Attorney Jessica Paluch-Hoerman, founder of TruLaw, has over 28 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLaw and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLaw does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
Question: Who is filing a Rocket League addiction lawsuit?
Answer: Young gamers who developed Internet Gaming Disorder from Rocket League’s competitive car-soccer gameplay are filing lawsuits against Psyonix, Epic Games, and other video game companies, alleging the game’s ranking systems, loot boxes, and daily rewards created gambling-like addiction requiring medical intervention.
Plaintiffs include minors and young adults who played Rocket League compulsively for years, experiencing academic failure, social isolation, chronic pain from repetitive strain injuries, and mental health disorders including anxiety and depression.
On this page, we’ll discuss this question in further depth, eligibility criteria to file a Rocket League Addiction lawsuit, mental health conditions linked to Rocket League Addiction, and much more.
Rocket League’s transition to free-to-play increased accessibility while implementing aggressive microtransaction systems that exploit players’ psychological vulnerabilities through fear of missing exclusive items.
The video game lawsuit claims Epic Games deliberately incorporated variable reward systems through Rocket League’s loot box mechanics, creating unpredictable dopamine responses that reinforce continued play.
Legal claims emphasize how video game developers deliberately failed to warn players about addiction risks while encouraging excessive gaming through progression-based achievements, seasonal events, and frequent content updates designed to increase engagement.
Daily and weekly challenges force regular login patterns, while the competitive ranking system creates social validation needs that push players toward unhealthy gaming marathons seeking higher status.
If you or someone you love has experienced compulsive gaming from playing video games like Rocket League, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can help you determine if you qualify to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit today.
Rocket League combines fast-paced gameplay with sophisticated psychological triggers designed to create compulsive engagement patterns, according to expert witnesses who have studied both Rocket League and violent video games in the litigation.
The game’s mechanics exploit vulnerabilities in adolescent brain development, particularly in areas controlling impulse control and reward processing.
Internal documents suggest major gaming companies like Epic Games employ behavioral psychologists specifically to optimize these systems for maximum player retention and monetization.
Rocket League’s ranked competitive system creates an endless treadmill where players constantly chase the next tier, exploiting the brain’s natural drive for achievement and status.
Seasonal rank resets every 3-4 months force players to maintain high engagement levels or lose their hard-earned progress, creating anxiety and compulsive play patterns.
Manipulative ranking features identified by addiction experts include:
Research from addiction specialists shows how variable ratio reinforcement in ranking systems creates the same neurological patterns as gambling addiction.
Epic Games employs behavioral psychologists to optimize these systems for maximum engagement, with internal metrics tracking player frustration levels to keep them in the “sweet spot” where they continue playing despite negative experiences.
Rocket League addiction lawsuits target Epic Games, Psyonix, and video game manufacturers for implementing predatory monetization systems that exploit psychological vulnerabilities in young players to drive compulsive spending behaviors similar to other competitive online games.
The lawsuits argue that Rocket League deliberately incorporated gambling-like mechanics and manipulative spending features designed to bypass the underdeveloped impulse control of minors while creating dopamine-driven reward loops that mirror substance addiction patterns found in traditional gambling disorders.
The litigation identifies specific monetization strategies that allegedly foster financial exploitation:
Legal experts compare these video game addiction cases to successful litigation against tobacco and opioid manufacturers as evidence shows the video game industry collaborated with behavioral psychologists to maximize addictive potential while targeting vulnerable youth populations.
If you or a loved one experienced financial harm, gaming addiction, or mental health issues from Rocket League’s predatory monetization systems, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rocket League Addiction Lawsuit today.
Rocket League’s team-based structure creates social obligations that prevent players from disconnecting, as leaving matches results in temporary bans ranging from 5 minutes to 24 hours and letting down teammates.
The game’s club system and tournament schedules create rigid gaming commitments that interfere with real-world responsibilities, while voice chat enables toxic behavior that damages self-esteem and drives compulsive play to “prove” oneself, leading to compulsive gaming behaviors.
Rocket League addiction lawsuits emphasize how Psyonix and Epic Games deliberately engineered social pressure mechanisms and team-based gameplay features that exploit fundamental human needs for connection and belonging.
