruLaw’s expertise capturing all categories of damage your family has suffered.
Both the World Health Organization’s ICD-11 classification of Gaming Disorder and the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-5 inclusion of Internet Gaming Disorder as a condition for further study provide medical legitimacy to TFT addiction claims.
Courts increasingly accept expert testimony from addiction specialists who can demonstrate how excessive TFT play meets established diagnostic criteria, creating the medical foundation necessary for holding Riot Games legally responsible for deliberately engineering their game to trigger these recognized mental health conditions in vulnerable young players.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?