The game’s fast-paced 3v3 soccer matches with rocket-powered cars create intense social dynamics where players feel obligated to continue gaming sessions to avoid disappointing teammates or losing their competitive edge, with some players displaying gamer’s rage when matches don’t go their way.
The lawsuits identify multiple social and multiplayer mechanics that foster compulsive engagement:
Research demonstrates that fear of missing out (FOMO) serves as a powerful mediator between social identity and gaming addiction in online gaming environments.
This psychological manipulation becomes particularly harmful when targeting adolescents whose developing brains are especially vulnerable to peer pressure and social validation through gaming achievements, similar to patterns seen in Grand Theft Auto and other addictive games by design.
Individuals seeking to take legal action against Psyonix and its parent company Epic Games typically need to meet specific age and gaming exposure criteria established by attorneys handling these cases.
Plaintiffs generally demonstrate they began playing Rocket League before turning 24 years old and experienced diagnosed addiction-related conditions before reaching age 25, though filings have occurred in various federal district courts.
The scientific basis for the age 25 cutoff stems from neurodevelopmental research showing the prefrontal cortex responsible for impulse control isn’t fully developed until mid-twenties.
Plaintiffs must have begun playing Rocket League before age 25 and developed addiction patterns during this vulnerable developmental period when the brain is most susceptible to reward-based manipulation, with detailed gaming history documentation strengthening their case.
Common eligibility factors considered for filing a claim include:
The statute of limitations for filing a Rocket League addiction lawsuit varies by state and generally ranges from one to six years from the date of injury discovery.
Parents may file claims on behalf of minor children who appear to meet the eligibility criteria and have experienced documented harm from excessive Rocket League gameplay or compulsive gaming habits.
If you or a loved one can demonstrate these eligibility criteria and have evidence of gaming-related harm, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to join others in filing a Rocket League Addiction Lawsuit today.
Research studies and clinical observations suggest that excessive video game playing may be associated with various mental health conditions that often form the basis of video game addiction litigation against major video game companies (including cases involving Sony Interactive Entertainment and other industry leaders).
The World Health Organization’s recognition of gaming disorder in the ICD-11 has provided legal support for claims that prolonged gaming can contribute to serious psychological and neurological impacts.
The dopamine dysregulation caused by excessive gaming leads to anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure from normal activities) and mood disorders that persist even after gaming stops, with victims gradually losing interest in activities they once enjoyed.
Healthcare providers have documented patterns where excessive gaming appears to correlate with deteriorating mental health particularly in adolescents (whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to dopamine dysregulation and reward pathway disruption, often manifesting as mental health struggles requiring professional intervention).
This raises questions about whether gaming companies failed to consider developmental vulnerabilities in their young users.
Research shows that 89% of gaming addiction cases involve comorbid depression or anxiety, with the constant stimulation from gaming depleting natural dopamine production.
Common mental health conditions associated with the effects of video game exposure and video game addiction include:
Legal documentation cites these conditions as evidence of harm caused by the game’s addictive nature and deliberate design choices.
Research suggests that individuals with pre-existing mental health vulnerabilities including those with neurodivergent conditions like autism spectrum disorder may experience heightened susceptibility to problematic gaming patterns as gaming addiction progresses.
The relationship between excessive gaming habits and mental health appears bidirectional with some individuals using games to self-medicate existing conditions while excessive play potentially triggers or worsens psychological symptoms including Computer Vision Syndrome from prolonged screen exposure.
Our video game addiction attorney at TruLaw is dedicated to supporting clients through the process of filing claims against gaming companies that failed to warn about addiction risks.
With extensive experience in product liability cases against tech companies, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman and our partner law firms work with litigation leaders and mental health professionals to prove how addictive gameplay mechanics with deliberately addictive features caused you harm.
TruLaw focuses on securing compensation for medical expenses, academic and career setbacks, family relationship damages, and other losses resulting from excessive gaming including negative consequences to your overall well-being.
We recognize the psychological and social toll that video game addicts face and provide the personalized guidance you need when seeking justice.
Meet our lead Video Game Addiction attorney:
At TruLaw, we believe financial concerns should never stand in the way of justice.
That’s why we operate on a contingency fee basis—with this approach, you only pay legal fees after you’ve been awarded compensation for your injuries.
If you or a loved one experienced video game addiction, depression, sleep disorders, social isolation, or other mental health problems associated with excessive video game use (including gaming behaviors that led to video game addiction), you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation and determine whether you qualify to file a Video Game Addiction lawsuit today.
Video game addiction lawsuits are being filed by individuals and families across the country who suffered mental health injuries and addiction from video games designed with manipulative features and addictive game mechanics.
TruLaw is currently accepting clients for the video game addiction lawsuit.
A few reasons to choose TruLaw for your video game addiction lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one suffered from video game addiction or related mental health problems including gaming habits that interfered with daily life, you may be eligible to seek compensation.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation that can determine if you qualify for the video game addiction lawsuit today.
Successful claims generally require documentation of excessive gameplay patterns sustained over extended periods, medical records showing gaming-related psychological or physical health issues, and evidence of real-world consequences such as job loss, academic failure, or relationship problems.
Supporting materials often include gameplay statistics, records of in-game purchases, and statements from family members, educators, or mental health professionals who witnessed the addiction’s impact on daily functioning.
TruLaw helps families identify and gather evidence they may not realize they have, from text messages about gaming conflicts to credit card statements showing in-game purchases.
Compensation varies based on severity of harm but includes medical costs, educational damages, and pain and suffering, with gaming addiction cases valued from $25,000 for minor disruption to over $300,000 for severe cases involving hospitalization.
Please be advised that the settlement amounts mentioned above are general estimations provided for informational purposes only and are not guaranteed.
Each case is unique and requires individual evaluation based on specific circumstances, evidence, and jurisdiction.
Contact TruLaw using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation to discuss the potential value of your specific case.
Adults who developed addiction before age 25 can file claims if they continue experiencing impacts, as the key factor is when addiction developed rather than current age.
Many adults in their late twenties or thirties still suffer from gaming addiction that began during adolescence, making them eligible for compensation if they can demonstrate ongoing harm from Rocket League’s addictive design.
TruLaw’s comprehensive approach includes free digital case evaluations providing instant eligibility assessment, expert witness coordination with gaming addiction specialists, contingency fee representation meaning no upfront costs, and leveraging their extensive product liability experience.
Their commitment to making the legal process accessible means families pay nothing unless compensation is recovered, ensuring justice is available regardless of financial circumstances.
Managing Attorney & Owner
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessica Paluch-Hoerman is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share the most reliable, accurate, and up-to-date legal information with our readers!
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TruLaw, we fiercely combat corporations that endanger individuals’ well-being. If you’ve suffered injuries and believe these well-funded entities should be held accountable, we’re here for you.
With TruLaw, you gain access to successful and seasoned lawyers who maximize your chances of success. Our lawyers invest in you—they do not receive a dime until your lawsuit reaches a successful resolution!
AFFF Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), commonly used in firefighting.
Claims allege that companies such as 3M, DuPont, and Tyco Fire Products failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of AFFF exposure — including increased risks of various cancers and diseases.
Depo Provera Lawsuit claims are being filed by individuals who allege they developed meningioma (a type of brain tumor) after receiving Depo-Provera birth control injections.
A 2024 study found that women using Depo-Provera for at least 1 year are five times more likely to develop meningioma brain tumors compared to those not using the drug.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit claims are being filed against Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, a medication used to treat opioid addiction.
Claims allege that Indivior failed to adequately warn users about the potential dangers of severe tooth decay and dental injuries associated with Suboxone’s sublingual film version.
Social Media Harm Lawsuits are being filed against social media companies for allegedly causing mental health issues in children and teens.
Claims allege that companies like Meta, Google, ByteDance, and Snap designed addictive platforms that led to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues without adequately warning users or parents.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Claims allege that companies like Ethicon, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific failed to adequately warn about potential dangers — including erosion, pain, and infection.
Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawsuits involve claims against 3M — alleging their surgical warming blankets caused severe infections and complications (particularly in hip and knee replacement surgeries).
Plaintiffs claim 3M failed to warn about potential risks — despite knowing about increased risk of deep joint infections since 2011.
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit claims are being filed against manufacturers of cow’s milk-based baby formula products.
Claims allege that companies like Abbott Laboratories (Similac) and Mead Johnson & Company (Enfamil) failed to warn about the increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants.
Here, at TruLaw, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Alongside our partner law firms, we have successfully collected over $3 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?